date:20100601

I just went to check 1.4.9 change list and I didn't see anything related to
  the way IOC works (at least from 1.4.8 which is what I'm using right now),
  or did I miss something in this thread or there in the release notes ? :)I 
don't think it has changed: I tested again 1.4.3, 1.4.7 and 1.4.9, with 
everytime the same result.

And sorry for badly expressing myself, but I'm using GuiceComponentInjector, 
instanciation listener and the like. Anyway, I'll do a demo project tomorrow 
morning so you could easily check that. Maybe I'm wrong (wouldn't be the first 
time arg ;) ).
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Martijn Dashorst  wrote:

  > Then we could use a longer trace from the serialization exception...
  > Plus some code to go with it. The best way would be to create a
  > minimal setup using a quickstart exhibiting the problem.
  >
  > Martijnsure I'll. In fact I had to deal with a similar problem outside of 
wicket recently and I "just" had to make the proxy implements serializable and 
write down specific stuff there. I thought the matter would be quite the same 
here. anyway, it seems more complex: I'll provide the demo tomorrow morning 
(time to sleep now).

thanks again all for your help

best
joseph

OT: Job Posting - Contractor in the Bay Area

2010-06-01 Thread Nick Heudecker

 A profitable start-up in the cable advertising space is looking to expand
its development team to include another well-rounded developer.  The
position is contract to start and may become full-time.  I've detailed some
of what we're looking for below and if you think you're a good fit, you're
welcome to send over your resume.

Personal Requirements:

   - Must be a US citizen.
   - Reside in the Bay Area and able to commute to the office at least 4
   days a week.
   - Accustomed to working with a small, distributed team and collaborating
   over email, Skype and IM.  Obviously, you need to be able to produce with
   little supervision.
   - Innovative thinker and a fast coder.  We're constantly working to set
   the tempo in our product space.  You'll need to help develop solutions to
   problems and implement them quickly.
   - Outstanding communication skills, both verbal and written.

Experience and Technical Requirements:

   - Ideally you've worked on several different types of products with
   varying teams.  Our product space is highly dynamic and a diverse experience
   base will help you succeed.
   - Must be a Java expert with at least 5 years of experience.  Experience
   with some or all of the following is required: Hibernate, Spring, web
   frameworks (GWT, Wicket), and XML technologies (SOAP, SOA, XSD, WSDL, etc).
   Experience with relational databases such as MySQL or PostgreSQL and a firm
   grasp of SQL.
   - Additionally, you must be familiar with development tools such as
   Maven, IDEA/Eclipse, unit testing, Subversion, among others.
   - Experience with non-relational data stores, caching and producing
   highly available applications is also desirable.

Re: Panel not refreshed from ModalWindow via Ajax Button

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:57 PM, jammyjohn  wrote:

>
> Thanks for your reply. I first went in the direction of changing the model
> object which did not work. Then I started using replacewith  which is still
> a issue.
>
> Jamuna.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Panel-not-refreshed-from-ModalWindow-via-Ajax-Button-tp2235354p2239200.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Next option is to create a quickstart that demonstrates this issue.  You
will either find your problem or else have something that will be easier for
us to try it out with.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

Re: Panel not refreshed from ModalWindow via Ajax Button

2010-06-01 Thread jammyjohn


Thanks for your reply. I first went in the direction of changing the model
object which did not work. Then I started using replacewith  which is still
a issue. 

Jamuna.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Panel-not-refreshed-from-ModalWindow-via-Ajax-Button-tp2235354p2239200.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: wicket clustering wicket-security

2010-06-01 Thread david_


The WaspSession is responsible for authorization of secured pages and
components.
For some reason if a user logs in on webapp-A and another user tries to
access a bookmarkable url in webapp-B he is granted access.

2010/6/1 Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2239092-140489179-232...@n4.nabble.com
>

> not sure how to do it with wicket-security, but a way to do it
> generically is to simply set the userid field you keep in your session
> to null instead of invalidating the entire session
>
> -igor
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:56 AM, david_ <[hidden 
> email]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > How can I logoff an individual instance without affecting the other ones?
>
> > I use the org.apache.wicket.security.WaspSession.logoff() method which
> > results in a normal invalidateNow().
> >
> >
> > 2010/6/1 Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
> > [hidden email] 
> > <[hidden
> email] >
> >>
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:17 AM, david_ <[hidden email]<
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2239009&i=0>>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If I call getSession().getId() in each webapp (for example at the
> >> indexpage)
> >> > I get the same sessionId's in all applications.
> >>
> >> yep, that returns the id of the underlying http session which would be
> >> the same for both wicket sessions
> >>
> >> > Another thing is, if two users are logged in in two different
> >> applications
> >> > and one of the two logs out the other one is also logged out.
> >>
> >> probably because your log out mechanism invalidates the underlying http
> >> session
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2010/6/1 Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
> >> > [hidden email] 
> >> > <[hidden
>
> >> email] >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >> each webapp has a single http session, however wicket's Session
> >> >> objects will not be shared.
> >> >>
> >> >> -igor
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:38 AM, David Meulemans
> >> >> <[hidden email] <
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2238846&i=0>>
> >>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > I want to have multiple wicket applications to be clustered.
> Because
> >> I'm
> >> >> > using ehcache it is necessary to merge the applications into one
> .war
> >> >> file
> >> >> > because ehcache needs to be initiated in the same scope as the
> other
> >> >> > applications.Now the session is shared among all applications.
> >> >> > Is there a way to avoid this?
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> -
>
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]<
> >> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2238846&i=1>
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]<
> >> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2238846&i=2>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>  View message @
> >> >>
> >>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238846.html
> >> >> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> >> >> [hidden email] 
> >> >> <[hidden
>
> >> email] >
> >> >> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click here<
> >>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=bWV1bGVtYW5zLmRhdmlkQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ3fC0xOTcyOTcxMjQ2>.
>
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238976.html
> >> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]<
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2239009&i=5>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]<
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2239009&i=6>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>  View message @
> >>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2239009.html
> >> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> >> [hidden email] 
> >> <[hidden
> email] >
> >> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click here<
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=bWV1bGVtYW5zLmRhdmlkQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ3fC0xOTcyOTcxMjQ2>.
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2239030.html
>
> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>

Re: OnChangeAjaxBehavior and other form components

2010-06-01 Thread Steven Haines

Hi Everyone,

I have a followup question to this thread from last month... The following Ajax 
call decorator that I added to my zipcode field (stopping the ajax call until 
the user enters 5 digits) works in Firefox, but not in Chrome or Safari 
(webkit):

@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator()
{
return new AjaxCallDecorator()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

@Override
public CharSequence decorateScript( CharSequence script )
{
// Only return the script (which means that it will be 
executed) after the
// user enters the 5th digit (or more)
return "if(this.value.length >= 5){" + script + "}";
}
};
}

This resolves to the following JS:

 ]]>*/

The problem seems to be that the browser loses sight of what "this" is and 
reports: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'length' of undefined.

The web developer that I'm working with suggested the following change to the 
Ajax decorator:

return "var zipcode = 
document.getElementById('zip_code'); if(zipcode.value.length >= 5 ){" + script 
+ "}";


And it worked correctly because it removed the ambiguity of the value of 
"this". He was suggesting that something that Wicket's JavaScript is doing is 
changing the value of "this".  I have a working solution, but wondering if you 
have any thoughts as to why this is happening?

Thanks
Steve



- Original Message 
From: Steven Haines 
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Wed, April 21, 2010 2:43:41 PM
Subject: Re: OnChangeAjaxBehavior and other form components

I finally got everything working... Here is what I did for anyone that comes 
across this problem..

