Re: (Probably) A Bug in AjaxLink and list

[lambdad...@gmail.com]

Hi Martin,

Here is the java file:
http://pastebin.com/rKpp50zr

and the corresponding html file:
http://pastebin.com/Cq1j7ZPT

I have also tried with the WebMarkupContainer and had experienced the same
behavior.

Thanks in advance,
L



On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The first mail didn't make it to the list. At least I haven't seen it.
>
> Show us your code please.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, lambdad...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Group,
> >
> > I haven't received any reply yet. Wasn't I clear enough in my query?
> >
> > cheers,
> > L
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:00 PM, lambdad...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am showing a list on wicket page. Each item (is a div) in the list,
> it
> > > has few labels and two AjaxLinks - show and hide, which show / hides
> some
> > > information (as another label) related to that item. If I have more
> than
> > > one item in the list, clicking on the ajax links of any item always
> > > modifies the first item in the list. For example, if I have 3 items,
> > > clicking on the third "show" link always shows and under the first item
> > > likewise for the "hide", nevertheless it shows the correct info. but
> the
> > > placement is wrong.
> > >
> > > This behavior wasn't there when the above code was relying on 1.5, only
> > > since I have moved to 6.11. I have very good reasons to update, though.
> > >
> > > Any help / guidance is very appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Lambda
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: "Document mode restart from > IE9 Standards to Quirks" - any ideas?

[Sebastien]

Hi Matt,

Just FYI, even Google apps stops supporting IE9...
http://googleappsupdates.blogspot.fr/2013/11/end-of-support-for-internet-explorer-9.html

I know it is not a resolution of your problem but it might help you to
justify IE9 is outdated...

Best regards,
Sebastien.


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Check the network tab in IE9 Dev Tools. I had success before finding the
> reason for such switch in modes in one of the static resources. I don't
> remember the concrete reason :-/
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Matt Steele  wrote:
>
> > Hi folks - I'm running into a really strange issue on IE9 where an ajax
> > request from Wicket triggers the browser to render Quirks Mode, which
> fails
> > the Ajax request, and renders the page unusable.
> >
> > The error we see in the F12 console is:
> > "*HTML1113*: *Document mode restart from IE9 Standards to Quirks*"
> >
> > This has been discussed a few years ago, but no solution was found:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-users/20.mbox/%3ccamomwmrla8pizqfzvtbxxbklp5bpmpygqdh2imhn1cvpzep...@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > It's unclear why this is happening. We've tried using different DOCTYPES,
> > have added the X-UA-Compatible  tag and HTTP header, but nothing
> has
> > solved the problem. It only seems to affect IE9; I've tested IE8 and IE10
> > and both seem to work fine.
> >
> > Has anyone encountered this before? I've found two separate Wicket
> > applications where we encounter this error, and it's really causing us
> > problems.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Document-mode-restart-from-IE9-Standards-to-Quirks-any-ideas-tp4662151.html
> > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: (Probably) A Bug in AjaxLink and list

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,

 

remove id="raw" and let Wicket generate the id for you


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:56 AM, lambdad...@gmail.com
wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Here is the java file:
> http://pastebin.com/rKpp50zr
>
> and the corresponding html file:
> http://pastebin.com/Cq1j7ZPT
>
> I have also tried with the WebMarkupContainer and had experienced the same
> behavior.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> L
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Martin Grigorov  >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The first mail didn't make it to the list. At least I haven't seen it.
> >
> > Show us your code please.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, lambdad...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Group,
> > >
> > > I haven't received any reply yet. Wasn't I clear enough in my query?
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > L
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:00 PM, lambdad...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am showing a list on wicket page. Each item (is a div) in the list,
> > it
> > > > has few labels and two AjaxLinks - show and hide, which show / hides
> > some
> > > > information (as another label) related to that item. If I have more
> > than
> > > > one item in the list, clicking on the ajax links of any item always
> > > > modifies the first item in the list. For example, if I have 3 items,
> > > > clicking on the third "show" link always shows and under the first
> item
> > > > likewise for the "hide", nevertheless it shows the correct info. but
> > the
> > > > placement is wrong.
> > > >
> > > > This behavior wasn't there when the above code was relying on 1.5,
> only
> > > > since I have moved to 6.11. I have very good reasons to update,
> though.
> > > >
> > > > Any help / guidance is very appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Lambda
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: (Probably) A Bug in AjaxLink and list

[lambdad...@gmail.com]

That works! Thanks for your answer.

cheers,
L


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:

> Hi,
>
>  
>
> remove id="raw" and let Wicket generate the id for you
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:56 AM, lambdad...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Here is the java file:
> > http://pastebin.com/rKpp50zr
> >
> > and the corresponding html file:
> > http://pastebin.com/Cq1j7ZPT
> >
> > I have also tried with the WebMarkupContainer and had experienced the
> same
> > behavior.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > L
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Martin Grigorov  > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The first mail didn't make it to the list. At least I haven't seen it.
> > >
> > > Show us your code please.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, lambdad...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Group,
> > > >
> > > > I haven't received any reply yet. Wasn't I clear enough in my query?
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > L
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:00 PM, lambdad...@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am showing a list on wicket page. Each item (is a div) in the
> list,
> > > it
> > > > > has few labels and two AjaxLinks - show and hide, which show /
> hides
> > > some
> > > > > information (as another label) related to that item. If I have more
> > > than
> > > > > one item in the list, clicking on the ajax links of any item always
> > > > > modifies the first item in the list. For example, if I have 3
> items,
> > > > > clicking on the third "show" link always shows and under the first
> > item
> > > > > likewise for the "hide", nevertheless it shows the correct info.
> but
> > > the
> > > > > placement is wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > This behavior wasn't there when the above code was relying on 1.5,
> > only
> > > > > since I have moved to 6.11. I have very good reasons to update,
> > though.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any help / guidance is very appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Lambda
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Back button not calling onConfigure()

[Artur Kronenberg]

Hi,

I would expect it to hit the container. Debuggin and testing on a test 
environment works and hits it. Unfortunatelly there is no way to 
definitely proove that the error in question hits it to. I do know that 
the onConfigure is not hit. I don't have access to the access logs.


Is there a way that the user uses a proxy that disables the response 
headers we set for caching?


Thanks!

On 05/11/13 14:22, Martin Grigorov wrote:

Hi,

It looks like the page is loaded from the browser/proxy cache.
Can you verify that the web container is hit ? E.g. check its access logs


On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Artur Kronenberg <
artur.kronenb...@openmarket.com> wrote:


Hi,

I have a rather odd problem with a page of mine. The design is that the
model on the page gets a flag set that indicates that the send button has
been clicked (so the user doesn't send multiple times by clicking it
vigurously over and over again).
The problem now is that on browser back, the model is still created and
the page can't be used.
I overwrote the onConfigure method to set up my model correctly and
everything works just fine. However there seems to be cases where the
onConfigure method is not called?

Does anyone know of those cases? Can it have anything to do with the user
using a proxy? A weird browser thing?

We set the response headers to:

Expires: -1
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate, no-store

This seems to be a very odd issue that I can not reproduce locally at all
(I used to be able to by hitting the back button so I am guessing this is
where things happen, but overwriting onConfigure fixed it for most cases).

Thanks!

Artur

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: getPage(pageReference) == null since Wicket 6.10.0

[Ondrej Zizka]

Try the JBoss EAP 6.1:
http://www.jboss.org/jbossas/downloads/

I didn't have much trouble using that with Wicket 6.x.

Ondra



On 5.11.2013 18:19, Dieter Tremel wrote:

Am 12.10.2013 12:19, schrieb Dieter Tremel:

Sometimes I have the impression that a Glassfish and wicket are not a
couple in great love.


Seems that Glassfish and Oracle are not in great love either, since
commercial Glassfish is dead, and this is no good future for the open
source edition:

https://blogs.oracle.com/theaquarium/entry/java_ee_and_glassfish_server

Dieter

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Signing in works on localhost but not on VPS server

[meduolis]

Does your VPS and your computer uses same databases? If not, check if user
that you want to log in exists in VPS DB



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Signing-in-works-on-localhost-but-not-on-VPS-server-tp4662167p4662169.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Cannot get to desired error page on handling RuntimeException in AbstractRequestCycleListener#onException()

[dgn]

Thanks Martin. Good to know about the other option.
I'll go with Session.get().bind();
since I get the redirect to the error page. Otherwise, if I add the
RedirectPolicy.NEVER_REDIRECT to the RenderPageRequestHandler there will
still be the original value in the URL bar of the browser.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Cannot-get-to-desired-error-page-on-handling-RuntimeException-in-AbstractRequestCycleListener-onExce-tp4662078p4662170.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Back button not calling onConfigure()

[Martin Funk]

Hi,

have you thought about wireshark?

