Re: Tomcat dying with Wicket 1.3.2 (Windows / JDK 1.5.0_10)

[Erik van Oosten]

Jeremy,

A workaround is to make the session timeout way lower and add some keep
alive javascript to each page. For example as described by Eelco
(http://chillenious.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/how-to-create-a-text-area-with-a-heart-beat-with-wicket/).

Regards,
 Erik.


Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> Yes - quite large.  I'm hoping someone has an idea to overcome this.  There
> were definitely not 4500+ unique users on the site at the time.
>
> There were two copies of the same app deployed on that server at the time -
> one was a staging environment, not being indexed, which is probably where
> the extra ten wicket sessions came from.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> On 4/9/08, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> 4585 tomcat sessions?
>>
>> thats quite large if may say that..
>> and even more 10 wicket sessions that tomcat sessions
>> Do you have multiply apps deployed on that server?
>>
>> if a search engine doesnt send a cookie back then the urls should be
>> encoded with jsessionid
>> and we get the session from that..
>>
>> johan
>>
>> 

--
Erik van Oosten
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BookmarkablePageLink Parameter order

[Johan Compagner]

PageParam is a map so the order is currently not remembered
Please make a jira issue for this

On 4/10/08, Takeshi Matsuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Can I control parameter order?
> I have been creating Blog software and using it.
> I noticed parameter order changed. (sorry I don't know what change is
> trigger)
>
> At Application class ,WebPage class is mounted.
>
> mountBookmarkablePage("/page", Hoo.class);
>
> At WebPage class, BookmarkablePageLink created.
>
> PageParameters param = new PageParameters();
> param.put("param1", "string1");
> param.put("param2", "string2");
> BookmarkablePageLink link = new BookmarkablePageLink("link", Hoo.class,
> param);
>
> I expect that URL like this.
> /page/param1/string1/param2/string2
>
> But actual like this.
> /page/param2/string2/param1/string1
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A few Wicket Questions

[Sam Stainsby]

On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:29:16 -0700, Michael Mehrle wrote:

> In general, Wicket does a great job of giving your trace output of your
> template when something goes awry, including the component inheritance
> and suggestions as to what could be wrong.

And for that I am *very* thankful. I've only just started using wicket, 
for some new experimental work (combined with YUI and DB4O). Those error 
traces that simply tell you what is wrong and precisely where have saved 
me many of those painful hours that you normally experience when adapting 
to a new framework. Thanks Wicket developers, this and other aspects of 
Wicket (and DB4O too!) have converted me back to using Java.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BookmarkablePageLink Parameter order

[Ryan Gravener]

indexedparamurlcodingstrategy

On 4/9/08, Takeshi Matsuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Can I control parameter order?
> I have been creating Blog software and using it.
> I noticed parameter order changed. (sorry I don't know what change is
> trigger)
>
> At Application class ,WebPage class is mounted.
>
> mountBookmarkablePage("/page", Hoo.class);
>
> At WebPage class, BookmarkablePageLink created.
>
> PageParameters param = new PageParameters();
> param.put("param1", "string1");
> param.put("param2", "string2");
> BookmarkablePageLink link = new BookmarkablePageLink("link", Hoo.class,
> param);
>
> I expect that URL like this.
> /page/param1/string1/param2/string2
>
> But actual like this.
> /page/param2/string2/param1/string1
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Ryan Gravener
http://ryangravener.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Navigation etc. URLs for DefaultDataTable - multiple issues

[Igor Vaynberg]

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Ritz123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
>  I am trying to use DefaultDataTable - out of the box, the URLs generated for
>  the header (sorting) and navigation look really weird. I have setup
>  URLStrategy for the application and would like these DefaultDataTable URLs
>  to follow that stragegy. I have tried to enclose  inside
>   but that didnt work. Any ideas?

sorting headers use stateful links, so they look like standard wicket
stateful links ?wicket:interface=foo:bar. if you want you can roll
your own headers toolbar that uses bookmarkable links.

>  Also, the header and navigation links (default ones) dont seem to be
>  working, I get Null pointer exception from my Data Access layer indicating
>  some ids for the entities (used in loadabledetachable) missing - either from
>  the url or from the component model somewhere. Any idea on how to debug
>  this?

i doubt its wicket. the headers work just fine here [1] so it is
probably something in your code. if you want paste it here and we
might be able to help you

[1] 
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/repeater/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=%3Aorg.apache.wicket.examples.repeater.DataTablePage

-igor



>  --
>  View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Navigation-etc.-URLs-for-DefaultDataTable---multiple-issues-tp16599293p16599293.html
>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BookmarkablePageLink Parameter order

[Takeshi Matsuba]

Hi all

Can I control parameter order?
I have been creating Blog software and using it.
I noticed parameter order changed. (sorry I don't know what change is trigger)

At Application class ,WebPage class is mounted.

mountBookmarkablePage("/page", Hoo.class);

At WebPage class, BookmarkablePageLink created.

PageParameters param = new PageParameters();
param.put("param1", "string1");
param.put("param2", "string2");
BookmarkablePageLink link = new BookmarkablePageLink("link", Hoo.class, param);

I expect that URL like this.
/page/param1/string1/param2/string2

But actual like this.
/page/param2/string2/param1/string1

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Navigation etc. URLs for DefaultDataTable - multiple issues

[Ritz123]

Hi,

I am trying to use DefaultDataTable - out of the box, the URLs generated for
the header (sorting) and navigation look really weird. I have setup
URLStrategy for the application and would like these DefaultDataTable URLs
to follow that stragegy. I have tried to enclose  inside
 but that didnt work. Any ideas?

Also, the header and navigation links (default ones) dont seem to be
working, I get Null pointer exception from my Data Access layer indicating
some ids for the entities (used in loadabledetachable) missing - either from
the url or from the component model somewhere. Any idea on how to debug
this?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Navigation-etc.-URLs-for-DefaultDataTable---multiple-issues-tp16599293p16599293.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Failed to handle wicket:container

[Jonathan Locke]

I am currently trying to debug a markup handling problem where Wicket is
complaining that it "Failed to handle: "

I suspect that the problem is mine as I am mucking around with content types
to deal with mobile devices.  Any ideas on what might be wrong or what might
be a good approach for debugging this? Also, I've changed markup loading a
bit so it switches back and forth between .wml and .html files (falling back
on the .html if the .wml does not exist). Would this cause any havoc with
resolving this wicket:container tag?

Thanks,

Jon



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Failed-to-handle-wicket%3Acontainer-tp16598980p16598980.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat dying with Wicket 1.3.2 (Windows / JDK 1.5.0_10)

[Jeremy Thomerson]

Yes - quite large.  I'm hoping someone has an idea to overcome this.  There
were definitely not 4500+ unique users on the site at the time.

There were two copies of the same app deployed on that server at the time -
one was a staging environment, not being indexed, which is probably where
the extra ten wicket sessions came from.

Any ideas?

Jeremy


On 4/9/08, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 4585 tomcat sessions?
>
> thats quite large if may say that..
> and even more 10 wicket sessions that tomcat sessions
> Do you have multiply apps deployed on that server?
>
> if a search engine doesnt send a cookie back then the urls should be
> encoded with jsessionid
> and we get the session from that..
>
> johan
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I finally am able to get a good analysis of it.  It dumped two memory
> > dumps
> > when it died in the past couple days (it's still dying about once or
> > twice a
> > day).  Using this GREAT tool:
> >
> > https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/Java/Java+Memory+AnalysisI
> > am able to see deep memory views that tell me what is taking up the
> > memory.
> >
> > Each time it dies, it is usually during heavy web crawler traffic from
> > Google / Ask.com / etc.  The memory tool shows me having:
> > 4585 instances of org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession, totaling
> > 984,160,016 bytes of memory (I give Tomcat 1GB).
> > 4595 instances of com.texashuntfish.web.wicket.WebSession, totaling
> > 530,524,680 bytes of memory.
> >
> > I have had the session expiration turned down to 90 minutes in Tomcat
> > for a
> > very long time.  So, this means that 4,585 sessions are created in 90
> > minutes, right?  It seems like I shouldn't have this many sessions,
> > right?
> > Are the search engines crawlers creating a new session for every page
> > they
> > hit?  I'm going to put some logging output in my subclass of WebSession
> > that
> > tells me when it's being created, and by what IP so that I can take a
> > look
> > at this.
> >
> > Does anyone have any ideas?  I don't know what my session counts were in
> > 1.2.6, but I never ran into this problem or ran out of memory, excecpt
> > for
> > about a year and a half ago when I had session lengths turned up to a
> > couple
> > days long.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Nope - one page never holds on to another.  I never even pass pages
> > into
> > > another page or link or something as a reference.
> > >
> > > Interestingly, I DECREASED the memory the JVM could have from 1.5 GB
> > to
> > > 1.0 GB today, and it has been stable all day (after also releasing a
> > version
> > > using Wicket 1.3.3).  That's not a definite sign - it was stable for
> > several
> > > days after upgrading to 1.3.2 from 1.2.6 before freaking out.  But
> > I'll
> > > watch it closely.  The memory creeped slowly up to the max, and has
> > stayed
> > > there, but without the site crashing, and without any degradation of
> > > performance.  Does that give anyone any ideas?  I'm so exhausted, I
> > think
> > > that I'm starting to lose my ability to think freshly about it.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is really weird. Do you have any inter-page references in your
> > > > application?
> > > >
> > > > -Matej
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > The oddness is what baffles me: Tomcat has no output anywhere.  I
> > have
> > > > >  grepped and tailed the entire Tomcat logs directory, stdout*,
> > > > stderr*,
> > > > >  localhost*, etc.  Nothing in eventvwr.
> > > > >
> > > > >  It must be memory related, though.  There is a steadily
> > increasing
> > > > memory
> > > > >  footprint - it was increasing so fast yesterday because we were
> > > > getting
> > > > >  pounded by tons of traffic and Google's crawler and Ask's crawler
> > all
> > > > >  simultaneously.  Of course, the traffic was still no higher than
> > it
> > > > has been
> > > > >  in the past - this is definitely a new problem.
> > > > >
> > > > >  I redeployed today with the pending 1.3.3 release built by Frank
> > to
> > > > see if
> > > > >  my leak could be the same as Martijn's below, but the memory
> > > > continues to
> > > > >  increase.  It will die soon.  I have added the parameter to tell
> > it
> > > > to dump
> > > > >  on OOM - hopefully I got the right parameter and it will work.
> > > > >
> > > > >  Anyone here know how to (or if you can) use jstat / jmap with
> > > > tomcat5.exe,
> > > > >  running as Windows service?  All my development is on Linux
> > machines,
> > > > and I
> > > > >  can easily use those tools, but on the Windows prod environment
> > > > (ughh), jps
> > > > >  doesn't give me a

Re: Tomcat dying with Wicket 1.3.2 (Windows / JDK 1.5.0_10)

[Johan Compagner]

4585 tomcat sessions?

thats quite large if may say that..
and even more 10 wicket sessions that tomcat sessions
Do you have multiply apps deployed on that server?

if a search engine doesnt send a cookie back then the urls should be encoded
with jsessionid
and we get the session from that..

