Re: Will renderHead method be invoked when a component is rendered via wicket events?
Hi,
If a component is rendered then its #renderHead() should be called!
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:08 AM, MadasamySankarapandian <
madas...@mcruncher.com> wrote:
> I am using bootstrap-timepicker.js in a single page application .
> Time picker is added in a panel which is then embedded in the page. When
> the entire page is reloaded, the timepicker is working fine. However, when
> the respective panel is displayed via Wicket events, the time picker is not
> rendered. I am using Component#onEvent(Ievent) method to display the panel.
> The javascript resource reference for timepicker is added in renderHead
> method. I would like to know if a panel is reloaded during onEvent call,
> will rendeHead method be invoked or not?
>
>
> Here are few code snippets to help you all understand what I am trying?
>
> public class BasePage
> {
>
> public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response)
>
Call super.renderHead(response) too.
Is this a method in the page or in SelectionPanel ?!
> {
> response.render(JavaScriHeaderItem.forReference(new
> JavaScriptResourceReference(bootstrap-timepicker.js)));
> response.render(JavaScriHeaderItem.forReference(new
> JavaScriptResourceReference(common.js)));
> }
>
> //event is received to display panel
> public void onEvent(IEvent ievent)
> {
> super.onEvent(ievent)
> if(event.getPayLoad() instance of Notification)
> {
> Notification notification = (Notification) event.getPayload();
> PageParameters parameters = notification.getPageParameters()
> Panel selectedPanel = getSelectedPanel(parameters,
> notification.getPanelClass);
> BasePage.this.selectedPanel.replaceWith(selectedPanel);
>
There is no Ajax here, so the whole page is re-rendered and #renderHead()
should be called for all visible components.
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> --
> Thanks and regards
> Madasamy
>
Re: Accordion folding unfolding smoothly
any workaround possible? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Accordion-folding-unfolding-smoothly-tp4669851p4669891.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: adding component Dynamically
I've checked browser console and the onclick call never gets triggered when i click on the "more" link. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/adding-component-Dynamically-tp4669838p4669892.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DataTable generics vs. IColumn generics
Hi Sven,
I did already implement it this way... and its working.
But my team members asked (more the client developers point of view),
why the column-class itself is not a generic of Location, like this.
public class LocationColumn extends PropertyColumn {
...
}
At the current implementation they need to do
cols.add(new LocationColum(...));
instead of just
cols.add(new LocationColum(...));
Thats why I "forwarded" the question here, because I studied a bit the
Column-Hierarchie code and also wondered about this strength coupling
between T of ICellPopulator and T of rowModel and T of DataTable.
I suppose my team members see the PropertyColumn more like the usage of
a PropertModel.
The generic of a PropertyModel is the type, which is returned by the
expression.
The generic of a PropertyColumn is the DataTables generic / rowModel
generic, not what its expression retrieves/returns/displays.
I think thats it...
As more as I think about this issue, maybe this could be a nice feature
of PropertyColums.
Not to have a too strength coupling of what the column displays in the
cell and what the data table shows.
kind regards
Patrick
Am 05.03.2015 um 18:43 schrieb Sven Meier:
Hi Patrick,
you can let your column implementation be generic:
public class LocationColumn extends PropertyColumn {
public LocationColumn(String expressionToLocation){
super(Model.of("Location"), expressionToLocation);
}
@Override
public void populateItem(Item> cellItem,
String componentId, IModel rowModel) {
cellItem.add(new Label(componentId, new
LocationFormatModel((IModel)createDataModel(rowModel),
Model.of(Session.get().getLocale();
}
}
What do you need more?
Regards
Sven
Am 05.03.2015 um 15:34 schrieb Patrick Davids:
Hi Sven,
thanx for feedback.
Ok, how to implement the LocationColumn more reusable?
I dont want to be bound to a Datatable of Persons.
I'd like to have a Column which works with a Locations, independently
from which model-object the expression fetches the Location.
Is there any way to do that?
best regards
Patrick
Am 05.03.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Sven Meier:
Hi,
generic T is identical for the DataTable, and it's IColumns: it's the
type of the row models.
A column is responsible to provide a cell component for a row: For
DataTable only the input (e.g. Person) is interesting, the output
(Location) doesn't matter.
Your LocationColumn should extend PropertyColumn:
public class LocationColumn extends PropertyColumn{
public LocationColumn(String expressionToLocation){
super(Model.of("Location"), expressionToLocation);
}
@Override
public void populateItem(Item> cellItem,
String componentId, IModel rowModel) {
cellItem.add(new Label(componentId, new
LocationFormatModel((IModel)createDataModel(rowModel),
Model.of(Session.get().getLocale();
}
}
Have fun
Sven
Am 05.03.2015 um 12:26 schrieb Patrick Davids:
Hi all,
whats the meaning of generic T on DataTables vs T of IColumn and T of
ICellPopulator?
As I understand its the type of object shown by the table rows.
Reading the javadoc of AbstractColumn it says T (if I understand
correct), its the type of object shown by the cell itself.
But DataTable and its internal list of columns are bound together.
T of both must be the same...
I tried to implement something like this, and here I get problems.
