Re: Unit testing for a page
Hi Anatoly, You are doing it right. To be able to verify that the other page is the response this other page have to be properly rendered, otherwise you would receive InternalErrorPage instead. To render it Wicket uses the normal rendering process so you need all prerequisites ... You can use tester#startComponentInPage() to test on component level. But this is not what you need. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Anatoly Kupriyanov kan@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I'm trying to implement a unit test for a page. The unit testing means I should test one page only. Suppose I have a page with a link. When I do wicketTester.clickLink(myLink); The WicketTester renders another page, the page rendering requires a lot of other injected dependencies, and the unit test set-up grows too much making the test fragile. I just want to verify that another page is set as a response page. Is it possible to do it? What are the best practices for unit testing of a wicket application? -- WBR, Anatoly. -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: understanding ajax response
Hi,
When you use target.prependJavaScript(some JS code) this generates
priority-evaluate.
When you use target.appendJavaScript(some JS code) - evaluate.
The difference is that the priority ones are executed first on the client
side, then the components added with target.add() are replaced and finally
the evaluate scripts are executed.
Your problem is because of this line:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/res/js/wicket-ajax-jquery.js#L135
All client side tasks related to processing an ajax response are put in a
queue and then processed one by one. This is needed because the response
may have header contributions and those should be executed synchronously
(to be able to load their stuff) and because of that an approach with
recursion + self-notification is used.
In your case it seems there are more tasks than what Firefox could handle
in one stack. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4675 for
some more details.
I'll experiment with try/catching the error and call setTimeout. Something
like:
if (this.depth 1000) {
// to prevent stack overflow (see WICKET-4675)
this.depth = 0;
window.setTimeout(run, 1);
} else {
try {
this.depth ++;
run();
} catch (e) {
if (e.message.indexOf('recursion') -1) {
this.depth = 0;
window.setTimeout(run, 1);
}
else throw e;
}
}
If this works then there is no reason to use 'depth' at all.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:56 PM, saty satya...@gmail.com wrote:
I receive several of evaluate tags within ajax-response such as below,
i
also receive several
priority-evaluate tags, what are these meant for, reworking an existing
application so i am not very clear how ajax response works in wicket, the
browser craps out parsing one or another of the evaluate tags (too much
recursion error), is there a way to overcome this parsing.
I understand that these are being generated by several ajax links in my
application, my goal is to overcome the browser issue with these, its quite
annoying that application runs fine on Opera but on Firefox (the browser
used in my firm) this is a serious problem.
ajax-response
.
.
.
evaluate
-
/evaluate
.
.
.
/ajax-response
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/understanding-ajax-response-tp4654310.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: Dynamic Components
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Martin The approach of adding the Sub/Details Panel to a DummyPage works fine for basic Panels, but there are a few problems I've hit: 1. onInitialize() isnt called - Im assuming this is because the Panel doesnt go through a normal lifecycle before being rendered back to the ART? 2. None of the Ajax/Links work - they are loading up the DummyPage The method I've provided involves calling a static addDynamicComponents(this); method from the onInitialise of a base class Panel and base class Page. Obviously all pages and panels need to derive from these common, application defined, Page and Panel classes - but that's no problem and most Wicket apps probably already do this as it's an easy way to add styling, behaviour etc., across the entire app easily. You can use org.apache.wicket.Application#getComponentInitializationListeners to do the same. For example check that the component is a Page/Panel and has package name that is in your namespace. This mechanism results in the dynamic components being added within the onInitialize method and so the dynamic components' own onInitialize methods are called which means you can have nested addition of dynamic components to any level your require. Because the components are added within the onInitialize method of their parent component all the AJAX goodies work as expected :) Now Im assuming this is all because the Component/Panel on the server side isnt associated with a real live page? Following on from a discussion thread that Chris Colman was going on about IComponentResolvers and those components being second class citizens, would it be possible to create dynamic components in a Page, and store them in a non-markup related area of the Page, such that they would go through normal lifecycle events etc, and AJAX callbacks would work to the Page, but they wouldnt be associated with the normal markup/component hierarchy? Based on Chris' comments, it seems like he has the initial stages of a workable solution to breaking the Component / Markup hierarchy and allowing a very flexible way of building applications. While I dont know what else Component Queueing was going to add, it seems that such functionality would provide a way to break the current hierarchy matching requirement. In my specific case, Im ok if the Components get thrown away on a full page (re)render, or that if Components were instantiated and not referenced in the markup, then they could be thrown away. While this might not suit the core framework for v7.0, could I build such functionality using the existing v6 APIs (maybe via a custom BasePage/ Component wrapper) and hooking in to the rendering cycle? N - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: understanding ajax response
The suggested solution wont work:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4675?focusedCommentId=13506367page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13506367
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
When you use target.prependJavaScript(some JS code) this generates
priority-evaluate.
