Re: Error no application attached to current thread main with AnnotApplicationContextMock
On 07/29/2010 06:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: what version of wicket? -igor On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Sam Grönblomsam.gronb...@eficode.fi wrote: Getting this error when trying to use AnnotApplicationContextMock. Judging by the example shown in the latest javadocs: http://wicketbyexample.com/api/wicket-spring/latest/org/apache/wicket/spring/injection/annot/test/AnnotApplicationContextMock.html you should create the application context mock before initializing WicketTester. However then you get the error mentioned in the subject, ie. no application attached to current thread main. However if I initialize the WicketTester before the AnnotApplicationContextMock I get null pointer errors which are caused when the Panel or Page to be tested tries to access a service, which seems to apply that they don't get injected correctly in this case either. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org 1.4.9 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Error no application attached to current thread main with AnnotApplicationContextMock
I receive this exception also on method Application.get(); It happens on Tomcat after a redeploy. When I remove the work directory of Tomcat, and do a restart, the error is gone. 2010/8/2 Sam Grönblom [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2309949-1951419770-232...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2309949-1951419770-232...@n4.nabble.com On 07/29/2010 06:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: what version of wicket? -igor On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Sam Grönblom[hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2309949i=0 wrote: Getting this error when trying to use AnnotApplicationContextMock. Judging by the example shown in the latest javadocs: http://wicketbyexample.com/api/wicket-spring/latest/org/apache/wicket/spring/injection/annot/test/AnnotApplicationContextMock.html you should create the application context mock before initializing WicketTester. However then you get the error mentioned in the subject, ie. no application attached to current thread main. However if I initialize the WicketTester before the AnnotApplicationContextMock I get null pointer errors which are caused when the Panel or Page to be tested tries to access a service, which seems to apply that they don't get injected correctly in this case either. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2309949i=1 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2309949i=2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2309949i=3 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2309949i=4 1.4.9 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2309949i=5 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2309949i=6 -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Error-no-application-attached-to-current-thread-main-with-AnnotApplicationContextMock-tp2306157p2309949.html To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email ml-node+1842947-1066186228-232...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-1066186228-232...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=bWV1bGVtYW5zLmRhdmlkQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ3fC0xOTcyOTcxMjQ2. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Error-no-application-attached-to-current-thread-main-with-AnnotApplicationContextMock-tp2306157p2309964.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
member variables, thread safety
Apologies for the dumb question but I'm rather new to wicket and was wondering if it is safe to use member variables within components (i.e. compared to servlets, struts1 actions etc). Many thanks, Manos -- Manos Batsis, Chief Technologist ___ _/ /_ (_)_ __ / __ `/ __ \/ / ___/ ___// __ `/ ___/ / /_/ / /_/ / (__ |__ )/ /_/ / / \__,_/_.___/_//(_)__, /_/ // 5, Daphnidos Street 141 22, Neo Iraklio Athens, Greece Tel: +30 210 2851517 Mob: +30 694 8376942 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
SV: member variables, thread safety
Apologies for the dumb question but I'm rather new to wicket and was wondering if it is safe to use member variables within components (i.e. compared to servlets, struts1 actions etc). Mostly yes: The component instances are tied to the user's session via the pagemap. But be wary of excessive state, i.e. prefer (dynamic) models over straight values, pass a PageReference instead of the Page to other pages etc. Shared state between pages/components is better kept in a custom Session subclass. - Tor Iver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: String not serializable exception coming for interned strings from Model with JRockit/Weblogic
Hello Janos, i have the excactlty the same problem with Wicket and JRockit R28. The only way to fix it, was to go back to JRockit R27. Hopefully they will fix it soon, the new R28.0.1 still has the problem. A collegue of mine will do a post in the Oracle forums now. regards Daniel On 08.07.2010 14:09, Janos Cserep wrote: The following seems to be a bug with JRockit or Weblogic, but maybe someone on this list has seen it before and has a better workaround/solution. We have been developing a Wicket application for a government agency that is going to be used by 15k users. The application will be deployed on a Weblogic cluster running on JRockit and Red Hat. We have been experiencing strange Model object not serializable exceptions coming from Model and traced it back to interned (by the compiler) String objects becoming not serializable after hitting the server with a few hundred parallel users. Once the exception occurs for a given String reference it keeps coming consistently for that reference. The current workaround is a custom Model class that has an overrided setObject method which checks the object if it's instanceof Serializable and if the check fails it sets new String(object) on the Model. This eliminates the exceptions but would like a better solution to the problem. Has anyone seen anything like this? Thanks and regards, Janos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Daniel Peters Idealo Internet GmbH Fon +49 30 40301033 Fax +49 30 28598351 Zionskirchstr. 73, 10119 Berlin Geschäftsführer: Martin Sinner, Dr. Albrecht v. Sonntag HRB 76749 Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg USt.-ID: DE813070905 www.idealo.de | www.idealo.at | www.idealo.co.uk | www.idealo.fr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to Update contents of a child component?
