loading scripts at the end of the document just prior to the
tag makes rendering the page more efficient. It is one of the golden
rules for page performance (see the yslow plugin for firefox).
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is this happening on
1) You *really*, *really*, *REALLY* should use an IDE. There is
absolutely *no* reason not to use one.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:02 AM, alex2008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) For see this project i don't use a true ide. Sorry. :blush:
>
> 2) Tomcat has extract the war file after the f
This assumes that the hacker correctly guesses the application key
(which you of course changed from the default setting), or has access
to your application to harvest URLs.
Making the SunJceCrypt user specific is as simple as:
new SunJceCrypt() {
@Override public String getKey() {
ret
but all actions on bookmarkable pages have session relative urls,
which makes guessing the correct URL still problematic.
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>> ...Which is pretty random. Only if all users would go over the
2 days without using google [1,2]?
listview.setreuseitems(true);
Martijn
[1] http://www.google.com/search?q=wicket+form+component+listview
[2]
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/listview-and-other-repeaters.html#ListViewandotherrepeaters-Usingformcomponentsinarepeater
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:09
Browsers don't know the wicket namespace, that is why we use it for
our own stuff. That is also why we strip them in production mode to
ensure that w3c validators won't bork on the markup.
You could use multiple tags to achieve what you want.
Martijn
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Martin Maku
also, don't use a submit button with wicket:id "submit"
Martijn
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:57 PM, FakeBoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I GOT IT
> I found the problem. The Problem was in the TextField with wicket id "id".
> When you want to safetly use ajax submit components (AjaxButton,
if you already know you want to append, then you can do this:
tag.put(getJsEvent(), "doChoosenBehaviour();" + tag.get(getJsEvent(;
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, ak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I stumbled upon this scenario wherein I have 'onclick=doSomething()'
> asso
also, take a look at AttributeAppender
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you already know you want to append, then you can do this:
>
> tag.put(getJsEvent(), "doChoosenBehaviour();" + tag.get(getJsEvent(;
>
AbstractBasePage extends WebPage
SecureBasePage extends AbstractBasePage
This is how we do it in our projects.
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Neil McT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm new to Wicket so please forgive me if I ask something incredibly dumb :)
>
> I've j
reWebPage. I'm assuming, therefore, that it
> implements ISecurePage?
>
> Thanks - Neil.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>> AbstractBasePage extends WebPage
>>
>> SecureBasePage extends AbstractBasePage
>>
>> This
perhaps LoadableDetachableModel?
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:07 AM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm stepping through my code that uses PropertyModel and noticed that it is
> called every time the object is required - which on my page is hundreds of
> time. I know
mount your page with hybridurlcodingstrategy
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:38 AM, pixologe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> no. having a nice/bookmarkble url means having all the state in the
>> url.
>
> hmmm i'm not sure... sometimes i'd like to have a pretty url, even if it
> does not hold t
Build it, try it, fix it, make it fast.
Assumptions are the root of all evil.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Wayne Pope
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> thanks for the pointer.
>
> However if I understand this correctly I would still need to setmetadata for
> every component,
move InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this); to the init() method
*AFTER* the addComponentInstantiatonListener call.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:22 PM, alex2008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In my small project (hibernate-spring-wicket) without JPA I have this big
> problem:
>
>
> @Sp
omers
happy and we are sure you'll enjoy creating them.
Eelco Hillenius & Martijn Dashorst
About Wicket in Action
Wicket in Action is a comprehensive guide for Java developers building
Wicket-based web applications. It introduces Wicket's structure and
components, and moves quick
Your repeating view is not dynamic. You should take a look at
refreshingview or listview. If you still want to use repeatingview
override onbeforerender and /modify/ the component structure.
Martijn
On 8/15/08, Daryl Handley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Newbie wicket user, but liking i
Node is not $1, that is LLMM$Node
$1 is declared inside LLMM#get(K key):
public List get(final @Nullable K key) {
return new AbstractSequentialList() {
public int size() {
return keyCount.count(key);
}
public ListIterator listIterator(int index) {
Chapter 5 of Wicket in Action covers this topic, to be more specific:
"Section 5.4.2 Using AjaxFallbackLink to respond to client actions",
and modifies the Cheesr store to use Ajax links to add items to the
shopping cart instead of using normal links.
Martijn
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Greg
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:05 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never did receive my email telling me the final copy was available
> for download. Should I email the publisher and ask for a new download
> link?
If you bought at the manning site, then yes. If you shopped at Amazon,
t
ly* glad that the journey is finally
>> over. We think it was worth it. Now we leave the book in your capable
>> hands to make beautiful applications that make your boss and customers
>> happy and we are sure you'll enjoy creating them.
>>
>> Eelco Hillenius & Mart
There is the slight possibility that the wiki is inaccurate.
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Wayne Pope
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to check I'm not alone on this, before going to the dev group.
> I've created a simple base page and markup and using market inherit
>
> Its a none issue really, just would be 'nice to have'
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> There is the slight possibility that the wiki is inaccurate.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Kaspar Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When/how often are the Wicketstuff snapshots generated? I am using
Everytime the source code changes for the project, or when Wicket is
updated (depending on the configuration of the projects in Teamcity
(http://wicketst
Did you consider upgrading to 1.3.4? THere are a lot of bugs fixed,
including session leakage.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Piller Sébastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm working with wicket 1.3.1. I've just get a very strange stacktrace in my
> logs. It is the firs
Not quite true: first Wicket will attach the model, which will load
the data from the database. When the form input is valid, this data
will be propagated to the attached model. => the data will reflect the
input.
The problem is that you don't want to persist the modified input
between the wizard
Failover support needs the updates done by the ajax request.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:13 PM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, this might be a really obvious question but... why are pages serialised
> for every ajax request? I thought the latest page was always stored in
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:27 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you don't commit the changes (and you wouldn't want to typically in
> a wizard) to the object between "pages", then the original data will
> merely be loaded from the database and your previous edits will be
> lost.
erhm
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:51 PM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Time for some coder booty! Yes wicket needs more action.
We already have the ultimate merchandise with Action:
http://manning.com/dashorst :)
- You can take it with you to work without raising eyebrows
- You can take
You might want to check this with the Apache PRC committee. They
handle trademark stuff.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is your friend.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So i'll try to get some things done, since there are many that wa
aiui, the far east even has a 26 or 27 hour clock. Mostly to denote
closing times of bars: so instead of saying closed at 2am, they say
closed at 26:00.
That said, 24:00 is uncommon in the Netherlands and the rest of Europe I think.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:10 PM, jnorris <[EMAIL PROTE
If you don't want to make the session contain the objects explicitly,
because the multistep process is only a small part of your
application, you could use session metadata to store the data
(temporarily). This does mean that it is serialized with the session,
but IMO that is a small price to pay (
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:57 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, all I can say is well done. Well done, indeed! :) It's somewhat
> more difficult to take the PDF version of the book to the toilet.
> People look at me funny at work when I walk into the stall with a
> laptop! :)
And
and use in places where you put between
and or and tags:
. is invalid html. Using
instead will automatically remove the tags in
production mode, so you don't have to use setRenderBodyOnly(true) on
the markup container.
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
<[EMAIL
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:22 AM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just considering storing the unit-of-work in the PageMap meta-data.
I haven't used that. Session is more in my comfort zone ;)
> What exactly is the problem with detecting the different browser windows?
> When doe
Yep,
We're *NOT* looking for blanket job offers that list all available
java frameworks. The job has to actually involve Wicket (related)
programming.
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Go ahead, feel free to post the job ads, as long as they are wi
but the coffee stains on your shirt from the coffee that seeps out of
those holes would detract from those points :)
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:07 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't really see why would you want to have Maven in
> between your IDE and the servlet container.
I Agree. Just use the wicket quickstart archetype generator and look
at the Start class in the src/test/java directory
1. you are repeating the UL tag instead of the LI tag. You should use
, but I'd recommend to rename the component to
menuitem to make it more clear
2. you don't have child components defined in the markup for each
element. This is necessary.
and in your populateItem:
link = new BookmarkablePa
Your application consists currently of only stateless pages. Wicket
will try to remain stateless until it is necessary, and keep
creating/discarding session objects until a stateful page comes along
(or rather, a session relative URL).
Read [1] for more information.
Martijn
[1] http://www.nabble
yes. Explicitly binding won't have an adverse effect if that is your
intention. Delayed (http) session creation is done to prevent an easy
DoS vector (though if your application at some point does create a
session, someone will find out and there you are...), and improve
scalability—having no sessi
I'd be more interested in getting this lady to showcase our merchandize:
http://digg.com/celebrity/A_Salute_to_Alice_the_Snorg_Tee_Girl_PICS
She's experienced in wearing tees. Imagine getting a promo round on
digg.com for a week
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Nino Saturnino Martin
While I like the language, I think it is a wrong path, because the
number of methods would explode:
new TextField().setRequired().setInvisible().isDisabled();
For each setFoo action you would get a setNotFoo action, and
corresponding isNotFoo query.
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Jan
Probably something for 1.5 (with WANG–Wicket Ajax Next
Generation–being based on YUI)
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been hearing some rants on how merging resources can up the
> performance, should wicket be able to
Just done that
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:19 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might help to have someone on the Wicket PMC contact the PRC folks
> as well. That way they know this stuff is going on with the consent
> of someone "in house."
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:44
because you're inside the constructor, and the fragment hasn't been
added to the page yet. So there is no parent to ask for a Form
instance.
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ritesh Trivedi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Edvin,
>
> Before posting, I already made Form a private member of t
throw restartresponseexception with your error page
On 8/27/08, m_salman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In my subclass of WebSession the constructor has to call a method that
> throws an exception. As you know the WebApplication calls the constructor
> of the WebSession.
>
>
> publi
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:52 PM, insom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> libraries?) I think I have it mostly configured correctly, but when I start
> Tomcat I get the following error:
> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter
> cannot be cast to javax.servlet.Filter
g
> of Maven would point me at the pom.xml, but that doesn't explicitly list
> servlet-api as a dependency either. Where is servlet-api defined as a
> dependency, and how do I get rid of it?
>
> Thanks for all your help.
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>
you could extend the serializerchecker to check for underached models.
We did something similar checking for non-transient Entity objects.
Iirc the code is either on my blog or Eelco's blog.
Martijn
On 8/28/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no, there is no easy way to "assert" that a
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:49 AM, pixotec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I checked out wicket-phonebook on 2008/08/27
> I can't execute
> "mvn package"
>
> successfully, because the repo "repo.mergere.com" does not respond for
> se
Though not Wicket based and probably overkill, but could
http://ofbiz.apache.org/ be anything to look at?
Martijn
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Korbinian Bachl - privat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> I'm also quite interested into this, however I'm stuck in work at
> moment, so
see IMarkupSettings#setDefault*DisabledLink
Martijn
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:55 AM, 张伟 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>I am reading -- a very good book. In the book ,
> authors explain the tag with the following code
>|#1
> |
>Page1 | #2
>Page2 | #3
> |
>
We just do it in CustomRequestCycle#onEndRequest():
@Override
protected void onEndRequest()
{
if (Application.get().isDevelopment())
{
// controleer of er hibernate objecten in de pagina
vastgehouden worden.
and yes, your implementation of the check looks good.
Martijn
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
--
and why even bother using mergere.com or devzus.com as a repo manager?
Martijn
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pixotec wrote:
>>
>> Thank you, this solves the SUN part...
>> But how to avoid using the unreachable repo.mergere.com-repository?
>> Where is i
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:54 PM, wil2008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could not deserialize object using
> `org.apache.wicket.util.io.IObjectStreamFactory$DefaultObjectStreamFactory`
> object factory
> at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Objects.byteArrayToObject(Objects.java:411)
>
> ..
Did you read http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html and see why
@SpringBean is important?
The problem is keeping a reference to the service. You might be good
enough to understand that, but how good do you trust your co-workers,
and even new members joining your team?
Martijn
On Sun, Aug 31,
Start the application in deployment mode?
Martijn
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Ronald Pieterse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I have been using Wicket for some time now and noticed that my processor
> activity is always at about 50%. When I start up my application server
> (Resin 3
It is the modification watcher thread, which is turned off in
deployment mode. So either you have tweaked the settings, or don't run
in deployment mode.
Martijn
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Ronald Pieterse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is already running in deployment mo
Just be patient: getting the first printed copies first is a writer's
prerogative. In the mean time, my Wicket in Action unboxing pictures
whos that the book is not a mirage:
http://martijndashorst.com/blog/2008/09/01/unboxing-wicket-in-action/
Martijn
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Jonathan Lo
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Jonathan Locke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wow. it comes with a free cat?!
No, but the cat comes with free lunches [1].
Martijn
[1] http://flickr.com/photos/dashorst/1401989456/in/set-72157594446810313/
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wic
item.add()
^
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, i see this error message a lot and i mean really a lot! i use a
> lot of ListViews, and the above error message is what you get when you
> forget to add to the ListItem and instead add to the
> Propert
Thanks for the report, I've notified Manning of this issue and they're
looking into it.
I also asked when the books should arrive. If you've ordered from
Manning, you should receive your copy one of these days. As I
understand it, shipping was happening today or tomorrow. I'm not sure
if you get a
a solution ;-)
>
> but wouldn't it be an improvement for new developers if the message
> were absolutely explicit about the problem?
>
> john
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> item.add()
>> ^
Take a look at enabling the RequestLogger and querying it. It gives
access to sessions and requests.
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/protocol/http/RequestLogger.html
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:32 PM, behlma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
Typical http log analyzers don't work well with wicket applications
because you can't get any idea which page is ?wicket:interface:3. We
use the request logger to give us statistics about the performance of
pages. From those logged requests we can track users, browsers,
sessions, requests, duration
Sounds like a bug in your NiteWebRequestCycleProcessor
Martijn
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:29 AM, rivkash1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello again,
>
> does someone have any more ideas about our problem?
> It is very problematic to work in production when the users are thrown out
> with exceptio
em that we have on production for a
> couple of weeks - long before the NiteWebRequestCycleProcessor class was
> created in the application.
>
> thanks
> Rebecca
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like a bug in your NiteWebRequestCycleProcessor
>>
>>
in html:
some foo
Which has the added bonus of being previewable.
Martijn
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm. As you say, there's no easy one-size-fits-all.
> There is an obvious improvement you could make, though. All JS/CSS
> contributi
Can we please get serious here? Google has delivered a beta product.
Untested, full with bugs. While I'd like to make sure that our
framework runs great on Chrome, I really like to wait until google
gets their act together and fix their f*ing product before we commit
resources to fix bugs that won'
I just reprodded them that we need closure *fast*.
Martijn
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> YES, Martjin wrote PRC (that it were approved by PMC members) and I wrote
> them too asking them what were needed to get approved. This were
;> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> great:) Im crossing my fingers
>>>
>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I just reprodded
p 4, 2008 at 3:27 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to drink enough beer that I can actually just set the book
> on top of it instead of sticking to the front!
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Martijn Dashorst
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
This is a good forum. As long as the screencasts are about Wicket (or
related community projects, I consider all 'stuff, databinder, brix,
web beans, etc part of that) it's ok. The same goes for
project/product announcements.
You should also link to those files from the wicket wiki.
Martijn
On T
you should use different browsers, not different browser instances.
For example firefox is unable to run multiple instances. IE is rather
tricky to really get it in different processes. So use IE *and* FF to
test this (or safari/konqueror/chrome/opera)
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:52 PM, m_salman <[EM
more bug fixes
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Jörn Zaefferer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a release date planned for 1.3.5? There are important updates
> in trunk, like protection against CSRF
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1782).
>
> If there isn't a date yet,
You mean 1.2 classes? Wicket classes reside in package
org.apache.wicket since 1.3
Martijn
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already understood the 1.4=m3 is the latest release. My problem is that I
> can't find any 1.3 Wicket classes with 1.4 jar. Does that
ppear to have ironed
> all those out. If you see something odd, please don't hesitate to let me
> know and I'll try to iron out any issues as quickly as possible.