johan



On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I finally am able to get a good analysis of it.  It dumped two memory
> dumps
> when it died in the past couple days (it's still dying about once or twice
> a
> day).  Using this GREAT tool:
>
> https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/Java/Java+Memory+AnalysisI
> am able to see deep memory views that tell me what is taking up the
> memory.
>
> Each time it dies, it is usually during heavy web crawler traffic from
> Google / Ask.com / etc.  The memory tool shows me having:
> 4585 instances of org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession, totaling
> 984,160,016 bytes of memory (I give Tomcat 1GB).
> 4595 instances of com.texashuntfish.web.wicket.WebSession, totaling
> 530,524,680 bytes of memory.
>
> I have had the session expiration turned down to 90 minutes in Tomcat for
> a
> very long time.  So, this means that 4,585 sessions are created in 90
> minutes, right?  It seems like I shouldn't have this many sessions, right?
> Are the search engines crawlers creating a new session for every page they
> hit?  I'm going to put some logging output in my subclass of WebSession
> that
> tells me when it's being created, and by what IP so that I can take a look
> at this.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas?  I don't know what my session counts were in
> 1.2.6, but I never ran into this problem or ran out of memory, excecpt for
> about a year and a half ago when I had session lengths turned up to a
> couple
> days long.
>
> Thank you,
> Jeremy Thomerson
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nope - one page never holds on to another.  I never even pass pages into
> > another page or link or something as a reference.
> >
> > Interestingly, I DECREASED the memory the JVM could have from 1.5 GB to
> > 1.0 GB today, and it has been stable all day (after also releasing a
> version
> > using Wicket 1.3.3).  That's not a definite sign - it was stable for
> several
> > days after upgrading to 1.3.2 from 1.2.6 before freaking out.  But I'll
> > watch it closely.  The memory creeped slowly up to the max, and has
> stayed
> > there, but without the site crashing, and without any degradation of
> > performance.  Does that give anyone any ideas?  I'm so exhausted, I
> think
> > that I'm starting to lose my ability to think freshly about it.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > This is really weird. Do you have any inter-page references in your
> > > application?
> > >
> > > -Matej
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The oddness is what baffles me: Tomcat has no output anywhere.  I
> have
> > > >  grepped and tailed the entire Tomcat logs directory, stdout*,
> > > stderr*,
> > > >  localhost*, etc.  Nothing in eventvwr.
> > > >
> > > >  It must be memory related, though.  There is a steadily increasing
> > > memory
> > > >  footprint - it was increasing so fast yesterday because we were
> > > getting
> > > >  pounded by tons of traffic and Google's crawler and Ask's crawler
> all
> > > >  simultaneously.  Of course, the traffic was still no higher than it
> > > has been
> > > >  in the past - this is definitely a new problem.
> > > >
> > > >  I redeployed today with the pending 1.3.3 release built by Frank to
> > > see if
> > > >  my leak could be the same as Martijn's below, but the memory
> > > continues to
> > > >  increase.  It will die soon.  I have added the parameter to tell it
> > > to dump
> > > >  on OOM - hopefully I got the right parameter and it will work.
> > > >
> > > >  Anyone here know how to (or if you can) use jstat / jmap with
> > > tomcat5.exe,
> > > >  running as Windows service?  All my development is on Linux
> machines,
> > > and I
> > > >  can easily use those tools, but on the Windows prod environment
> > > (ughh), jps
> > > >  doesn't give me a VMID for Tomcat.
> > > >
> > > >  Thank you for your help!
> > > >  Jeremy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  > You can use as many anonymous inner classes as you like. I have
> > > them
> > > >  > coming
> > > >  > out of my ears, personally.
> > > >  >
> > > >  > It's very odd for tomcat to die with no output. There will be
> > > output
> > > >  > somewhere. Check logs/catalina.out and also logs/localhost*. If
> the
> > > JVM
> > > >  > dies, it will hotspot or even segfault and log that, at least. If
> > > you have
> > > >  > gradually increasing memory footprint then this should be pretty
> > 

Re: Tomcat dying with Wicket 1.3.2 (Windows / JDK 1.5.0_10)

[Jeremy Thomerson]

I finally am able to get a good analysis of it.  It dumped two memory dumps
when it died in the past couple days (it's still dying about once or twice a
day).  Using this GREAT tool:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/Java/Java+Memory+AnalysisI
am able to see deep memory views that tell me what is taking up the
memory.

Each time it dies, it is usually during heavy web crawler traffic from
Google / Ask.com / etc.  The memory tool shows me having:
4585 instances of org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession, totaling
984,160,016 bytes of memory (I give Tomcat 1GB).
4595 instances of com.texashuntfish.web.wicket.WebSession, totaling
530,524,680 bytes of memory.

I have had the session expiration turned down to 90 minutes in Tomcat for a
very long time.  So, this means that 4,585 sessions are created in 90
minutes, right?  It seems like I shouldn't have this many sessions, right?
Are the search engines crawlers creating a new session for every page they
hit?  I'm going to put some logging output in my subclass of WebSession that
tells me when it's being created, and by what IP so that I can take a look
at this.

Does anyone have any ideas?  I don't know what my session counts were in
1.2.6, but I never ran into this problem or ran out of memory, excecpt for
about a year and a half ago when I had session lengths turned up to a couple
days long.

Thank you,
Jeremy Thomerson


On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Nope - one page never holds on to another.  I never even pass pages into
> another page or link or something as a reference.
>
> Interestingly, I DECREASED the memory the JVM could have from 1.5 GB to
> 1.0 GB today, and it has been stable all day (after also releasing a version
> using Wicket 1.3.3).  That's not a definite sign - it was stable for several
> days after upgrading to 1.3.2 from 1.2.6 before freaking out.  But I'll
> watch it closely.  The memory creeped slowly up to the max, and has stayed
> there, but without the site crashing, and without any degradation of
> performance.  Does that give anyone any ideas?  I'm so exhausted, I think
> that I'm starting to lose my ability to think freshly about it.
>
> Thank you,
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is really weird. Do you have any inter-page references in your
> > application?
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The oddness is what baffles me: Tomcat has no output anywhere.  I have
> > >  grepped and tailed the entire Tomcat logs directory, stdout*,
> > stderr*,
> > >  localhost*, etc.  Nothing in eventvwr.
> > >
> > >  It must be memory related, though.  There is a steadily increasing
> > memory
> > >  footprint - it was increasing so fast yesterday because we were
> > getting
> > >  pounded by tons of traffic and Google's crawler and Ask's crawler all
> > >  simultaneously.  Of course, the traffic was still no higher than it
> > has been
> > >  in the past - this is definitely a new problem.
> > >
> > >  I redeployed today with the pending 1.3.3 release built by Frank to
> > see if
> > >  my leak could be the same as Martijn's below, but the memory
> > continues to
> > >  increase.  It will die soon.  I have added the parameter to tell it
> > to dump
> > >  on OOM - hopefully I got the right parameter and it will work.
> > >
> > >  Anyone here know how to (or if you can) use jstat / jmap with
> > tomcat5.exe,
> > >  running as Windows service?  All my development is on Linux machines,
> > and I
> > >  can easily use those tools, but on the Windows prod environment
> > (ughh), jps
> > >  doesn't give me a VMID for Tomcat.
> > >
> > >  Thank you for your help!
> > >  Jeremy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >  > You can use as many anonymous inner classes as you like. I have
> > them
> > >  > coming
> > >  > out of my ears, personally.
> > >  >
> > >  > It's very odd for tomcat to die with no output. There will be
> > output
> > >  > somewhere. Check logs/catalina.out and also logs/localhost*. If the
> > JVM
> > >  > dies, it will hotspot or even segfault and log that, at least. If
> > you have
> > >  > gradually increasing memory footprint then this should be pretty
> > easy to
> > >  > track down with a profiler.
> > >  >
> > >  > Make sure you run Tomcat with a sensible amount of permanent
> > generation
> > >  > space (128M+).
> > >  >
> > >  > Regards,
> > >  >
> > >  > Alastair
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
> > >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >  > wrote:
> > >  >
> > >  > > There are commandline options for the jvm to dump on OOM.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Anyway, doesn't the log file give any insight into what is
> > happening
> > >  > > in your application? Did you (or your sysadmin) disable logging
> > for
> > >  > > Wicket?

Re: customize SignInPanel look and feel

[Gerolf Seitz]

or, you can really use roll your own.
last time i used it (for a small project for my studies),
it felt like it wasn't actually made with customization in mind.
and iirc, it's in the wicket-auth-roles project, so it's basically an
example
on how to do it.

  Gerolf

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:48 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> extend it
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Broderick
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  How do I customize the markup for the stock SignInPanel?
> >
> >  Thanks
> >
> >  ___
> >
> >  The  information in this email or in any file attached
> >  hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden-
> >  tial  use  of  the individual or entity to which it is
> >  addressed and may contain information that is  propri-
> >  etary  and  confidential.  If you are not the intended
> >  recipient of this message you are hereby notified that
> >  any  review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
> >  this message is strictly prohibited.  This  communica-
> >  tion  is  for information purposes only and should not
> >  be regarded as an offer to sell or as  a  solicitation
> >  of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans-
> >  mission cannot be guaranteed to be  secure  or  error-
> >  free. P6070214
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: StringResourceModel parameter substitutions question

[Maurice Marrink]

Have you considered wrapping your parameters in models? In the
model.getObject you can then use your own toString function.

Maurice

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:27 AM, TonyVegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Hi!
>
>  When setting a string via StringResourceModel and using parameters, the
>  default operation in Wicket for retreiving the parameters' strings is to
>  call PropertyVariableInterpolator.getValue(final String variableName) within
>  the localizer.
>  This operation retreives the string by simply calling the toString-method of
>  the parameter.
>
>  Our object's string representation is retreived by another operation though.
>  So we need to call this operation rather than the toString.
>  Is there any method to achieve this other than overwriting the localizer?
>
>  Greetings,
>  Tony
>  --
>  View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/StringResourceModel-parameter-substitutions-question-tp16582995p16582995.html
>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fail to close ModalWindow on top of ModalWindow

[Maurice Marrink]

Could you open up an issue for this?

Maurice

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Nili Adoram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>  I have a ModalWindow "A" containing a page  i.e. opened as an iframe.
>  This modal opens another ModalWindow "B" containing a panel.
>  Window "B" contains a simple AjaxLink that should close "B".
>
>  add(new AjaxLink("cancel") {
>
>@Override
>public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
>
>ModalWindow.closeCurrent(target);
>}
>
>});
>
>  However, when I click this AjaxLink in order to close "B" the following
> message is displayed:
>  'You can\'t close this modal window. Close the top-level modal window
> first.'
>
>  This message is displayed since isIframe() returns true, which is
> problematic since "B" is not an iframe but a div.
>
>  Is there a workaround for this issue ?
>
>  --
>  Best,
>  Nili
>  ===
>  Nili Adoram
>  GRM Team, R&D, Qlusters Inc.
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  +972-3-6236636
>
>
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ListView with images and getting absolut path

[Maurice Marrink]

URL url = getServletContext().getResource("/WEB-INF/templates/"); will
give you a url instead of a file path if that is of any help.
You can use getServletContext from within your application.
Using tomcat i find this is usually a jndi url.

Maurice

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there are RequestUtils that can convert a wicket relative url to an
>  absolute one, if thats what you are asking.
>
>  there is no better way for you to get the src because direct access to
>  WEB-INF is not allowed, so you do have to stream it using a middleman
>  such as Image component instead of having the container stream it
>  directly.
>
>  -igor
>
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:24 PM, unka_hahrry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >  I want that all image files in a given directory are shown on my site so 
> that
>  >  the admin can simply add/delete image files by editing the directory. So I
>  >  do this with ListView:
>  >
>  >  ImgListView imgListView = new ImgListView("listImageData", new
>  >  LoadableDetachableModel()
>  > {
>  > protected Object load()
>  > {
>  > Folder folder = new
>  >  Folder("D:/wicketex/Kunsthaus/context/WEB-INF/classes/ueberuns/images1");
>  > return Arrays.asList(folder.listFiles());
>  > }
>  > });
>  > add(imgListView);
>  >
>  >  So my first problem is: how can I get the absolut path for my Folder?
>  >
>  >  The images are added in the following way:
>  >
>  > public ImgListView(String name, final IModel files)
>  > {
>  > super(name, files);
>  > }
>  > protected void populateItem(ListItem listItem)
>  > {
>  > final File file = (File)listItem.getModelObject();
>  > Resource resource = new WebResource() {
>  >
>  > public IResourceStream getResourceStream() {
>  > IResourceStream stream = new FileResourceStream(file);
>  > return stream;
>  > }
>  > };
>  > Image image = new Image("imageFile", resource);
>  > image.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier("class", "bildlinks"));
>  > listItem.add(image);
>  > }
>  > }
>  >
>  >  Is there a better way of adding the "src" to my image component?
>  >
>  >  Thank you for your help!
>  >  --
>  >  View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/ListView-with-images-and-getting-absolut-path-tp16580373p16580373.html
>  >  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>  >
>  >
>  >  -
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A few Wicket Questions

[Maurice Marrink]

>  not out of the box. ISecurityStrategy does provide a central point to
>  intercept lifecycle event, so you can easily do something like
>
>  new isecuritystrategy() { boolean isactionallowed(component caction a) {
>   if (pastLoadThreshold()&&component.render.equals(a)&&c instanceof
>  degradable) {
>  return false;
>   } else { return true; }
>  }

I think Igor means IAuthorizationStrategy. :)

Maurice

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Integrating Wicket and Jersey

[Michael Laccetti]

Ah, that's good news.  Appreciate the info.