Thanks guys for the input. Will give a yell when I have resolved it, thanks for the time. Reg Niv On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, vov vov...@mail.ru wrote: Do not forgot about setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true) for your components that initially as invisible. And use AJAX...:) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-Update-contents-of-a-child-component-tp2307756p2307883.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Error Hypothesis...
I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by you guys. In my log files, I first see this: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: After 1 minute the Pagemap null is still locked by: Thread[http-10080-Processor23,5,main], giv ing up trying to get the page for path: 3:projects at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1310) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:215) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188) Then, a bit lower in the file, I see: org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase$IOFileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Connection reset at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:386) at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.ServletFileUpload.parseRequest(ServletFileUpload.java:129) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:155) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:83) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.newMultipartWebRequest(ServletWebRequest.java:500) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.handleMultiPart(Form.java:1668) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:862) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.java:135) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxEventBehavior.respond(AjaxEventBehavior.java:177) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.onRequest(AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.java:286) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents(BehaviorRequestTarget.java:119) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:92) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1250) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) My theory is that our users are beginning the file upload, but hitting F5 (reload) or something before letting the file upload complete. Does that sound feasible? It's hard for me to test this because I'm running locally and the file upload happens almost instantaneously. The user that is causing this to happen is in Europe, so I'm thinking the file upload (only 8.5 MB) might take a bit longer and they are getting impatient. If this can happen, is there something Wicket can do to not lock up the pagemap in this case, because there's nothing really I can do to block the user from hitting F5?
Re: Error Hypothesis...
yes that is most likely the case. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by you guys. In my log files, I first see this: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: After 1 minute the Pagemap null is still locked by: Thread[http-10080-Processor23,5,main], giv ing up trying to get the page for path: 3:projects at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1310) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:215) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188) Then, a bit lower in the file, I see: org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase$IOFileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Connection reset at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:386) at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.ServletFileUpload.parseRequest(ServletFileUpload.java:129) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:155) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:83) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.newMultipartWebRequest(ServletWebRequest.java:500) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.handleMultiPart(Form.java:1668) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:862) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.java:135) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxEventBehavior.respond(AjaxEventBehavior.java:177) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.onRequest(AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.java:286) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents(BehaviorRequestTarget.java:119) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:92) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1250) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) My theory is that our users are beginning the file upload, but hitting F5 (reload) or something before letting the file upload complete. Does that sound feasible? It's hard for me to test this because I'm running locally and the file upload happens almost instantaneously. The user that is causing this to happen is in Europe, so I'm thinking the file upload (only 8.5 MB) might take a bit longer and they are getting impatient. If this can happen, is there something Wicket can do to not lock up the pagemap in this case, because there's nothing really I can do to block the user from hitting F5? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Error Hypothesis...
maybe do the actual upload through and iframe or something that has its own pagemap? Or block the ui in the browser as long as the upload is in progress (but then user can still do F5, but they should know that they should wait for it) You can also for example use a flash uploader to a servlet that has nice progress indicator (like gmail) johan On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:29, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: So, is there anything I can do to fix the problem (aside from hitting the user on the head and telling them not to do that again)? They keep getting the application error screen when they do that. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote: yes that is most likely the case. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by you guys. In my log files, I first see this: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: After 1 minute the Pagemap null is still locked by: Thread[http-10080-Processor23,5,main], giv ing up trying to get the page for path: 3:projects at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1310) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:215) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188) Then, a bit lower in the file, I see: org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase$IOFileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Connection reset at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:386) at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.ServletFileUpload.parseRequest(ServletFileUpload.java:129) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:155) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:83) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.newMultipartWebRequest(ServletWebRequest.java:500) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.handleMultiPart(Form.java:1668) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:862) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.java:135) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxEventBehavior.respond(AjaxEventBehavior.java:177) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.onRequest(AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.java:286) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents(BehaviorRequestTarget.java:119) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:92) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1250) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) My theory is that our users are beginning the file upload, but hitting F5 (reload) or something before letting the file upload complete. Does that sound feasible? It's hard for me to test this because I'm running locally and the file upload happens almost instantaneously. The user that is causing this to happen is in Europe, so I'm thinking the file upload (only 8.5 MB) might take a bit longer and they are getting impatient. If this can happen, is there something Wicket can do to not lock up the pagemap in this case, because there's nothing really I can do to block the user from hitting F5? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Error Hypothesis...