When you use target.appendJavaScript(some JS code) - evaluate.
The difference is that the priority ones are executed first on the client
side, then the components added with target.add() are replaced and finally
the evaluate scripts are executed.
Your problem is because of this line:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/res/js/wicket-ajax-jquery.js#L135
All client side tasks related to processing an ajax response are put in a
queue and then processed one by one. This is needed because the response
may have header contributions and those should be executed synchronously
(to be able to load their stuff) and because of that an approach with
recursion + self-notification is used.
In your case it seems there are more tasks than what Firefox could handle
in one stack. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4675 for
some more details.
I'll experiment with try/catching the error and call setTimeout. Something
like:
if (this.depth 1000) {
// to prevent stack overflow (see WICKET-4675)
this.depth = 0;
window.setTimeout(run, 1);
} else {
try {
this.depth ++;
run();
} catch (e) {
if (e.message.indexOf('recursion') -1) {
this.depth = 0;
window.setTimeout(run, 1);
}
else throw e;
}
}
If this works then there is no reason to use 'depth' at all.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:56 PM, saty satya...@gmail.com wrote:
I receive several of evaluate tags within ajax-response such as
below, i
also receive several
priority-evaluate tags, what are these meant for, reworking an existing
application so i am not very clear how ajax response works in wicket, the
browser craps out parsing one or another of the evaluate tags (too much
recursion error), is there a way to overcome this parsing.
I understand that these are being generated by several ajax links in my
application, my goal is to overcome the browser issue with these, its
quite
annoying that application runs fine on Opera but on Firefox (the browser
used in my firm) this is a serious problem.
ajax-response
.
.
.
evaluate
-
/evaluate
.
.
.
/ajax-response
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/understanding-ajax-response-tp4654310.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
RE: multiple requests and StalePageException
Problem comes from 3rd party library that does some extra actions along applet's 3 requests. Library actions trigger extra GET requests for a whole page ( for example http://server/app/?2 ), Which are the reason of StalePageException during calling javascript from applet. I must still debug to see what really triggers these GETs. Thanks for the help Martin. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 14:03 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: multiple requests and StalePageException The renderCount increases only when you use non-Ajax requests, i.e. when you re-render the whole page. Make sure that executes Wicket behavior via js uses Wicket.Ajax.** On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi group, In my Wicket application I have an applet. In the background it requests servlet and finally executes Wicket behavior via js. If one request is performed, then everything works without problems. Lately I have changed applet and now it can do one or three requests. If it performs three requests then StalePageException is thrown, which causes page refreshed and that is not a desired behavior. When I debug difference between render counter and page counter is exactly 2, so I think that issue is connected with two extra applet requests. Do I miss something on the Wicket side? If not, what is the best way to avoid StalePageException in this case? Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
RE: How important is detaching models really ?
A similar scenario applies when using Wicket with JDO. You can use simple LDM when dealing with read only model objects. However, when you deal with model objects that are the subject of modification in a form you need to use JDO's detach/reattach mechanism which allows the form elements to keep references to serializable, detachable (and reattachable) copies of the object(s) being modified. This means all changes the user makes to the model objects are preserved across multiple HTTP requests (AJAX or opening new panels in a wizard style form) but not written to the DB. It's important to note (and this applies to any ORM that supports detach/attach) that the detach/attach cycle for objects being modified are not the same times as a typical LDM detach/attach (i.e. typically with the http request cycle). It's also important to note that Wicket 'detach' is not the same as ORM 'detach' although you can perform an ORM detach inside a wicket detach method. When setting up an object for modification you load the objects required by the form and then perform a single detach so the object has a persistent ID but it no longer attached to the PersistenceManager(JDO) or Session(Hibernate/JPA). As many http requests can come and go as you like but until the user clicks OK or Submit on the form there should be no more ORM detaches or attaches peformed. Clicking Ok or Submit in the form performs a reattach and then you commit your transaction. It is at this point that any OptimisticVerificationExceptions will be raised if an object the user was editing was changed by another user or another process so you need to wrap this 'commit' inside an appropriate try/catch and warn the user (eg., with a modal form) that an object they were modifying had been modified by another user. JDO manages all the detach/attach for you. I just wrap the detach/attach in a custom IModel. Back in my day we didn't need Wicket, Tapestry, JSF or WebObjects, or even Servlets, or for that matter Java! We just coded in plain assembly language. And before that we had to just type in 1's and 0's. Sometimes we didn't even have 1's. I once had to code for an entire month, barefoot, in the dead of winter, using just 0's... but you didn't hear me complaining. -Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2012 11:19 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: How important is detaching models really ? On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Colin, I find I am in agreement with your points about lazy loaded parts of the data model and how this can be simplified if you use LDMs. However, if you use LDMs for edit pages, you need to deal with concurrency issues yourself. You cannot rely on Hibernate's optimistic concurrency mechanism (version). Because every time your LDM fetches a fresh instance of the entity, you can never have a StaleObjectException. Dealing with concurrency yourself may be as easy as keeping the version property in addition to the Id property in the LDM, and checking against it when re-attaching the model, but this does add some complexity to the application code. Any thoughts on this? From the good old days: http://martijndashorst.com/blog/2006/02/13/wicket-goodie-hibernate- versioned-form/ Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
