Re: Custom implementation of IStringResourceLoader not working
will try .. 10x ! Regards Armando -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Custom-implementation-of-IStringResourceLoader-not-working-tp3244747p3248311.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Submit form after onchange of Field
No one has any idea? Cant believe it -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Submit-form-after-onchange-of-Field-tp3236003p3248332.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Use Byte for CheckBox instead of Boolean
@ rolandpeng: Thanks alot. It works great! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Use-Byte-for-CheckBox-instead-of-Boolean-tp3236065p3248333.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
[SOLVED] Custom implementation of IStringResourceLoader not working
it works .. thank you ! Regards Armando -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Custom-implementation-of-IStringResourceLoader-not-working-tp3244747p3248335.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
[SOLVED] Nesting Links
Here we go ...
//... from code ...
AjaxFallbackLink link1 = new AjaxFallbackLinkT(article-link-1, new
ModelT((T)this.getDefaultModelObject())) {
private static final long serialVersionUID =
8011531891135888415L;
@Override
public void onClick(final AjaxRequestTarget theTarget) {
LOG.info(LINK 1 clicked);
}
};
SimpleAttributeModifier sam = new
SimpleAttributeModifier(onclick,
stopEvent(window.event);) {
public void onComponentTag(final Component
theComponent, final
ComponentTag theTag) {
String onClick = stopEvent(window.event); +
theTag.getAttribute(onclick);
theTag.put(onclick, onClick);
}
};
link1.add(sam);
//javascript function
function stopEvent(e) {
if (!e) e = window.event;
if (e.stopPropagation) {
e.stopPropagation();
} else {
e.cancelBubble = true;
}
}
(tried it on IE7 - IE8 and firefox (linux) and chrome (for linux)
regards
Armando
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Nesting-Links-tp1885368p3248475.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
correct way to get css classes of component
Hi! I was trying to solve the problem of replacing a specific css class of a wicket component with another css class. Google pointed me to the following thread: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-add-and-remove-css-classes-the-right-way-td1868408.html The nice and simple solution was something like this: String oldCss = String.valueOf(this.getMarkupAttributes().get(class)); String newCss = oldCss.replaceFirst(old, new); new SimpleAttributeModifier(class, newCss); I've used it and it works just fine. Unfortunately - as I've just found out - the method getMarkupAttributes() has the following javadoc: THIS IS WICKET INTERNAL ONLY. DO NOT USE IT. If I'm not supposed to use getMarkupAttributes(), what would be the correct way then to get the current css classes of a wicket component? Cheers, Patrick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: correct way to get css classes of component
You can override the Component#onComponentTag or AbstractBehavior#onComponentTag method and use the ComponentTag API to deal with the tag attributes. On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Patrick Petermair patrick.peterm...@openforce.com wrote: Hi! I was trying to solve the problem of replacing a specific css class of a wicket component with another css class. Google pointed me to the following thread: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-add-and-remove-css-classes-the-right-way-td1868408.html The nice and simple solution was something like this: String oldCss = String.valueOf(this.getMarkupAttributes().get(class)); String newCss = oldCss.replaceFirst(old, new); new SimpleAttributeModifier(class, newCss); I've used it and it works just fine. Unfortunately - as I've just found out - the method getMarkupAttributes() has the following javadoc: THIS IS WICKET INTERNAL ONLY. DO NOT USE IT. If I'm not supposed to use getMarkupAttributes(), what would be the correct way then to get the current css classes of a wicket component? Cheers, Patrick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Submit form after onchange of Field
You can iterate over your form components and add an AjaxFormSubmitBehavior for the event onchange On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:11 AM, MattyDE ufer.mar...@gmail.com wrote: No one has any idea? Cant believe it -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Submit-form-after-onchange-of-Field-tp3236003p3248332.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Cheap chaining of compound property model to propertymodel
In this code, do you think I am using the method
CompoundPropertyModel.bind properly? See my example in Code2, below.
In my snippet Code1, the values for the propertymodel were lost when I
did an ajax onClick.
But in Code2, the values are retained...