Mike

igor.vaynberg wrote:
> 
> you can make both to /*
> 
> wicket is a filter, so if it thinks it cant handle the url it will let
> it fall through at which point jersey will have a try
> 
> -igor
> 


-
--
Michael Laccetti (416)558-9718
S2G Limited   http://www.s2g.ca/
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Integrating-Wicket-and-Jersey-tp16595984p16597161.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Integrating Wicket and Jersey

[Igor Vaynberg]

you can make both to /*

wicket is a filter, so if it thinks it cant handle the url it will let
it fall through at which point jersey will have a try

-igor


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Michael Laccetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Is there any way to integrate Wicket and Jersey (REST framework) in the same
>  webapp without requiring each to have a unique mapping (Wicket filter set to
>  /web/* and Jersey filter set somewhere else)?  I looked into the web.xml to
>  see if there was a way to put exclusions in a filter mapping, but no go.
>
>  Mike
>
>  -
>  --
>  Michael Laccetti (416)558-9718
>  S2G Limited   http://www.s2g.ca/
>  --
>  View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Integrating-Wicket-and-Jersey-tp16595984p16595984.html
>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: customize SignInPanel look and feel

[James Carman]

extend it

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Broderick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  How do I customize the markup for the stock SignInPanel?
>
>  Thanks
>
>  ___
>
>  The  information in this email or in any file attached
>  hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden-
>  tial  use  of  the individual or entity to which it is
>  addressed and may contain information that is  propri-
>  etary  and  confidential.  If you are not the intended
>  recipient of this message you are hereby notified that
>  any  review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
>  this message is strictly prohibited.  This  communica-
>  tion  is  for information purposes only and should not
>  be regarded as an offer to sell or as  a  solicitation
>  of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans-
>  mission cannot be guaranteed to be  secure  or  error-
>  free. P6070214
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

customize SignInPanel look and feel

[Andrew Broderick]

Hi,

How do I customize the markup for the stock SignInPanel?

Thanks

___

The  information in this email or in any file attached
hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden-
tial  use  of  the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is  propri-
etary  and  confidential.  If you are not the intended
recipient of this message you are hereby notified that
any  review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited.  This  communica-
tion  is  for information purposes only and should not
be regarded as an offer to sell or as  a  solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans-
mission cannot be guaranteed to be  secure  or  error-
free. P6070214

RE: Wicket Extensions

[Andrew Broderick]

Oops! Didn't realize it was in the distribution 

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:17 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket Extensions

No. You need all versions to be equal for all projects. We release all
projects concurrently under the same version number. Why did you
download wicket extensions when it is in the distribution? Or why
didn't you just add it to your pom?

Martijn

On 4/9/08, Andrew Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  Is Wicket Extensions 1.2.7 compatible with Wicket 1.3? I downloaded it, but 
> I can't find any mention of Wicket versions in the documentation
>
>  Thanks
>
>  ___
>
>  The  information in this email or in any file attached
>  hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden-
>  tial  use  of  the individual or entity to which it is
>  addressed and may contain information that is  propri-
>  etary  and  confidential.  If you are not the intended
>  recipient of this message you are hereby notified that
>  any  review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
>  this message is strictly prohibited.  This  communica-
>  tion  is  for information purposes only and should not
>  be regarded as an offer to sell or as  a  solicitation
>  of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans-
>  mission cannot be guaranteed to be  secure  or  error-
>  free. P6070214
>


--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Integrating Wicket and Jersey

[Michael Laccetti]

Is there any way to integrate Wicket and Jersey (REST framework) in the same
webapp without requiring each to have a unique mapping (Wicket filter set to
/web/* and Jersey filter set somewhere else)?  I looked into the web.xml to
see if there was a way to put exclusions in a filter mapping, but no go.

Mike

-
--
Michael Laccetti (416)558-9718
S2G Limited   http://www.s2g.ca/
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Integrating-Wicket-and-Jersey-tp16595984p16595984.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wicket Extensions

[Martijn Dashorst]

No. You need all versions to be equal for all projects. We release all
projects concurrently under the same version number. Why did you
download wicket extensions when it is in the distribution? Or why
didn't you just add it to your pom?

Martijn

On 4/9/08, Andrew Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  Is Wicket Extensions 1.2.7 compatible with Wicket 1.3? I downloaded it, but 
> I can't find any mention of Wicket versions in the documentation
>
>  Thanks
>
>  ___
>
>  The  information in this email or in any file attached
>  hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden-
>  tial  use  of  the individual or entity to which it is
>  addressed and may contain information that is  propri-
>  etary  and  confidential.  If you are not the intended
>  recipient of this message you are hereby notified that
>  any  review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
>  this message is strictly prohibited.  This  communica-
>  tion  is  for information purposes only and should not
>  be regarded as an offer to sell or as  a  solicitation
>  of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans-
>  mission cannot be guaranteed to be  secure  or  error-
>  free. P6070214
>


-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Application Context

[Edvin Syse]

.. or just implement ApplicationContextAware ofcourse :)

-- Edvin

Edvin Syse skrev:

Pinger wrote:

All the examples I see do something like


WebApplicationContext ctx = 
WebApplicationContextUtils.getRequiredWebApplicationContext(

this.getServletContext());

how do I do the this.getServletContext() when I am not in the wicket 
file? 


Maybe you could implement ServletContextAware?

-- Edvin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Application Context

[Edvin Syse]

Pinger wrote:

All the examples I see do something like


WebApplicationContext ctx = 
	WebApplicationContextUtils.getRequiredWebApplicationContext(

this.getServletContext());

how do I do the this.getServletContext() when I am not in the wicket file? 


Maybe you could implement ServletContextAware?

-- Edvin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MarkupCache change in 1.3.2 breaks style/variation/locale markup support

[Igor Vaynberg]

what if the cache knew the actual resource path of the resource also

then we can cache login.html, default.html, default_style1.html,
default_style2.html independently of what they actually map to...

-igor


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but then we are back at the original problem that we have many same
>  resources in the cache
>  that will be a real memory hog.
>
>  johan
>
>
>  On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Meetesh Karia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  wrote:
>
>
>  >  What about adding the style and variation into the location string when
>  > it's used as a cache key.  That will prevent the problem with the locales,
>  > but will address the issue below too ...
>  >
>  >
>  > Johan Compagner wrote:
>  >
>  > hmm this is now a tricky one..
>  > i need to figure out how it should work now..
>  >
>  >
>  > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Meetesh Karia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > wrote:
>  >
>  > > We're running into a problem with the change made for this issue:
>  > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1370
>  > >
>  > > Basically, if you have a situation like this where the Login page
>  > > extends DefaultPage and uses :
>  > >
>  > > Login.html
>  > > DefaultPage.html
>  > > DefaultPage_style1.html
>  > > DefaultPage_style2.html
>  > >
>  > > The markup for DefaultPage will always be based on the first style the
>  > > site is hit with.  This is because the location string ("Login.html") 
> hasn't
>  > > changed with the style change.
>  > >
>  > > Can anyone think of a simple way to work around this or a simple patch
>  > > we can apply for now?
>  > >
>  > > I've entered this issue for this as well:
>  > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1507
>  > >
>  > > Thanks,
>  > > Meetesh
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MarkupCache change in 1.3.2 breaks style/variation/locale markup support

[Johan Compagner]

but then we are back at the original problem that we have many same
resources in the cache
that will be a real memory hog.

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Meetesh Karia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>  What about adding the style and variation into the location string when
> it's used as a cache key.  That will prevent the problem with the locales,
> but will address the issue below too ...
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> hmm this is now a tricky one..
> i need to figure out how it should work now..
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Meetesh Karia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > We're running into a problem with the change made for this issue:
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1370
> >
> > Basically, if you have a situation like this where the Login page
> > extends DefaultPage and uses :
> >
> > Login.html
> > DefaultPage.html
> > DefaultPage_style1.html
> > DefaultPage_style2.html
> >
> > The markup for DefaultPage will always be based on the first style the
> > site is hit with.  This is because the location string ("Login.html") hasn't
> > changed with the style change.
> >
> > Can anyone think of a simple way to work around this or a simple patch
> > we can apply for now?
> >
> > I've entered this issue for this as well:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1507
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Meetesh
> >
>
>

Re: MarkupCache change in 1.3.2 breaks style/variation/locale markup support

[Meetesh Karia]

What about adding the style and variation into the location string when 
it's used as a cache key.  That will prevent the problem with the 
locales, but will address the issue below too ...


Johan Compagner wrote:

hmm this is now a tricky one..
i need to figure out how it should work now..


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Meetesh Karia <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


We're running into a problem with the change made for this issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1370

Basically, if you have a situation like this where the Login page
extends DefaultPage and uses :

Login.html
DefaultPage.html
DefaultPage_style1.html
DefaultPage_style2.html

The markup for DefaultPage will always be based on the first style
the site is hit with.  This is because the location string
("Login.html") hasn't changed with the style change.

Can anyone think of a simple way to work around this or a simple
patch we can apply for now?

I've entered this issue for this as well:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1507

Thanks,
Meetesh

Re: Application Context

[Pinger]

All the examples I see do something like


WebApplicationContext ctx = 
WebApplicationContextUtils.getRequiredWebApplicationContext(
this.getServletContext());

how do I do the this.getServletContext() when I am not in the wicket file? 

James McLaughlin-3 wrote:
> 
> Have a look at Springs
> WebApplicationContextUtils.getWebApplicationContext(...).  This in
> conjunction with org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener
> should give you what you need.
> 
> best,
> jim
> 
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Pinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>  So I am using wicket annot.
>>
>>  So I have classes elsewhere in my app that are using JMS and other
>> services
>>  in a web service. The issue I am having is I need the ApplicationContext
>> in
>>  non-wicket files.
>>
>>  When I Do public static ApplicationContext spring = new
>>  ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("applicationContext.xml");
>>
>>  this causes issues cause things are created 2 times..
>>
>>
>>  Thanks
>>  --
>>  View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Application-Context-tp16592544p16592544.html
>>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>  -
>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Application-Context-tp16592544p16593219.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MarkupCache change in 1.3.2 breaks style/variation/locale markup support

[Johan Compagner]

hmm this is now a tricky one..
i need to figure out how it should work now..


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Meetesh Karia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> We're running into a problem with the change made for this issue:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1370
>
> Basically, if you have a situation like this where the Login page extends
> DefaultPage and uses :
>
> Login.html
> DefaultPage.html
> DefaultPage_style1.html
> DefaultPage_style2.html
>
> The markup for DefaultPage will always be based on the first style the
> site is hit with.  This is because the location string ("Login.html") hasn't
> changed with the style change.
>
> Can anyone think of a simple way to work around this or a simple patch we
> can apply for now?
>
> I've entered this issue for this as well:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1507
>
> Thanks,
> Meetesh
>

Re: Application Context

[James McLaughlin]

Have a look at Springs
WebApplicationContextUtils.getWebApplicationContext(...).  This in
conjunction with org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener
should give you what you need.

best,
jim

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Pinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  So I am using wicket annot.
>
>  So I have classes elsewhere in my app that are using JMS and other services
>  in a web service. The issue I am having is I need the ApplicationContext in
>  non-wicket files.
>
>  When I Do public static ApplicationContext spring = new
>  ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("applicationContext.xml");
>
>  this causes issues cause things are created 2 times..
>
>
>  Thanks
>  --
>  View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Application-Context-tp16592544p16592544.html
>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MarkupCache change in 1.3.2 breaks style/variation/locale markup support

[Meetesh Karia]

We're running into a problem with the change made for this issue: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1370


Basically, if you have a situation like this where the Login page 
extends DefaultPage and uses :


Login.html
DefaultPage.html
DefaultPage_style1.html
DefaultPage_style2.html

The markup for DefaultPage will always be based on the first style the 
site is hit with.  This is because the location string ("Login.html") 
hasn't changed with the style change.


Can anyone think of a simple way to work around this or a simple patch 
we can apply for now?


I've entered this issue for this as well: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1507


Thanks,
Meetesh

Application Context

[Pinger]

So I am using wicket annot.

So I have classes elsewhere in my app that are using JMS and other services
in a web service. The issue I am having is I need the ApplicationContext in
non-wicket files. 

When I Do public static ApplicationContext spring = new
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("applicationContext.xml");

this causes issues cause things are created 2 times..