Easy to set up and not all that hard to handle. Filters are powerful and most 
interestingly for Web-Development
ist the "Follow TCP stream" function.
http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChAdvFollowTCPSection.html


mf

Am 06.11.2013 um 15:27 schrieb Artur Kronenberg 
:

> Hi,
> 
> I would expect it to hit the container. Debuggin and testing on a test 
> environment works and hits it. Unfortunatelly there is no way to definitely 
> proove that the error in question hits it to. I do know that the onConfigure 
> is not hit. I don't have access to the access logs.
> 
> Is there a way that the user uses a proxy that disables the response headers 
> we set for caching?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> On 05/11/13 14:22, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> It looks like the page is loaded from the browser/proxy cache.
>> Can you verify that the web container is hit ? E.g. check its access logs
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Artur Kronenberg <
>> artur.kronenb...@openmarket.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I have a rather odd problem with a page of mine. The design is that the
>>> model on the page gets a flag set that indicates that the send button has
>>> been clicked (so the user doesn't send multiple times by clicking it
>>> vigurously over and over again).
>>> The problem now is that on browser back, the model is still created and
>>> the page can't be used.
>>> I overwrote the onConfigure method to set up my model correctly and
>>> everything works just fine. However there seems to be cases where the
>>> onConfigure method is not called?
>>> 
>>> Does anyone know of those cases? Can it have anything to do with the user
>>> using a proxy? A weird browser thing?
>>> 
>>> We set the response headers to:
>>> 
>>> Expires: -1
>>> Pragma: no-cache
>>> Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate, no-store
>>> 
>>> This seems to be a very odd issue that I can not reproduce locally at all
>>> (I used to be able to by hitting the back button so I am guessing this is
>>> where things happen, but overwriting onConfigure fixed it for most cases).
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Artur
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Back button not calling onConfigure()

[Artur Kronenberg]

Hi Martin,

I had a quick read through it and this is not an option. I can't 
reproduce the error and it is not given when it will reoccur. If I 
understood it correctly I'd have to caputre all network traffic for my 
application until the point the error occurs to be able to use wireshark 
and analyze it. This won't be possble.


Thanks,

Artur

On 06/11/13 15:53, Martin Funk wrote:

Hi,

have you thought about wireshark?

Easy to set up and not all that hard to handle. Filters are powerful and most 
interestingly for Web-Development
ist the "Follow TCP stream" function.
http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChAdvFollowTCPSection.html


mf

Am 06.11.2013 um 15:27 schrieb Artur Kronenberg 
:


Hi,

I would expect it to hit the container. Debuggin and testing on a test 
environment works and hits it. Unfortunatelly there is no way to definitely 
proove that the error in question hits it to. I do know that the onConfigure is 
not hit. I don't have access to the access logs.

Is there a way that the user uses a proxy that disables the response headers we 
set for caching?

Thanks!

On 05/11/13 14:22, Martin Grigorov wrote:

Hi,

It looks like the page is loaded from the browser/proxy cache.
Can you verify that the web container is hit ? E.g. check its access logs


On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Artur Kronenberg <
artur.kronenb...@openmarket.com> wrote:


Hi,

I have a rather odd problem with a page of mine. The design is that the
model on the page gets a flag set that indicates that the send button has
been clicked (so the user doesn't send multiple times by clicking it
vigurously over and over again).
The problem now is that on browser back, the model is still created and
the page can't be used.
I overwrote the onConfigure method to set up my model correctly and
everything works just fine. However there seems to be cases where the
onConfigure method is not called?

Does anyone know of those cases? Can it have anything to do with the user
using a proxy? A weird browser thing?

We set the response headers to:

Expires: -1
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate, no-store

This seems to be a very odd issue that I can not reproduce locally at all
(I used to be able to by hitting the back button so I am guessing this is
where things happen, but overwriting onConfigure fixed it for most cases).

Thanks!

Artur

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: getPage(pageReference) == null since Wicket 6.10.0

[David Beer]

JBoss AS 7 and Wildfly 8 work nicely with Wicket.


On 6 November 2013 15:25, Ondrej Zizka  wrote:

> Try the JBoss EAP 6.1:
> http://www.jboss.org/jbossas/downloads/
>
> I didn't have much trouble using that with Wicket 6.x.
>
> Ondra
>
>
>
>
> On 5.11.2013 18:19, Dieter Tremel wrote:
>
>> Am 12.10.2013 12:19, schrieb Dieter Tremel:
>>
>>> Sometimes I have the impression that a Glassfish and wicket are not a
>>> couple in great love.
>>>
>>
>> Seems that Glassfish and Oracle are not in great love either, since
>> commercial Glassfish is dead, and this is no good future for the open
>> source edition:
>>
>> https://blogs.oracle.com/theaquarium/entry/java_ee_and_glassfish_server
>>
>> Dieter
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: getPage(pageReference) == null since Wicket 6.10.0