Code1:
Panel {
Panel() {
CompoundPropertyModel compoundPropertyModel = new
CompoundPropertyModel(someObject);
Form f = new Form(compoundPropertyModel);
f.add(new TextField(name)); This works fine, data able to
setObject and getObject on ajax and other cases
f.add(new TextField(name, new PropertyModel(someObject); --- ON
AJAX, VALUES LOST
f.add(new AjaxLink() {
onClick() {
target.add(form);
}
}
}
}
...
...
Code2:
As a fix, I did the following:
final PropertyModel pm = new
PropertyModel(compoundPropertyModel, number) {
@Override
public Object getObject() {
return ((CompoundPropertyModel)
form.getDefaultModel()).bind(number).getObject();
}
public void setObject(final Object obj) {
((CompoundPropertyModel)
billingForm.getDefaultModel()).bind(number).setObject(obj);
}
};
f.add(new TextField(name)); This works fine, data able to
setObject and getObject on ajax and other cases
f.add(new TextField(name, pm)--- ON AJAX, NOW VALUES ARE
AVAILABLE, FIXED!
Berlin Brown
Re: Cheap chaining of compound property model to propertymodel
Two possible problems:
- duplicated instances, then you set some property at instance 1 expecting
to see it changed at instance 2
- missing Component#modelChanged, since you need to signal the form
component that you have set some property into its model
the best would be you send a quickstart showing the problem
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS]
berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote:
In this code, do you think I am using the method
CompoundPropertyModel.bind properly? See my example in Code2, below.
In my snippet Code1, the values for the propertymodel were lost when I
did an ajax onClick.
But in Code2, the values are retained...
Code1:
Panel {
Panel() {
CompoundPropertyModel compoundPropertyModel = new
CompoundPropertyModel(someObject);
Form f = new Form(compoundPropertyModel);
f.add(new TextField(name)); This works fine, data able to
setObject and getObject on ajax and other cases
f.add(new TextField(name, new PropertyModel(someObject); --- ON
AJAX, VALUES LOST
f.add(new AjaxLink() {
onClick() {
target.add(form);
}
}
}
}
...
...
Code2:
As a fix, I did the following:
final PropertyModel pm = new
PropertyModel(compoundPropertyModel, number) {
@Override
public Object getObject() {
return ((CompoundPropertyModel)
form.getDefaultModel()).bind(number).getObject();
}
public void setObject(final Object obj) {
((CompoundPropertyModel)
billingForm.getDefaultModel()).bind(number).setObject(obj);
}
};
f.add(new TextField(name)); This works fine, data able to
setObject and getObject on ajax and other cases
f.add(new TextField(name, pm)--- ON AJAX, NOW VALUES ARE
AVAILABLE, FIXED!
Berlin Brown
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: setResponsePage weirdness
You might want to use a Wizard for the record. Just curious does first page add anything to the page, perhaps a new url and redirect is not necessary if no Wicket Components were added, try adding some Wicket Label about a redirect or something (just trying to narrow this down). Just curious, the way you have it, in theory a user really could enter the second or third page without the previous page(s), with the url, no? I suggest look into making a wizard component http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/wizard/ . Matthew syg6 wrote: I have a few mounts set up: mount(new QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(/first, FirstPage.class)); mount(new QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(/second, SecondPage.class)); mount(new QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(/third, ThirdPage.class)); And in HomePage I have a link to FirstPage: add(new BookmarkablePageLinkFirstPage(firstPageLink, FirstPage.class, parameters)); All FirstPage does is verify some parameters sent to it and do a setResponse() to SecondPage. Why is it that when I click on the link in HomePage, to FirstPage, when setResponsePage(SecondPage.class) in FirstPage's constructor is called the url remains: http://localhost:8080/myapp/first when I am actually now on SecondPage? But when I call setResponsePage(ThirdPage.class) from SecondPageForm's onSubmit() (SecondPage contains SecondPageForm), the url is: http://localhost:8080/myapp/third I've tried sticking setRedirect(true) in a few places but that seems to mess up my custom session; my custom session is constantly reset, previous info stored in the session is wiped out. I've also tried using setResponsePage(new SecondPage()) but it doesn't seem to change the url and SecondPage.html breaks, it's telling me none of my form components are present! Both SecondPage and ThirdPage *can* (and should!) be tied to the session, the user must never be able to enter directly into either one, but rather first enter FirstPage. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong? Thanks, Bob -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/setResponsePage-weirdness-tp3248650p3249002.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Static member wicket version... post 1.4.13
Is there a way to print the wicket version number from wicket class files or property files? E.g. Version.buildNum or something similar? Berlin Brown
Re: Static member wicket version... post 1.4.13
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/settings/IFrameworkSettings.html#getVersion%28%29 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote: Is there a way to print the wicket version number from wicket class files or property files? E.g. Version.buildNum or something similar? Berlin Brown - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Static member wicket version... post 1.4.13
The Wicket version and deployment mode are also output during startup... From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Date: 01/31/2011 11:33 AM Subject:Re: Static member wicket version... post 1.4.13 Sent by:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/settings/IFrameworkSettings.html#getVersion%28%29 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote: Is there a way to print the wicket version number from wicket class files or property files? E.g. Version.buildNum or something similar? Berlin Brown - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this communication in error and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information.