Thanks
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Application-Context-tp16592544p16592544.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wicket Extensions

[Andrew Broderick]

Hi,

Is Wicket Extensions 1.2.7 compatible with Wicket 1.3? I downloaded it, but I 
can't find any mention of Wicket versions in the documentation

Thanks

___

The  information in this email or in any file attached
hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden-
tial  use  of  the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is  propri-
etary  and  confidential.  If you are not the intended
recipient of this message you are hereby notified that
any  review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited.  This  communica-
tion  is  for information purposes only and should not
be regarded as an offer to sell or as  a  solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans-
mission cannot be guaranteed to be  secure  or  error-
free. P6070214

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Niels Bo]

ok, I can put a try-catch(Throwable t) around the service() and log that
together with the request-url.
But since it is a production server, I am not able to get it deployed until
tomorrow evening, and right now we are doing ok with the workaround.

Niels
 

Johan Compagner wrote:
> 
> if there was an error before that
> that should then be logged just before you log that there is a wrong state
> 
> The way you do it now is in reverse
> 
> the wrong state was already set in X number of request back
> so when you log it, You can;'t really tie it to a a specific request that
> did go wrong.
> 
> If you log it later after the service method. Then you know that it did
> happen for that request
> And most likely there should be some error before that.. Because i dont
> see
> another way
> how it would be possible when the normal flow without exceptions would
> happen.
> 
> johan
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi
>> How can I check/log if there are "error for that thread"?
>> Niels
>>
>>
>> Johan Compagner wrote:
>> >
>> > could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
>> > and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example
>> also
>> > log the url call so that we can see
>> > what kind of request did let one thread local be there?
>> >
>> > Which one is it by the way?
>> > is it app, session or request cycle?
>> >
>> > i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every
>> where
>> > in WicketFilter.doGet
>> > and in RequestCycle.steps
>> >
>> > And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.
>> >
>> > johan
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16585768.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16590574.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tag in Link

[Beyonder Unknown]

Thanks Gerolf! I appreciate it.

--- Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> in Application.init():
>
getMarkupSettings().setDefaultBeforeDisabledLink("");
> getMarkupSettings().setDefaultAfterDisabledLink("");
> 
>   Gerolf
> 
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Beyonder Unknown
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I was wondering if there's a way to get rid of the
> > added  tag every time I disable the Link
> > component?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wen Tong
> >
> > --
> > The only constant in life is change.
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
-
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 


--
The only constant in life is change.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug in wicket-ajax.js introduced in Wicket 1.3.2?

[Meetesh Karia]

Unfortunately that patch doesn't solve the problem.  I've added a 
comment to the issue with a different patch which addresses our problem 
and the problem mentioned in the issue (I hope :) ).


Thanks,
Meetesh

Thijs wrote:

See

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1426



Meetesh Karia schreef:

Hi all,

We recently upgraded to Wicket 1.3.2 from Wicket 1.3.1 and we're 
seeing a bug with ajax behavior in Firefox (2.0.0.13 on Windows 
Vista).  Basically, the following header is returned from an ajax call:


encoding="UTF-8"?>encoding="wicket1" >

The page this is called from has a URL that looks like this 
http://host/2008/foo/bar


In Wicket 1.3.1, the script /templates/mediaplayer/swfobject.js gets 
correctly loaded from


http://host/templates/mediaplayer/swfobject.js

However, in Wicket 1.3.2, it is incorrectly loaded from

http://host/2008/foo//templates/mediaplayer/swfobject.js

This appears to be related to one of these two changes:

http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/wicket-ajax.js?r1=614229&r2=619539 

http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/wicket-ajax.js?r1=627225&r2=628015 



I haven't narrowed it down but replacing wicket-ajax.js with the 
version from 1.3.1 makes it work again.


Should I file a bug for this?  Or is this going to be the new 
behavior going forward for Firefox?  Also, I'm guessing that the 
safest way to work around this problem is to remove those two changes 
and temporarily use a local build of wicket, right?


Thanks,
Meetesh




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: a transparent conversion of a CheckBoxMultipleChoice value

[Vitaly Tsaplin]

   The method getModel will always return a wrapper and that fact
breaks an encapsulation. So we can say that any wrapping can be done
only from outside which is not good. A conversion is an essential
part of an internal component's functionality and it's normally
shoudn't be exposed. I am not so strict as you can think but since
wicket people are struggling for every final keyword in the API I am
trying to be conceptual as well :)

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:30 PM, John Krasnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:09:03PM +0200, Vitaly Tsaplin wrote:
>  >What is going to happen if I call getModel on such a component? The
>  > model should be properly unwrapped I suspect. It's a logical behavior.
>  > Is it possible to achieve?
>
>  If you extend CheckBoxMultipleChoice, getModel() must return a
>  Collection. That's the contract that CheckBoxMultipleChoice offers, as
>  you will see when Wicket becomes generified in 1.4. If you create a
>  panel, then your model can be whatever you want, as long as you provide
>  an appropriate model to the CheckBoxMultipleChoice when you create it.
>
>  Wicket does no "unwrapping" of models; the fact that a model delegates a
>  portion of its operation to another model is purely an implementation
>  detail of that model.
>
>
>
>  jk
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tag in Link

[Gerolf Seitz]

in Application.init():
getMarkupSettings().setDefaultBeforeDisabledLink("");
getMarkupSettings().setDefaultAfterDisabledLink("");

  Gerolf

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Beyonder Unknown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering if there's a way to get rid of the
> added  tag every time I disable the Link
> component?
>
> Thanks,
> Wen Tong
>
> --
> The only constant in life is change.
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: AjaxSubmitLink accessing model object non-existent property

[Igor Vaynberg]

you can, just give the cpm reference to link as the model.

-igor


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Tim Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK.  It's clicked.  I was hoping to have a simple ajaxed submit link
>  without having to create a fake property on the model object.  No problem,
>  I can see what I missed.
>
>  Thanks for your help Igor.
>
>  Tim
>
>
>
>  > you said it yourself:
>  >
>  > "Insure that the component identifier names match
>  > the appropriate property names."
>  >
>  > what that says is that the model you get is the property of the model
>  > object that is in the cpm with the name of component id.
>  >
>  > so since your links id is "foo" it will try to pull out the model
>  > object from the cpm and call getfoo() on it, the result of which is
>  > the model object of the link
>  >
>  > -igor
>  >
>  >
>  > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Tim Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >> I have read it - a few times over the last 3 years of using Wicket and
>  >>  even bought the book ;)
>  >>
>  >>  It says
>  >>
>  >>  "To use a CompoundPropertyModel, simply set one as the model for a
>  >>  container, such as a Form or a Page. Create the contained components
>  >> with
>  >>  no model of their own. Insure that the component identifier names match
>  >>  the appropriate property names."
>  >>
>  >>  The AjaxSubmitLink is picking-up the parent forms compound property
>  >> model
>  >>  but only checking to see if the "mylink" property exists when onSubmit
>  >>  calls getModelObject().
>  >>
>  >>  I would like to get the Forms model via getModelObject but because it
>  >>  errors when called, I have to either set a false model on the
>  >>  AjaxSubmitLink or get the model object outside of the onSubmit, assign
>  >> it
>  >>  to a final property and then use it in the onSubmit.
>  >>
>  >>  I'm happy to admit that I'm doing something wrong but I cannot see what
>  >> it
>  >>  is???
>  >>
>  >>  Thanks again,
>  >>  Tim
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  > no, components do not randomly pick up models from their parents. i
>  >>  > would suggest reading the models wiki page.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > -igor
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  >> Thanks Igor but should it not pick-up the model from the Form?
>  >> There's
>  >>  >> no
>  >>  >>  constructor that takes a model.  Should the AjaxSubmitLink(id,
>  >> form)
>  >>  >>  constructor be used with the Form that it's being added to?  e..g
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  MyForm extends Form {
>  >>  >>  public MyForm(){
>  >>  >>  
>  >>  >>  add( new AjaxSubmitLink("mylink",this){
>  >>  >>  
>  >>  >>  });
>  >>  >>  }}
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  If it's already bound to a Form, should it not pick-up the model
>  >> used
>  >>  >> by
>  >>  >>  the form?
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  Am I looking at the problem/solution the wrong way???
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  Thanks again,
>  >>  >>  Tim
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  > you forgot to give ajaxsubmitlink a model, so getmodelobject()
>  >> will
>  >>  >>  > either return null or a compound model.confirm - neither of which
>  >> i
>  >>  >>  > think you want.
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > -igor
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Tim Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >> wrote:
>  >>  >>  >> Hi,
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  When adding an AjaxSubmitLink, the onSubmit method tries to
>  >> access
>  >>  >> a
>  >>  >>  >>  property of the model object that does not exists:
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  ---
>  >>  >>  >> final AjaxSubmitLink confirmLink = new
>  >>  >>  >>  AjaxSubmitLink("confirm") {
>  >>  >>  >> @Override
>  >>  >>  >> public void onSubmit(final AjaxRequestTarget
>  >> target,
>  >>  >>  >> final Form form) {
>  >>  >>  >> if (((Will) getModelObject()).getExecutor()
>  >> !=
>  >>  >> null)
>  >>  >>  >> {
>  >>  >>  >> willModalWindow.show(target);
>  >>  >>  >> } else {
>  >>  >>  >> warn("Please choose an executor.");
>  >>  >>  >> target.addComponent(feedback);
>  >>  >>  >> }
>  >>  >>  >> }
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >> @Override
>  >>  >>  >> public void onError(final AjaxRequestTarget
>  >> target,
>  >>  >>  >> final Form form) {
>  >>  >>  >> target.addComponent(feedback);
>  >>  >>  >> }
>  >>  >>  >> };
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >> add(confirmLink);
>  >>  >>  >>  ---
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  It tries to access the "confirm" property of the Model, in this
>  >>  >> case a
>  >>  >>  >>  Will object.
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  ---
>  >>  >>  >>  org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: No get method defined
>  >> f

tag in Link

[Beyonder Unknown]

Hi All,

I was wondering if there's a way to get rid of the
added  tag every time I disable the Link
component? 

Thanks,
Wen Tong

--
The only constant in life is change.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: a transparent conversion of a CheckBoxMultipleChoice value

[John Krasnay]

On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:09:03PM +0200, Vitaly Tsaplin wrote:
>What is going to happen if I call getModel on such a component? The
> model should be properly unwrapped I suspect. It's a logical behavior.
> Is it possible to achieve?

If you extend CheckBoxMultipleChoice, getModel() must return a
Collection. That's the contract that CheckBoxMultipleChoice offers, as
you will see when Wicket becomes generified in 1.4. If you create a
panel, then your model can be whatever you want, as long as you provide
an appropriate model to the CheckBoxMultipleChoice when you create it.

Wicket does no "unwrapping" of models; the fact that a model delegates a
portion of its operation to another model is purely an implementation
detail of that model.

jk

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: a transparent conversion of a CheckBoxMultipleChoice value

[Vitaly Tsaplin]

   What is going to happen if I call getModel on such a component? The
model should be properly unwrapped I suspect. It's a logical behavior.
Is it possible to achieve?

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:03 PM, John Krasnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:03:52PM +0200, Vitaly Tsaplin wrote:
>  >Yep. It looks simple and efficient. But it's quite a repetitive
>  > task. As I already mentioned I am going to create a component. And a
>  > data conversion should be its direct responsibility. The model wrapper
>  > cannot be provided from outside. It would be conceptually wrong in
>  > this case. I think this question is a bit wider then just a particular
>  > case with choices to bits conversion. I am getting running into this
>  > problem again and again. Wicket was created with a component driven
>  > design in mind and for, wasn't it?
>  >
>
>  That's fine too. Create a panel, or subclass CheckBoxMultipleChoice, and
>  have your panel|subclass apply the BitMapModel wrapper.
>
>  Converters are primarily for use with TextFields. They can only convert
>  to/from Strings.
>
>
>
>  jk
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [announce] Wicket 1.3 has been branched, trunk is now 1.4

[Johan Compagner]

http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.4-SNAPSHOT/

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> How far away is wicket with generics? /Anders
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
> > If you are depending on trunk and build your own Wicket versions,
> > please note that trunk is now Wicket 1.4 and will be used for the next
> > Wicket version.
> >
> > If you wish to continue building 1.3 jars then switch your local
> > checkout to:
> >
> > svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.3.x
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael]

Johan Compagner wrote:

why would that help?