What is Atmosphere doing wrong so i cant debug the websocket
Hi Folks, iam using Wicket 6.2.0 with Wicket-Atmosphere 0.4 and everything works great, but Iam not able to debug the websocket-transfer in Chrome Debug-Tools like its explained and working here : http://blog.kaazing.com/2012/05/09/inspecting-websocket-traffic-with-chrome-developer-tools/ Is there something wrong with the initialization of the WebSocket in Atmosphere so Chrome cant identify it as a WebSocket? Iam also want to know, how i could disable the window.info/.console output on every WebSocket-Pull Thanks in Advance for any Hints or Help :) - Matty -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/What-is-Atmosphere-doing-wrong-so-i-cant-debug-the-websocket-tp4654322.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Authorization without redirect
Hi Ernesto, Thanks but this isn't really what I was looking for as it is too simple to remove the Modal Window from the DOM tree and see the already rendered hidden page without entering a PIN. I'd use normal Modal Windows for every link to the PIN protected page but this wouldn't cover bookmarks. A RestartResponseWithInterceptComponentException(Component component) would be marvellous which re-renders the current page and injects the given component but this is just fantasy. So I'll have to give this another thought or two. Cheers, Karsten Am 28.11.2012 13:36, schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro: See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Modal+Windows Opening a modal window on page load (no AJAX involved) You could use one to block the page till pin is typed. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Karsten Gaul karsten.g...@exedio.comwrote: Hi everyone, I'm currently building an application using wicket 1.4.21 and what I'm trying to achieve is the following: I have a protected area (stage 1) which requires the user to input his credentials and I'm using an AuthorizationStrategy for this. This Strategy throws a RestartResponseAtInterceptPage**Exception in it's onUnauthorizedInstantiation method. (works as is with a redirect to a Login Page) However, within stage 1 I have links to another page (stage 2) which requires a PIN and I want no redirect to the login page again but just show a pop-up with an input field. Something like a confirmation dialog which on close still displays the page the link to stage 2 was rendered in. Any ideas? Thanks, Karsten --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Authorization without redirect
Hi, On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Karsten Gaul karsten.g...@exedio.comwrote: Hi Ernesto, Thanks but this isn't really what I was looking for as it is too simple to remove the Modal Window from the DOM tree and see the already rendered hidden page without entering a PIN. Don't put the hidden content till pin is provided. This way there is no way to manipulate client side to access protected content. Once pin is provided you redirect to same page (and then content is displayed). It is resposaability of the page to ensure it is protected (with server side state). Is usser does not provides pin or closes the modal you redirect to a public page. I'd use normal Modal Windows for every link to the PIN protected page but this wouldn't cover bookmarks. A **RestartResponseWithInterceptCo**mponentException(Component component) would be marvellous which re-renders the current page and injects the given component but this is just fantasy. So I'll have to give this another thought or two. With the approach mentioned above you don't have to take care of the details you mention. Cheers, Karsten Am 28.11.2012 13:36, schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro: See https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/WICKET/**Modal+Windowshttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Modal+Windows Opening a modal window on page load (no AJAX involved) You could use one to block the page till pin is typed. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Karsten Gaul karsten.g...@exedio.com** wrote: Hi everyone, I'm currently building an application using wicket 1.4.21 and what I'm trying to achieve is the following: I have a protected area (stage 1) which requires the user to input his credentials and I'm using an AuthorizationStrategy for this. This Strategy throws a RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException in it's onUnauthorizedInstantiation method. (works as is with a redirect to a Login Page) However, within stage 1 I have links to another page (stage 2) which requires a PIN and I want no redirect to the login page again but just show a pop-up with an input field. Something like a confirmation dialog which on close still displays the page the link to stage 2 was rendered in. Any ideas? Thanks, Karsten --** --**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apa**che.orghttp://apache.org users-unsubscribe@**wicket.apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro Antilia Soft http://antiliasoft.com/ http://antiliasoft.com/antilia
Re: Authorization without redirect
Hi. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Karsten Gaul karsten.g...@exedio.comwrote: Hi Ernesto, Thanks but this isn't really what I was looking for as it is too simple to remove the Modal Window from the DOM tree and see the already rendered hidden page without entering a PIN. Don't put the hidden content till pin is provided. This way there is no way to manipulate client side to access protected content. Once pin is provided you redirect to same page (and then content is displayed). It is resposaability of the page to ensure it is protected (with server side state). Is usser does not provides pin or closes the modal you redirect to a public page. Or use AJAX to repaint the hidden content of the page. -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro Antilia Soft http://antiliasoft.com/ http://antiliasoft.com/antilia
Re: What is Atmosphere doing wrong so i cant debug the websocket
Are you sure web socket connection was established? Maybe your connection is long-polling. N On Nov 29, 2012 7:36 AM, MattyDE ufer.mar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Folks, iam using Wicket 6.2.0 with Wicket-Atmosphere 0.4 and everything works great, but Iam not able to debug the websocket-transfer in Chrome Debug-Tools like its explained and working here : http://blog.kaazing.com/2012/05/09/inspecting-websocket-traffic-with-chrome-developer-tools/ Is there something wrong with the initialization of the WebSocket in Atmosphere so Chrome cant identify it as a WebSocket? Iam also want to know, how i could disable the window.info/.console output on every WebSocket-Pull Thanks in Advance for any Hints or Help :) - Matty -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/What-is-Atmosphere-doing-wrong-so-i-cant-debug-the-websocket-tp4654322.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: What is Atmosphere doing wrong so i cant debug the websocket
How should i test this? I did no special configuration and testing it with the latest google chrome, which supports WebSockets. I think the atmosphere implementation tests on clientside which type of transfer is possible (WebSocket, SSE, Long-Polling etc.) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/What-is-Atmosphere-doing-wrong-so-i-cant-debug-the-websocket-tp4654322p4654327.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: What is Atmosphere doing wrong so i cant debug the websocket
Atmosphere checks both the client and the server capabilities to decide which transport to use. Some web servers do not support WebSocket. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, MattyDE ufer.mar...@gmail.com wrote: How should i test this? I did no special configuration and testing it with the latest google chrome, which supports WebSockets. I think the atmosphere implementation tests on clientside which type of transfer is possible (WebSocket, SSE, Long-Polling etc.) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/What-is-Atmosphere-doing-wrong-so-i-cant-debug-the-websocket-tp4654322p4654327.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: What is Atmosphere doing wrong so i cant debug the websocket
7.0.27 added support for WebSockets On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:32 PM, MattyDE ufer.mar...@gmail.com wrote: Oh okay.. iam Using Tomcat 7.0.12 without any special configuration -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/What-is-Atmosphere-doing-wrong-so-i-cant-debug-the-websocket-tp4654322p4654329.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: wicket:link + component images
The problem has nothing to do with html tags nor the wicket handles resources. It's related to TinyMCE. The editor set this for emoticons src=../../plugins/emotions/img/smiley-.gif This won't work because the gifs are inside wicket.contrib.tinymce.jar and they not supposed to be located elsewhere. (Quick hack could be to copy all the images the path above.) My solution is to replace src=../../plugins/emotions/img/smiley-.gif with src=wicket.contrib.tinymce.tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-.gif before add my Label to the page. I have a feeling that I spent much more time to solve this problem than it deserved but my app shines a little bit more :). regards., Sandor -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-link-component-images-tp4654258p4654332.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
events between pages
Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Is it possible to workaround it? Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn
Re: events between pages
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: Dynamic Components
This works great! Many thanks. I made a small addition to allow the markupId to be passed in via a new constructor - this is for the case where a JS component/lib creates new elements and inserts them into a specific place in the DOM - I pass the new ID back via an Ajax call, and then let the helper deal with hooking up the Wicket component. Thanks again Nick On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Bas Gooren b...@iswd.nl wrote: Hi, We've written the following class to dynamically add components to a page and then render them in an ajax request: http://pastebin.com/p4cSNsUw The rendered component is in the current page, not in a dummy page, so everything works as expected. The only thing that doesn't work is a full re-render, since that requires a hook in the page markup, which does not exist (hence dynamic components). To circumvent that, the dynamic components are automatically removed on a full page re-render. Have a look at the code, maybe it helps you. It's rather simple when you think about it. onInitialize() and ajax calls in the dynamically injected components work as expected for us. We use it in our (wicket 1.5) cms to dynamically inject editors and popups. Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, Bas Gooren Op 28-11-2012 21:00, schreef Nick Pratt: Martin The approach of adding the Sub/Details Panel to a DummyPage works fine for basic Panels, but there are a few problems I've hit: 1. onInitialize() isnt called - Im assuming this is because the Panel doesnt go through a normal lifecycle before being rendered back to the ART? 2. None of the Ajax/Links work - they are loading up the DummyPage Now Im assuming this is all because the Component/Panel on the server side isnt associated with a real live page? Following on from a discussion thread that Chris Colman was going on about IComponentResolvers and those components being second class citizens, would it be possible to create dynamic components in a Page, and store them in a non-markup related area of the Page, such that they would go through normal lifecycle events etc, and AJAX callbacks would work to the Page, but they wouldnt be associated with the normal markup/component hierarchy? Based on Chris' comments, it seems like he has the initial stages of a workable solution to breaking the Component / Markup hierarchy and allowing a very flexible way of building applications. While I dont know what else Component Queueing was going to add, it seems that such functionality would provide a way to break the current hierarchy matching requirement. In my specific case, Im ok if the Components get thrown away on a full page (re)render, or that if Components were instantiated and not referenced in the markup, then they could be thrown away. While this might not suit the core framework for v7.0, could I build such functionality using the existing v6 APIs (maybe via a custom BasePage/ Component wrapper) and hooking in to the rendering cycle? N
Re: What is Atmosphere doing wrong so i cant debug the websocket
Its likely your web server capabilities / configuration On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:18 AM, MattyDE ufer.mar...@gmail.com wrote: How should i test this? I did no special configuration and testing it with the latest google chrome, which supports WebSockets. I think the atmosphere implementation tests on clientside which type of transfer is possible (WebSocket, SSE, Long-Polling etc.) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/What-is-Atmosphere-doing-wrong-so-i-cant-debug-the-websocket-tp4654322p4654327.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: events between pages
Thanks Martin. What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)? Component id or page version id (present in url)? For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a current user. For application the same but for all users. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:01 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: events between pages
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Thanks Martin. What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)? Component id or page version id (present in url)? The id from the url. See Page#getPageReference() For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a current user. Define recent :-) One, two, ... more ? For application the same but for all users. If a random user can manipulate the pages of the other users would be a security issue, and rude :-) Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:01 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
RE: events between pages
Recent = one. It would be security issue only if event API has some holes :) Anyway it would be quite handy to send for example some info events to all logged users. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:16 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Thanks Martin. What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)? Component id or page version id (present in url)? The id from the url. See Page#getPageReference() For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a current user. Define recent :-) One, two, ... more ? For application the same but for all users. If a random user can manipulate the pages of the other users would be a security issue, and rude :-) Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:01 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: events between pages
You can do this. You can use either wicket-atmosphere or wicket-native-websocket to push data to the clients. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Recent = one. It would be security issue only if event API has some holes :) Anyway it would be quite handy to send for example some info events to all logged users. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:16 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Thanks Martin. What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)? Component id or page version id (present in url)? The id from the url. See Page#getPageReference() For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a current user. Define recent :-) One, two, ... more ? For application the same but for all users. If a random user can manipulate the pages of the other users would be a security issue, and rude :-) Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:01 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
RE: events between pages
-Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:43 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages You can do this. You can use either wicket-atmosphere or wicket-native-websocket to push data to the clients. But only with Wicket =6.0.0. Is it hard to affect also all recent (at least for current user) pages for events in Wicket? That would be a nice feature. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Recent = one. It would be security issue only if event API has some holes :) Anyway it would be quite handy to send for example some info events to all logged users. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:16 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Thanks Martin. What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)? Component id or page version id (present in url)? The id from the url. See Page#getPageReference() For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a current user. Define recent :-) One, two, ... more ? For application the same but for all users. If a random user can manipulate the pages of the other users would be a security issue, and rude :-) Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:01 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: events between pages
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:43 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages You can do this. You can use either wicket-atmosphere or wicket-native-websocket to push data to the clients. But only with Wicket =6.0.0. Is it hard to affect also all recent (at least for current user) pages for events in Wicket? That would be a nice feature. New features go only in 6.x anyway. You can keep a list of created WebSession objects, all last used pages are kept as attribute in the Session object. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Recent = one. It would be security issue only if event API has some holes :) Anyway it would be quite handy to send for example some info events to all logged users. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:16 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Thanks Martin. What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)? Component id or page version id (present in url)? The id from the url. See Page#getPageReference() For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a current user. Define recent :-) One, two, ... more ? For application the same but for all users. If a random user can manipulate the pages of the other users would be a security issue, and rude :-) Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:01 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
RE: events between pages
-Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 16:33 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:43 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages You can do this. You can use either wicket-atmosphere or wicket-native-websocket to push data to the clients. But only with Wicket =6.0.0. Is it hard to affect also all recent (at least for current user) pages for events in Wicket? That would be a nice feature. New features go only in 6.x anyway. You can keep a list of created WebSession objects, all last used pages are kept as attribute in the Session object. Shall I add then new feature request for 6.x? :) On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Recent = one. It would be security issue only if event API has some holes :) Anyway it would be quite handy to send for example some info events to all logged users. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:16 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Thanks Martin. What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)? Component id or page version id (present in url)? The id from the url. See Page#getPageReference() For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a current user. Define recent :-) One, two, ... more ? For application the same but for all users. If a random user can manipulate the pages of the other users would be a security issue, and rude :-) Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:01 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: events between pages
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 16:33 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:43 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages You can do this. You can use either wicket-atmosphere or wicket-native-websocket to push data to the clients. But only with Wicket =6.0.0. Is it hard to affect also all recent (at least for current user) pages for events in Wicket? That would be a nice feature. New features go only in 6.x anyway. You can keep a list of created WebSession objects, all last used pages are kept as attribute in the Session object. Shall I add then new feature request for 6.x? :) I lost you. Wicket 6.x provides these features - Atmosphere/WebSocket. What feature request exactly ? You cannot initiate push from the server to the browsers with normal HTTP. You need either WebSocket/SSE/Long-Polling/Streaming/Flash On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Recent = one. It would be security issue only if event API has some holes :) Anyway it would be quite handy to send for example some info events to all logged users. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:16 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Thanks Martin. What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)? Component id or page version id (present in url)? The id from the url. See Page#getPageReference() For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a current user. Define recent :-) One, two, ... more ? For application the same but for all users. If a random user can manipulate the pages of the other users would be a security issue, and rude :-) Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:01 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
RE: events between pages
-Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 16:57 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 16:33 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:43 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages You can do this. You can use either wicket-atmosphere or wicket-native-websocket to push data to the clients. But only with Wicket =6.0.0. Is it hard to affect also all recent (at least for current user) pages for events in Wicket? That would be a nice feature. New features go only in 6.x anyway. You can keep a list of created WebSession objects, all last used pages are kept as attribute in the Session object. Shall I add then new feature request for 6.x? :) I lost you. Wicket 6.x provides these features - Atmosphere/WebSocket. What feature request exactly ? You cannot initiate push from the server to the browsers with normal HTTP. You need either WebSocket/SSE/Long-Polling/Streaming/Flash Sorry, I was not clear enough. Feature would be to trigger wicket events on all user pages and not only on the current page. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Recent = one. It would be security issue only if event API has some holes :) Anyway it would be quite handy to send for example some info events to all logged users. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:16 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Thanks Martin. What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)? Component id or page version id (present in url)? The id from the url. See Page#getPageReference() For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a current user. Define recent :-) One, two, ... more ? For application the same but for all users. If a random user can manipulate the pages of the other users would be a security issue, and rude :-) Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 15:01 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: events between pages On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michal Wegrzyn michal.wegr...@onior.comwrote: Hi, I would like to send event from iframe to parent page which has multiple iframes. Event framework makes it possible to use application or session as sinks, but event affects only page from which event was sent. Why events which have session/application as sinks are not propagated to all pages? Define all pages. For application that could mean all pages for all users ever used so far. For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data store). Is it possible to workaround it? You can get any page by its id: session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId) and use it as a sink. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting,
Re: understanding ajax response
Most of these are coming from using IndicatingAjaxLink link = new IndicatingAjaxLink(link) That launches a model window. The data grid i have , many rows (hence every cell on that row) have a AJAX link that opens a model window to show more details. I don't have anything else that is adding java script calls on this page, do you see anything can can be done here (instead) to overcome the issue. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/understanding-ajax-response-tp4654310p4654342.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Unit testing for a page
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Anatoly Kupriyanov kan@gmail.com wrote: wicketTester.clickLink(myLink); The WicketTester renders another page, the page rendering requires a lot of other injected dependencies, and the unit test set-up grows too much making the test fragile. I just want to verify that another page is set as a response page. Is it possible to do it? What are the best practices for unit testing of a wicket application? This is actually a good point to improve your application and its tests. Use dependency injection to organize your application, say through wicket-guice or wicket-cdi. Use an alternative test Guice module to build your pages with while testing. So, when you reach the second test page, it gets built with low-cost data, Respectfully, Eric Jablow - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Validators in Wicket 6
I'm hoping someone can help me with my understanding. I've been updating my website to Wicket 6. In doing that the DateConverter I was applying to a field has started throwing a class cast exception. After some work, I made the problem go away, by checking the class parameter in the over-ridden getConverter(Class type) method and only returning the DateConverter for a date object - as it's shown in the DateTextField class. All fine. My confusion is that the class cast exception happens at the point where Wicket is forming the error message. At that point it passes the name of the field's label (birth date in this case) to the DateConverter's toString method (which naturally expects a Date object) and hence the class cast exception. I just don't understand why it would do that? Why is the field label being sent to the field's converter? If I've misread what is happening then I apologize - I'm not an experienced java coder but I have checked and rechecked this because I just couldn't believe what I was seeing. And while I've made the problem go away, I'm concerned I've achieved that with a profound lack of understanding as to why it is happening. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Validators-in-Wicket-6-tp4654349.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Validators in Wicket 6
checking the class parameter in the over-ridden getConverter(Class type) method and only returning the DateConverter for a date object Yes, you have to check the type parameter, as other types than the component's model type might need a converter. With WICKET-4608 all variables in error messages are now properly converted by the formComponent. This is why getConverter() is called more often. Sven On 11/29/2012 06:46 PM, Hobbes00uk wrote: I'm hoping someone can help me with my understanding. I've been updating my website to Wicket 6. In doing that the DateConverter I was applying to a field has started throwing a class cast exception. After some work, I made the problem go away, by checking the class parameter in the over-ridden getConverter(Class type) method and only returning the DateConverter for a date object - as it's shown in the DateTextField class. All fine. My confusion is that the class cast exception happens at the point where Wicket is forming the error message. At that point it passes the name of the field's label (birth date in this case) to the DateConverter's toString method (which naturally expects a Date object) and hence the class cast exception. I just don't understand why it would do that? Why is the field label being sent to the field's converter? If I've misread what is happening then I apologize - I'm not an experienced java coder but I have checked and rechecked this because I just couldn't believe what I was seeing. And while I've made the problem go away, I'm concerned I've achieved that with a profound lack of understanding as to why it is happening. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Validators-in-Wicket-6-tp4654349.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Unit testing for a page
On 29 November 2012 08:03, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi Anatoly, You are doing it right. To be able to verify that the other page is the response this other page have to be properly rendered, otherwise you would receive InternalErrorPage instead. To render it Wicket uses the normal rendering process so you need all prerequisites ... Yes, exactly. I've tried to mock/spy RequestCycle object to verify setResponsePage calls, however no success, too many dependencies. You can use tester#startComponentInPage() to test on component level. But this is not what you need. Not sure how could it help me. My aim is to verify that a link on a page follows to another page if some conditions are met. startComponent doesn't deal with pages, and also assumes use of clickLink. What's a difference? -- WBR, Anatoly.
Re: Unit testing for a page
On 29 November 2012 16:55, Eric Jablow erjab...@gmail.com wrote: wicketTester.clickLink(myLink); The WicketTester renders another page, the page rendering requires a lot of other injected dependencies, and the unit test set-up grows too much making the test fragile. I just want to verify that another page is set as a response page. Is it possible to do it? What are the best practices for unit testing of a wicket application? This is actually a good point to improve your application and its tests. Use dependency injection to organize your application, say through wicket-guice or wicket-cdi. Use an alternative test Guice module to build your pages with while testing. So, when you reach the second test page, it gets built with low-cost data, It contradicts with the idea of unit tests: test only a small unit, bringing minimum dependencies. Otherwise a change in one page would break a lot of other tests. It is significant especially for web-applications, because usually pages have a lot links between them. It makes a test run longer, which would cause performance problems for large test suite. -- WBR, Anatoly.
RE: Dynamic Components
Martin The approach of adding the Sub/Details Panel to a DummyPage works fine for basic Panels, but there are a few problems I've hit: 1. onInitialize() isnt called - Im assuming this is because the Panel doesnt go through a normal lifecycle before being rendered back to the ART? 2. None of the Ajax/Links work - they are loading up the DummyPage The method I've provided involves calling a static addDynamicComponents(this); method from the onInitialise of a base class Panel and base class Page. Obviously all pages and panels need to derive from these common, application defined, Page and Panel classes - but that's no problem and most Wicket apps probably already do this as it's an easy way to add styling, behaviour etc., across the entire app easily. You can use org.apache.wicket.Application#getComponentInitializationListeners to do the same. For example check that the component is a Page/Panel and has package name that is in your namespace. Thanks Martin, I wasn't aware of that particular listener mechanism. This mechanism results in the dynamic components being added within the onInitialize method and so the dynamic components' own onInitialize methods are called which means you can have nested addition of dynamic components to any level your require. Because the components are added within the onInitialize method of their parent component all the AJAX goodies work as expected :) Now Im assuming this is all because the Component/Panel on the server side isnt associated with a real live page? Following on from a discussion thread that Chris Colman was going on about IComponentResolvers and those components being second class citizens, would it be possible to create dynamic components in a Page, and store them in a non-markup related area of the Page, such that they would go through normal lifecycle events etc, and AJAX callbacks would work to the Page, but they wouldnt be associated with the normal markup/component hierarchy? Based on Chris' comments, it seems like he has the initial stages of a workable solution to breaking the Component / Markup hierarchy and allowing a very flexible way of building applications. While I dont know what else Component Queueing was going to add, it seems that such functionality would provide a way to break the current hierarchy matching requirement. In my specific case, Im ok if the Components get thrown away on a full page (re)render, or that if Components were instantiated and not referenced in the markup, then they could be thrown away. While this might not suit the core framework for v7.0, could I build such functionality using the existing v6 APIs (maybe via a custom BasePage/ Component wrapper) and hooking in to the rendering cycle? N - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Pages, Panels, and Dependency Injection
I'm having trouble understanding how to inject components into a page so
that the page will be easy to unit test later. Say I have a page that
contains two panels. I can easily use constructor injection to inject these
panels into the page:
class MyPage extends WebPage {
@Inject
public MyPage(PanelA a, PanelB b) { ... }
}
The problem is that all Panels require an id during construction.[1] How do
I supply the id to my Panels? I could simply construct every PanelA with an
id of panela and every PanelB with an id of panel, but that doesn't
seem very flexible. What do other people do in this situation? The hope
would be to pass mocked panels into the page during unit testing,
the separately test each panel.
What if instead of a panel it was a button where the onSubmit method must
be specified by overriding the method. How does one go about injecting such
a component so that it's still easy to test later in unit tests?
All thoughts and/or best practices are greatly welcomed. For reference I'm
using Guice as my dependency injection framework and
GuiceWebApplicationFactory to inject components into pages.
Thanks...
Bill-
[1]
http://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/6.0.x/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/panel/Panel.html
select2 integration -Duplicate(selected) value are appear in drop down box
we are using select2 version 2.0 in our application. Select2MultiChoice field are using for select a multiple value. here we set the maximumselectionsize is 20. and set minimuminputlength is 1.when we give input in that field the relevant value are appear in drop down box correctly, if selection count reach 15 or 16, hence we give input in that field the duplicated (selected) value are appear in the drop down box. but i could not recreate this problem in Myquickstart. the sample code is Select2MultiChoiceFoo fooField = new Select2MultiChoiceFoo(message, new PropertyModelCollectionFoo(this, foo), new FooProvider); fooField.getSettings().setMinimumInputLength(1); fooField.getSettings().setMaximumSelectionSize(20); fooField.setRequired(true); return fooField;
Re: select2 integration -Duplicate(selected) value are appear in drop down box
Can you please post your FooProvider implementation? -Tom On 30.11.2012, at 05:31, Madasamy mcruncher madas...@mcruncher.com wrote: we are using select2 version 2.0 in our application. Select2MultiChoice field are using for select a multiple value. here we set the maximumselectionsize is 20. and set minimuminputlength is 1.when we give input in that field the relevant value are appear in drop down box correctly, if selection count reach 15 or 16, hence we give input in that field the duplicated (selected) value are appear in the drop down box. but i could not recreate this problem in Myquickstart. the sample code is Select2MultiChoiceFoo fooField = new Select2MultiChoiceFoo(message, new PropertyModelCollectionFoo(this, foo), new FooProvider); fooField.getSettings().setMinimumInputLength(1); fooField.getSettings().setMaximumSelectionSize(20); fooField.setRequired(true); return fooField; - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
