(ofcourse I mean invoke within 1 minute...) 2012/2/23 Martin Makundi <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com>: > I think that would be something that should be implemented at wicket > core... anybody done this before? > > Is there any way to tell wicket NOT to serialize a page? For example > give a timer.... if user does not invoke the page for 1 minutes it > will not be serializeed..? > > ** > Martin > > 2012/2/23 Juha Syrjälä <juha.syrj...@gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> I would guess that Wicket uses a normal Java built-in serializer by default. >> >> Here are some benchmarks for different serializer implementations >> https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki/ . Java's built-in serializer >> is not the fastest... >> >> -- >> Juha Syrjälä >> >> >> On 02/23/2012 08:45 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: >>> >>> But is serializing wicket native components only.. I would assume >>> wicket does it best. >>> >>> 2012/2/23 Juha Syrjälä<juha.syrj...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Wicket 1.5 has support for pluggable serializers via ISerializer >>>> interface, >>>> you could try to plug in different serializer implementations, for >>>> example >>>> this one https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/wiki/Kryo-Serializer . That >>>> should make the serialization bit faster. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Juha Syrjälä >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/23/2012 05:12 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> Any experiences how to optimize the performance of a Page that >>>>> contains nested ListView:s with a total page serialized size of over >>>>> 10 MB? >>>>> >>>>> I have made all actual data objects non-serializable and available via >>>>> loadabledetachablemodel, but page Serialization seems to kill the >>>>> performance in ajax requests where I might be modifying just a single >>>>> cell in the maze. >>>>> >>>>> I tried callinc removeAll at onDetach... it improved performance but >>>>> ofcourse event listeners don't work anymore ;) I could write custom >>>>> event listeners as workaround, though, which would know to call >>>>> onPopulate() before triggering an event. >>>>> >>>>> Any experiences of similar situation? >>>>> >>>>> ** >>>>> Martin >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
