you
> are putting instances of it into hashed collections.
> Even if that isn't causing the main issue you are demonstrating, you may
> witness "surprising" behaviour.
>
> Regards - Cemal
> http://jWeekend.com jWeekend
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 15:35, Brill Pappin wrote:
> if "xxx" is a mutable Set then it should work.
>
> However you have to be careful about how you remove elements from the
> collection you working with, depending on your you do it, you'll get an
> exception about concu
}
> ... yes, it passes!
> That means that you could have elements of the same type in both your
> collections and still get a different result from each of your two snippets
> depending on the Comparator passed in to a sorted collection referred to by
> set1.
>
> I think there may
rdness.
>
>
>
> On Mar 3, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> Is this the same?
>>
>> Set set1 = xxx
>> Collection col1 = xxx;
>>
>> foreach (col in col1)
>> set1.remove(col)
>>
>> or
>>
>> set1.removeAll(col
Is this the same?
Set set1 = xxx
Collection col1 = xxx;
foreach (col in col1)
set1.remove(col)
or
set1.removeAll(col1);
???
If we loose the wildcard is it then still possible to do everything?
We have it to be able to use a List when we declare it as a
When you have that you have to copy it over i guess by a helper method.
I just want to know for sure that i dont miss something that if we remove it
that then somethi
fields to a
> newly-loaded object, then Hibernate will be able to detect cases in which
> the user is trying to save edits to a stale version of the object. This
> isn't always useful, but it might be, depending on your requirements.
>
> W
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2009
You shouldnt put that object directly in a CPM, but have a loadabled
detachable model in between. Because now you probably have that hib
object in the page between requests
On 28/02/2009, Stephen Swinsburg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm after your thoughts on the following method.
>
> Suppose there is
you cant do it like that
look at ResourceStreamRequestTarget
what you want is a combination of that and AbstractRestartResponseException
so you must set the RequestTarget in the RequestCycle and then throw an
AbstractRestartResponseException
(just like RestartResponseException works)
johan
On T
that was the whole idea, now you spoiled it! ;(
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 17:09, Jeremy Thomerson
wrote:
> I've seen plenty of programming language flame wars, but it looks like
> Johan
> is starting a REAL language flamewar. :)
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Joh
if you would do it in a time that i am in the swiss then i could also attend
But that is now and then +/- 1 time in 2 months..
(this week i am in Bern)
I dont have a problem if it was in real german, but it cant be in that swiss
german (which has i my eyes nothing to do with german anyway)
becaus
override the getDefaultChoice() and generate a (yes empty)
and the if selected is also empty generate
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 15:31, pixologe wrote:
>
> I tried overriding getDefaultChoice already, returning an empty string,
> this
> did not work, unfortunately.
>
> The 'Please choose one' opt
but if you just use static fields
then the only thing you have to do in your app
is when the Application.init() is called you just set them once through a
static setter on that component. (or reflection)
So you have to do all your injection over your components onces at startup
of your application
know.. I reported that to sourceforge months ago... :/ And it seems
> to be very unpredictable..
>
> However Jeremy's server seems to have no problems..
>
> 2009/2/19 Johan Compagner
>
> > First i also have to checkout why this happens and why it happens only to
> >
p on that.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Johan Compagner
> wrote:
> > First i also have to checkout why this happens and why it happens only to
> > sourceforge wicketstuff
> > only from that server
> >
> > Caused by: java.net.ConnectExc
/
>> [3] - http://www.wickettraining.com/ws-snaps/
>> [4] - http://www.wickettraining.com/ws-sites/
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Thomerson
>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:41 AM, nino martinez wael <
>>
.wickettraining.com/ws-snaps/
> [4] - http://www.wickettraining.com/ws-sites/
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:41 AM, nino martinez wael <
> nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I see t
no because the component isnt instantiated so that wount be called. after
deserialization that field will be null.
maybe you could bulid in a container/page a deserialize hook and when that
is called go over all your components and inject it again
johan
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:41, Martin Sac
a static service inside a component?
why would you have that? that sounds weird to me
Then you share that services over all sessions, if that is the case then you
can just as well make it a single ton class by itself
(MyService.getInstance())
johan
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 15:52, Christian Helmb
Hi,
if i look into this dir:
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/scriptaculous/1.4-SNAPSHOT/
i am getting really really sad :(
I want to get rid of all those horrible timestamps snapshots
these should be removed for everything, this will run out of disk space soon
like t
as far as i know it is called all over the place
For example WicketFilter.getLastModified()
But you are right about the RSRT that one should call close on detach as far
as i can see
can you make a jira issue?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:44, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <
adrian...@gmail.com> wrote
as far as i know it does follow the spec specially for query portion and the
path portions.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:26, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The constructor WicketURLEncoder(Type type) explains a whole lot about
> the compatibility of QUERY_IN
uot;modelObject.smallObject")))
>
> However, ComponentPropertyModel does the same thing in a clearer and
> slightly more efficient manner.