Re: setResponsePage weirdness
Okay, So don't use a link on the html page for FirstPage. Try redirecting when there is an html page with some filler, try adding a wicket label if plain html doesn't work. Although it's not the best solution it will narrow down the problem! The Wizard is useful in the sense, you can go back and forth for the user and it is all in one page etc There is nothing amazing about the wizard, just that it seems your trying to do the same thing, and it would handle making each step and not allowing one to skip to the second page because they bookmarked the url No worries about the ranting, I do it all the time. Matthew syg6 wrote: Hi and thanks for the response. No, FirstPage doesn't add anything to the page. It checks a param passed to it and redirects to one page or the other. Just for a test, I made a FirstPage.html with a link to SecondPage and had FirstPage.java just bring me to FirstPage.html, instead of doing a redirect. When I click on it the url changes correctly, unlike when I do a setResponsePage(SecondPage) from HomePage. But I don't need to 'stop' on FirstPage ... in fact I don't even have a FirstPage.html because I always redirect somewhere else. As for using a Wizard ... I thought about it and looked into it but it doesn't seem do too much. I only have 3 pages in my wizard and and controlling access to the 2nd and 3rd pages with a custom session object. ie, when you click on the link in the HomePage, if everything is correct (right parameters), I stick something in the session and redirect to page2. I do the same with page2. So access to the pages is controlled by my custom session object. Would it be that much easier with a wizard? I guess it would control the order of the pages but I would still need to stick my own logic in there because it's not just about the order of the pages, it also needs to validate other stuff. Anyway ...sorry to rant. Thanks for your help. Any other ideas much appreciated. Bob -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/setResponsePage-weirdness-tp3248650p3249263.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: correct way to get css classes of component
You can also use an AttributeModifier, which will give you the old value (as I recall). overriding the method onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag), will let you easily put a new variable for your class etc... but you will need to use tag.get(), and tag.put(tag.get()+...). Looks somewhat messy when you start using StringBuffers, unless your doing a lot of tag modifications might as well use AttributeModifier. In fact use, SimpleAttributeModifier: component.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(class, my-css-class)); More methods can be seen here: https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-modify-an-attribute-on-a-html-tag.html Matthew -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/correct-way-to-get-css-classes-of-component-tp3248490p3249278.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Newbie Question
Hi All, how are you?
I'm new in this list, actually I'm new to wicket and I'm trying to learn
it. So far I hadn't found any issues and it worked great until I came across
this anoying problem, I have as part of my html:
I wanted to add to a page a button with a text, on click the button hits the
sever, performs some action and it should remove the button from the page
(make it not visible)
I added:
a class=button wicket:id=ajaxbuttonlabel
wicket:id=button-text/label/a
and then In the java Page I have
(this code is inside a populateItem method from a ListView)
.
.