  

Did'nt state it would, was just currious..

the first finally block is on the RequestCycle that only lives in 1 thread
and has all the state in one thread.

the second (in wicket filter) does only reset thread locals which are single
threaded by nature.

I did see one thing that could go wrong
we also call Response.close() and if that one some how fails, this could
happen i think in maybe certain situations
then the thread locals are not reset

I fixed that with an extra try catch block

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  

Do you synchronize those final blocks?


Johan Compagner wrote:



could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example
also
log the url call so that we can see
what kind of request did let one thread local be there?

Which one is it by the way?
is it app, session or request cycle?

i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every
where
in WicketFilter.doGet
and in RequestCycle.steps

And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:



  

We have kind of the same problem.
It looks like Application and Session are not always cleared from the
request thread, and to test this I have just deployed a subclassed
WicketServlet with these checks (and also as a workaround):

  protected void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
resp)
throws ServletException, IOException {
  if(Application.exists()) {
  LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
"Application on Thread");
  Application.unset();
  }
  if(Session.exists()) {
  LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
"Session on Thread");
  Session.unset();
  }
  if(RequestCycle.get() != null) {
  LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
"RequestCycle on Thread");
  RequestCycle.get().detach();
  }

  super.service(req, resp); // call WicketServlet
  }

Our logs show that it actually happens that both Application and
Session
are
already attached to the thread before the request is processed.
I have only seen it once or twice in our development environment, but
it
happens a few times every hour on the production server.

Niels
--
View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16583880.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







  

--
-Wicket for love

Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





  


--
-Wicket for love

Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [announce] Wicket 1.3 has been branched, trunk is now 1.4

[Anders Peterson]

How far away is wicket with generics? /Anders

Martijn Dashorst wrote:

If you are depending on trunk and build your own Wicket versions,
please note that trunk is now Wicket 1.4 and will be used for the next
Wicket version.

If you wish to continue building 1.3 jars then switch your local checkout to:

svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.3.x

Martijn

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is there a Wicket spinner component?

[Gerolf Seitz]

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Martijn Lindhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> I guess you mean the cvs/svn repo, because there's nothing on the
> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-stuff.html site?


this site is really old and should be updated (or removed?)


>
>
> wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/wicketstuff-minis doesn't
> seem
> to work


yes, right now it doesn't work. browse the wicketstuff SVN repository (url
available on sf.net)
and look inside the wicketstuff-minis project.

  Gerolf


>
> 2008/4/9, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > the spinner in wicketstuff-minis should do the trick.
> >
> >   Gerolf
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Martijn Lindhout <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Something like this:  http://www.eclipse.org/swt/R3_1/spinner.png
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martijn Lindhout
> > > JointEffort IT Services
> > > http://www.jointeffort.nl
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > +31 (0)6 18 47 25 29
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Martijn Lindhout
> JointEffort IT Services
> http://www.jointeffort.nl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +31 (0)6 18 47 25 29
>

Re: Question on component hierarchy

[Jonathan Locke]

yes.  

at the root, remember it's all just java so most patterns of composition are
applicable.  the trouble is finding the right one for your application.  you
can do some very fancy things with wicket components and design patterns.

also, see wicket:enclosure to reduce your webmarkupcontainers when hiding
things.


Eric Rotick wrote:
> 
> Good, this suggests that having a Panel as a boilerplate and then turning
> off the parts that are not required is a recognised pattern. Otherwise I
> could foresee the proliferation of home made components reaching a point
> where it became a burden to know which one to use.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:57 AM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>
>> You would also need to setVisible(false) on the WMC or wicket would throw
>> an
>> exception at the missing child components.  I use a simple class
>> InvisibleComponent for this.
>>
>>
>> Eric Rotick wrote:
>> >
>> > One more thing that was suggested in class.
>> >
>> > Is it possible to define a Panel which had all suitable and appropriate
>> > sub
>> > components and then to no-op the ones that were not needed?
>> >
>> > So in the earlier example there could be a panel
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > and if the image was not needed it could be no-op'ed out by defining a
>> > WebMarkupContainer but with no children.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Eric Rotick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Many thanks for the clarification.
>> >>
>> >> As I am about to start teaching the rudiments of Wicket to a project
>> team
>> >> I guess the teacher should know what they are talking about.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Igor Vaynberg
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > you dont need a panel for the repeater itself. as for variable
>> >> > component hierarchy inside the repeater itself, you are correct: you
>> >> > have to either use a panel or a fragment.
>> >> >
>> >> > -igor
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Eric Rotick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > > I thought I understood the component hierarchy but then I started
>> to
>> >> > tell
>> >> > >  the guys about it and now I'm not so sure.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  If the markup defines a hierarchy as A contains B contains C, in
>> >> > effect,
>> >> > >  this means that C is added to B which is added to A. If we expand
>> B
>> >> > to be
>> >> > >  more complex we can use maybe a Panel which we identify as B but
>> >> > inside it
>> >> > >  is BA , BB and so on. So, all the time there is a direct
>> >> relationship
>> >> > >  between the wicket identified tags in the markup and the
>> components
>> >> > in the
>> >> > >  code.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  Now we introduce a repeater of some kind and it appears that the
>> >> > component
>> >> > >  hierarchy is broken but it's not. So if C was a repeater and it
>> had
>> >> 4
>> >> > >  children then the hierarchy is still A to B to C but within C
>> there
>> >> > is C to
>> >> > >  C1, C to C2 and so on.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  Now, if we need to have a runtime variable amount of markup which
>> is
>> >> > >  variable, not in terms of the same markup repeated but completely
>> >> > different
>> >> > >  markup based on some logic then we might define a Panel which
>> >> handles
>> >> > the
>> >> > >  variation. This is fine but what if the contents of the Panel is
>> >> also
>> >> > >  variable. In this case further Panels are needed until the
>> variable
>> >> > >  requirements are covered.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  Now the rub; although there are components, such as
>> >> > WebMarkupContainer which
>> >> > >  can be used to group components, the use of any component which
>> is
>> >> > not
>> >> > >  'transparent' must have the related wicket:id in some markup
>> >> > somewhere.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  So, lets take an example where we have a list of items which can
>> be
>> >> > just
>> >> > >  text or a link which has an optional image. It seems that I have
>> to
>> >> > define
>> >> > >  panels for :-
>> >> > >
>> >> > >- wrapper panel for the list
>> >> > >- a link with it's text
>> >> > >- a link with it's text and image
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  So we have markup such as
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  
>> >> > >  
>> >> > >  
>> >> > >  
>> >> > >  
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  Have I got this correct or have I gone astray somewhere?
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> -
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-component-hierarchy-tp16567888p16580692.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> 

Re: Problems with cookie

[Fabien D.]

It's working, thank you for your help

igor.vaynberg wrote:
> 
> like i said change your code to
> ((WebResponse)RequestCycle.get().getResponse()).addCookie(...
> 
> -igor
> 
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Fabien D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>>  Thank you for your response...
>>
>>  But it's possible to explain me a little more???
>>  I have tried :
>>
>> >  ((WebResponse)getRequestCycle().getResponse()).addCookie(cookieUser);
>>  > 
>> ((WebResponse)getRequestCycle().getResponse()).addCookie(cookiePassword);
>>
>>  But i Think the problem comes from the method in my WebApplication
>> object
>>
>>  public Session newSession (Request request, Response response){
>>  return new GestionSession(request);
>>  }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>>  >
>>  > you really should use an IDE
>>  >
>>  > other then that you can do requestcycle.get() instead
>>  >
>>  > -igor
>>  >
>>  > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Fabien D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  > wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >>  Hi
>>  >>
>>  >>  I have a problem to set and use cookie !!
>>  >>
>>  >>  I have followed the example found in wickets example :
>>  >>
>>  >>  Cookie cookieUser = new Cookie("cookieUser", email);
>>  >>  Cookie cookiePassword = new Cookie("cookiePassword", mdp);
>>  >>  cookieUser.setMaxAge(3600);
>>  >>  cookiePassword.setMaxAge(3600);
>>  >> 
>> ((WebResponse)getRequestCycle().getResponse()).addCookie(cookieUser);
>>  >>
>>  >>
>> ((WebResponse)getRequestCycle().getResponse()).addCookie(cookiePassword);
>>  >>
>>  >>  There is a problem during compilation :
>>  >>   cannot find symbol method getRequestCycle()...
>>  >>
>>  >>  I have a WebSession objet where i stock the user for right acces
>>  >>
>>  >>  In my WebApplication objet I have declared this :
>>  >> public Session newSession (Request request, Response
>> response){
>>  >> return new GestionSession(request);
>>  >> }
>>  >>
>>  >>  Thank you in advance for your help
>>  >>  --
>>  >>  View this message in context:
>>  >> http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-cookie-tp16537484p16537484.html
>>  >>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> 
>> -
>>  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  > -
>>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>
>>  --
>>  View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-cookie-tp16537484p16548307.html
>>
>>
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>  -
>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-cookie-tp16537484p16585977.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is there a Wicket spinner component?

[Martijn Lindhout]

I guess you mean the cvs/svn repo, because there's nothing on the
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-stuff.html site?

wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/wicketstuff-minis doesn't seem
to work

2008/4/9, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> the spinner in wicketstuff-minis should do the trick.
>
>   Gerolf
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Martijn Lindhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> wrote:
>
>
> > Something like this:  http://www.eclipse.org/swt/R3_1/spinner.png
> >
> > --
> > Martijn Lindhout
> > JointEffort IT Services
> > http://www.jointeffort.nl
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > +31 (0)6 18 47 25 29
> >
>



-- 
Martijn Lindhout
JointEffort IT Services
http://www.jointeffort.nl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+31 (0)6 18 47 25 29

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Johan Compagner]

if there was an error before that
that should then be logged just before you log that there is a wrong state

The way you do it now is in reverse

the wrong state was already set in X number of request back
so when you log it, You can;'t really tie it to a a specific request that
did go wrong.

If you log it later after the service method. Then you know that it did
happen for that request
And most likely there should be some error before that.. Because i dont see
another way
how it would be possible when the normal flow without exceptions would
happen.

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Hi
> How can I check/log if there are "error for that thread"?
> Niels
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
> > and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example
> also
> > log the url call so that we can see
> > what kind of request did let one thread local be there?
> >
> > Which one is it by the way?
> > is it app, session or request cycle?
> >
> > i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every
> where
> > in WicketFilter.doGet
> > and in RequestCycle.steps
> >
> > And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.
> >
> > johan
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16585768.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Niels Bo]

Hi
How can I check/log if there are "error for that thread"?
Niels


Johan Compagner wrote:
> 
> could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
> and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example also
> log the url call so that we can see
> what kind of request did let one thread local be there?
> 
> Which one is it by the way?
> is it app, session or request cycle?
> 
> i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every where
> in WicketFilter.doGet
> and in RequestCycle.steps
> 
> And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.
> 
> johan
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16585768.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Johan Compagner]

where are the values stored?
do you really see the same page ?

For example place in a private field of the page the session.getId()
when you create the page
then when you do your test is the id in both sides the same??