I added an onComponentRendered() method to my AjaxFormSubmitBehavior in that 
method I added the new Wicket.ChangeHandler (I saw the code in the 
OnChangeAjaxBehavior class):

@Override
protected final void onComponentRendered()
{
Response response = getComponent().getResponse();

final String id = getComponent().getMarkupId();

response.write( JavascriptUtils.SCRIPT_OPEN_TAG );
response.write( "new Wicket.ChangeHandler('" + id + "');" );
response.write( JavascriptUtils.SCRIPT_CLOSE_TAG );
}

So here is my final zipcode field:

zipcodeField.add( new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior( form, "onchange" )
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

@Override
protected void onSubmit( AjaxRequestTarget target )
{
 // Access your objects through the form bound in your 
CompoundPropertyModel
 myModel.getZipcode();
 myModel.getStreet1();
}

@Override
protected void onError( AjaxRequestTarget art )
{
// Called for things like validation errors ...
}

@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator()
{
return new AjaxCallDecorator()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

@Override
public CharSequence decorateScript( CharSequence script )
{
// Only return the script (which means that it will be 
executed) after the
// user enters the 5th digit (or more)
return "if(this.value.length >= 5){" + script + "}";
}
};
}

  @Override
protected final void onComponentRendered()
{
// Creates a new Wicket.ChangeHandler for immediate 
notifications of
// change events
Response response = getComponent().getResponse();
final String id = getComponent().getMarkupId();
response.write( JavascriptUtils.SCRIPT_OPEN_TAG );
response.write( "new Wicket.ChangeHandler('" + id + "');" );
response.write( JavascriptUtils.SCRIPT_CLOSE_TAG );
}
} );





- Original Message 
From: Steven Haines 
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Wed, April 21, 2010 1:38:04 PM
Subject: Re: OnChangeAjaxBehavior and other form components

Thanks Igor, the AjaxFormSubmitBehavior worked to give me access to all form 
fields. I have one additional problem: with the OnChangeAjaxBehavior 
implementation it used my Ajax call decorator correctly and sent me updates 
after the user typed the 5th character in the field, but with the 
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior it only

Wicket acl and spring security

Hi all,
  I have wicket acl and spring security working well together.  However,
there's one glitch I haven't solved.  With springs http interception, I can
create a "remember-me" cookie that allows the user to automatically log in.
 Is it possible to use the ACL to create this functionality?


Thanks,
Todd

Re: wicket clustering wicket-security

not sure how to do it with wicket-security, but a way to do it
generically is to simply set the userid field you keep in your session
to null instead of invalidating the entire session

-igor

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:56 AM, david_  wrote:
>
> How can I logoff an individual instance without affecting the other ones?
> I use the org.apache.wicket.security.WaspSession.logoff() method which
> results in a normal invalidateNow().
>
>
> 2010/6/1 Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
> ml-node+2239009-1783456523-232...@n4.nabble.com
>>
>
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:17 AM, david_ <[hidden 
>> email]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > If I call getSession().getId() in each webapp (for example at the
>> indexpage)
>> > I get the same sessionId's in all applications.
>>
>> yep, that returns the id of the underlying http session which would be
>> the same for both wicket sessions
>>
>> > Another thing is, if two users are logged in in two different
>> applications
>> > and one of the two logs out the other one is also logged out.
>>
>> probably because your log out mechanism invalidates the underlying http
>> session
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2010/6/1 Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
>> > [hidden email] 
>> > <[hidden
>> email] >
>> >>
>> >
>> >> each webapp has a single http session, however wicket's Session
>> >> objects will not be shared.
>> >>
>> >> -igor
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:38 AM, David Meulemans
>> >> <[hidden email] >
>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > I want to have multiple wicket applications to be clustered. Because
>> I'm
>> >> > using ehcache it is necessary to merge the applications into one .war
>> >> file
>> >> > because ehcache needs to be initiated in the same scope as the other
>> >> > applications.Now the session is shared among all applications.
>> >> > Is there a way to avoid this?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]<
>> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2238846&i=1>
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]<
>> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2238846&i=2>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>  View message @
>> >>
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238846.html
>> >> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
>> >> [hidden email] 
>> >> <[hidden
>> email] >
>> >> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click here<
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=bWV1bGVtYW5zLmRhdmlkQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ3fC0xOTcyOTcxMjQ2>.
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238976.html
>> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
>> email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
>> email]
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  View message @
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2239009.html
>> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
>> ml-node+1842947-1066186228-232...@n4.nabble.com
>> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
>> here.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2239030.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Turning of the labels in the Panel when reused

make that a feature of your panel

-igor

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:55 AM, jammyjohn  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having a panel with labels and textfields. I am reusing this panel
> twice next to each other on the form.
> Is there a way to turn off  the rendering of labels only, while displaying
> the panel for the second time in order to avoid repetition of labels on the
> form.
>
> Please suggest.
> Jamuna
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Turning-of-the-labels-in-the-Panel-when-reused-tp2239027p2239027.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Can't use form inside fragment

Man, I changed way too much code far too late last night.  I missed
assigning my model as the form in my test fields.


TextField userIdField = new TextField("email", new
PropertyModel(this, "email"));


On 2 June 2010 06:33, Igor Vaynberg  wrote:

> headerPanel:session:session:loginForm:email
>
> this textfield? has a null model, so wicket cannot push the submitted
> value.
>
> -igor
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Todd Nine 
> wrote:
> > Ok, I solved the initial problem.  I didn't specify a container for the
> > fragment, I missed that in the examples.  I changes my template to
> contain
> > this extra div.
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > Then I specify my panels with
> >
> > if(session.isSignedIn()){
> > add(new LogoutFragment("session", "logout", this));
> > }else{
> > add(new LoginFragment("session", "login", this));
> > }
> >
> > Everything is rendering, but if I try to submit my form, I receive this
> > error
> >
> > WicketMessage: Method onFormSubmitted of interface
> > org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmitListener targeted at
> component
> > [MarkupContainer [Component id = loginForm]] threw an exception
> >
> > Root cause:
> >
> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Attempt to set model object on null
> model
> > of component: headerPanel:session:session:loginForm:email
> > at
> > org.apache.wicket.Component.setDefaultModelObject(Component.java:3033)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.updateModel(FormComponent.java:1168)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form$FormModelUpdateVisitor.component(Form.java:227)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitComponentsPostOrderHelper(FormComponent.java:514)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitComponentsPostOrderHelper(FormComponent.java:493)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitComponentsPostOrder(FormComponent.java:465)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.internalUpdateFormComponentModels(Form.java:2081)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.updateFormComponentModels(Form.java:2049)
> > at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.process(Form.java:1004)
> > at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.process(Form.java:931)
> > at
> > org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:896)
> >
> > If I have my form in it's own panel it seems to work.  I've changed it's
> > paret class to to be the following
> >
> > public class LoginForm extends Form
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Todd
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2 June 2010 05:15, Todd Nine  wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry, forgot that. 1.4.9
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2 June 2010 03:03, Jeremy Thomerson 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> what version of wicket?
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Todd Nine 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi all,
> >>> >  I'm new to Wicket, so if I've done something obviously wrong, please
> >>> point
> >>> > it out.  I have 2 ways the user could log in to our site.  One if via
> >>> the
> >>> > full page login form, the other is via  quick login in the header.
> >>>  Since
> >>> > I'll need to gather the same form data in multiple places, I've
> created
> >>> a
> >>> > reusable form object below.
> >>> >
> >>> > http://pastie.org/private/7v1vnmyb4kefamu8q1tnfw
> >>> >
> >>> > Now, I'm working on my "SessionPanel".  This is the panel at the top
> >>> right
> >>> > of my header.  If the user is logged in, it shows a logout link.  If
> >>> > they're
> >>> > an anonymous user, it shows the login form.  I have this for my panel
> >>> code.
> >>> >
> >>> > http://www.pastie.org/private/bw5vvzddtrcruemnobjg
> >>> >
> >>> > And here is my html
> >>> >
> >>> > http://www.pastie.org/private/o9gzhxeqfcbu8vpohr1uvw
> >>> >
> >>> > Whenever I try to render the page, I always receive this error.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Root cause:
> >>> >
> >>> > org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Expected close tag for
> >>> > 
> >>> > [markup =
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> file:/Users/toddnine/development/aviator-services/logbook/target/classes/com/spidertracks/aviator/logbook/panel/SessionPanel.html
> >>> >  >>> >   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
> >>> >
> >>> > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
> >>> > xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.sourceforge.net/"; xml:lang="en"
> lang="en">
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > keep me logged in:
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> >  email: 
> >>> > password: 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > 
> >>> > logout
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > , index = 5, current = '' (line 9,
> >>> > column
> >>> > 3)]
> >>> >at
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupStream.throwMarkupException(MarkupStream.java:474)
> >>> >at
> >>> >
> >>>
> org.apache.wicket.Component.renderClosingComponentTag(Component.java:4318)
> >>> >at
> org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2627)
> >>> >at
> >>> org.apach