List> cols = new ArrayList<>();
cols.add(new PropertyColumn(Model.of("Name"), "name"));
(compiler error)
cols.add(new LocationColumn("location"));
(compiler error)
new DataTable("id", cols, new
ListDataProvider(), 50);
public class LocationColumn extends PropertyColumn{
public LocationColumn(String expressionToLocation){
super(Model.of("Location"), expressionToLocation);
}
@Override
public void populateItem(Item> cellItem,
String componentId, IModel rowModel) {
cellItem.add(new Label(componentId, new
LocationFormatModel(rowModel, Model.of(Session.get().getLocale();
}
}
Also the Generic of ICellPopulator is bound to T of column.
I always thought it could be possible to implement sub-class columns
to allow special renderings of table-cells.
But how can I achieve this, if also ICellPopulator is bound to T of
the rowModel?
kind regards
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
How to load-balance on AWS with standalone Tomcats
Hi list, One of the modules of our application is completely written in Wicket 1.4.17. This application runs on a single standalone Tomcat installation. We now need to move this to AWS servers and ensure the service is 24/7 available. We are looking to have multiple Tomcat instances (not a cluster) which are load-balanced with ELB. My question is: what do I we need to do in order to achieve this? I now we'll have to write a IPageStore in order to serialise the page map into a shared database. Any suggestion on how to do this? Will we have to write a ISessionStore as well? I've found a solution for clustering (see link below) which I'm now about to test but I've thought that it'd be useful to try get some advice from this list. http://letsgetdugg.com/2010/02/07/clustering-wicket-for-fun-and-profit/ Many thanks for your help. Regards, Daniel DDC -- This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or organization to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you believe you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender as soon as possible. This e-mail has been scanned for known viruses by Mimecast for IMD. ---
Re: How to load-balance on AWS with standalone Tomcats
Hi, I think it would be much simpler if you use Tomcat clustering support. Wicket 1.4.x is a bit old but as far as I remember the support for it in Wicket has been introduced with 1.4.1 so it should work fine in 1.4.17. But if Tomcat clustering in not an option for you for some reason then: - make sure you use session affinity (aka sticky sessions) - create your own IPageStore to keep the serialized view of the pages in shared DB (as you already figured out) - no need of custom ISessionStore. You need custom one only in case you want to put your Wicket Session instances in something else than HTTP Session I guess you are not interested in upgrading to Wicket 6.x but I'd recommend you to upgrade at least to 1.4.22. There were some security fixes in the last few releases from 1.4.x series. Martin Grigorov Funemployed! Available for hire! Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Del Castillo wrote: > Hi list, > > One of the modules of our application is completely written in Wicket > 1.4.17. This application runs on a single standalone Tomcat installation. > > We now need to move this to AWS servers and ensure the service is 24/7 > available. We are looking to have multiple Tomcat instances (not a cluster) > which are load-balanced with ELB. > > My question is: what do I we need to do in order to achieve this? I now > we'll have to write a IPageStore in order to serialise the page map into a > shared database. Any suggestion on how to do this? Will we have to write a > ISessionStore as well? > > I've found a solution for clustering (see link below) which I'm now about > to test but I've thought that it'd be useful to try get some advice from > this list. > > http://letsgetdugg.com/2010/02/07/clustering-wicket-for-fun-and-profit/ > > Many thanks for your help. > > Regards, > Daniel > DDC > > -- > This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or > organization to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged > and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you > should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. > > If you believe you received this transmission in error, please notify the > sender as soon as possible. > > This e-mail has been scanned for known viruses by Mimecast for IMD. > > --- >
Re: Will renderHead method be invoked when a component is rendered via wicket events?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If a component is rendered then its #renderHead() should be called!
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:08 AM, MadasamySankarapandian <
> madas...@mcruncher.com> wrote:
>
> > I am using bootstrap-timepicker.js in a single page application
> .
> > Time picker is added in a panel which is then embedded in the page. When
> > the entire page is reloaded, the timepicker is working fine. However,
> when
> > the respective panel is displayed via Wicket events, the time picker is
> not
> > rendered. I am using Component#onEvent(Ievent) method to display the
> panel.
> > The javascript resource reference for timepicker is added in renderHead
> > method. I would like to know if a panel is reloaded during onEvent call,
> > will rendeHead method be invoked or not?
> >
> >
> > Here are few code snippets to help you all understand what I am trying?
> >
> > public class BasePage
> > {
> >
> > public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response)
> >
>
> >>Call super.renderHead(response) too.
>
> >>Is this a method in the page or in SelectionPanel ?!
>
> This method is in BasePage.
>
> > {
> > response.render(JavaScriHeaderItem.forReference(new
> > JavaScriptResourceReference(bootstrap-timepicker.js)));
> > response.render(JavaScriHeaderItem.forReference(new
> > JavaScriptResourceReference(common.js)));
> > }
> >
> > //event is received to display panel
> > public void onEvent(IEvent ievent)
> > {
> > super.onEvent(ievent)
> > if(event.getPayLoad() instance of Notification)
> > {
> > Notification notification = (Notification) event.getPayload();
> > PageParameters parameters = notification.getPageParameters()
> > Panel selectedPanel = getSelectedPanel(parameters,
> > notification.getPanelClass);
> > BasePage.this.selectedPanel.replaceWith(selectedPanel);
> >
>
> >>There is no Ajax here, so the whole page is re-rendered and #renderHead()
> >>should be called for all visible components.
>
Sorry here ajax is involved. In the sample code i forgot to
add.
selectedPanel.setOutputMarkupId(true);
notification.getTarget().add(selectedPanel);
>
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks and regards
> > Madasamy
> >
>
--
Thanks and regards
Madasamy