[Dieter Tremel]

Thank You, will try that.
Dieter

Am 06.11.2013 17:14, schrieb David Beer:
> JBoss AS 7 and Wildfly 8 work nicely with Wicket.
> 
> 
> On 6 November 2013 15:25, Ondrej Zizka  wrote:
> 
>> Try the JBoss EAP 6.1:
>> http://www.jboss.org/jbossas/downloads/
>>
>> I didn't have much trouble using that with Wicket 6.x.
>>
>> Ondra
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5.11.2013 18:19, Dieter Tremel wrote:
>>
>>> Am 12.10.2013 12:19, schrieb Dieter Tremel:
>>>
 Sometimes I have the impression that a Glassfish and wicket are not a
 couple in great love.

>>>
>>> Seems that Glassfish and Oracle are not in great love either, since
>>> commercial Glassfish is dead, and this is no good future for the open
>>> source edition:
>>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

How to use BootStrap3 ProgressBar and UpdateableProgress Bar

[David Beer]

Hi Guys

I have added an UploadProgressBar from the Wicket extensions to my upload
form and process, it would be nice if I could keep the Bootstrap3
components.

I am having a bit of difficulty fguring out how I can attach either a
ProgressBar or UpdatableProgresBar to my upload form.

Any thoughts on this would be great. HTML template for form is as follows:





Select file
Change



×












Upload
File


[progressbar]


Thanks

David

Re: Back button not calling onConfigure()

[Martin Funk]

Hi Arthur,

no worries. This was just a hint. Wireshark might look quite discouraging at 
first sight.

When it is started it will show all the network traffic on the machine, but 
that output can be filtered quite effectively.

If it is really important, then wireshark can analyse gigabyte big tcpdump 
files:
http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/AppToolstcpdump.html

It depends on the pain, that bug is giving, but at least it would be known 
which request 'really' leaves the building.

mf

Am 06.11.2013 um 17:08 schrieb Artur Kronenberg 
:

> Hi Martin,
> 
> I had a quick read through it and this is not an option. I can't reproduce 
> the error and it is not given when it will reoccur. If I understood it 
> correctly I'd have to caputre all network traffic for my application until 
> the point the error occurs to be able to use wireshark and analyze it. This 
> won't be possble.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Artur
> 
> On 06/11/13 15:53, Martin Funk wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> have you thought about wireshark?
>> 
>> Easy to set up and not all that hard to handle. Filters are powerful and 
>> most interestingly for Web-Development
>> ist the "Follow TCP stream" function.
>> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChAdvFollowTCPSection.html
>> 
>> 
>> mf
>> 
>> Am 06.11.2013 um 15:27 schrieb Artur Kronenberg 
>> :
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I would expect it to hit the container. Debuggin and testing on a test 
>>> environment works and hits it. Unfortunatelly there is no way to definitely 
>>> proove that the error in question hits it to. I do know that the 
>>> onConfigure is not hit. I don't have access to the access logs.
>>> 
>>> Is there a way that the user uses a proxy that disables the response 
>>> headers we set for caching?
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> On 05/11/13 14:22, Martin Grigorov wrote:
 Hi,
 
 It looks like the page is loaded from the browser/proxy cache.
 Can you verify that the web container is hit ? E.g. check its access logs
 
 
 On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Artur Kronenberg <
 artur.kronenb...@openmarket.com> wrote:
 
> Hi,
> 
> I have a rather odd problem with a page of mine. The design is that the
> model on the page gets a flag set that indicates that the send button has
> been clicked (so the user doesn't send multiple times by clicking it
> vigurously over and over again).
> The problem now is that on browser back, the model is still created and
> the page can't be used.
> I overwrote the onConfigure method to set up my model correctly and
> everything works just fine. However there seems to be cases where the
> onConfigure method is not called?
> 
> Does anyone know of those cases? Can it have anything to do with the user
> using a proxy? A weird browser thing?
> 
> We set the response headers to:
> 
> Expires: -1
> Pragma: no-cache
> Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate, no-store
> 
> This seems to be a very odd issue that I can not reproduce locally at all
> (I used to be able to by hitting the back button so I am guessing this is
> where things happen, but overwriting onConfigure fixed it for most cases).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Artur
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> 
> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket job opportunities

[Ondrej Zizka]

I guess you have checked
http://careers.stackoverflow.com/jobs/tag/wicket

and also
http://www.linkedin.com/vsearch/j?keywords=wicket&openAdvancedForm=true&locationType=Y&sortBy=R

Ondra



On 29.10.2013 19:13, Leonid Bogdanov wrote:

Hello!