Re: wicket clustering wicket-security

2010-06-01 Thread david_


How can I logoff an individual instance without affecting the other ones?
I use the org.apache.wicket.security.WaspSession.logoff() method which
results in a normal invalidateNow().


2010/6/1 Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2239009-1783456523-232...@n4.nabble.com
>

> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:17 AM, david_ <[hidden 
> email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > If I call getSession().getId() in each webapp (for example at the
> indexpage)
> > I get the same sessionId's in all applications.
>
> yep, that returns the id of the underlying http session which would be
> the same for both wicket sessions
>
> > Another thing is, if two users are logged in in two different
> applications
> > and one of the two logs out the other one is also logged out.
>
> probably because your log out mechanism invalidates the underlying http
> session
>
> -igor
>
> >
> >
> >
> > 2010/6/1 Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
> > [hidden email] 
> > <[hidden
> email] >
> >>
> >
> >> each webapp has a single http session, however wicket's Session
> >> objects will not be shared.
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:38 AM, David Meulemans
> >> <[hidden email] >
>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I want to have multiple wicket applications to be clustered. Because
> I'm
> >> > using ehcache it is necessary to merge the applications into one .war
> >> file
> >> > because ehcache needs to be initiated in the same scope as the other
> >> > applications.Now the session is shared among all applications.
> >> > Is there a way to avoid this?
> >> >
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]<
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2238846&i=1>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]<
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2238846&i=2>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>  View message @
> >>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238846.html
> >> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> >> [hidden email] 
> >> <[hidden
> email] >
> >> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click here<
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=bWV1bGVtYW5zLmRhdmlkQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ3fC0xOTcyOTcxMjQ2>.
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238976.html
> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
>
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2239009.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1066186228-232...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2239030.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Turning of the labels in the Panel when reused

2010-06-01 Thread jammyjohn


Hi,

I am having a panel with labels and textfields. I am reusing this panel
twice next to each other on the form. 
Is there a way to turn off  the rendering of labels only, while displaying
the panel for the second time in order to avoid repetition of labels on the
form.

Please suggest.
Jamuna
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Turning-of-the-labels-in-the-Panel-when-reused-tp2239027p2239027.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Why does SerializableChecker throw WicketNotSerializableException on guice injected non Serializable class ?

2010-06-01 Thread yaniv kessler

I just went to check 1.4.9 change list and I didn't see anything related to
the way IOC works (at least from 1.4.8 which is what I'm using right now),
or did I miss something in this thread or there in the release notes ? :)

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Martijn Dashorst  wrote:

> Then we could use a longer trace from the serialization exception...
> Plus some code to go with it. The best way would be to create a
> minimal setup using a quickstart exhibiting the problem.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Joseph Pachod  wrote:
> > Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>
> >> You need to use the Wicket injector for guice. That will create a
> >> serializable proxy for the service. Guice itself doesn't know about
> >> Wicket, so you can't expect it to magically work.
> >>
> >> Martijn
> >
> > sorry, I didn't provide enough context: I'm using wicket-guice (on
> 1.4.9).
> > So injection is dealed with by wicket.
> >
> > best regards
> > joseph
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Tel: +972-77-4100977
Fax: +972-77-4100976
Mobile: +972-54-7755427

http://www.codeark.com
http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/yanush/
http://headtoscreencollision.blogspot.com

Re: Why does SerializableChecker throw WicketNotSerializableException on guice injected non Serializable class ?

2010-06-01 Thread Martijn Dashorst

Then we could use a longer trace from the serialization exception...
Plus some code to go with it. The best way would be to create a
minimal setup using a quickstart exhibiting the problem.

Martijn

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Joseph Pachod  wrote:
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>> You need to use the Wicket injector for guice. That will create a
>> serializable proxy for the service. Guice itself doesn't know about
>> Wicket, so you can't expect it to magically work.
>>
>> Martijn
>
> sorry, I didn't provide enough context: I'm using wicket-guice (on 1.4.9).
> So injection is dealed with by wicket.
>
> best regards
> joseph
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: wicket clustering wicket-security

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:17 AM, david_  wrote:
>
> If I call getSession().getId() in each webapp (for example at the indexpage)
> I get the same sessionId's in all applications.

yep, that returns the id of the underlying http session which would be
the same for both wicket sessions

> Another thing is, if two users are logged in in two different applications
> and one of the two logs out the other one is also logged out.

probably because your log out mechanism invalidates the underlying http session

-igor

>
>
>
> 2010/6/1 Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
> ml-node+2238846-1446394513-232...@n4.nabble.com
>>
>
>> each webapp has a single http session, however wicket's Session
>> objects will not be shared.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:38 AM, David Meulemans
>> <[hidden email] >
>> wrote:
>> > I want to have multiple wicket applications to be clustered. Because I'm
>> > using ehcache it is necessary to merge the applications into one .war
>> file
>> > because ehcache needs to be initiated in the same scope as the other
>> > applications.Now the session is shared among all applications.
>> > Is there a way to avoid this?
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
>> email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
>> email]
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  View message @
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238846.html
>> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
>> ml-node+1842947-1066186228-232...@n4.nabble.com
>> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
>> here.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238976.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Can't use form inside fragment

headerPanel:session:session:loginForm:email

this textfield? has a null model, so wicket cannot push the submitted value.

-igor

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Todd Nine  wrote:
> Ok, I solved the initial problem.  I didn't specify a container for the
> fragment, I missed that in the examples.  I changes my template to contain
> this extra div.
>
>
> 
>
> Then I specify my panels with
>
> if(session.isSignedIn()){
> add(new LogoutFragment("session", "logout", this));
> }else{
> add(new LoginFragment("session", "login", this));
> }
>
> Everything is rendering, but if I try to submit my form, I receive this
> error
>
> WicketMessage: Method onFormSubmitted of interface
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmitListener targeted at component
> [MarkupContainer [Component id = loginForm]] threw an exception
>
> Root cause:
>
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Attempt to set model object on null model
> of component: headerPanel:session:session:loginForm:email
>     at
> org.apache.wicket.Component.setDefaultModelObject(Component.java:3033)
>     at
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.updateModel(FormComponent.java:1168)
>     at
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form$FormModelUpdateVisitor.component(Form.java:227)
>     at
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitComponentsPostOrderHelper(FormComponent.java:514)
>     at
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitComponentsPostOrderHelper(FormComponent.java:493)
>     at
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitComponentsPostOrder(FormComponent.java:465)
>     at
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.internalUpdateFormComponentModels(Form.java:2081)
>     at
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.updateFormComponentModels(Form.java:2049)
>     at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.process(Form.java:1004)
>     at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.process(Form.java:931)
>     at
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:896)
>
> If I have my form in it's own panel it seems to work.  I've changed it's
> paret class to to be the following
>
> public class LoginForm extends Form
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Todd
>
>
>
> On 2 June 2010 05:15, Todd Nine  wrote:
>
>> Sorry, forgot that. 1.4.9
>>
>>
>> On 2 June 2010 03:03, Jeremy Thomerson  wrote:
>>
>>> what version of wicket?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Todd Nine 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >  I'm new to Wicket, so if I've done something obviously wrong, please
>>> point
>>> > it out.  I have 2 ways the user could log in to our site.  One if via
>>> the
>>> > full page login form, the other is via  quick login in the header.
>>>  Since
>>> > I'll need to gather the same form data in multiple places, I've created
>>> a
>>> > reusable form object below.
>>> >
>>> > http://pastie.org/private/7v1vnmyb4kefamu8q1tnfw
>>> >
>>> > Now, I'm working on my "SessionPanel".  This is the panel at the top
>>> right
>>> > of my header.  If the user is logged in, it shows a logout link.  If
>>> > they're
>>> > an anonymous user, it shows the login form.  I have this for my panel
>>> code.
>>> >
>>> > http://www.pastie.org/private/bw5vvzddtrcruemnobjg
>>> >
>>> > And here is my html
>>> >
>>> > http://www.pastie.org/private/o9gzhxeqfcbu8vpohr1uvw
>>> >
>>> > Whenever I try to render the page, I always receive this error.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Root cause:
>>> >
>>> > org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Expected close tag for
>>> > 
>>> > [markup =
>>> >
>>> >
>>> file:/Users/toddnine/development/aviator-services/logbook/target/classes/com/spidertracks/aviator/logbook/panel/SessionPanel.html
>>> > >> >   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
>>> >
>>> > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
>>> > xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.sourceforge.net/"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > keep me logged in:
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> >  email: 
>>> > password: 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 
>>> > logout
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > , index = 5, current = '' (line 9,
>>> > column
>>> > 3)]
>>> >    at
>>> >
>>> >
>>> org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupStream.throwMarkupException(MarkupStream.java:474)
>>> >    at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.wicket.Component.renderClosingComponentTag(Component.java:4318)
>>> >    at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2627)
>>> >    at
>>> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1512)
>>> >    at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450)
>>> >    at
>>> > org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414)
>>> >    at
>>> >
>>> >
>>> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1577)
>>> >    at
>>> >
>>> >
>>> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:675)
>>> >    at
>>> >
>>> >
>>> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:114)
>>> >    at org.apache.wicket.Component.ren

Please read before using JIRA

If you use our JIRA for tickets, please note the following couple of
reminders:

   - Do not clone an issue that was closed as "wont't fix", etc.  Just
   reopen and comment if you have a new use case that should be submitted.
This way we keep all history together in the same issue.
   - Do NOT set the "fix version".  The developers will set that when they
   actually fix it.  If you set it, it may not show up on our radar, or may not
   get into the changelog.  You SHOULD set the "affects version", but NOT the
   "fix version".

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

Re: wicket clustering wicket-security

2010-06-01 Thread david_


If I call getSession().getId() in each webapp (for example at the indexpage)
I get the same sessionId's in all applications.

Another thing is, if two users are logged in in two different applications
and one of the two logs out the other one is also logged out.



2010/6/1 Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2238846-1446394513-232...@n4.nabble.com
>

> each webapp has a single http session, however wicket's Session
> objects will not be shared.
>
> -igor
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:38 AM, David Meulemans
> <[hidden email] >
> wrote:
> > I want to have multiple wicket applications to be clustered. Because I'm
> > using ehcache it is necessary to merge the applications into one .war
> file
> > because ehcache needs to be initiated in the same scope as the other
> > applications.Now the session is shared among all applications.
> > Is there a way to avoid this?
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
>
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238846.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1066186228-232...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-clustering-wicket-security-tp2238257p2238976.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Image Upload Using TinyMCE Within Wicket Framework

2010-06-01 Thread danisevsky

Hello, I checkout wicket-stuff core, install and run tinymce-examples, every
examples works fine except image upload. Firebug do not show any javascript
error. Could you please tell me what is wrong. What I get is on the
attachment picture.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Can't use form inside fragment

Ok, I solved the initial problem.  I didn't specify a container for the
fragment, I missed that in the examples.  I changes my template to contain
this extra div.




Then I specify my panels with

if(session.isSignedIn()){
add(new LogoutFragment("session", "logout", this));
}else{
add(new LoginFragment("session", "login", this));
}

Everything is rendering, but if I try to submit my form, I receive this
error

WicketMessage: Method onFormSubmitted of interface
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmitListener targeted at component
[MarkupContainer [Component id = loginForm]] threw an exception

Root cause:

java.lang.IllegalStateException: Attempt to set model object on null model
of component: headerPanel:session:session:loginForm:email
 at
org.apache.wicket.Component.setDefaultModelObject(Component.java:3033)
 at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.updateModel(FormComponent.java:1168)
 at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form$FormModelUpdateVisitor.component(Form.java:227)
 at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitComponentsPostOrderHelper(FormComponent.java:514)
 at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitComponentsPostOrderHelper(FormComponent.java:493)
 at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitComponentsPostOrder(FormComponent.java:465)
 at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.internalUpdateFormComponentModels(Form.java:2081)
 at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.updateFormComponentModels(Form.java:2049)
 at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.process(Form.java:1004)
 at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.process(Form.java:931)
 at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:896)

If I have my form in it's own panel it seems to work.  I've changed it's
paret class to to be the following

public class LoginForm extends Form

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Todd



On 2 June 2010 05:15, Todd Nine  wrote:

> Sorry, forgot that. 1.4.9
>
>
> On 2 June 2010 03:03, Jeremy Thomerson  wrote:
>
>> what version of wicket?
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Todd Nine 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >  I'm new to Wicket, so if I've done something obviously wrong, please
>> point
>> > it out.  I have 2 ways the user could log in to our site.  One if via
>> the
>> > full page login form, the other is via  quick login in the header.
>>  Since
>> > I'll need to gather the same form data in multiple places, I've created
>> a
>> > reusable form object below.
>> >
>> > http://pastie.org/private/7v1vnmyb4kefamu8q1tnfw
>> >
>> > Now, I'm working on my "SessionPanel".  This is the panel at the top
>> right
>> > of my header.  If the user is logged in, it shows a logout link.  If
>> > they're
>> > an anonymous user, it shows the login form.  I have this for my panel
>> code.
>> >
>> > http://www.pastie.org/private/bw5vvzddtrcruemnobjg
>> >
>> > And here is my html
>> >
>> > http://www.pastie.org/private/o9gzhxeqfcbu8vpohr1uvw
>> >
>> > Whenever I try to render the page, I always receive this error.
>> >
>> >
>> > Root cause:
>> >
>> > org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Expected close tag for
>> > 
>> > [markup =
>> >
>> >
>> file:/Users/toddnine/development/aviator-services/logbook/target/classes/com/spidertracks/aviator/logbook/panel/SessionPanel.html
>> > > >   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
>> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
>> > xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.sourceforge.net/"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > keep me logged in:
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  email: 
>> > password: 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >
>> >
>> > 
>> > logout
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > , index = 5, current = '' (line 9,
>> > column
>> > 3)]
>> >at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupStream.throwMarkupException(MarkupStream.java:474)
>> >at
>> >
>> org.apache.wicket.Component.renderClosingComponentTag(Component.java:4318)
>> >at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2627)
>> >at
>> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1512)
>> >at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450)
>> >at
>> > org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414)
>> >at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1577)
>> >at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:675)
>> >at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:114)
>> >at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2619)
>> >
>> > My XHtml seems well formed, what am I doing wrong?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Todd
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Thomerson
>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>
>
>

Re: How to make visible all child of WebMarkupContainer

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:02 PM,  wrote:

>  Yeap I am adding both wrappers to AjaxRequesttarget  like this
>
>
>
>   target.addComponent(seeRecentWrapper..setVisible(true));
>
>   target.addComponent(seeAllWrapper..setVisible(false));
>
>
I'm not sure why you have the wrappers at all - they don't seem to add
anything.  Why not just toggle the visibility on the links themselves?  Have
you looked at the ajax debug window to see what's being sent?  Post that
response if you can't figure it out.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

Re: Why does SerializableChecker throw WicketNotSerializableException on guice injected non Serializable class ?

2010-06-01 Thread yaniv kessler

Joseph,

I believe what Martijn meant was that you need to use
GuiceComponentInjector.
This class will handle the serialization stuff in components for you. You
can find more details in these place (and in org.apache.wicket.guice
javadoc
):

Alastair Maw’s blog - Wicket gets
guicy
Wicket examples - Guice
Atomic Gamer dev blog - Wicket, Guice and
Warp-Persist
My 
blog


Yaniv kessler

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Joseph Pachod  wrote:

> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
>> You need to use the Wicket injector for guice. That will create a
>> serializable proxy for the service. Guice itself doesn't know about
>> Wicket, so you can't expect it to magically work.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
> sorry, I didn't provide enough context: I'm using wicket-guice (on 1.4.9).
> So injection is dealed with by wicket.
>
> best regards
> joseph
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Tel: +972-77-4100977
Fax: +972-77-4100976
Mobile: +972-54-7755427

http://www.codeark.com
http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/yanush/
http://headtoscreencollision.blogspot.com

Re: Panel not refreshed from ModalWindow via Ajax Button

instead of all that replacing the entire contact panel, just trying changing
the model object that the panel is pulling the data from.  remove all the
replace stuff.  i think your bug might be somewhere in there, although i
haven't looked in enough detail to find it yet.

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM, jammyjohn  wrote:

>
>  Could any one help me in solving this issue
>
> Jamuna.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Panel-not-refreshed-from-ModalWindow-via-Ajax-Button-tp2235354p2238945.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

RE: How to make visible all child of WebMarkupContainer

2010-06-01 Thread Gurpreet.Singh

Yeap I am adding both wrappers to AjaxRequesttarget  like this

  target.addComponent(seeRecentWrapper..setVisible(true));
  target.addComponent(seeAllWrapper..setVisible(false));

From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 10:59 AM
To: Singh, Gurpreet
Cc: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to make visible all child of WebMarkupContainer

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:45 PM, 
mailto:gurpreet.si...@wellsfargo.com>> wrote:
Thanks for replying and sorry about typos. Here is the real code

 See 
All 

View Most Recent 

seeAll and seeRecent links visibility is set to default , which I assume is 
true.

Initialy seeRecentWrapper visibility is set to false and seeAllWrapper 
visibility is set to true.

On click on seeAll Ajax link I am setting seeRecentWrapper.setVisible(true) and 
seeAllWrapper.setVisble(false)

On click on seeRecent Ajax link I am setting seeRecentWrapper.setVisible(false) 
and seeAllWrapper.setVisble(true)

If setting parent component visibility does not affect its child visibility So 
not sure why links doesn't show up. Any idea?

In both links you will need to add both wrappers to the ajax response.  Are you 
doing this?

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

Re: How to make visible all child of WebMarkupContainer

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:45 PM,  wrote:

> Thanks for replying and sorry about typos. Here is the real code
>
>   src="images/al_faqarrow1_gen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle"
> border="0"/>See All 
> src="images/al_faqarrow1_gen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" border="0"/>
> View Most Recent 
>
> seeAll and seeRecent links visibility is set to default , which I assume is
> true.
>
> Initialy seeRecentWrapper visibility is set to false and seeAllWrapper
> visibility is set to true.
>
> On click on seeAll Ajax link I am setting seeRecentWrapper.setVisible(true)
> and seeAllWrapper.setVisble(false)
>
> On click on seeRecent Ajax link I am setting
> seeRecentWrapper.setVisible(false) and seeAllWrapper.setVisble(true)
>
> If setting parent component visibility does not affect its child visibility
> So not sure why links doesn't show up. Any idea?


In both links you will need to add both wrappers to the ajax response.  Are
you doing this?

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

Re: Panel not refreshed from ModalWindow via Ajax Button

2010-06-01 Thread jammyjohn


 Could any one help me in solving this issue

Jamuna.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Panel-not-refreshed-from-ModalWindow-via-Ajax-Button-tp2235354p2238945.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Guicey Wicket and JUnit4

2010-06-01 Thread yaniv kessler

Wicket, Guice, Junit4 - putting it all together:

http://headtoscreencollision.blogspot.com/2010/06/writing-unit-tests-for-guicey-wicket.html?x=wicket

Enjoy :-)

Yaniv Kessler

RE: How to make visible all child of WebMarkupContainer

2010-06-01 Thread Gurpreet.Singh

Thanks for replying and sorry about typos. Here is the real code

 See 
All 

View Most Recent 

seeAll and seeRecent links visibility is set to default , which I assume is 
true.

Initialy seeRecentWrapper visibility is set to false and seeAllWrapper 
visibility is set to true.

On click on seeAll Ajax link I am setting seeRecentWrapper.setVisible(true) and 
seeAllWrapper.setVisble(false)

On click on seeRecent Ajax link I am setting seeRecentWrapper.setVisible(false) 
and seeAllWrapper.setVisble(true)

If setting parent component visibility does not affect its child visibility So 
not sure why links doesn't show up. Any idea?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 10:36 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to make visible all child of WebMarkupContainer

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM,  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
> I  am getting strange problem. Setting WebMarkupContainer.setVisible(true)
> is not making all its child visible via Ajax Link.
>
> My Html code looks like this
>
> Show All
> Show
> Recent
>
> I need to show one of those links at a time. But somehow setting
> setVisible(true) is not working , but setVisible(false) works
>

Is that really your code?  There are multiple typos that would stop stuff
from working.  Please paste real code.

Anyway, if you have setVisible(false) on any children, then calling
setVisible(true) on the parent will not make the children also visible.
However, if the parent (webmarkupcontainer) were not visible, then obviously
the children would not be visible, even though their individual isVisible()
methods would return true.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Show/hide form components best practice

return true from wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications and put your visibility
changing code in onSelectionChanged


http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/CheckGroup.html#wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications()

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Iain Reddick
wrote:

> Say I have a form with a check box that, when checked, shows some other
> field (i.e. it controls the visibility of other form components).
>
> What is the best approach to handling this?
>
> From what I understand, you have 3 options:
>
> 1. Add ajax behaviour to the check box (re-render relevant components).
> 2. Add javascript from the Java code (e.g. add some kind of show/hide
> behaviour).
> 3. Add javascript directly to the HTML.
>
> What are peoples experiences of the 3 methods, and which is best?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

Re: How to make visible all child of WebMarkupContainer

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM,  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
> I  am getting strange problem. Setting WebMarkupContainer.setVisible(true)
> is not making all its child visible via Ajax Link.
>
> My Html code looks like this
>
> Show All
> Show
> Recent
>
> I need to show one of those links at a time. But somehow setting
> setVisible(true) is not working , but setVisible(false) works
>

Is that really your code?  There are multiple typos that would stop stuff
from working.  Please paste real code.

Anyway, if you have setVisible(false) on any children, then calling
setVisible(true) on the parent will not make the children also visible.
However, if the parent (webmarkupcontainer) were not visible, then obviously
the children would not be visible, even though their individual isVisible()
methods would return true.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

How to make visible all child of WebMarkupContainer

2010-06-01 Thread Gurpreet.Singh

Hi All,


I  am getting strange problem. Setting WebMarkupContainer.setVisible(true) is 
not making all its child visible via Ajax Link.

My Html code looks like this

Show All
Show Recent

I need to show one of those links at a time. But somehow setting 
setVisible(true) is not working , but setVisible(false) works

Thanks in Advance for replying

Preet

Re: Can't use form inside fragment

Sorry, forgot that. 1.4.9

On 2 June 2010 03:03, Jeremy Thomerson  wrote:

> what version of wicket?
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Todd Nine  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >  I'm new to Wicket, so if I've done something obviously wrong, please
> point
> > it out.  I have 2 ways the user could log in to our site.  One if via the
> > full page login form, the other is via  quick login in the header.  Since
> > I'll need to gather the same form data in multiple places, I've created a
> > reusable form object below.
> >
> > http://pastie.org/private/7v1vnmyb4kefamu8q1tnfw
> >
> > Now, I'm working on my "SessionPanel".  This is the panel at the top
> right
> > of my header.  If the user is logged in, it shows a logout link.  If
> > they're
> > an anonymous user, it shows the login form.  I have this for my panel
> code.
> >
> > http://www.pastie.org/private/bw5vvzddtrcruemnobjg
> >
> > And here is my html
> >
> > http://www.pastie.org/private/o9gzhxeqfcbu8vpohr1uvw
> >
> > Whenever I try to render the page, I always receive this error.
> >
> >
> > Root cause:
> >
> > org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Expected close tag for
> > 
> > [markup =
> >
> >
> file:/Users/toddnine/development/aviator-services/logbook/target/classes/com/spidertracks/aviator/logbook/panel/SessionPanel.html
> >  >   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
> > xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.sourceforge.net/"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > keep me logged in:
> > 
> > 
> >  email: 
> > password: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> >
> > 
> > logout
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > , index = 5, current = '' (line 9,
> > column
> > 3)]
> >at
> >
> >
> org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupStream.throwMarkupException(MarkupStream.java:474)
> >at
> >
> org.apache.wicket.Component.renderClosingComponentTag(Component.java:4318)
> >at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2627)
> >at
> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1512)
> >at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450)
> >at
> > org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414)
> >at
> >
> >
> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1577)
> >at
> >
> >
> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:675)
> >at
> >
> >
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:114)
> >at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2619)
> >
> > My XHtml seems well formed, what am I doing wrong?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Todd
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>

Re: how to get the selected tabbedpanel

TabbedPanel#getSelectedTab()

-igor

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Antonio Mauriello
 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have the following issue:
>
> A wicket page where I'm working on has a Form plus an AjaxTabbedPannel.
>
> The form has only buttons that change the status of some values in the page.
>
> In each onSubmit() I set the response page to reload the same page but it
> goes the default tab and not to the one selected when I click the button.
>
> (All the buttons are outside the tabbedPanels, the panels just show
> different details..)
>
>
> Is there a way to get from an onSubmit() button method the selectedTab?
>
> I cannot find a way to call from onSubmit the getSelectedTab() and pass it
> as pageparameter to the wicketPage (to use then the setSelectedTab)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: wicket clustering wicket-security

each webapp has a single http session, however wicket's Session
objects will not be shared.

-igor

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:38 AM, David Meulemans
 wrote:
> I want to have multiple wicket applications to be clustered. Because I'm
> using ehcache it is necessary to merge the applications into one .war file
> because ehcache needs to be initiated in the same scope as the other
> applications.Now the session is shared among all applications.
> Is there a way to avoid this?
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Process background

why does your background code need access to application?

-igor

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Ivan Arcos  wrote:
> I have the following problem. I want you when you click on a link I
> load a modal window with an image of loading. Meanwhile I want to run
> a background process. I've tried OnAfterRender but my process is
> running before, I tried to thread but I must be doing something wrong
> that always gives me an error There is no style application attached
> to current thread.
>
> What could I do?
>
> Thank you very much
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: populateItem() not invoked on my custom list

2010-06-01 Thread Sven Meier

You're not passing the entries to the super implementation - how should 
the PropertListView know what objects to iterate over?


public Entries(String id, List entries) {

   super(id, entries);
}

protected  void  populateItem(ListItem  item)  {
  MyEntry entry =  item.getModelObject();

  item.add(new  Label("key", entry.id));
  item.add(new  ServiceTreeValuesList("serviceTreeList", entry.services));
}

Sven



On 06/01/2010 03:41 PM, Romain Pelisse wrote:

Hi,

I got a rather dumb issue. As I've been using Wicket only for 2 weeks,
I'm pretty sure that my issue is just a misuse more than a bug.
I implemented a Custom list by inheriting PropertyViewList. This
custom list is then placed into a Panel, which it is itself added to
the Page.

// The panel constructor
public MapResultsPanel(String id, Map>  results) {
super(id);
 // Construct the list of Entry
 List  myEntries = new ArrayList();
 for (Entry>  servicesEntry :
results.entrySet()) {
  myEntries.add(new
MyEntry(servicesEntry.getKey(),servicesEntry.getValue()));

 }
 // Here comes my custom list
 Entries e = new Entries("entryList", myEntries);
 // Adding entries to the panel
 add(e);
 }


class Entries extends PropertyListView  {
 private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
 private final List  entries;
 public Entries(String id, List  entries) {
 super(id);
 this.entries = entries;
 }
// This is not invoked at run time ...
 @Override
 protected void populateItem(ListItem  item) {
 for (MyEntry entry : entries) {
 item.add(new Label("key", entry.id));
 // ...
 }
 }
 }


However, at run time, nothing is displayed on my page and if I debug
the populateItem() method on my custom list implementation is not
called. Somebody on IRC suspected that my model might be empty but how
comes ?

I posted this code on paste bin also : http://pastebin.com/vEVrmDM4
(in case you want to tweak it)

Thanks for any help you can gave me, because I have exhausted most of
my options here...

--
Romain PELISSE,
"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will
insist on coming along and trying to put things in it" -- Terry
Pratchett
http://belaran.eu/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How to get PageClass form mounted bookmarkable page

same way wicket does, run it through webrequestcodingstrategy and you
will get back an bookmarkablepagerequesttarget, use methods on that to
get the page class.

-igor

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Stefan Lindner  wrote:
> I have some pages mounted  with
>
>
>
>                moutBookmarkablePage("/somePath", MyPage.class)
>
>
>
> in Application.init. Now I have the path "/somePath" from webRequest.
> How can I retriev the matching MyPage.class for the path "/somePath"?
>
>
>
> Stefan
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Show/hide form components best practice

2010-06-01 Thread Xavier López

I'd say what's reccomended to do in that case is to use a FormValidator in
order to check the conditions that make the toggling component validatable
or not. Check those conditions on the other component's input (getInput(),
getConvertedInput()), because model objects won't be updated until
validation phase ends.

I've been struggling recently on this matter with components inside
refreshingviews, and I have to say I'm feeling like not doing things the way
they should be, i'll append a sample of the formvalidator. I have the
refreshingview as a class attribute, altough it could have been found by
calling a visitor on the Form parameter of validate(), and using a 'tagging'
subclass for the refreshingview. I'd appreciate any comments on this code,
and if it can be improved in any way, I'd love to follow your suggestions
(also, hope that helps, Iain :) )

It's a validator that need counting how many inputs have been filled by the
user to make some business validation. I've been making 'tagging' subclasses
(no code by themselves, only super constructors) of the components inside
the view just to write a simpler visitor:

new IFormValidator(){
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public FormComponent[] getDependentFormComponents() { return
null; }

public void validate(Form form) {
List beansList =
(List)refreshingView.getModelObject();

   // Check count for some inputs on the view
countInputsA= 0;
countInputsB = 0;

// Obtenir els components de desplegables per consultar
inputs en cas que toqui
final List typeAComponents = new
ArrayList();
final List typeBComponents= new
ArrayList();
refreshingView.visitChildren(TypeAComponent.class, new
IVisitor(){
public Object component(Component component) {
typeAComponents.add((FormComponent)component);
return CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL;
}
});

refreshingView.visitChildren(DdcEntrevistaM45DropDownChoice.class, new
IVisitor(){
public Object component(Component component) {
typeBComponents.add((FormComponent)component);
return CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL;
}
});

for (FormComponent component : typeAComponents ) {
if (component.getConvertedInput() != null){
countInputsA++;
}
}
for (FormComponent component : typeBComponents ) {
if (component.getConvertedInput() != null){
countInputsB++;
}
}

// perform some validations on countInputsA and countInputsB
if (countInputsA > countInputsB) {
error("whatever");
}
}

2010/6/1 Iain Reddick 

> With (2) and (3), what is the best way of handling validation?
>
> With (1), the server-side state for the form is correct, and the hidden
> component won't be validated on form submit.
>
> With (2) and (3), the "visible" state of the toggled component is purely
> client side. This means that on form submit, the hidden component will still
> be validated.
>
>
> Pedro Santos wrote:
>
>> 2 or 3 since there is no relevant state on the server side you want to
>> consider to implement the component visibility rule.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Iain Reddick
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Say I have a form with a check box that, when checked, shows some other
>>> field (i.e. it controls the visibility of other form components).
>>>
>>> What is the best approach to handling this?
>>>
>>> From what I understand, you have 3 options:
>>>
>>> 1. Add ajax behaviour to the check box (re-render relevant components).
>>> 2. Add javascript from the Java code (e.g. add some kind of show/hide
>>> behaviour).
>>> 3. Add javascript directly to the HTML.
>>>
>>> What are peoples experiences of the 3 methods, and which is best?
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Show/hide form components best practice

2010-06-01 Thread Iain Reddick


With (2) and (3), what is the best way of handling validation?

With (1), the server-side state for the form is correct, and the hidden 
component won't be validated on form submit.


With (2) and (3), the "visible" state of the toggled component is purely 
client side. This means that on form submit, the hidden component will 
still be validated.


Pedro Santos wrote:

2 or 3 since there is no relevant state on the server side you want to
consider to implement the component visibility rule.

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Iain Reddick
wrote:

  

Say I have a form with a check box that, when checked, shows some other
field (i.e. it controls the visibility of other form components).

What is the best approach to handling this?

From what I understand, you have 3 options:

1. Add ajax behaviour to the check box (re-render relevant components).
2. Add javascript from the Java code (e.g. add some kind of show/hide
behaviour).
3. Add javascript directly to the HTML.

What are peoples experiences of the 3 methods, and which is best?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org






  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Can't use form inside fragment

what version of wicket?

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Todd Nine  wrote:

> Hi all,
>  I'm new to Wicket, so if I've done something obviously wrong, please point
> it out.  I have 2 ways the user could log in to our site.  One if via the
> full page login form, the other is via  quick login in the header.  Since
> I'll need to gather the same form data in multiple places, I've created a
> reusable form object below.
>
> http://pastie.org/private/7v1vnmyb4kefamu8q1tnfw
>
> Now, I'm working on my "SessionPanel".  This is the panel at the top right
> of my header.  If the user is logged in, it shows a logout link.  If
> they're
> an anonymous user, it shows the login form.  I have this for my panel code.
>
> http://www.pastie.org/private/bw5vvzddtrcruemnobjg
>
> And here is my html
>
> http://www.pastie.org/private/o9gzhxeqfcbu8vpohr1uvw
>
> Whenever I try to render the page, I always receive this error.
>
>
> Root cause:
>
> org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Expected close tag for
> 
> [markup =
>
> file:/Users/toddnine/development/aviator-services/logbook/target/classes/com/spidertracks/aviator/logbook/panel/SessionPanel.html
>"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
>
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
> xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.sourceforge.net/"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
> 
> 
> 
> 
> keep me logged in:
> 
> 
>  email: 
> password: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>
> 
> logout
> 
> 
> 
> , index = 5, current = '' (line 9,
> column
> 3)]
>at
>
> org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupStream.throwMarkupException(MarkupStream.java:474)
>at
> org.apache.wicket.Component.renderClosingComponentTag(Component.java:4318)
>at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2627)
>at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1512)
>at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450)
>at
> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414)
>at
>
> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1577)
>at
>
> org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:675)
>at
>
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:114)
>at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2619)
>
> My XHtml seems well formed, what am I doing wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Todd
>



-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

populateItem() not invoked on my custom list

2010-06-01 Thread Romain Pelisse

Hi,

I got a rather dumb issue. As I've been using Wicket only for 2 weeks,
I'm pretty sure that my issue is just a misuse more than a bug.
I implemented a Custom list by inheriting PropertyViewList. This
custom list is then placed into a Panel, which it is itself added to
the Page.

       // The panel constructor
       public MapResultsPanel(String id, Map> results) {
               super(id);
        // Construct the list of Entry
        List myEntries = new ArrayList();
        for (Entry> servicesEntry :
results.entrySet()) {
         myEntries.add(new
MyEntry(servicesEntry.getKey(),servicesEntry.getValue()));

        }
        // Here comes my custom list
        Entries e = new Entries("entryList", myEntries);
        // Adding entries to the panel
        add(e);
    }


class Entries extends PropertyListView {
        private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
        private final List entries;
        public Entries(String id, List entries) {
            super(id);
            this.entries = entries;
        }
       // This is not invoked at run time ...
       �...@override
        protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
            for (MyEntry entry : entries) {
                item.add(new Label("key", entry.id));
                // ...
            }
        }
    }


However, at run time, nothing is displayed on my page and if I debug
the populateItem() method on my custom list implementation is not
called. Somebody on IRC suspected that my model might be empty but how
comes ?

I posted this code on paste bin also : http://pastebin.com/vEVrmDM4
(in case you want to tweak it)

Thanks for any help you can gave me, because I have exhausted most of
my options here...

--
Romain PELISSE,
"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will
insist on coming along and trying to put things in it" -- Terry
Pratchett
http://belaran.eu/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Show/hide form components best practice

2010-06-01 Thread Pedro Santos

2 or 3 since there is no relevant state on the server side you want to
consider to implement the component visibility rule.

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Iain Reddick
wrote:

> Say I have a form with a check box that, when checked, shows some other
> field (i.e. it controls the visibility of other form components).
>
> What is the best approach to handling this?
>
> From what I understand, you have 3 options:
>
> 1. Add ajax behaviour to the check box (re-render relevant components).
> 2. Add javascript from the Java code (e.g. add some kind of show/hide
> behaviour).
> 3. Add javascript directly to the HTML.
>
> What are peoples experiences of the 3 methods, and which is best?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos

Re: Why does SerializableChecker throw WicketNotSerializableException on guice injected non Serializable class ?


Martijn Dashorst wrote:

You need to use the Wicket injector for guice. That will create a
serializable proxy for the service. Guice itself doesn't know about
Wicket, so you can't expect it to magically work.

Martijn
sorry, I didn't provide enough context: I'm using wicket-guice (on 
1.4.9). So injection is dealed with by wicket.


best regards
joseph

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Why does SerializableChecker throw WicketNotSerializableException on guice injected non Serializable class ?


nino martinez wael wrote:

did you mark it transient?
  