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Wolfgang Gehner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I am sorry to report that we see the same problem. We run a page in IE,
> enter
> some values, ajax-submit, open the same page in Firefox, and the values
> are
> already there.
>
> Does the serialization ignore the user session? We store values in
> CompoundPropertyModel.
>
> As for the other posters, this is critical for us.
>
> We are using the april 6 snapshot from
>
> http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3-SNAPSHOT/
>
> We need that snapshot because it has the StreamCorrupted fix. We can't use
> 1.3.3 final because it doesn't have that fix.
>
> Please advise.
>
> Wolfgang Gehner
>
>
> Niels Bo wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I can do that.
> >
> > It is both Application and Session at the same time.
> > RequestCycle I have never seen it happen for.
> >
> > Niels
> >
> >
> > Johan Compagner wrote:
> >>
> >> could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
> >> and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example
> >> also
> >> log the url call so that we can see
> >> what kind of request did let one thread local be there?
> >>
> >> Which one is it by the way?
> >> is it app, session or request cycle?
> >>
> >> i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every
> >> where
> >> in WicketFilter.doGet
> >> and in RequestCycle.steps
> >>
> >> And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.
> >>
> >> johan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> We have kind of the same problem.
> >>> It looks like Application and Session are not always cleared from the
> >>> request thread, and to test this I have just deployed a subclassed
> >>> WicketServlet with these checks (and also as a workaround):
> >>>
> >>>protected void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
> >>> resp)
> >>> throws ServletException, IOException {
> >>>if(Application.exists()) {
> >>>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> >>> "Application on Thread");
> >>>Application.unset();
> >>>}
> >>>if(Session.exists()) {
> >>>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> >>> "Session on Thread");
> >>>Session.unset();
> >>>}
> >>>if(RequestCycle.get() != null) {
> >>>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> >>> "RequestCycle on Thread");
> >>>RequestCycle.get().detach();
> >>>}
> >>>
> >>>super.service(req, resp); // call WicketServlet
> >>>}
> >>>
> >>> Our logs show that it actually happens that both Application and
> Session
> >>> are
> >>> already attached to the thread before the request is processed.
> >>> I have only seen it once or twice in our development environment, but
> it
> >>> happens a few times every hour on the production server.
> >>>
> >>> Niels
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>>
> http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16583880.html
> >>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16585349.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[kman]

have you tried with a different servlet container for instance tomcat?
i've experienced the same session problems with a custom webapp deployed on
jetty some time ago.
the sessionid was used to track the session and we had the same problem as
you describe in a single instance of jetty.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16585502.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: I have an error when try to test submit using FormTester

[Tomasz Prus]

Thank You very many  :)

I overide method newRequestCycleProcessor in my MockApplication and submit
works now for me:



@Override
protected IRequestCycleProcessor newRequestCycleProcessor() {
IRequestCycleProcessor newRequestCycleProcessor =
super.newRequestCycleProcessor();

return new UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor() {

@Override
protected IRequestTarget resolveListenerInterfaceTarget(final
RequestCycle requestCycle,
final Page page, final String componentPath, String
interfaceName,
final RequestParameters requestParameters)
{
String pageRelativeComponentPath =
Strings.afterFirstPathComponent(componentPath,
Component.PATH_SEPARATOR);
Component component = null;
if (page instanceof WebPage &&
!"IResourceListener".equals(interfaceName))
{
//ComponentAndInterface cai =
((WebPage)page).getUrlCompressor().getComponentAndInterfaceForUID(pageRelativeComponentPath);
UrlCompressor.ComponentAndInterface cai = null;
if (cai != null)
{
interfaceName = cai.getInterfaceName();
component = cai.getComponent();
}
}

requestParameters.setInterfaceName(interfaceName);

if
(interfaceName.equals(IRedirectListener.INTERFACE.getName()))
{
return new RedirectPageRequestTarget(page);
}
else if
(interfaceName.equals(INewBrowserWindowListener.INTERFACE.getName()))
{
return
INewBrowserWindowListener.INTERFACE.newRequestTarget(page, page,
INewBrowserWindowListener.INTERFACE,
requestParameters);
}
else
{
// Get the listener interface we need to call
final RequestListenerInterface listener =
RequestListenerInterface
.forName(interfaceName);
if (listener == null)
{
throw new WicketRuntimeException(
"Attempt to access unknown request listener
interface " + interfaceName);
}

// Get component
if (component == null)
{
if (Strings.isEmpty(pageRelativeComponentPath))
{
component = page;
}
else
{
component = page.get(pageRelativeComponentPath);
}
}

if (component == null)
{
// still null? that's not right
throw new WicketRuntimeException("cannot resolve
component with path '" +
pageRelativeComponentPath + "', listener " +
listener + " on page " + page);
}

if (!component.isEnableAllowed())
{
throw new UnauthorizedActionException(component,
Component.ENABLE);
}

// Ask the request listener interface object to create a
request
// target
return listener.newRequestTarget(page, component,
listener, requestParameters);
}
}
};
}

Re: a transparent conversion of a CheckBoxMultipleChoice value

[John Krasnay]

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:03:52PM +0200, Vitaly Tsaplin wrote:
>Yep. It looks simple and efficient. But it's quite a repetitive
> task. As I already mentioned I am going to create a component. And a
> data conversion should be its direct responsibility. The model wrapper
> cannot be provided from outside. It would be conceptually wrong in
> this case. I think this question is a bit wider then just a particular
> case with choices to bits conversion. I am getting running into this
> problem again and again. Wicket was created with a component driven
> design in mind and for, wasn't it?
> 

That's fine too. Create a panel, or subclass CheckBoxMultipleChoice, and
have your panel|subclass apply the BitMapModel wrapper.

Converters are primarily for use with TextFields. They can only convert
to/from Strings.

jk

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Wolfgang Gehner]

I am sorry to report that we see the same problem. We run a page in IE, enter
some values, ajax-submit, open the same page in Firefox, and the values are
already there. 

Does the serialization ignore the user session? We store values in
CompoundPropertyModel.

As for the other posters, this is critical for us.

We are using the april 6 snapshot from
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3-SNAPSHOT/

We need that snapshot because it has the StreamCorrupted fix. We can't use
1.3.3 final because it doesn't have that fix.

Please advise.

Wolfgang Gehner


Niels Bo wrote:
> 
> Yes, I can do that.
> 
> It is both Application and Session at the same time.
> RequestCycle I have never seen it happen for.
> 
> Niels
> 
> 
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>> 
>> could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
>> and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example
>> also
>> log the url call so that we can see
>> what kind of request did let one thread local be there?
>> 
>> Which one is it by the way?
>> is it app, session or request cycle?
>> 
>> i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every
>> where
>> in WicketFilter.doGet
>> and in RequestCycle.steps
>> 
>> And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.
>> 
>> johan
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>> We have kind of the same problem.
>>> It looks like Application and Session are not always cleared from the
>>> request thread, and to test this I have just deployed a subclassed
>>> WicketServlet with these checks (and also as a workaround):
>>>
>>>protected void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
>>> resp)
>>> throws ServletException, IOException {
>>>if(Application.exists()) {
>>>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
>>> "Application on Thread");
>>>Application.unset();
>>>}
>>>if(Session.exists()) {
>>>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
>>> "Session on Thread");
>>>Session.unset();
>>>}
>>>if(RequestCycle.get() != null) {
>>>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
>>> "RequestCycle on Thread");
>>>RequestCycle.get().detach();
>>>}
>>>
>>>super.service(req, resp); // call WicketServlet
>>>}
>>>
>>> Our logs show that it actually happens that both Application and Session
>>> are
>>> already attached to the thread before the request is processed.
>>> I have only seen it once or twice in our development environment, but it
>>> happens a few times every hour on the production server.
>>>
>>> Niels
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16583880.html
>>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16585349.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Johan Compagner]

why would that help?

the first finally block is on the RequestCycle that only lives in 1 thread
and has all the state in one thread.

the second (in wicket filter) does only reset thread locals which are single
threaded by nature.

I did see one thing that could go wrong
we also call Response.close() and if that one some how fails, this could
happen i think in maybe certain situations
then the thread locals are not reset

I fixed that with an extra try catch block

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Do you synchronize those final blocks?
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> > could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
> > and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example
> > also
> > log the url call so that we can see
> > what kind of request did let one thread local be there?
> >
> > Which one is it by the way?
> > is it app, session or request cycle?
> >
> > i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every
> > where
> > in WicketFilter.doGet
> > and in RequestCycle.steps
> >
> > And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.
> >
> > johan
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > We have kind of the same problem.
> > > It looks like Application and Session are not always cleared from the
> > > request thread, and to test this I have just deployed a subclassed
> > > WicketServlet with these checks (and also as a workaround):
> > >
> > >   protected void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
> > > resp)
> > > throws ServletException, IOException {
> > >   if(Application.exists()) {
> > >   LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> > > "Application on Thread");
> > >   Application.unset();
> > >   }
> > >   if(Session.exists()) {
> > >   LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> > > "Session on Thread");
> > >   Session.unset();
> > >   }
> > >   if(RequestCycle.get() != null) {
> > >   LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> > > "RequestCycle on Thread");
> > >   RequestCycle.get().detach();
> > >   }
> > >
> > >   super.service(req, resp); // call WicketServlet
> > >   }
> > >
> > > Our logs show that it actually happens that both Application and
> > > Session
> > > are
> > > already attached to the thread before the request is processed.
> > > I have only seen it once or twice in our development environment, but
> > > it
> > > happens a few times every hour on the production server.
> > >
> > > Niels
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> > > http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16583880.html
> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> -Wicket for love
>
> Nino Martinez Wael
> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> http://www.jayway.dk
> +45 2936 7684
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: Bug in wicket-ajax.js introduced in Wicket 1.3.2?

[Thijs]

See

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1426



Meetesh Karia schreef:

Hi all,

We recently upgraded to Wicket 1.3.2 from Wicket 1.3.1 and we're 
seeing a bug with ajax behavior in Firefox (2.0.0.13 on Windows 
Vista).  Basically, the following header is returned from an ajax call:


encoding="UTF-8"?>encoding="wicket1" >

The page this is called from has a URL that looks like this 
http://host/2008/foo/bar


In Wicket 1.3.1, the script /templates/mediaplayer/swfobject.js gets 
correctly loaded from


http://host/templates/mediaplayer/swfobject.js

However, in Wicket 1.3.2, it is incorrectly loaded from

http://host/2008/foo//templates/mediaplayer/swfobject.js

This appears to be related to one of these two changes:

http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/wicket-ajax.js?r1=614229&r2=619539 

http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/wicket-ajax.js?r1=627225&r2=628015 



I haven't narrowed it down but replacing wicket-ajax.js with the 
version from 1.3.1 makes it work again.


Should I file a bug for this?  Or is this going to be the new behavior 
going forward for Firefox?  Also, I'm guessing that the safest way to 
work around this problem is to remove those two changes and 
temporarily use a local build of wicket, right?


Thanks,
Meetesh




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug in wicket-ajax.js introduced in Wicket 1.3.2?

[Meetesh Karia]

Hi all,

We recently upgraded to Wicket 1.3.2 from Wicket 1.3.1 and we're seeing 
a bug with ajax behavior in Firefox (2.0.0.13 on Windows Vista).  
Basically, the following header is returned from an ajax call:




The page this is called from has a URL that looks like this 
http://host/2008/foo/bar


In Wicket 1.3.1, the script /templates/mediaplayer/swfobject.js gets 
correctly loaded from


http://host/templates/mediaplayer/swfobject.js

However, in Wicket 1.3.2, it is incorrectly loaded from

http://host/2008/foo//templates/mediaplayer/swfobject.js

This appears to be related to one of these two changes:

http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/wicket-ajax.js?r1=614229&r2=619539
http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/wicket-ajax.js?r1=627225&r2=628015

I haven't narrowed it down but replacing wicket-ajax.js with the version 
from 1.3.1 makes it work again.


Should I file a bug for this?  Or is this going to be the new behavior 
going forward for Firefox?  Also, I'm guessing that the safest way to 
work around this problem is to remove those two changes and temporarily 
use a local build of wicket, right?


Thanks,
Meetesh

Re: warning with enclosure

[Eyal Golan]

strange,
was your other inner tag also a Wicket or a simple HTML ?
It keeps on going ...

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Michael Sparer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
> I tried, but I can't reproduce this warning using your code ...
>
>
>
> Eyal Golan wrote:
> >
> > anyone ??
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Eyal Golan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> hello all,
> >> I have an enclosure tag with two inner ones.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>
> >> Whenever I go to the page with the panel that has this enclosure, I get
> a
> >> warning message:
> >> 2008-04-06 18:35:49,670 WARN [org.apache.wicket.Page] - Component
> >> [Component id = allSelectedLabel, page =
> >> comweb.entitybrowserBrowserPage, path =
> >> 5:tabs:browserTabbedPanel:panel:allSelectedLabel.Label, isVisible =
> true,
> >> isVersioned = false] wasn't rendered but most likely it has a
> transparent
> >> parent: [MarkupContainer [Component id = enclosure-165, page =
> >> com..web.entitybrowserBrowserPage, path =
> >> 5:tabs:browserTabbedPanel:panel:enclosure-165.Enclosure, isVisible =
> >> false,
> >> isVersioned = false]]
> >>
> >> I know it's no problem, but it's a bit annoying.
> >> Is there a way removing this warning?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> --
> >> Eyal Golan
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Eyal Golan
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> Michael Sparer
> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/warning-with-enclosure-tp16534709p16557837.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Niels Bo]

Yes, I can do that.

It is both Application and Session at the same time.
RequestCycle I have never seen it happen for.