>
> W
>
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> do it then a bit different
>>
>> public
The below solution requires that SmallComponent know it's parent has
> CompoundPropertyModel and that there is a member called "smallObject." I'm
> trying to keep SmallComponent generic, like the Wicket built-in components.
>
> W
>
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2009, a
yes initmodel shouldnt call getModel() on the parent
because that was a big performance penalty on some solutions because that
would create and walk over the complete hierarchy of things
and then many many in between models are created, that dont do really
anything.
But why not something like this
On 13/02/2009, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> Johan Compagner escreveu:
>> if that happens then the newWindowBrowser detection is enabled and
>> executed.
>> This makes sure that a new tab or browser window (but same session) will
>> have there own pagema
against hibernate and then when it was finished
swapped it for something else?
johan
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 16:59, Hoover, William wrote:
> First of all, thank you for entertaining this idea :o)
>
> See comments below...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Compagn
>
> From a developers point-of-view standardization can often be a thorn in our
> side, but for management it can offer a
> vendor-independent/implementation-independent solution.
> Maintaining/upgrading infrastructure is difficult, expensive and time
> consuming. From the point-of-view of manageme
if that happens then the newWindowBrowser detection is enabled and executed.
This makes sure that a new tab or browser window (but same session) will
have there own pagemap
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 18:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <
adrian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Mäder escreveu:
>
>> Why
more "cut your development costs
> in two with Wicket". From experience, I am totally convinced that you can
> save 50% off your development costs if you switch to wicket (from just about
> any other framework), however, I've yet to find a contracting job here in
> Zür
switch to wicket (from just about any other
> framework), however, I've yet to find a contracting job here in Zürich where
> wicket is asked for (it's JSF, or even Struts).
>
> Thomas
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Johan Compagner
> wrote:
>
>> And t
And for 1.4+ we could make that map concurrent if that isnt already the case
On 12/02/2009, Thomas Mäder wrote:
> The synchronizationn is around a HashMap lookup. Considering how much longer
> it takes to actually process a request, I very much doubt that there is much
> contention. Modern VM's a
And then come into the horrible voting/administive stuff? Long Release
cycles that are controlled, features that are discussed over and over.
Hmm
On 12/02/2009, Hoover, William wrote:
> Just out of curiosity... Are there any plans to push a JSR that Wicket
> could follow. I think there would be
i can attend both
and also can present something on both if needed. But i dont know what :)
johan
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 23:53, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> During ApacheCon EU 2009 we can fill a 3 hour slot in the evening with
> a real Wicket community meetup. The meetup will be hosted in the
>
Talking about apache con eu 2009
Shouldnt we organize a get to gether?
I think we can now use the conference rooms of apache con them selfs.
On 06/02/2009, Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My colleagues Markus Hjort and Marko Sibakov and I are
> holding a full-day training session on apply
xtend.
>
> J.
>
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>
>> yes it grows until a max
>>
>> public DiskPageStore()
>>{
>>this((int)Bytes.megabytes(10).bytes(),
>> (int)Bytes.megabytes(100).bytes(), 50);
>>}
>>
>> (10MB for one p
yes it grows until a max
public DiskPageStore()
{
this((int)Bytes.megabytes(10).bytes(),
(int)Bytes.megabytes(100).bytes(), 50);
}
(10MB for one pagemap and 100MB for a complete session over multiply
pagemaps)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:44, Jürgen Lind wrote:
> Probably I was a
no i mean Tomcat settings not wicket settings
search for "tomcat utf uri encoding" in google
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:11, Philipp Daumke wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> thanks for your help, but I think it doesn't help. Just to make sure that I
> understood the Application#init correctly, you meant to
Did you configure tomcat correctly for utf 8?
Search this list for the right settings
On 30/01/2009, Philipp Daumke wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> when I enter German umlauts (e.g. "äöü") in a wicket text field it's
> converted to "äöü". Everything seems to be in "UTF-8". I already
> tried to apply a fi
because in the onbeginrequest of the requestcycle
the request parsing starts.. it is not done yet. so the request cycle doenst
know the page
What you should do is have a AbstractSecurePage and do you stuff there (and
so on)
But look at the other projects like Swarm/Wasp or wicket-aut-roles
On We
I guess wicket should dump the page serialized size in development
mode. So that users see them when developing.
On 21/01/2009, Michael O'Cleirigh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A big delay in refreshing can be a sign that your pages are serializing
> your domain object graph as part of the page serializati
detached.
>
> It seems to me that for wicket to support comet/bayeux, there will have
> to be a solution for the kind of problems I'm running into here. I
> don't think pushing the problem to the application developer (as I think
> you are suggesting) is acceptable in th
en the session is detached.
>
> It seems to me that for wicket to support comet/bayeux, there will have
> to be a solution for the kind of problems I'm running into here. I
> don't think pushing the problem to the application developer (as I think
> you are suggesting) is
You should hold that info yourself
Not the page itself but just the id and the version number (and pagemap)
Then through session.get(x,y,z) you can get the page
On 25/01/2009, Per Newgro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can i easily access the page from which another page is called? I would
> like to share the
I think having references to or from pages is a bad idea in wicket. We
serialize pages so if pages would have listeners then the are also
serialized. If others reference pages then after
serialization/deserialization they point to the wrong instance.
Way better is pure pull support. Components kno
Can i then do this?
Component x = new Component()
parent.add('first', x)
parent.add('second',x)
Or should it then throw an exception at runtime (it wil in develop mode)
And if there are situations that the component wants to know its name
before its added to the parent (in its constructor for ex
What kind of dirs doe jou see in that dir under tomcat? How many entries?
Do you have it for all your sessions? Is the filename incorrect?
On 16/01/2009, ragu_sree wrote:
>
> I am using wicket1.3.5 version only , but still getting the problem , any
> one please provide me the solution
> --
> Vi
> An ideal web-application is developed once and the Java code is never
> touched again for 3-5 years until there are a lot of new features
> necessary
where do you live?
thats not my experience. Yes after a while the web app code is pretty done
but then it did already run for 1 or 2 years i
create your own BufferedWebResponse
and overwrite this method:
public CharSequence encodeURL(CharSequence url)
and do nothing, just return the url
johan
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 18:14, Quan Zhou wrote:
> Firstly, i should say i have already read about those past threads which
> are
> concerned
This is because of your:
getSession().replaceSession();
call
You can change that in 2 ways
change the place where you call that so not at the beginning of the onsubmit
but completely at the end:
// Return onto the same page but disable inputField
setResponsePage
> think a big part of making it so good was the dutch cultural willingness
> (even eagerness) to puzzle over things until they make sense ("discussion"
> they call it).
:)
1.3 has its own ConcurrentHashmap copied from the 1.4 port
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 17:46, kanou wrote:
>
> It might be one idea to use concurrenthashmap.
> However, concurrenthashmap is API supported from JDK1.5.
> Moreover, I think that the Wicket1.3 series was JDK1.4 support.
>
> Therefore, I
Hmm weird nobody else seem to notice this before, we just should make
it a concurrenthashmap
On 24/12/2008, 加納充照 wrote:
> The following errors occurred when the performance of the wicket
> application was tested.
>
> [Trace of error]
> [08/12/18 9:53:34:575 JST] 003e SystemOut O 2008-12-18
>
really?
if somebody wants by bankaccount to put some large sum of money on it that
also would be more then welcome ;)
johan
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 19:19, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> As for the Wicket team, nothing is more welcome than being part of the
> community and contributing patches and on
yes something like that
more:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 15:07, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> do you mean?
>
> ..
>
> ..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Wadi,
> >
> > Sorry, but I do
no thats on the todo for 1.5
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 14:51, Wadi Jalil Maluf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All! I would like to know if the multiple wicket child is implemented.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Regards,
>
> Wadi
>
>
fixed
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:48, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am busy fixing it
> but it is not as straightforward as just replacing it with Object[]
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:38, jWeekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes
i am busy fixing it
but it is not as straightforward as just replacing it with Object[]
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:38, jWeekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, your suggestion should stop that runtime exception being thrown. A new
> (or more comprehensive) test for that method could confirm th
you can monitor what wicket does with the IRequestLogger
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:13, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is not a direct wicket question, but important for wicket usage, so
> I'm asking here...
