Ok. So I finally figured out my javascript syntax mistake. Do not use
Wicket.Ajax.registerPreCallHandler(showBusysign()) but instead without
the brackets with the function:
Wicket.Ajax.registerPreCallHandler(showBusysign);
This snipplet is now complete and can be used with any application:
/*
On Monday 09 June 2008 10:47:45 Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > IMHO they cannot be easily used together at the moment.
>
> Hmmm, interesting. My only experience with Groovy is years ago, and
> back then we abandoned and switched to PNuts (which I guess should
> work with Wicket as well) due to Groovy's
> I have got a question on bookmarkable page and if wicket session's
> life-cycle has any relation with it.
>
> Actually i have a couple of bookmarkable pages in my application (mounted
> through queryurlcodingstrategy).
>
> For scenarios where the session-expiry has reached, invoking any action on
> IMHO they cannot be easily used together at the moment.
Hmmm, interesting. My only experience with Groovy is years ago, and
back then we abandoned and switched to PNuts (which I guess should
work with Wicket as well) due to Groovy's immaturity back then.
Dima, are these problems hard to overcom
Guys,
I have got a question on bookmarkable page and if wicket session's
life-cycle has any relation with it.
Actually i have a couple of bookmarkable pages in my application (mounted
through queryurlcodingstrategy).
For scenarios where the session-expiry has reached, invoking any action on
any
On Saturday 07 June 2008 22:09:02 Ashley Aitken wrote:
> So my question is: what is the status (now and going forward) with
> regards to using Groovy to develop with Wicket? I know there has been
> much discussion of generifying Wicket but perhaps moving to a dynamic
> language could be an a
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:53 PM, nate roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using Wicket 1.2, and it appears that when a user's session times out,
> my implementation of AbstractAutoCompleteTextRenderer stops working. I
> assume that when the session times out, the server returns errors and the
> pa
> I am bumping this because this is an issue I know people are interested in. I
> am not the only one wanting the choices for autocomplete to be shown on a
> null value. I know technically you have this fixed in 1.4-m2 but you still
> have to press the down arrow. I would like the choices to show u
No idea. Check if the source looks good and what the proxy does. It
sounds like the problem is with the proxy somehow.
Eelco
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Martijn Lindhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone ever deployed a Wicket app at EATJ (www.eatj.com)? I did
> last week an
No ideas, sorry. Wizard seems to be working fine for us. I'm afraid
you'll have to dig deeper.
Eelco
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Michael Laccetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've implemented a Wizard that uses dynamic steps to process things based on
> user input. Everything works under
You'll need to set the whole thread up like you would regularly do
when you want to construct and render a Wicket page in a separate
thread. After that, it should just work. If it doesn't even execute
your log statement, I suspect something else is wrong. Do you have a
stack trace to share?
Eelco
That's just by design to not make the assumption where the locale
comes from. But you can override the class and pass
Session.get().getLocale() and you're done :-)
Eelco
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Stefan Simik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi boys,
>
> I would like to ask, why PackageResour
> I know Wicket makes it very easy to develop components and there are some
> component libraries (e.g. Wicket Stuff) but it doesn't seem like there are
> as many (high level components) as Django or that they are as easy to
> integrate (that's just my perception).
I don't know about Django, but I
I imagine it can be done, but I don't know how. You might want to explain more
about what you're trying to do.
-Original Message-
From: Mathias P.W Nilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 6/8/2008 6:08 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Can't get round this problem
The hi
The hidden fields are set after ajax submit and then I set the action on the
form. I must MD5 some fields before submitting. Why can't this be done in
wicket?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can%27t-get-round-this-problem-tp17723379p17723787.html
Sent from the Wicket - Us
Sounds like you're submitting the info to another website (not back to your
wicket app), in which case you should just use a plain HTML form (without
associated wicket form components): wicket won't change the input field names
then.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Mathias P.W Nilsson [m
I have a page that has 2 fragment. One for normal ordering and one for credit
card ordering.
When sending the input type hidden names they must have the exact name but
wicket changes it
orderPanel:Merchant_id
must be Merchant_id. How can I remove the orderPanel that adds to the
markup.
I have t
Thank you for your solution!
My workaround was just to check it on the loginpage before I create the
session.
So if the user is in the wrong group he will get the message "account not
activated"...
but I will try your sollution.
greets
-hannes
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabb
Hi!
In my understanding it should (IMHO) be possible to hook all ajax
calls without doing anything on the server side. I think your "add
onClick to an AjaxButton" issue involves attaching specific javascript
(from the server side) to a specific button. That's not what I need,
is it? I would have t
Hi, we have reproduced the same problem with AutocompleteTextfield. We
use 1.3-SNAPSHOT. Did you get it solved?
Code and css we use is same as in Wicket Examples:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/?wicket:interface=sources:0:filespanel:file:2:link::ILinkListener::
br,
Marcus
O
Hi Emacs:
Can you handle this by raising an exception in your "check" method?
In the web-session
public boolean isActivated(String userId) throws
UserAccountNotActivatedExcepeption {
...
}
So you could catch the Exception in your component (where the auth call was
made) and you have all access
check my posts on "add onClick to an AjaxButton" in the users list (I
couldn't get the URL for it ...)
It seems that you have a similar problem.
Eyal
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Martin Makundi <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Did I misunderstand something? I am not a javascript-wizar
No,
We're on 1.3.3
Nice though :) when we move to 1.4, I'll try to remember using it as well.
Thanks
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> are you on 1.4, i checked in a change that will allow ajaxbutton to
> utilize getonclickscript() within the ajax handler
23 matches
Mail list logo