Thanks! I guess it's now a matter of telling the user if you want to do stupid stuff like this, it's going to cost you X for us to code around it. I'm sure that should get them to stop what they're doing. :) On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote: maybe do the actual upload through and iframe or something that has its own pagemap? Or block the ui in the browser as long as the upload is in progress (but then user can still do F5, but they should know that they should wait for it) You can also for example use a flash uploader to a servlet that has nice progress indicator (like gmail) johan On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:29, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: So, is there anything I can do to fix the problem (aside from hitting the user on the head and telling them not to do that again)? They keep getting the application error screen when they do that. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote: yes that is most likely the case. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by you guys. In my log files, I first see this: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: After 1 minute the Pagemap null is still locked by: Thread[http-10080-Processor23,5,main], giv ing up trying to get the page for path: 3:projects at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1310) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:215) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188) Then, a bit lower in the file, I see: org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase$IOFileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Connection reset at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:386) at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.ServletFileUpload.parseRequest(ServletFileUpload.java:129) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:155) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:83) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.newMultipartWebRequest(ServletWebRequest.java:500) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.handleMultiPart(Form.java:1668) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:862) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.java:135) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxEventBehavior.respond(AjaxEventBehavior.java:177) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.onRequest(AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.java:286) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents(BehaviorRequestTarget.java:119) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:92) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1250) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) My theory is that our users are beginning the file upload, but hitting F5 (reload) or something before letting the file upload complete. Does that sound feasible? It's hard for me to test this because I'm running locally and the file upload happens almost instantaneously. The user that is causing this to happen is in Europe, so I'm thinking the file upload (only 8.5 MB) might take a bit longer and they are getting impatient. If this can happen, is there something Wicket can do to not lock up the pagemap in this case, because there's nothing really I can do to block the user from hitting F5? - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: Form Component Border - on Submit
On the submit link's onclick event you must iterate the form fields and run the same script you do on the field's onblur event. kjarbr On 02.08.10 16.33, cresc md.naz...@gmail.com wrote: I have implemented form component border to validate and show the error messages inline just below the form component. (as explained here) http://www.java2s.com/Open-Source/Java-Document/JBoss/jboss-seam-2.1.0.A1/org/ jboss/seam/example/wicket/FormInputBorder.java.htm But this works only when the focus is on the field and blur is triggered. Without focussing on the form component if I hit the submit ajax link, then how do I show inline error messages. Please assist. Regards, cresc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using cometd with threads
Yes, the code is designed to be thread safe. On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 07:15 -0700, fachhoch wrote: I was looking into cometd , I tried the example it worked for me.I havea new requirement , I have to update a panel in my page if a job running seperately in a thread has finished processing. for example user clicks a link, this starts a job in a thread asychronously. This job might take several days , when this user logs in back and if the job is completed I want to show the user that the job is completed, in my case a thread has to publish to a channel is this possible ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using cometd with threads
but is it write to use web api in my service classes ? My job is in service layer as its a thread and web has nothing to do with , now I have to call web api (cometd api ) inside my service classes is this write ? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/using-cometd-with-threads-tp2310323p2310404.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WicketTester and Palette component
Hi Kent, thanks a lot i will take a look a this Regards, Loic -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WicketTester-and-Palette-component-tp2306743p2310424.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to access div on wicket modal dialog
Hi, I'm using a wicket modal dialog with the panel that contains a div container like div id=slider/div I want to access it from jQuery to create a jQuery UI slider like $(#slider).slider(); For some reason, this doesn't work. Is there some reason related to wicket that prevents this to find div container using its id, because the same thing works fine when I use jQuery modal dialog instead of wicket modal dialog? Zoran -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-access-div-on-wicket-modal-dialog-tp2310678p2310678.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using cometd with threads
How are you getting the Bayeux service? It is alright to think of the Bayeux service as a messaging api, that jumps across your various layers (from the service to the javascript client). As long as you remember you can't trust the javascript clients (malicious users), you are fine. On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 08:14 -0700, fachhoch wrote: but is it write to use web api in my service classes ? My job is in service layer as its a thread and web has nothing to do with , now I have to call web api (cometd api ) inside my service classes is this write ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using cometd with threads
Please suggest me how to get Bayeux service in service layer , right now I have in subclass of org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.Application -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/using-cometd-with-threads-tp2310323p2310715.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript) Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and replace original value (###-##-) This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will be considerably longer than the original string, validations on this field (ssn must be nine digits) will fail. I've considered placing the hashed value into a hidden field, but then the unencrypted value will be posted and the hashing accomplishes nothing. If I clear out the original value I lose server-side validations. Anyone have any ideas of the best way to accomplish this? Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information.