Niels


Johan Compagner wrote:
> 
> could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
> and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example also
> log the url call so that we can see
> what kind of request did let one thread local be there?
> 
> Which one is it by the way?
> is it app, session or request cycle?
> 
> i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every where
> in WicketFilter.doGet
> and in RequestCycle.steps
> 
> And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.
> 
> johan
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
>>
>> We have kind of the same problem.
>> It looks like Application and Session are not always cleared from the
>> request thread, and to test this I have just deployed a subclassed
>> WicketServlet with these checks (and also as a workaround):
>>
>>protected void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
>> resp)
>> throws ServletException, IOException {
>>if(Application.exists()) {
>>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
>> "Application on Thread");
>>Application.unset();
>>}
>>if(Session.exists()) {
>>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
>> "Session on Thread");
>>Session.unset();
>>}
>>if(RequestCycle.get() != null) {
>>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
>> "RequestCycle on Thread");
>>RequestCycle.get().detach();
>>}
>>
>>super.service(req, resp); // call WicketServlet
>>}
>>
>> Our logs show that it actually happens that both Application and Session
>> are
>> already attached to the thread before the request is processed.
>> I have only seen it once or twice in our development environment, but it
>> happens a few times every hour on the production server.
>>
>> Niels
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16583880.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16585336.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is there a Wicket spinner component?

[Gerolf Seitz]

the spinner in wicketstuff-minis should do the trick.

  Gerolf

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Martijn Lindhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Something like this:  http://www.eclipse.org/swt/R3_1/spinner.png
>
> --
> Martijn Lindhout
> JointEffort IT Services
> http://www.jointeffort.nl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +31 (0)6 18 47 25 29
>

Is there a Wicket spinner component?

[Martijn Lindhout]

Something like this:  http://www.eclipse.org/swt/R3_1/spinner.png

-- 
Martijn Lindhout
JointEffort IT Services
http://www.jointeffort.nl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+31 (0)6 18 47 25 29

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael]

Do you synchronize those final blocks?

Johan Compagner wrote:

could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example also
log the url call so that we can see
what kind of request did let one thread local be there?

Which one is it by the way?
is it app, session or request cycle?

i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every where
in WicketFilter.doGet
and in RequestCycle.steps

And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  

We have kind of the same problem.
It looks like Application and Session are not always cleared from the
request thread, and to test this I have just deployed a subclassed
WicketServlet with these checks (and also as a workaround):

   protected void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
resp)
throws ServletException, IOException {
   if(Application.exists()) {
   LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
"Application on Thread");
   Application.unset();
   }
   if(Session.exists()) {
   LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
"Session on Thread");
   Session.unset();
   }
   if(RequestCycle.get() != null) {
   LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
"RequestCycle on Thread");
   RequestCycle.get().detach();
   }

   super.service(req, resp); // call WicketServlet
   }

Our logs show that it actually happens that both Application and Session
are
already attached to the thread before the request is processed.
I have only seen it once or twice in our development environment, but it
happens a few times every hour on the production server.

Niels
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16583880.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





  


--
-Wicket for love

Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: I have an error when try to test submit using FormTester

[lars vonk]

According to that Thread I was referring it was probably caused by the fact
the newRequestCycleProcessor method in the WebApplication class was
overridden to return the UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor. Did you override
that method as well?


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Tomasz Prus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Can You give mi more details how remove the
> UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor because i don't have any idea?
>
> >
>

Re: I have an error when try to test submit using FormTester

[Tomasz Prus]

Can You give mi more details how remove the
UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor because i don't have any idea?

>

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Johan Compagner]

could you change that method that it checks this after the fact?
and then see if there is an error for that thread before? for example also
log the url call so that we can see
what kind of request did let one thread local be there?

Which one is it by the way?
is it app, session or request cycle?

i just checked our code and we have finally blocks pretty much every where
in WicketFilter.doGet
and in RequestCycle.steps

And i have no idea how those can be jumped over.

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> We have kind of the same problem.
> It looks like Application and Session are not always cleared from the
> request thread, and to test this I have just deployed a subclassed
> WicketServlet with these checks (and also as a workaround):
>
>protected void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
> resp)
> throws ServletException, IOException {
>if(Application.exists()) {
>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> "Application on Thread");
>Application.unset();
>}
>if(Session.exists()) {
>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> "Session on Thread");
>Session.unset();
>}
>if(RequestCycle.get() != null) {
>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> "RequestCycle on Thread");
>RequestCycle.get().detach();
>}
>
>super.service(req, resp); // call WicketServlet
>}
>
> Our logs show that it actually happens that both Application and Session
> are
> already attached to the thread before the request is processed.
> I have only seen it once or twice in our development environment, but it
> happens a few times every hour on the production server.
>
> Niels
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16583880.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Johan Compagner]

this can happen at some level..

for example if you have somewhere in the code that an error code is set as a
response
and that error code is mounted to a error page in the app server
then there are 2 request at the same time for the same thread to wicket..

I worked around that last weekend. But in this case the request
cycle/session can still be there or must be there.

johan


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> We have kind of the same problem.
> It looks like Application and Session are not always cleared from the
> request thread, and to test this I have just deployed a subclassed
> WicketServlet with these checks (and also as a workaround):
>
>protected void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
> resp)
> throws ServletException, IOException {
>if(Application.exists()) {
>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> "Application on Thread");
>Application.unset();
>}
>if(Session.exists()) {
>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> "Session on Thread");
>Session.unset();
>}
>if(RequestCycle.get() != null) {
>LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
> "RequestCycle on Thread");
>RequestCycle.get().detach();
>}
>
>super.service(req, resp); // call WicketServlet
>}
>
> Our logs show that it actually happens that both Application and Session
> are
> already attached to the thread before the request is processed.
> I have only seen it once or twice in our development environment, but it
> happens a few times every hour on the production server.
>
> Niels
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16583880.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: I have an error when try to test submit using FormTester

[lars vonk]

Hi,

This is a bug in WicketTester. See
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-861.

There was a similar thread on the user-group recently:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Best-method-of-testing-behaviors.-p1639.html

As I understand it the workaround is to remove the
UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor from your WebApplication, but maybe there
is a better solution.

Hopes this helps,

Lars

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Tomasz Prus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I have test and formTester.submit(); throws an error:
>
> java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "p:form"
>at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(Unknown Source)
>at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Unknown Source)
>at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Unknown Source)
>at
>
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.urlcompressing.UrlCompressor.getComponentAndInterfaceForUID(UrlCompressor.java:122)
>at
>
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.urlcompressing.UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor.resolveListenerInterfaceTarget(UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor.java:79)
>at
>
> org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveRenderedPage(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:461)
>at
>
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:139)
>at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1224)
>at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1331)
>at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493)
>at
>
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(MockWebApplication.java:401)
>at org.apache.wicket.util.tester.FormTester.submit(FormTester.java:617)
>at
>
> pl.mainseek.forum.wicket.components.AddQuestionPanelTest.testSubmit(AddQuestionPanelTest.java:48)
>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
>at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
>at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
>at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:59)
>at
>
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTestMethod(MethodRoadie.java:98)
>at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:79)
>at
>
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:87)
>at
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:77)
>at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:42)
>at
>
> org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.invokeTestMethod(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:88)
>at
>
> org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.runMethods(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:51)
>at
>
> org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner$1.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:44)
>at
> org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:27)
>at
> org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:37)
>at
>
> org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:42)
>at
>
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:38)
>at
>
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
>at
>
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
>at
>
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
>at
>
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
>at
>
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
>
> Sources:
>
> public class AddQuestionPanelTest extends AbstractWebPageContext {
>
>private static final String FORM_PATH =
> DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.PANEL_NAME + ":" +
> AddQuestionPanel.FORM_NAME;
>private FakeForumService forumService;
>
>@Before public void setUp() throws Exception {
>super.setUp();
>forumService = MockFactory.makeMock(FakeForumService.class);
>getMockContext().putBean("forumService", forumService);
>}
>
>@Test public void testCreate() {
>getTester().startPage(DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.class);
>
>  getTester().assertRenderedPage(DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.class);
>getTester().assertNoErrorMessage();
>
>
> getTester().assertComponent(DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.PANEL_NAME,
> Panel.class);
>getTester().assertComponent(FORM_PATH, Form.class);
>getTester().assertComponent(FORM_PATH + ":" +
> AddQuestionPanel.SUBJECT, RequiredTextField.class);
>getTester().assertComponent(FORM_PATH + ":" +
> AddQuestionPanel.BODY,
> TextArea.class);
>}
>
>@Test public void testSubmit() {
>getTester().startPage(DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.class);
>
>FormTester formTester = getTester().newFormTester(FORM_PATH);
>formTester.setVal

I have an error when try to test submit using FormTester

[Tomasz Prus]

I have test and formTester.submit(); throws an error:

java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "p:form"
at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Unknown Source)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.urlcompressing.UrlCompressor.getComponentAndInterfaceForUID(UrlCompressor.java:122)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.urlcompressing.UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor.resolveListenerInterfaceTarget(UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor.java:79)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveRenderedPage(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:461)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:139)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1224)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1331)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(MockWebApplication.java:401)
at org.apache.wicket.util.tester.FormTester.submit(FormTester.java:617)
at
pl.mainseek.forum.wicket.components.AddQuestionPanelTest.testSubmit(AddQuestionPanelTest.java:48)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:59)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTestMethod(MethodRoadie.java:98)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:79)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:87)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:77)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:42)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.invokeTestMethod(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:88)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.runMethods(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:51)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner$1.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:44)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:27)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:37)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:42)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:38)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)

Sources:

public class AddQuestionPanelTest extends AbstractWebPageContext {

private static final String FORM_PATH =
DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.PANEL_NAME + ":" + AddQuestionPanel.FORM_NAME;
private FakeForumService forumService;

@Before public void setUp() throws Exception {
super.setUp();
forumService = MockFactory.makeMock(FakeForumService.class);
getMockContext().putBean("forumService", forumService);
}

@Test public void testCreate() {
getTester().startPage(DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.class);
getTester().assertRenderedPage(DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.class);
getTester().assertNoErrorMessage();


getTester().assertComponent(DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.PANEL_NAME,
Panel.class);
getTester().assertComponent(FORM_PATH, Form.class);
getTester().assertComponent(FORM_PATH + ":" +
AddQuestionPanel.SUBJECT, RequiredTextField.class);
getTester().assertComponent(FORM_PATH + ":" + AddQuestionPanel.BODY,
TextArea.class);
}

@Test public void testSubmit() {
getTester().startPage(DummyPageWithAddQuestionPanel.class);

FormTester formTester = getTester().newFormTester(FORM_PATH);
formTester.setValue(AddQuestionPanel.SUBJECT, "s");
formTester.setValue(AddQuestionPanel.BODY, "b");
getTester().debugComponentTrees();
formTester.submit();
}

}

public class AddQuestionPanel extends Panel {

public static final String ADD_QUESTION_BUTTON = "addQuestionButton";
public static final String SUBJECT = "subject";
public static final String BODY = "body";
public static final String FORM_NAME = "form";

private Message message;

public AddQuestionPanel(String id, final User user, final MessageService
forumService) {
super(id);
message = new Message("", "", user);

Re: Invoulentary session sharing/leakage in Wicket 1.3.x

[Niels Bo]

We have kind of the same problem.
It looks like Application and Session are not always cleared from the
request thread, and to test this I have just deployed a subclassed
WicketServlet with these checks (and also as a workaround):

protected void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp)
throws ServletException, IOException {
if(Application.exists()) {
LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
"Application on Thread");
Application.unset();
}
if(Session.exists()) {
LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
"Session on Thread");
Session.unset();
}
if(RequestCycle.get() != null) {
LogHelper.applicationLog(ILogEvents.LOGEVENT_UNEXPECTED,
"RequestCycle on Thread");
RequestCycle.get().detach();
}

super.service(req, resp); // call WicketServlet
}

Our logs show that it actually happens that both Application and Session are
already attached to the thread before the request is processed.
I have only seen it once or twice in our development environment, but it
happens a few times every hour on the production server.

Niels
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16583880.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

StringResourceModel parameter substitutions question

[TonyVegas]

Hi!

When setting a string via StringResourceModel and using parameters, the
default operation in Wicket for retreiving the parameters' strings is to
call PropertyVariableInterpolator.getValue(final String variableName) within
the localizer.
This operation retreives the string by simply calling the toString-method of
the parameter.