 Sorry for bringing this topic, but I'm wondering are there any Software 
Developer positions that require Wicket knowledge and a remote work is an 
option?
 It would be double awesome if such position involves Scala/Clojure/Hadoop. 
I'll provide my CV on a request.

Thank you!



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Signing in works on localhost but not on VPS server

[MartinoSuperman]

Hello,

I made authentication and authorization in my website.

Signing in works perfectly on my own computer on localhost, but it does not
work on my VPS server. 

I installed everything according to plan. 

But now I want to sign in and that does not work.

Does someone know what the cause of that can be?





--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Signing-in-works-on-localhost-but-not-on-VPS-server-tp4662167.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Issue w/ Ajax and setting form containers visible in Deployment mode.

[Ben S]

Hello,



I've been trying to work on this issue for hours and have had no luck.

Basically, my code works just fine in development mode as intended, however 
when in Deployment mode I can't seem to get WebMarkupContainers toggle between 
visibility.

If they're visible, they won't go invisible, however if they are invisible they 
will toggle visible.

However, the markup containers seems to work as expected when the form is 
passed to the AjaxRequestTarget,  however this will clear all the data that's 
on the form page, even though the form is set up for a compound property model..

Is there any way to set the webmarkupcontainers visible to false using ajax in 
Deployment mode?

Bizarre undentified error resulting in blank page

[Rafael Barrera Oro]

Hello!

I've stumbled across a tricky one, i am getting a blank screen withouth any
error in the logs, the only thing i can observe is the following javascript
error on the js console:

*Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'appendChild' of
null wicket-ajax-debug.js:207*

*GET http://localhost:8080/lars/app/src/debug.js

404
(Not Found)*

This only happens if "development" mode is set in the web.xml of the
project (the js error happens because document.body is null).

I still don't know if this the cause or a consequence of whatever is going
wrong.

The really weird thing is the error does not happen if i comment certain
lines of code within a class all pages in the project inherit from, these
lines invoke some getters for attributes of the page, set a few
pageParameters properties and retrieve the session to do stuff. For
example, there is a line that is quite like the following:

PageParameters pageParameters = getBean().getParameters();

To my amazement, if i comment it out and replace it for, lets say...

PageParameters pageParameters = new PageParameters();

everything goes smoothly...

Has anyone ran across something similar?

Thanks in advance!
Rafael

Re: Issue w/ Ajax and setting form containers visible in Deployment mode.

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,

Show us your code.
It is possible to do what you need but we cannot say what is wrong from the
provided information.


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Ben S  wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> I've been trying to work on this issue for hours and have had no luck.
>
> Basically, my code works just fine in development mode as intended,
> however when in Deployment mode I can't seem to get WebMarkupContainers
> toggle between visibility.
>
> If they're visible, they won't go invisible, however if they are invisible
> they will toggle visible.
>
> However, the markup containers seems to work as expected when the form is
> passed to the AjaxRequestTarget,  however this will clear all the data
> that's on the form page, even though the form is set up for a compound
> property model..
>
> Is there any way to set the webmarkupcontainers visible to false using
> ajax in Deployment mode?

Re: Bizarre undentified error resulting in blank page

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I've stumbled across a tricky one, i am getting a blank screen withouth any
> error in the logs, the only thing i can observe is the following javascript
> error on the js console:
>
> *Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'appendChild' of
> null wicket-ajax-debug.js:207*
>
> *GET http://localhost:8080/lars/app/src/debug.js
> <
> http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8080%2Flars%2Fapp%2Fsrc%2Fdebug.js&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFTx3mceKhWiXKl1lTEwHaeEdOAyQ
> >
> 404
> (Not Found)*
>
> This only happens if "development" mode is set in the web.xml of the
> project (the js error happens because document.body is null).
>

This is strange indeed.


>
> I still don't know if this the cause or a consequence of whatever is going
> wrong.
>
> The really weird thing is the error does not happen if i comment certain
> lines of code within a class all pages in the project inherit from, these
> lines invoke some getters for attributes of the page, set a few
> pageParameters properties and retrieve the session to do stuff. For
> example, there is a line that is quite like the following:
>
> PageParameters pageParameters = getBean().getParameters();
>

what are the keys/values in these problematic parameters ?


>
> To my amazement, if i comment it out and replace it for, lets say...
>
> PageParameters pageParameters = new PageParameters();
>
> everything goes smoothly...
>
> Has anyone ran across something similar?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Rafael