Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-12-12 Thread Ricardo Mayerhofer
ex); >> } >> } >> } >> NIFTY!! I hadn't written any IComponentResolver's before - but wanted to >> try it. Wicket is AWESOME!! It makes it so easy to customize the >> framework >> to YOUR needs without imposing one person's ideas on another person. >> > > -- > -Wicket f

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-27 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
COOL!!! :) Jeremy Thomerson wrote: You can do exactly what you asked in less than 40 lines of code - and not be bound to the class name in the HTML (which you shouldn't do). Here's how: IN YOUR APPLICATION CLASS: @Override protected void init() { super.init(); register

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-27 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
t; > feedbackPanel, a feedbackpanel component is automatically added to that > > page. > > Another example is SubmitLink component. No special handling required, > but > > for wicket sake the developer must add it on the java the page. > > > > -- > View this m

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-27 Thread Alex Objelean
with id > feedbackPanel, a feedbackpanel component is automatically added to that > page. > Another example is SubmitLink component. No special handling required, but > for wicket sake the developer must add it on the java the page. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabbl

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
dd a markup with id feedbackPanel, a feedbackpanel component is automatically added to that page. Another example is SubmitLink component. No special handling required, but for wicket sake the developer must add it on the java the page. -- View this message in contex

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Ricardo Mayerhofer
rstand that CoC means convention >>>>>>> over >>>>>>> configuration instead of the Dutch meaning "gay rights group". >>>>>>> >>>>

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg
our own addon framework and publish it on 'stuff or >>>>>> google code, but I won't be using it ever nor including it in core. >>>>>> >>>>>> The biggest plus point of wicket is that it doesn't perform magic. I >>>>>&g

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Ricardo Mayerhofer
d the bigger part of the day wondering which >>>>> incantation I did wrong. >>>>> >>>>> Martijn >>>>> On 11/26/08, Ricardo Mayerhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >&

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread wfaler
; On 11/26/08, Ricardo Mayerhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I started to use wicket some time ago, and I'm really enjoying it. >>>>>> Best >>>>>> framework ever. >>>>>> But I've so

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread jWeekend
amework ever. >>>>> But I've some suggestions. >>>>> I think wicket could be better if it had less boiler plate code. This >>>>> could >>>>> be reduced by using CoC. >>>>> Take the FeedBackPanel for example, you always

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread jWeekend
t. >>>>> Best >>>>> framework ever. >>>>> But I've some suggestions. >>>>> I think wicket could be better if it had less boiler plate code. This >>>>> could >>>>> be re

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg
>> I think wicket could be better if it had less boiler plate code. This >>>>> could >>>>> be reduced by using CoC. >>>>> Take the FeedBackPanel for example, you always have to add the >>>>> component >>>>> on >>&g

RES: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Bruno Cesar Borges
Assunto: Re: Wicket and CoC Perhaps the name could be userFeedBackPanel :) "One Word per Concept" (Clean Code, Bob Martin, p. 26) I'm just talking about code duplication, add( new SubmitLink( "submitLink" ) ) and similars many times in a code doenst makes a programmer happ

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Ricardo Mayerhofer
this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-and-CoC-tp20706881p20706881.html >>>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> --

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg
gt;> Take the FeedBackPanel for example, you always have to add the component >>> on >>> the web page, even if no special handling is requires (which is almost >>> the >>> case). >>> Wicket could have some reserved ids, so if I add a markup with id >>

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
always have to add the component > >> on > >> the web page, even if no special handling is requires (which is almost > >> the > >> case). > >> Wicket could have some reserved ids, so if I add a markup with id > >> feedbackPanel, a feedbackpanel compon

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Ricardo Mayerhofer
he web page, even if no special handling is requires (which is almost >> the >> case). >> Wicket could have some reserved ids, so if I add a markup with id >> feedbackPanel, a feedbackpanel component is automatically added to that >> page. >> Another exam

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Ricardo Mayerhofer
is SubmitLink component. No special handling required, >> but >> for wicket sake the developer must add it on the java the page. >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands,

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Sven Meier
With IComponentResolver you can easily roll your own 'CoC' solution. Sven Ricardo Mayerhofer schrieb: I started to use wicket some time ago, and I'm really enjoying it. Best framework ever. But I've some suggestions. I think wicket could be better if it had less boiler plate code. This could be

Re: Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Martijn Dashorst
ket could have some reserved ids, so if I add a markup with id > feedbackPanel, a feedbackpanel component is automatically added to that > page. > Another example is SubmitLink component. No special handling required, but > for wicket sake the developer must add it on the java the page. &g

Wicket and CoC

2008-11-26 Thread Ricardo Mayerhofer
d, but for wicket sake the developer must add it on the java the page. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-and-CoC-tp20706881p20706881.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --