Hi,
Wicket 1.5 uses by default JavaSerializer (ISerializer impl based on
Java Serialization API) because it is tested well (in previous
versions of Wicket). It may be slower than other serialization
frameworks but it works well in all cases.
KryoSerializer is easy to use with Java objects and it i
(ofcourse I mean invoke within 1 minute...)
2012/2/23 Martin Makundi :
> I think that would be something that should be implemented at wicket
> core... anybody done this before?
>
> Is there any way to tell wicket NOT to serialize a page? For example
> give a timer if user does not invoke the
I think that would be something that should be implemented at wicket
core... anybody done this before?
Is there any way to tell wicket NOT to serialize a page? For example
give a timer if user does not invoke the page for 1 minutes it
will not be serializeed..?
**
Martin
2012/2/23 Juha Syrjä
Hi,
I would guess that Wicket uses a normal Java built-in serializer by default.
Here are some benchmarks for different serializer implementations
https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki/ . Java's built-in
serializer is not the fastest...
--
Juha Syrjälä
On 02/23/2012 08:45 AM, Martin
But is serializing wicket native components only.. I would assume
wicket does it best.
2012/2/23 Juha Syrjälä :
> Hi,
>
> Wicket 1.5 has support for pluggable serializers via ISerializer interface,
> you could try to plug in different serializer implementations, for example
> this one https://gith
Hi,
Wicket 1.5 has support for pluggable serializers via ISerializer
interface, you could try to plug in different serializer
implementations, for example this one
https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/wiki/Kryo-Serializer . That should
make the serialization bit faster.
--
Juha Syrjälä
On 0
The problem is that the SERIALIZATION takes time. So it does not help to
ZIP AFTER serialization...
I have debugged it and it's just thousands and thousands of components.
Even printing the component paths alone take almost 10mb or more because
there is repetition ;)
**
Martin
2012/2/23 Bertran
Wicket : 1.5.4
Tomcat : 6.0.28 to 6.0.35
JDK - 1.6
I have a simple search application where I could enter search parameters
like city name in a input textbox component. I am using displaying the
results in a separate page by passing search criteria as pageparameters.
searchForm.add(n
Hi,
Have you seen the following thread?
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Shrinking-the-session-size-simply-by-zipping-it-Saved-my-day-td4402980.html
Perhaps this can help you.
That said, 10MB seems HUGE! Since you already use detachable models,
maybe you could have a look at a memory
Hi!
Any experiences how to optimize the performance of a Page that
contains nested ListView:s with a total page serialized size of over
10 MB?
I have made all actual data objects non-serializable and available via
loadabledetachablemodel, but page Serialization seems to kill the
performance in aj
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the tip! This is an interesting approach as well.
On 22/02/2012 2:49 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
HI Bertrand,
I'm not quite sure whether this is your concern but take a look at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.tree.BaseTree#newLink()
It uses LinkType to decide what kind of Li
Hi,
what kind of exception do you get the second time?
Hi to everyone,
i have added some jquery validation code to my page and add
AjaxFormValidatingBehavior to my submit button.When i do not fill fields and
click on submit button, it gives error next to each field and does not
submit anything.
Got it. I was overriding the wrong getCallbackURL method:
public CharSequence getCallbackUrl()
instead of:
public CharSequence getCallbackUrl(final boolean onlyTargetActivePage);
Thanks a lot!!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Adding-extra-request-p
Hi,
Headers are not cookies.
By setting a header in the response you should not expect that it will
come in the next request.
A request header is set by the client (the browser in this case). You
can use UrlConnection or Apache HttpClient to set header request
which will be available thru WebRequ
Hi Martin,
COOKIES
---
I'm fine for this. My cookie code actually works. (But if the user's browser
disables cookies, then I want to use HTTP headers to be able to say "The
user is on his/her second page, and still no cookie, so cookies are
definitely disabled (I cannot tell this on the first
Put a break point at
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior#getCallbackScript()
and see what happens
This method should be called when the page HTML is generated. Long
before you are able to click in the browser.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:18 PM, gmparker2000 wrote:
> I appreciate all
I appreciate all the help but still no luck. I changed things to look like
this:
DropDownChoice myDropDown = new DropDownChoice("myDropDown");
myDropDown.add(new ConversationAjaxBehavior("onchange"));
add(myDropDown);
and:
class ConversationAjaxBehavior extends AjaxEventBehavio
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:50 PM, gmparker2000 wrote:
> I gave that a try on a DropDownChoice with no success. I'm probably doing
> something wrong. Here is what I tried:
>
> I added this to the constructor of the page:
>
> DropDownChoice myDropDown = new DropDownChoice("myDropDown");
>
I gave that a try on a DropDownChoice with no success. I'm probably doing
something wrong. Here is what I tried:
I added this to the constructor of the page:
DropDownChoice myDropDown = new DropDownChoice("myDropDown");
myDropDown.add(new ConversationAjaxBehavior());
add
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:03 PM, grazia wrote:
> I am trying to use the
> org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.data.table.DataTable
> following the example in Igor Vaynberg's Apache Wicket Cookbook. The line "
> table.addTopToolbar(new HeadersToolbar(table, null));" gives me the error
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:51 PM, gmparker2000 wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response. However, I'm still a bit lost. I'm currently
> still using Wicket 1.4 (although upgrading to 1.5 is possible). Both of the
> links in your reply take me to pages that appear to be related to Wicket 6.
> They b
Thanks for the quick response. However, I'm still a bit lost. I'm currently
still using Wicket 1.4 (although upgrading to 1.5 is possible). Both of the
links in your reply take me to pages that appear to be related to Wicket 6.
They both talk about a class named "AjaxRequestAttributes" that doe
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Martin Grigorov
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Stoch
>>> wrote:
No. I want to have . When you use this LinkContain
So my last message got off.
This will force a new session on every request of the page since the jsessionid
is not in url and cookies are not being accepted by the browser.
I would look at the wiki entry and see if that is what you are looking for.
--
Jeff Schneller
Sent with Sparrow (ht
If all you want to do is remove the jsessionid from the URL there is a wiki
entry on how to do this. It is under SEO optimization. This will force a new
session on every
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2012, at 8:00 AM, geissb...@gmx.org wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm struggling with the document
Hi folks,
I'm struggling with the documentation of ExternalLink (applies for both 1.4 and
1.5):
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/link/ExternalLink.html
I.e. especially with this paragraph:
"Note: in the case when the support for cookies in the browser is disab
Ah, thanks for noticing that. That is what happens when one person is late at
night...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ContextNotActiveException-using-net-ftlines-wicket-cdi-wicket-cdi-1-2-tp4408946p4410191.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list ar
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Stoch
>> wrote:
>>> No. I want to have . When you use this LinkContainer from my
>>> example in HTML like:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It will be
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
>> No. I want to have . When you use this LinkContainer from my
>> example in HTML like:
>>
>>
>>
>> It will be rendered as:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> So any attributes modified using behavior
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
> No. I want to have . When you use this LinkContainer from my
> example in HTML like:
>
>
>
> It will be rendered as:
>
> ...
>
> So any attributes modified using behavior will disappear.
>
>
> But if LinkContainer will not have setRenderBod
No. I want to have . When you use this LinkContainer from my
example in HTML like:
It will be rendered as:
...
So any attributes modified using behavior will disappear.
But if LinkContainer will not have setRenderBodyOnly(true), the the
corresponding HTML will be:
...
--
DS
On Wed, F
Hi,
So you want to not have (because this is what
.setRenderBodyOnly(true) does) and in the same time you want to set a
class an that non-existing tag ?!
The easiest way is to remove the call to .setRenderBodyOnly(true).
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it pos
Yes, bad.
We noticed this soon after releasing 1.5.4 ...
It is fixed : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4365
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found a problem with the latest Wicket version (1.5.4) and stateless
> forms. Now the values of input fi
Hi,
Is it possible to modify tag attribute (eg. add a CSS class) of
component which has set renderBodyOnly flag to true?
When using component.add(new AttributeModifier(...)) it has no effect,
because a tag in which this class attribute is appended is not
rendered in HTML (because of setRenderBodyO
Hi,
I've found a problem with the latest Wicket version (1.5.4) and
stateless forms. Now the values of input fields are passed via GET
parameters and are always appended to form's action attribute and it's
not possible to change field's value after the first submit.
You can reproduce the probl
To roll your own theme use www.themeroller.com and when done choose download.
You can then use the contents of the zipfile to create your own
resourcereference to use in IThemableApplication.
Hielke
-Original Message-
From: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com]
Sent: wo
Natalie,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:10 PM, N. Metzger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having another of my blind mornings.
> I just tried wiquery for the first time and had an accordion running within
> a few minutes, so first of all: thanks!!!
> Now: what's the best way to change the look and feel? I s
37 matches
Mail list logo