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
jar file in the
> same direction but not Wicket. I can download the build again to see whether
> it helps or not.
>
>
>
> - Original Message ----
> From: Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, September 8, 2008 2:53:53
Or typing in WebApplication should give the appropriate class.
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then either your classpath is not correctly setup, or the jar is
> corrupt. Typing in WebApplication should give
> or
To check the jar file:
jar -t wicket-1.4-m3.jar
or if you have a zip client, open the archive to see if there are
classes inside.
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or typing in WebApplication should give the appropriate class.
&g
We use reportmill (I wouldn't pick that anymore), jasperreports (has
its own problems), crystal reports (haven't done anything serious yet)
and business objects (old version and nowadays XI). IMO there are lots
of problems with reporting tools: jasper is not sophisticated enough
in its design tools
ireport is not suitable for users.
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>> We use reportmill (I wouldn't pick that anymore), jasperreports (has
>> its own pr
Auch, with all those feathers stuck in my behind sitting will be a
problem for the next couple of days. Thanks for the review, I'm glad
you enjoyed it!
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Craig Tataryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey folks, here's my review of Wicket in Action. Excellent jo
wicket:message is stripped from the final markup in development mode,
this is intentional.
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:31 PM, insom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this is a Wicket bug or my own misunderstanding of
> development vs. deployment modes. My markup included the fol
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wicket:message is stripped from the final markup in development mode,
> this is intentional.
>
> Martijn
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:31 PM, insom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
&
The maven jetty plugin needs to be configured separately. See its
documentation regarding hot deployment.
Martijn
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:44 PM, pixologe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> The app is running in development mode and I did not change anything in the
> quickst
t; Even though it will obviously take me some more time to figure out how this
> can be achieved, all the more in a project that does not use maven - if
> anybody knows a good site regarding to this, i'd be happy to see a link :)
>
> Thanks a lot
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wro
>
> Eyal Golan wrote:
>>
>> Regarding the embedded jetty, do you know if it is possible to point it to
>> an external WAR so it will be as if deployed as well?
>> I looked into Jetty's document but didn't find.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:17
Then you don't have netbeans configured to copy the html over to the
classpath, like I told in my first reply.
Martijn
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:56 PM, pixologe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>> The maven jetty plugin is not mean
s/first/second/
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then you don't have netbeans configured to copy the html over to the
> classpath, like I told in my first reply.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:56 PM, pixol
hat there is no swapping apart from the one my
> IDE offers and thus indirectly answers my question.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sorry if this conversation is/was frustrating to you.
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>> s/first/second/
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:1
y, I can imagine that development will be
> faster using hotswap.
>
> Roman
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>> Because of discussions such as this. I'd like folks to actually use an
>> IDE and the quickstart as it was intended. We made the quickstart so
>> th
With that many users you probably have session retention. Try to
profile your app with yourkit or another profiler. Failing that, you
could look at the numbers using jmap and jstat.
Martijn
On 9/11/08, jmatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have a server with more or les 30K daily pageviews with
afaik http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1409
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Weaver, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I to would like to know the cause also as we have had this happen more
> than once in our production environment, five or six times that I know
> (through troubl
We need more information. Latest version doesn't provide enough. Which
*specific* version? What was your previous version? What are your
settings for wicket?
Martijn
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Johannes Schneider
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since I have switched to the latest Wicket
include example markup using
Martijn
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some very annoing designers is messing things up :)
>
> Here's the thing. I'm designing the wicket pages and a common thing is to
> add a css attribute to a ListView.
> Some
In his case I'd add a different stylesheet through a
webmarkupcontainer and attribute modifier. No need to go all skinny
dipping imo.
Martijn
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:46 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Take a look at this document. It should help you.
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/W
Why not create an authenticated session instead?
Martijn
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Neil McT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I tried that but it didn't work.
>
> But it did remove the need for me to manufacture a unique hive-key per
> WicketTester instance... so it wasn't a total loss :)
>
701 - 800 of 1791 matches
Mail list logo