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
Why not use a password field to keep the value hidden and SSL to make sure there are no man in the middle attacks. Seems like you are making it too hard? - Original Message - From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:00:55 -0400 Subject: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript) Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and replace original value (###-##-) This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will be considerably longer than the original string, validations on this field (ssn must be nine digits) will fail. I've considered placing the hashed value into a hidden field, but then the unencrypted value will be posted and the hashing accomplishes nothing. If I clear out the original value I lose server-side validations. Anyone have any ideas of the best way to accomplish this? Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
I totally agree, seems like double-duty that accomplishes very little, and actually adds overhead. But this is another debate and the feature has been requested and must be implemented as I described... Craig McIlwee craig.mcil...@openroadsconsulting.com 08/02/2010 03:06 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Why not use a password field to keep the value hidden and SSL to make sure there are no man in the middle attacks. Seems like you are making it too hard? - Original Message - From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:00:55 -0400 Subject: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript) Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and replace original value (###-##-) This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will be considerably longer than the original string, validations on this field (ssn must be nine digits) will fail. I've considered placing the hashed value into a hidden field, but then the unencrypted value will be posted and the hashing accomplishes nothing. If I clear out the original value I lose server-side validations. Anyone have any ideas of the best way to accomplish this? Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information.
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
override getinputasarray() on the field and decrypt it there, that way wicket sees the decrypted value -igor On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:14 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: I totally agree, seems like double-duty that accomplishes very little, and actually adds overhead. But this is another debate and the feature has been requested and must be implemented as I described... Craig McIlwee craig.mcil...@openroadsconsulting.com 08/02/2010 03:06 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Why not use a password field to keep the value hidden and SSL to make sure there are no man in the middle attacks. Seems like you are making it too hard? - Original Message - From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:00:55 -0400 Subject: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript) Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and replace original value (###-##-) This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will be considerably longer than the original string, validations on this field (ssn must be nine digits) will fail. I've considered placing the hashed value into a hidden field, but then the unencrypted value will be posted and the hashing accomplishes nothing. If I clear out the original value I lose server-side validations. Anyone have any ideas of the best way to accomplish this? Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to access div on wicket modal dialog
if you open a page inside modal then the markup is in a different window so you have to make sure your jquery script executes in the right window. if you are using a panel and the markup is rendered in the same window it means your script is probably running too early. -igor On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:00 AM, zoran jeremy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm using a wicket modal dialog with the panel that contains a div container like div id=slider/div I want to access it from jQuery to create a jQuery UI slider like $(#slider).slider(); For some reason, this doesn't work. Is there some reason related to wicket that prevents this to find div container using its id, because the same thing works fine when I use jQuery modal dialog instead of wicket modal dialog? Zoran -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-access-div-on-wicket-modal-dialog-tp2310678p2310678.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
Thanks for the reply, that would work however per our business rules the encryption must be one-way and will not be decrypted... Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com 08/02/2010 03:23 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS override getinputasarray() on the field and decrypt it there, that way wicket sees the decrypted value -igor On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:14 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: I totally agree, seems like double-duty that accomplishes very little, and actually adds overhead. But this is another debate and the feature has been requested and must be implemented as I described... Craig McIlwee craig.mcil...@openroadsconsulting.com 08/02/2010 03:06 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Why not use a password field to keep the value hidden and SSL to make sure there are no man in the middle attacks. Seems like you are making it too hard? - Original Message - From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:00:55 -0400 Subject: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript) Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and replace original value (###-##-) This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will be considerably longer than the original string, validations on this field (ssn must be nine digits) will fail. I've considered placing the hashed value into a hidden field, but then the unencrypted value will be posted and the hashing accomplishes nothing. If I clear out the original value I lose server-side validations. Anyone have any ideas of the best way to accomplish this? Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information.
