Ahh, I misunderstood then, I though that every thing that were not in
compliance was commented out.
Looks really nice with the new simplified names.
2009/9/15 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
Nino,
Thanks for taking a look at this. This is only half the battle, though.
Looking
Hi,
I read this post
http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/perfbench-update-tapestry-5-and-grails/
and he suggested to use HttpSessionStore instead of the second cache...
I looked into the javadoc and the code itself and understood the
differences.
However, can anyone explain in a bit more
There really is no good reason to use http session store instead of
secondlevelcachesessionstore unless you are experiencing performance
problems. HttpSessionStore uses more memory and keeps much shorter
history so your users will be experiencing page expiration much more
often.
-Matej
On Tue,
And that back and forward buttons in the browser dont really work well in
the HttpSessionStore
But i cant believe that the overhead he is reporting is really the
overhead..
It could be an Antivirus checker or other stuff like that.
Besides that if that would be a problem just get an SSD and
Well,
there are two kinds of overhead with SecondLevelCacheSessionStore.
Object serialization and writing to disk. I can imagine antivirus
interfering with the writing.
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
And that back and forward buttons in the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well,
there are two kinds of overhead with SecondLevelCacheSessionStore.
Object serialization and writing to disk. I can imagine antivirus
interfering with the writing.
I did mention in comment #2 under the blog post
I'm looking to make an improvement to the generic busy indicator. I believe
the showBusysign() script should also be triggered by the onchange method of
choice components (non ajax) with wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications set to
true. Any idea's how to tackle this?
You're still missing the point. Look at the following URL. See where it
says wicketstuff-jquery. This should be jquery. That's what caused the
confusion that started this thread. That's what should be fixed. I'm not
sure how many other projects do the same. Haven't had time to test.
Hello,
I'm currently working on a search interface, where the required-ness
of some fields depends on the value of some other. In particular, the
form looks something like
(+) search by X
a: [_]
b: [_]
() search by Y
...
() search by Z
...
So the radio button selects a group of
You can override isRequired for any component.
**
Martin
2009/9/15 Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I'm currently working on a search interface, where the required-ness
of some fields depends on the value of some other. In particular, the
form looks something like
(+)
Hi!
If someone is looking for a quick way to handle multipart posts using
pageparameters, the following is sufficient:
...
public PostOrGetPage(PageParameters pageParameters) {
if (pageParameters.size() = 0) {
final WebRequest multipartWebRequest =
2009/9/15 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
You can override isRequired for any component.
**
Martin
Thanks, but I really don't want to have to make the individual fields
context aware unless I have to. We have quite a few custom form
controls, which are used both in
Hi
You could also write your own FormValidator which does the 'required'
validation on its own by checking whether the field's input string is
empty/null.
Matt
Phil Housley wrote:
2009/9/15 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
You can override isRequired for any
Phil,
The way we deal with this is by using an ajax behavior on radiobuttons, and
update the required flag on dependant fields from there.
Another way (without ajax) could be to update the required flag on the form
components on submit, prior to validation.
E.g. by overriding Form.process()
It is easier just to make your own components, say
CentrallyControlledRequiredCheckBox extends CheckBox etc.
In this way you can put your central code into
CentrallyControlledRequiredCheckBox and reuse that component.
There cannot be an easier way... how difficult is that anyways?
**
Martin
Come on guys. Please help me. Since there is an invalid repository
definition no one out there will be able to use a project using
input-events...
I have the necessary patches sitting right here. I have created a Jira
entry and I am willing to commit them if anybody gives me commit access.
Please
Several interesting ideas, but they all seem to involve more invasive
changes than I really want to make - either changing component classes
or changing values of components at process time, which would be hard
to undo (and maybe not possible, as some components already have logic
to say if they
The fact of the matter is that you will need extra logic _somewhere_. It's a
matter of personal preference where you put it (overriden components, ajax,
override form methods, ...).
If what you're trying to accomplish is difficult given a certain set of
tools, my experience is that it's good
Well.. all IFormSubmittingComponents have this method called
getDefaultFormProcessing. To me it sounds like that would at least do
what you need.
**
Martin
2009/9/15 Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com:
Several interesting ideas, but they all seem to involve more invasive
changes than I
Thank you all.
This thread was very informative and educated.
Peter, I will try the two suggestions you've mentioned.
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's
2009/9/15 Bas Gooren b...@iswd.nl:
The fact of the matter is that you will need extra logic _somewhere_. It's a
matter of personal preference where you put it (overriden components, ajax,
override form methods, ...).
If what you're trying to accomplish is difficult given a certain set of
Maybe you should turn your enforcements to the framework hot spots.
(+) search by X
a: [_]
b: [_]
() search by Y
...
() search by Z
Each group of options is its own panel
You can create an validation with those conditions, and add only on
necessary fiels.
Ex:
private class
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:10:51PM +0100, Phil Housley wrote:
A good point, but I don't think it exactly applies in this case. What
I really want is for each component to know whether it is required
within a very small context. For example, a might have a criteria
panel (one of the
I am using GAE + Wicket too, and I also had to copy/paste that class.
Any chances of making a refactor in a future release?