.
protected void populateItem(final ListItemPoll
item) {
final AjaxLinkTest button = new
AjaxLinkTest(ajaxbutton, item.getModel()) {
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
//Do whatever I have
to do
System.out.println(works?);
this.setEnabled(false); //Also tried removing the label component,
setVisible(false)
}
};
Label label = new Label(button-text, AText);
label.setOutputMarkupId(true);
button.add(label);
button.setOutputMarkupId(true);//these are desparates attemps to solve it
item.setOutputMarkupId(true);
button.setEnabled(!item.getModelObject().shouldBeDisabled()); //this works,
those that should be disabled do not show a button.
item.add(button);
}
.
.
Any idea of what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks!
Re: Newbie Question
onclick (target) { setvisible(false); target.add(this); }
-igor
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Fernando O. fot...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All, how are you?
I'm new in this list, actually I'm new to wicket and I'm trying to learn
it. So far I hadn't found any issues and it worked great until I came across
this anoying problem, I have as part of my html:
I wanted to add to a page a button with a text, on click the button hits the
sever, performs some action and it should remove the button from the page
(make it not visible)
I added:
a class=button wicket:id=ajaxbuttonlabel
wicket:id=button-text/label/a
and then In the java Page I have
(this code is inside a populateItem method from a ListView)
.
.
.
protected void populateItem(final ListItemPoll
item) {
final AjaxLinkTest button = new
AjaxLinkTest(ajaxbutton, item.getModel()) {
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
//Do whatever I have
to do
System.out.println(works?);
this.setEnabled(false); //Also tried removing the label component,
setVisible(false)
}
};
Label label = new Label(button-text, AText);
label.setOutputMarkupId(true);
button.add(label);
button.setOutputMarkupId(true);//these are desparates attemps to solve it
item.setOutputMarkupId(true);
button.setEnabled(!item.getModelObject().shouldBeDisabled()); //this works,
those that should be disabled do not show a button.
item.add(button);
}
.
.
Any idea of what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Newbie Question
Thanks!!! worked!
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
onclick (target) { setvisible(false); target.add(this); }
-igor
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Fernando O. fot...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All, how are you?
I'm new in this list, actually I'm new to wicket and I'm trying to
learn
it. So far I hadn't found any issues and it worked great until I came
across
this anoying problem, I have as part of my html:
I wanted to add to a page a button with a text, on click the button hits
the
sever, performs some action and it should remove the button from the page
(make it not visible)
I added:
a class=button wicket:id=ajaxbuttonlabel
wicket:id=button-text/label/a
and then In the java Page I have
(this code is inside a populateItem method from a ListView)
.
.
.
protected void populateItem(final
ListItemPoll
item) {
final AjaxLinkTest button = new
AjaxLinkTest(ajaxbutton, item.getModel()) {
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
//Do whatever I
have
to do
System.out.println(works?);
this.setEnabled(false); //Also tried removing the label component,
setVisible(false)
}
};
Label label = new Label(button-text, AText);
label.setOutputMarkupId(true);
button.add(label);
button.setOutputMarkupId(true);//these are desparates attemps to solve it
item.setOutputMarkupId(true);
button.setEnabled(!item.getModelObject().shouldBeDisabled()); //this
works,
those that should be disabled do not show a button.
item.add(button);
}
.
.
Any idea of what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Mapping wicket:id to component without changing Java code
Hello, I would like to add credit card processing form to many different pages in my application. However, I don't know which pages it will be added to and it is up to the web designer to decide. I would like to allow the web designer to be able to put div wicket:id=creditCardForm/ anywhere in HTML. This would typically cause Wicket to throw an error saying that a matching component was not added. Is there a way to configure Wicket to somehow add an instance of CreditCardForm class whenever it sees div wicket:id=creditCardForm/? Thanks, Alec
JWicket drag/drop handle
I'm trying to create a widget/gadget (similar to google's home page or yahoo). I've got it largely figured out except for one thing. I'm trying to restrict the drag operation to just the top div (the header). So my widget will look like this: div class=widget div class=wheaderDrag here/div div class=wbodystuff goes here.../div /div This functionality is described in JQuery here: http://jqueryui.com/demos/draggable/#handle It seems like DraggableBehavior should have a setHandle method so I can define the draggable region. Any thoughts? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/JWicket-drag-drop-handle-tp3250469p3250469.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