Re: Error Hypothesis...
In Wicket Extensions we have an ajax upload field iirc. That should not block the pagemap... Martijn On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote: maybe do the actual upload through and iframe or something that has its own pagemap? Or block the ui in the browser as long as the upload is in progress (but then user can still do F5, but they should know that they should wait for it) You can also for example use a flash uploader to a servlet that has nice progress indicator (like gmail) johan On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:29, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: So, is there anything I can do to fix the problem (aside from hitting the user on the head and telling them not to do that again)? They keep getting the application error screen when they do that. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote: yes that is most likely the case. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by you guys. In my log files, I first see this: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: After 1 minute the Pagemap null is still locked by: Thread[http-10080-Processor23,5,main], giv ing up trying to get the page for path: 3:projects at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1310) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:215) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188) Then, a bit lower in the file, I see: org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase$IOFileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Connection reset at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:386) at org.apache.wicket.util.upload.ServletFileUpload.parseRequest(ServletFileUpload.java:129) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:155) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init(MultipartServletWebRequest.java:83) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.newMultipartWebRequest(ServletWebRequest.java:500) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.handleMultiPart(Form.java:1668) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:862) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.java:135) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxEventBehavior.respond(AjaxEventBehavior.java:177) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.onRequest(AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.java:286) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents(BehaviorRequestTarget.java:119) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:92) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1250) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) My theory is that our users are beginning the file upload, but hitting F5 (reload) or something before letting the file upload complete. Does that sound feasible? It's hard for me to test this because I'm running locally and the file upload happens almost instantaneously. The user that is causing this to happen is in Europe, so I'm thinking the file upload (only 8.5 MB) might take a bit longer and they are getting impatient. If this can happen, is there something Wicket can do to not lock up the pagemap in this case, because there's nothing really I can do to block the user from hitting F5? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
so how do you expect to validate on server side??? -igor On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:29 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: Thanks for the reply, that would work however per our business rules the encryption must be one-way and will not be decrypted... Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com 08/02/2010 03:23 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS override getinputasarray() on the field and decrypt it there, that way wicket sees the decrypted value -igor On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:14 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: I totally agree, seems like double-duty that accomplishes very little, and actually adds overhead. But this is another debate and the feature has been requested and must be implemented as I described... Craig McIlwee craig.mcil...@openroadsconsulting.com 08/02/2010 03:06 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Why not use a password field to keep the value hidden and SSL to make sure there are no man in the middle attacks. Seems like you are making it too hard? - Original Message - From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:00:55 -0400 Subject: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript) Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and replace original value (###-##-) This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will be considerably longer than the original string, validations on this field (ssn must be nine digits) will fail. I've considered placing the hashed value into a hidden field, but then the unencrypted value will be posted and the hashing accomplishes nothing. If I clear out the original value I lose server-side validations. Anyone have any ideas of the best way to accomplish this? Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to access div on wicket modal dialog
Igor, You save my life :) if you are using a panel and the markup is rendered in the same window it means your script is probably running too early. That is exactly what was the problem. I added response.renderOnDomReadyJavascript(js); In AbstractBehavior RenderHead method, and everything works like it should work. Thanks, Zoran -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-access-div-on-wicket-modal-dialog-tp2310678p2310845.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