Thanks a lot! :)
Nico
Esteban Masoero-2 wrote:
Hi there:
In MultipartServletWebRequest constructor we have:
...
(line 93) DiskFileItemFactory factory = new
Have you asked for commit access? I don't see your sf.net username on the
thread. Nobody is stingy with wicketstuff commit access. Just send your
username.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Johannes Schneider
maili...@cedarsoft.comwrote:
No chance without a Jira issue.
-igor
On 9/15/09, nico2884 fernandonicolasmelen...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using GAE + Wicket too, and I also had to copy/paste that class.
Any chances of making a refactor in a future release?
Thanks a lot! :)
Nico
Esteban Masoero-2 wrote:
Hi there:
Great Jeremy, I were about to ask the same, so Johannes please give
us the sf account and we will add you to the project. And thanks for
these updates.. :)
regards Nino
2009/9/15 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
Have you asked for commit access? I don't see your sf.net username on
No I understood what you said.. I'll fix them..
2009/9/15 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
You're still missing the point. Look at the following URL. See where it
says wicketstuff-jquery. This should be jquery. That's what caused the
confusion that started this thread. That's
Ok fixed the jquery one.. Everybody else seems to comply (not having
contrib or stuff in their name), although alot of projects has a
naming like this : wicket-projectname
Im not sure if that fits the standard?
2009/9/15 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
No I understood what you
Btw went trough all the project.. There a lot of them these days.. I
should try some of them out :)
Although almost every of them are not described on the wicketstuff
wiki, that is sad (I know im one of the sinners aswell)..
This could be used as template page (although the part about maven are
On the other hand, maybe that whole criteria panel is deselected, in
which case I want to be able to stop the whole thing from doing any
validation at all, so it won't even look at whether the check box is
checked.
disable panel don't work on that case?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Phil
Looking for hints to debug the situation I am in. Thanks.
Using wickets 1.4.1
I have tried a simple scenario - opening a page in a modal window and then
using a link in the page to close the window. Works fine.
Now I am opening a more complicated page with its own javascript - performing a
On this ajax response, we can see that the close script was appended 2
times. Make sure that it appended only once, by close(target) or
ModalWindow.close(target).
Before click the close link, in a moment that was causing trouble, see if
these variables are not null:
Wicket.Window.current
by close(target) or ModalWindow.close(target)
-- use close(target), to maintain ModalWindow internal states updated.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
On this ajax response, we can see that the close script was appended 2
times. Make sure that it
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2469
Thanks,
Esteban
Igor Vaynberg escribió:
No chance without a Jira issue.
-igor
On 9/15/09, nico2884 fernandonicolasmelen...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using GAE + Wicket too, and I also had to copy/paste that class.
Any chances of making
Igor, could you plan it for 1.4.2?
Vladimir K wrote:
done
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2463
Vladimir K wrote:
sure
igor.vaynberg wrote:
i guess create a quickstart and attach it to a jira issue. when i
tested buttons, while developing the feature, it
Thanks for the suggestion.
I have been using close(target) - unfortunately attached a run when I was using
both methods. Even with one ajax response appended it doesn't work.
New to JS - can you tell me how to test the variables. If I add
var status = window.parent.Wicket.Window; as part of
Here is the wicket AJax Debug
INFO: focus set on cancelUpdatea8INFO: Using XMLHttpRequest transportINFO:
INFO: Initiating Ajax GET request on
?wicket:interface=modal-dialog-pagemap:26:cancelUpdate::IBehaviorListener:0:random=0.5391539823210829INFO:
Invoking pre-call handler(s)...INFO:
- I get permission denied exception as reported by firebug.
- head section with my javascript
The firebug firefox plugging has an javascript console. Execute on him (
maybe you will not to get permission denied here):
alert(Wicket.Window.current)
alert(window.parent.Wicket.Window.current)
at the
Ok I added this to the html
script type=text/javascript
alert(window.parent.Wicket.Window.current);
/script
of my simple page example and the alert poped up with [object Object]
When I add it to my actual page - I get permission denied. :(
alert(Wicket.Window.current) -
Permission denied for http://domain.com to get property Window.Wicket from
http://subdomain.domain.com:8080.
http://subdomain.domain.com:8080/?wicket:interface=modal-dialog-pagemap:15
Line 265
wonder why it thinks that the domains are different ?
can I force domain.doc value somehow
thx
For cross (sub) domain reasons - I am adding document.domain to my page.
Is there a way to make modalwindow / Wickets Ajax links to work with it?
thx
From: ed_b...@hotmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unable to close ModalWindow 1.4.1
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:49:03
I recently moved from 1.3.6 to 1.4.1 and came across a compile error. I
believe I had a local copy of GMap2 (1.3.x) and made modifications to make the
following work.
Now I would like to propose a change but not sure who I need to talk.
Specifically, I would like to request to change
Hi all,
I use detection of JavaScript the way described e.g. here
http://www.mkyong.com/wicket/how-do-detect-browser-javascript-or-ajax-disabled-in-wicket/
and it works OK providing that client has JRE installed on his/her machine.
But if there is a machine without JRE, the browser (Firefox,
44 matches
Mail list logo