>
> What you use to monitor Tomcat sessions size?
What kind of markup? Div? wrote:
> While I understand the Wicket authors do not want a magic framework, I
> wonder if anyone else than me ever wished for a "development mode" or
> option on the error page when protyping and receiving the very typical
> "org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Th
correctly.
>>>
>>> you mean that it should have been in 1.4-rc1 but it is not? so i
>>> could expect this to be fixed in 1.4-rc2 or 1.4 final?
>>>
>>> francisco
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PRO
if you make this:
final Recommendation recommendation = (Recommendation)
item.getModelObject();
not final does it compile?
If it doesnt then you have a leak
johan
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:02 AM, jhp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a serious problem with our application. It u
est(RequestCycle.java:498)
>at
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:444)
>at
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:282)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoF
We really should straighten this isVisible up.
Make it final, and let that on check flag and the other isVisible
things with an overridable method that users can override. (and maybe
cache this result in a flag for 1 request)
On 11/23/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sounds like a bu
If you dont want to use an original object why not just clone/create a
copy of the original end use that and then copy the values over again?
(i think beanutils or something van do that for you)
On 11/18/08, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Im trying todo a
/08, Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That was only after he cut the listview sizes - problem is that his sessions
> are 2MB now. Still should support quite a few (1000 = 2GB), but there is
> probably a memory issue to address there.
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:2
Please make issues for this in jira
On 11/20/08, aditsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I've been using m3 for a while and just tried switching to rc1. I found
> several problems:
> - LabelTree.getNodeTextModel requires IModel and returns IModel. I was
> overriding it and returning a Model, but
200kb per session sounds very reasonable.
Then you should be able to handle quite a lot of concurrent sessions.
What kind of hardware do you use?
On 11/20/08, Ralf Siemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have recently launched our new Wicket-based website, and now we are
> experiencing th
We tried that once, to have state transfered to the client, we didnt
like it (where it did go to) and we dropped it.
Cpu time and bandtwidth is way more expensive then memory. Wicket
takes now memory on the server but the overhead it would generate by
serializing and base64 every page into the resu
Can mysql really load balance like that? How does it work with
transactions and so on?
Normally you scale the webservers and have 1 big database server thats
serves all of them.
For wicket you just need tomcat with sticky sessions. Then you only
have to take care of the hibernate caching on each
no the only realy thing that i know most browser really look it up again is
"no-store"
thats why we have that disabled by default:
protected void setHeaders(WebResponse response)
{
response.setHeader("Pragma", "no-cache");
response.setHeader("Cache-Control", "no-cache, max-age
>
>
>
> > I already changed the handling of that in trunk so that now a page
> expired
> > is thrown when that happens.
>
> johan when did you exactly change that? does it also impact my issue?
dont know exactly but it is in M1 and the current trunk of 1.3
You dont have it yet if you are on au
i guess this is because we now use sessionid as the seed for the encryption
of the urls
So when a session times out and that user makes another request to it we
cant decrypt it anymore because
another seed is used.
I already changed the handling of that in trunk so that now a page expired
is thro
dont use a wicket form
But only have the form inside your html not as a component
And configure that form to just do a get to the url it is on
Then url must be mounted/bookmarked
The page must then have a PageParameters constructor where you read your
parameters from
johan
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008
was also
> identical.
>
> Also on line 246:
> channel.write(ByteBuffer.wrap(page.getData()), window.getFilePartOffset());
>
> PageA is written to channel twice with identical content.
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Regards,
> Mikko Pukki
>
> -Original Message-
Doesnt have to be a bug, (it could be a new version of page a) but
besides that dont we have a sliding window in the pagemap, so if page
a is touched shouldnt it get its own new place in the file (more 2 the
top) so that it doesnt get overwritten later on to early?
On 11/14/08, Matej Knopp <[EMAI
should i?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> youve never coded WTL?
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Who has a real live example of this function:
> >
Who has a real live example of this function:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jsr166/dist/jsr166ydocs/jsr166y/forkjoin/ParallelArrayWithMapping.html#withMapping(jsr166y.forkjoin.Ops.BinaryOp,%20jsr166y.forkjoin.ParallelArrayWithMapping)
Its one of the most beautiful generic methods i have ever seen!
Where is the Wicket solution!
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> This is off-topic, but I figured there couldn't be a better pool of people
> to ask. I have several friends and family members that want to set up
> small
> websites for their businesses
Personally i dont see an integration at all between GWT an Wicket.
Both are ui techs that do things completely different.
Give us an example how you see flow (setResponsePage()) in wicket and
what GWT then should do
On 11/13/08, nitingupta183 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am worki
I guess somehow the pages hold references to each other so if you
press the button on the inner page, and do your stuff, after that
wicket serializes that page it also encounters the other pages and
those are also serialized.
On 11/12/08, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a ModalW
If you use eclipse you should use the project specific format we have
defined for it. You should have a .settings dir or something like
that. Look at the wicket project preferences and look what formatter
you use there
On 11/12/08, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sure igor... :-) your op
I think that is what happens.
If pages are mounted we will fix the images so that they are not
screwed up because of the mount. What is ecactly in the html? I guess
../images/xxx right?
On 11/11/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wicket should be rewriting static urls for you so it sho
(getDefaultFileStoreFolder(), maxSizePerPagemap,
maxSizePerSession,
fileChannelPoolCapacity);
}
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David R Robison <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The size the session takes up on the disk. David
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>
>> which size ex
which size exactly are you talking about?
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:03 PM, David R Robison <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a convenient way to tell the size of user's session cache? David
>
> --
>
> David R Robison
> Open Roads Consulting, Inc.
> 103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320
> p
you could do something like that through the pagefactory i guess
override the default one
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:12 PM, miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I mounted a page in my Application
>
> now any time user requests the mounted path I want wicket to pull the
> instance of the page from s
that does work no
you cant invalidate the session and then redirect to an instance/session
page.
What you could try is the invalidateNow() method and then the new instance
page will be created in the new session.
Also clearing pagemap or maybe just replacing the http session should work
(a new met
wicket already works that way.
but what do you mean by "selects the page" how does one "select" a page in
the browser?
if you just use page links (back links) to the page then that will always
happen
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:25 PM, miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I want to make a page sessi
thats simple
what you there create is an inner class in an inner class...
so your textfield has a ajax behavior that is an inner class fo the Visitor
inner class so that behavior has a parent reference to the visitor..
make that ajax behavior his own class and your problem is solved
johan
On T
we still have a last x pages stored on disk.
it is just not a number of pages but it is how many pages fit in the default
window size of the file on disk (1 file per pagemap)
by default it is 10MB per pagemap and 100MB per total session.
so by default you can hold 10 pagemaps of 10MB after that le
i agree and we only need 2 things to be fixed improved by sun and then all
the current problems are completely gone
But i guess we never get them
Because they find JavaFX way more importand.. I am glad the focused on that
because it gave us Java6U10 but that whole JavaFX i dont have much hope f
i added my comments on how generics should be in a javalobby/dzone thread
about java 7:
http://java.dzone.com/articles/java-7-and-art-patience
couldnt help myself :)
I think java 7 could help wicket in 2 areas
generics:
class Foo
{
Foo(){}
Foo(Bar){}
}
better type inference Foo
one model because you have to manually call wrap() on those
> anyways...lately ive been writing a lot of components that take more
> then one model so i noticed this :)
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > its
its not just compound
we have 2 special cases for this:
IComponentAssignedModel and IComponentInheritedModel
which will be both pretty tricky to do if the users must make a field for
the model them selfs.
but we will see.
johan
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gt; >
> > >>> > and use it like this:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > form.add(new TextField("firstName", customer.firstName));
> > >>> > form.add(new TextField("lastName", customer.lastName));
> > >>> >
> > &
posed above seems really smart as well. However I'd rather
> keep is 100% java (ie not cglib) if possible.
>
> Thanks for any update if anyone knows anything!
> Wayne
>
>
>
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > no i really dont like that
> > then ever
me to
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Rob Sonke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not really a meeting but at november the 12th there's the NLJug's JFall
> again with at least one wicket session. I'll be there anyway.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> Harro Lissenberg wrote:
>
>> A colleague and I are getting more and
i also dont want to have another constructor with that title parameter
But if there are a certain amount of components that could use something for
accessibility then i am more for just a method
setTitle(IModel model)
or something like that
johan
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Steve Swinsbu
:51 PM, aditsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I thought about what you said, and debugged some more. Here's what I
> found out:
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > RequestCycle.isRedirect() is right, because that is a call that tells us
> > must i
redirect flag.
johan
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:11 AM, aditsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > what doesnt work?
> > it will throw a page expire now and that works.
> > It should work now just as normal links.
> >
>
&
201 - 300 of 1508 matches
Mail list logo