I didn't expect it to be necessary since the wicket guice proxy is still 
serializable (in the way that it handles serialization of its own)


but could be done yes

best
joseph

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Show/hide form components best practice

2010-06-01 Thread Iain Reddick

Say I have a form with a check box that, when checked, shows some other 
field (i.e. it controls the visibility of other form components).


What is the best approach to handling this?

From what I understand, you have 3 options:

1. Add ajax behaviour to the check box (re-render relevant components).
2. Add javascript from the Java code (e.g. add some kind of show/hide 
behaviour).

3. Add javascript directly to the HTML.

What are peoples experiences of the 3 methods, and which is best?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Why does SerializableChecker throw WicketNotSerializableException on guice injected non Serializable class ?

2010-06-01 Thread Martijn Dashorst

You need to use the Wicket injector for guice. That will create a
serializable proxy for the service. Guice itself doesn't know about
Wicket, so you can't expect it to magically work.

Martijn

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Joseph Pachod  wrote:
> hi
>
> In a form, I'm injecting a factory through guice. The factory's interface
> doesn't extend Serializable, as well as the implementation.
>
> Then the SerializableChecker throws
> org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException:
> Unable to serialize class:
> com.softculture.core.dataseries.morphia.wicket.DefaultDecoratorFactory
>
> I was assuming that such a class wouldn't need to be Serializable, since it
> was never serialized done thanks to guice injection... Am I wrong ?
>
> thanks in advance
>
> best regards
> --
>
> Joseph Pachod
> IT
> THOMAS DAILY GmbH
> Adlerstraße 19
> 79098 Freiburg
> Deutschland
> T  + 49 761 3 85 59 410
> F  + 49 761 3 85 59 550
> E  lar...@thomas-daily.de
> www.thomas-daily.de
>
> Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
> Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
> Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947
>
>
> Registrieren Sie sich unter https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in für die
> TD Morning News, eine kostenlose Auswahl aktueller Themen aus TD Premium,
> morgens ab 9:15 in Ihrer Mailbox.
>
> Aktuelle Presseinformationen für die TD Morning News und TD Premium nimmt
> unsere Redaktion unter redakt...@thomas-daily.de entgegen.
> Redaktionsschluss für die TD Morning News ist täglich um 8:45.
>
> Register free of charge at https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in to have
> the TD Morning News, a selection of the latest topics from TD Premium,
> delivered to your mailbox from 9:15 every morning.
>
> Our editorial department receives the latest press releases for the TD
> Morning News and TD Premium at redakt...@thomas-daily.de. The editorial
> deadline for the TD Morning News is 8.45am daily.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

how to get the selected tabbedpanel

2010-06-01 Thread Antonio Mauriello

Hi All,

I have the following issue:

A wicket page where I'm working on has a Form plus an AjaxTabbedPannel.

The form has only buttons that change the status of some values in the page.

In each onSubmit() I set the response page to reload the same page but it
goes the default tab and not to the one selected when I click the button.

(All the buttons are outside the tabbedPanels, the panels just show
different details..)


Is there a way to get from an onSubmit() button method the selectedTab?

I cannot find a way to call from onSubmit the getSelectedTab() and pass it
as pageparameter to the wicketPage (to use then the setSelectedTab)


Regards,

Antonio

Re: Why does SerializableChecker throw WicketNotSerializableException on guice injected non Serializable class ?

2010-06-01 Thread nino martinez wael

did you mark it transient?

2010/6/1 Joseph Pachod :
> hi
>
> In a form, I'm injecting a factory through guice. The factory's interface
> doesn't extend Serializable, as well as the implementation.
>
> Then the SerializableChecker throws
> org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException:
> Unable to serialize class:
> com.softculture.core.dataseries.morphia.wicket.DefaultDecoratorFactory
>
> I was assuming that such a class wouldn't need to be Serializable, since it
> was never serialized done thanks to guice injection... Am I wrong ?
>
> thanks in advance
>
> best regards
> --
>
> Joseph Pachod
> IT
> THOMAS DAILY GmbH
> Adlerstraße 19
> 79098 Freiburg
> Deutschland
> T  + 49 761 3 85 59 410
> F  + 49 761 3 85 59 550
> E  lar...@thomas-daily.de
> www.thomas-daily.de
>
> Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
> Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
> Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947
>
>
> Registrieren Sie sich unter https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in für die
> TD Morning News, eine kostenlose Auswahl aktueller Themen aus TD Premium,
> morgens ab 9:15 in Ihrer Mailbox.
>
> Aktuelle Presseinformationen für die TD Morning News und TD Premium nimmt
> unsere Redaktion unter redakt...@thomas-daily.de entgegen.
> Redaktionsschluss für die TD Morning News ist täglich um 8:45.
>
> Register free of charge at https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in to have
> the TD Morning News, a selection of the latest topics from TD Premium,
> delivered to your mailbox from 9:15 every morning.
>
> Our editorial department receives the latest press releases for the TD
> Morning News and TD Premium at redakt...@thomas-daily.de. The editorial
> deadline for the TD Morning News is 8.45am daily.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Why does SerializableChecker throw WicketNotSerializableException on guice injected non Serializable class ?

In a form, I'm injecting a factory through guice. The factory's
interface doesn't extend Serializable, as well as the implementation.

Then the SerializableChecker throws
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException:
Unable to serialize class:
com.softculture.core.dataseries.morphia.wicket.DefaultDecoratorFactory

I was assuming that such a class wouldn't need to be Serializable, since
it was never serialized done thanks to guice injection... Am I wrong ?

thanks in advance

best regards
--

Joseph Pachod
IT
THOMAS DAILY GmbH
Adlerstraße 19
79098 Freiburg
Deutschland
T + 49 761 3 85 59 410
F + 49 761 3 85 59 550
E lar...@thomas-daily.de
www.thomas-daily.de

Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947

Registrieren Sie sich unter https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in für die TD
Morning News, eine kostenlose Auswahl aktueller Themen aus TD Premium, morgens
ab 9:15 in Ihrer Mailbox.

Aktuelle Presseinformationen für die TD Morning News und TD Premium nimmt
unsere Redaktion unter redakt...@thomas-daily.de entgegen.
Redaktionsschluss für die TD Morning News ist täglich um 8:45.

Register free of charge at https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in to have the
TD Morning News, a selection of the latest topics from TD Premium, delivered to
your mailbox from 9:15 every morning.

Our editorial department receives the latest press releases for the TD Morning News and TD Premium at redakt...@thomas-daily.de. The editorial deadline for the TD Morning News is 8.45am daily.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

wicket clustering wicket-security

2010-06-01 Thread David Meulemans

I want to have multiple wicket applications to be clustered. Because I'm
using ehcache it is necessary to merge the applications into one .war file
because ehcache needs to be initiated in the same scope as the other
applications.Now the session is shared among all applications.
Is there a way to avoid this?

Re: Right-Click on LinkTree

2010-06-01 Thread AleXeL


I finally figured it out by overriding newNodeComponent and redefinying the
structure of each link.
Each link is now a BookmarkablePageLink and has the correct URL...

This could be helpful:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/LinkTree-with-BookmarkablePageLinks-td1878004.html#a1878004
LinkTree-with-BookmarkablePageLinks 

Best Regards, 
AleXeL
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Right-Click-on-LinkTree-tp2237440p2238234.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Process background

2010-06-01 Thread Ivan Arcos

I have the following problem. I want you when you click on a link I
load a modal window with an image of loading. Meanwhile I want to run
a background process. I've tried OnAfterRender but my process is
running before, I tried to thread but I must be doing something wrong
that always gives me an error There is no style application attached
to current thread.

What could I do?

Thank you very much

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Can't use form inside fragment