The only thing I've come up with to meet all the requirements is to set the hashed value to a hidden field, and replace the original value (123-45-6789) with all nines (999-99-). This would allow the validator to pass but puts a requirement on the js to validate the original value, ie it should not replace a 'Q' with a '9' Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com 08/02/2010 03:46 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS so how do you expect to validate on server side??? -igor On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:29 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: Thanks for the reply, that would work however per our business rules the encryption must be one-way and will not be decrypted... Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com 08/02/2010 03:23 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS override getinputasarray() on the field and decrypt it there, that way wicket sees the decrypted value -igor On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:14 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: I totally agree, seems like double-duty that accomplishes very little, and actually adds overhead. But this is another debate and the feature has been requested and must be implemented as I described... Craig McIlwee craig.mcil...@openroadsconsulting.com 08/02/2010 03:06 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Why not use a password field to keep the value hidden and SSL to make sure there are no man in the middle attacks. Seems like you are making it too hard? - Original Message - From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:00:55 -0400 Subject: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript) Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and replace original value (###-##-) This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will be considerably longer than the original string, validations on this field (ssn must be nine digits) will fail. I've considered placing the hashed value into a hidden field, but then the unencrypted value will be posted and the hashing accomplishes nothing. If I clear out the original value I lose server-side validations. Anyone have any ideas of the best way to accomplish this? Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected
Re: How to access div on wicket modal dialog
thats what i do...save lives :) -igor On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:50 PM, zoran jeremy...@gmail.com wrote: Igor, You save my life :) if you are using a panel and the markup is rendered in the same window it means your script is probably running too early. That is exactly what was the problem. I added response.renderOnDomReadyJavascript(js); In AbstractBehavior RenderHead method, and everything works like it should work. Thanks, Zoran -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-access-div-on-wicket-modal-dialog-tp2310678p2310845.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
using breadcrumbs in Wicket 1.4.9
My first Wicket application uses Wicket 1.4.9 and breadcrumbs where I need to go from: panel A / panel B / panel C to: panel A / panel B / panel D by selecting a submit button on a form in panel C, e.g. replace panel C (after processing the form) with panel D as the active crumb. Is this possible? I have only been able to do the following: panel A / panel B / panel C / panel D - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
Then it's not encryption. Encrypted data should be readable to those who have the key. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:29 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: Thanks for the reply, that would work however per our business rules the encryption must be one-way and will not be decrypted... Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com 08/02/2010 03:23 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS override getinputasarray() on the field and decrypt it there, that way wicket sees the decrypted value -igor On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:14 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: I totally agree, seems like double-duty that accomplishes very little, and actually adds overhead. But this is another debate and the feature has been requested and must be implemented as I described... Craig McIlwee craig.mcil...@openroadsconsulting.com 08/02/2010 03:06 PM Please respond to users@wicket.apache.org To users@wicket.apache.org cc Subject Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Why not use a password field to keep the value hidden and SSL to make sure there are no man in the middle attacks. Seems like you are making it too hard? - Original Message - From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:00:55 -0400 Subject: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript) Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and replace original value (###-##-) This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will be considerably longer than the original string, validations on this field (ssn must be nine digits) will fail. I've considered placing the hashed value into a hidden field, but then the unencrypted value will be posted and the hashing accomplishes nothing. If I clear out the original value I lose server-side validations. Anyone have any ideas of the best way to accomplish this? Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information.
Re: using cometd with threads
You can get it from the ServletContext: getServletContext().getAttribute(BayeuxServer.ATTRIBUTE); On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 11:18 -0700, fachhoch wrote: Please suggest me how to get Bayeux service in service layer , right now I have in subclass of org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.Application - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
KonaKart shopping cart integration
I've been looking for a shopping cart solution that I can properly integrate with wicket. There's been a few threads on this list where people have indicated they were building one but as far as I know nothing has ever eventuated. I don't really want to build to whole engine from scratch so I've been looking around and come across konakart. It's partially open source. Meaning the engine itself is closed but it has a complete (and well documented) integration layer. I think this would be a good solution because all the backend functionality is there along with a nice admin panel. The interface is either Java or SOAP (one line of code to switch between the two) which means you can run your cart engine on another server if you want. So what I'm proposing is build a set of front-end wicket components. I'd prefer a fully open source solution but in the free java space this seems to be the easiest solution I can find. I really don't have time to build an engine from the ground up. So before I get going I just wanted to bounce it off the community and see if anyone can think of a better solution? I only just come across brix and I'm still trying to get my head around it. Any comments on whether I should make this brix centric or pure wicket? p.s. If I do build these components then I will release them as LGPL... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