Our object's string representation is retreived by another operation though.
So we need to call this operation rather than the toString.
Is there any method to achieve this other than overwriting the localizer?

Greetings,
Tony
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/StringResourceModel-parameter-substitutions-question-tp16582995p16582995.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Question on component hierarchy

[Eric Rotick]

Good, this suggests that having a Panel as a boilerplate and then turning
off the parts that are not required is a recognised pattern. Otherwise I
could foresee the proliferation of home made components reaching a point
where it became a burden to know which one to use.

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:57 AM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> You would also need to setVisible(false) on the WMC or wicket would throw
> an
> exception at the missing child components.  I use a simple class
> InvisibleComponent for this.
>
>
> Eric Rotick wrote:
> >
> > One more thing that was suggested in class.
> >
> > Is it possible to define a Panel which had all suitable and appropriate
> > sub
> > components and then to no-op the ones that were not needed?
> >
> > So in the earlier example there could be a panel
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > and if the image was not needed it could be no-op'ed out by defining a
> > WebMarkupContainer but with no children.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Eric Rotick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Many thanks for the clarification.
> >>
> >> As I am about to start teaching the rudiments of Wicket to a project
> team
> >> I guess the teacher should know what they are talking about.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > you dont need a panel for the repeater itself. as for variable
> >> > component hierarchy inside the repeater itself, you are correct: you
> >> > have to either use a panel or a fragment.
> >> >
> >> > -igor
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Eric Rotick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > I thought I understood the component hierarchy but then I started
> to
> >> > tell
> >> > >  the guys about it and now I'm not so sure.
> >> > >
> >> > >  If the markup defines a hierarchy as A contains B contains C, in
> >> > effect,
> >> > >  this means that C is added to B which is added to A. If we expand
> B
> >> > to be
> >> > >  more complex we can use maybe a Panel which we identify as B but
> >> > inside it
> >> > >  is BA , BB and so on. So, all the time there is a direct
> >> relationship
> >> > >  between the wicket identified tags in the markup and the
> components
> >> > in the
> >> > >  code.
> >> > >
> >> > >  Now we introduce a repeater of some kind and it appears that the
> >> > component
> >> > >  hierarchy is broken but it's not. So if C was a repeater and it
> had
> >> 4
> >> > >  children then the hierarchy is still A to B to C but within C
> there
> >> > is C to
> >> > >  C1, C to C2 and so on.
> >> > >
> >> > >  Now, if we need to have a runtime variable amount of markup which
> is
> >> > >  variable, not in terms of the same markup repeated but completely
> >> > different
> >> > >  markup based on some logic then we might define a Panel which
> >> handles
> >> > the
> >> > >  variation. This is fine but what if the contents of the Panel is
> >> also
> >> > >  variable. In this case further Panels are needed until the
> variable
> >> > >  requirements are covered.
> >> > >
> >> > >  Now the rub; although there are components, such as
> >> > WebMarkupContainer which
> >> > >  can be used to group components, the use of any component which is
> >> > not
> >> > >  'transparent' must have the related wicket:id in some markup
> >> > somewhere.
> >> > >
> >> > >  So, lets take an example where we have a list of items which can
> be
> >> > just
> >> > >  text or a link which has an optional image. It seems that I have
> to
> >> > define
> >> > >  panels for :-
> >> > >
> >> > >- wrapper panel for the list
> >> > >- a link with it's text
> >> > >- a link with it's text and image
> >> > >
> >> > >  So we have markup such as
> >> > >
> >> > >  
> >> > >  
> >> > >  
> >> > >  
> >> > >  
> >> > >
> >> > >  
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >  
> >> > >
> >> > >  
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >  
> >> > >
> >> > >  Have I got this correct or have I gone astray somewhere?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > -
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-component-hierarchy-tp16567888p16580692.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: How to Create a link in a treeview

[Thomas Kappler]

Hi,

you should base your tree on BaseTree, as it implements a lot of
things for you.  Then, you implement newNodeComponent(), where you can
create any component (e.g. a link) to represent a tree node.  The
component you create there is not tree-specific.

Cheers,
Thomas


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:59 AM, ouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>  No one can help me ?
>  --
>  View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-Create-a-link-in-a-treeview-tp16557773p16580102.html
>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Feature request: using @SpringBean outside Wicket request

[Erik van Oosten]

Igor Vaynberg wrote:

can you not roll your own simple filter? you can pull the webapp from
the servletcontext

-igor
  


Thanks for the suggestion. It works perfectly.

Here is the code for those that are interested.

import org.apache.wicket.Application;
import org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication;

import javax.servlet.*;
import java.io.IOException;

/**
* Filter that sets the wicket application, just like [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter}

* would do.
*
* This implementation assumes that it is placed in a filter chain, 
after WicketFilter,

* for URLs that are not handled by the WicketFilter.
*
* The filter name of the wicket filter is retrieved from the init 
parameter wicketFilterName.

*
* @author Erik van Oosten
*/
public class WicketApplicationFilter implements Filter {

   private WebApplication webApplication;

   public void init(FilterConfig filterConfig) throws ServletException {
   // Get instance of the Wicket application, it is set by the 
Wicket filter.
   String contextKey = "wicket:" + 
filterConfig.getInitParameter("wicketFilterName");
   webApplication = (WebApplication) 
filterConfig.getServletContext().getAttribute(contextKey);


   if (webApplication == null) {
   throw new ServletException("Could not find the Wicket 
application, please make " +
   "sure filter WicketApplicationFilter is embedded in 
Wicket's filter");

   }
   }

   public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse 
response, FilterChain chain) throws IOException, ServletException {

   try {
   // Set the webapplication for this thread
   Application.set(webApplication);

   chain.doFilter(request, response);

   } finally {
   // always unset the application thread local
   Application.unset();
   }
   }

   public void destroy() {
   webApplication = null;
   }
}


Regards,
   Erik.


--
Erik van Oosten
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AjaxSubmitLink accessing model object non-existent property

[Tim Squires]

OK.  It's clicked.  I was hoping to have a simple ajaxed submit link
without having to create a fake property on the model object.  No problem,
I can see what I missed.

Thanks for your help Igor.

Tim

> you said it yourself:
>
> "Insure that the component identifier names match
> the appropriate property names."
>
> what that says is that the model you get is the property of the model
> object that is in the cpm with the name of component id.
>
> so since your links id is "foo" it will try to pull out the model
> object from the cpm and call getfoo() on it, the result of which is
> the model object of the link
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Tim Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have read it - a few times over the last 3 years of using Wicket and
>>  even bought the book ;)
>>
>>  It says
>>
>>  "To use a CompoundPropertyModel, simply set one as the model for a
>>  container, such as a Form or a Page. Create the contained components
>> with
>>  no model of their own. Insure that the component identifier names match
>>  the appropriate property names."
>>
>>  The AjaxSubmitLink is picking-up the parent forms compound property
>> model
>>  but only checking to see if the "mylink" property exists when onSubmit
>>  calls getModelObject().
>>
>>  I would like to get the Forms model via getModelObject but because it
>>  errors when called, I have to either set a false model on the
>>  AjaxSubmitLink or get the model object outside of the onSubmit, assign
>> it
>>  to a final property and then use it in the onSubmit.
>>
>>  I'm happy to admit that I'm doing something wrong but I cannot see what
>> it
>>  is???
>>
>>  Thanks again,
>>  Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>  > no, components do not randomly pick up models from their parents. i
>>  > would suggest reading the models wiki page.
>>  >
>>  > -igor
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  >> Thanks Igor but should it not pick-up the model from the Form?
>> There's
>>  >> no
>>  >>  constructor that takes a model.  Should the AjaxSubmitLink(id,
>> form)
>>  >>  constructor be used with the Form that it's being added to?  e..g
>>  >>
>>  >>  MyForm extends Form {
>>  >>  public MyForm(){
>>  >>  
>>  >>  add( new AjaxSubmitLink("mylink",this){
>>  >>  
>>  >>  });
>>  >>  }}
>>  >>
>>  >>  If it's already bound to a Form, should it not pick-up the model
>> used
>>  >> by
>>  >>  the form?
>>  >>
>>  >>  Am I looking at the problem/solution the wrong way???
>>  >>
>>  >>  Thanks again,
>>  >>  Tim
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>  > you forgot to give ajaxsubmitlink a model, so getmodelobject()
>> will
>>  >>  > either return null or a compound model.confirm - neither of which
>> i
>>  >>  > think you want.
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > -igor
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Tim Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>  >>  >> Hi,
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  When adding an AjaxSubmitLink, the onSubmit method tries to
>> access
>>  >> a
>>  >>  >>  property of the model object that does not exists:
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  ---
>>  >>  >> final AjaxSubmitLink confirmLink = new
>>  >>  >>  AjaxSubmitLink("confirm") {
>>  >>  >> @Override
>>  >>  >> public void onSubmit(final AjaxRequestTarget
>> target,
>>  >>  >> final Form form) {
>>  >>  >> if (((Will) getModelObject()).getExecutor()
>> !=
>>  >> null)
>>  >>  >> {
>>  >>  >> willModalWindow.show(target);
>>  >>  >> } else {
>>  >>  >> warn("Please choose an executor.");
>>  >>  >> target.addComponent(feedback);
>>  >>  >> }
>>  >>  >> }
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >> @Override
>>  >>  >> public void onError(final AjaxRequestTarget
>> target,
>>  >>  >> final Form form) {
>>  >>  >> target.addComponent(feedback);
>>  >>  >> }
>>  >>  >> };
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >> add(confirmLink);
>>  >>  >>  ---
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  It tries to access the "confirm" property of the Model, in this
>>  >> case a
>>  >>  >>  Will object.
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  ---
>>  >>  >>  org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: No get method defined
>> for
>>  >>  >> class:
>>  >>  >>  class crystalmark.willfinder.model.Will expression: confirm
>>  >>  >>  at
>>  >>  >>  
>> org.apache.wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolver.getGetAndSetter(PropertyResolver.java:433)
>>  >>  >>  at
>>  >>  >>  
>> org.apache.wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolver.getObjectAndGetSetter(PropertyResolver.java:275)
>>  >>  >>  at
>>  >>  >>  
>> org.apache.wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolver.getValue(PropertyResolver.java:84)
>>  >>  >>  at
>>  >>  >>  
>> org.apache.wicket.model.AbstractPropertyModel.getObject(AbstractProper

Fail to close ModalWindow on top of ModalWindow

[Nili Adoram]

Hi all,
I have a ModalWindow "A" containing a page  i.e. opened as an iframe.
This modal opens another ModalWindow "B" containing a panel.
Window "B" contains a simple AjaxLink that should close "B".

add(new AjaxLink("cancel") {

   @Override
   public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {

   ModalWindow.closeCurrent(target);
   }

   });

However, when I click this AjaxLink in order to close "B" the following 
message is displayed:
'You can\'t close this modal window. Close the top-level modal window 
first.'


This message is displayed since isIframe() returns true, which is 
problematic since "B" is not an iframe but a div.


Is there a workaround for this issue ?

--
Best,
Nili 


===
Nili Adoram
GRM Team, R&D, Qlusters Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-3-6236636




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New wicketstuff progress bar component / project

[Christopher Hlubek]

Hi Lucio,

I looked at the pom.xml and fixed a wrong dependency. Currently I
cannot commit to the SVN, but I think it will be fixed soon.

2008/3/27, luciolrv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  I downloaded svn from the link below,
>  but running maven2 on any of the 3 project gives the error:
>  Missing
>  com.resoap.wicket:wicket-progressbar:jar:0.1-SNAPSHOT
>
>  Is this a repository problem?
>
>  Lucio Rodriguez
>
>
>
>  Christopher Hlubek wrote:
>  >
>  > I always wondered why there was no progress bar component for wicket.
>  > The UploadProgressBar is cool but only for file uploads and not
>  > designed for background tasks or long taking actions.
>  >
>  > So some time ago I wrote a progress bar component to have an easy to
>  > use a component for progress display of some task with AJAX updates. I
>  > recently published this as the "wicketstuff-progressbar" project.
>  >
>
> > Just see the wiki
>  > 
> (http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/wicketstuff-progressbar)
>  > for a short description and the examples module for some example code.
>  >
>  > Since this is still work in progress I appreciate your comments or
>  > contribution!
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  >
>  > Christopher Hlubek
>  >
>
> > -
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  --
>  View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/New-wicketstuff-progress-bar-component---project-tp15392340p16321414.html
>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]