It's not possible to help you without knowing seeing more code. What
are the items you are creating? It's probably the models itself that
cause the outofmemory error, you are likely to be loading someting
huge.
-Matej
On Dec 17, 2007 6:12 AM, kenixwong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi, anyone ca
he super class. Are there any plans to change this?
>
> -
> Loren
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2007 3:28 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You need to override the getImageResourceReference method of
> > LabelIconPanel (or LinkIconPanel). Look at the default
There is no reason why clustering support should have any additional
runtime overhead in non-clustered environment.
-Matej
On Dec 12, 2007 9:44 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree for full transparant clustering if that cost only 5%
> performance compared to what we have now
You need to override the getImageResourceReference method of
LabelIconPanel (or LinkIconPanel). Look at the default implementation
in LabelIconPanel.
-Matej
On Dec 12, 2007 9:27 PM, Loren Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to remove the folder and page icons from a LinkTree and I'm not
>
Application.getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(boolean stripWicketTags);
-Matej
On Dec 8, 2007 4:36 PM, Thomas R. Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm biulding YUI menus using wicket panels for composition.
> But even though I use setRenderBodyOnly( true ) to get rid of the
> element, Y
That's not really a wicket thing. It's about how you style it,
optionally you can provide alternative markup by subclassing it and
creating new markup file for the subclass.
-Matej
On Dec 7, 2007 11:42 PM, Beyonder Unknown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Have anybody here implemented a
Probably just avoiding api clutter. You can always use
IHeaderResponse.renderString.
-Matej
On Dec 7, 2007 9:38 AM, Bart Molenkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a special reason why there is no IHeaderResponse.renderCSS()
> to render a String of CSS inline? There is something simi
Why don't you post a comment to the article?
-Matej
On Dec 7, 2007 9:13 AM, tsuresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear wicketeers
> Has any one tried Suckerfish dropdowns in wicket. I saw one examle of it in
> http://javathoughts.capesugarbird.com/2007/11/suckerfish-dropdowns-for-wicket.html
>
On Dec 4, 2007 6:29 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before today the default behavior for wicket Trees was that all nodes
> were expanded by default. This caused problems with lazily initialized
> modes (e.g. file system model or JSR model) where wicket at
at this happens in IE only. I
> am using wicket-1.3.0-rc1.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
>
> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't seem so. Is it reproducable? How does it happen?
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On Dec 4, 2007 3:43 PM, Alex Objelean <[EM
Hi,
before today the default behavior for wicket Trees was that all nodes
were expanded by default. This caused problems with lazily initialized
modes (e.g. file system model or JSR model) where wicket attempted to
load the entire data during tree render.
So I changed the default behavior to have
.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80)
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
&
You need to use ajax button to properly close the window.
Alternatively, you can put this script to your page (only for 1.3):
Wicket.Window.unloadConfirmation = false;
-Matej
On Dec 3, 2007 7:48 PM, narup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am using a custom wizard in a modal windo
Hi,
at this point back button will not work across cluster (it's planned
though). However, the failover for last accessed page should work
anyway. If it doesn't, you have probably problem in your
configuration.
-Matej
On Dec 4, 2007 11:26 AM, michalb_cz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lo,
>
> I h
hether to
> subclass BaseTree (from core) or DefaultAbstractTree (from extensions) for
> one's own tree implementation, by just looking quickly at the APIs, code or
> the javadoc.
>
> Regards - Cemal
> http://jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk
>
>
>
>
>
Hi,
the diagram looks ok, however it covers a lot of internal tree state,
which is something the users shouldn't be botherered with. Are you
sure you want to go into such details?
-Matej
On Dec 2, 2007 9:39 PM, jweekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm preparing a presentation on Trees in Wick
use httpservletresponsewrapper and intercept setHeader.
-Matej
On Dec 1, 2007 10:47 PM, Artur W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> >
> > Check the response headers.
> >
>
> Sorry for the stupid question but how can i do tha
ill work across cluster.
-Matej
>
> FArhan.
>
>
>
>
>
> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, that will not work anyway. The files stored on disk are not
> > self-contained. The index required to interpret the files is stored in
> > memory and is spe
? can u give me an idea..?
>
> Farhan.
>
>
>
> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, that will not work anyway. The files stored on disk are not
> > self-contained. The index required to interpret the files is stored in
> > memory and is specific for each node
Check the response headers.
-Matej
On Dec 1, 2007 12:08 PM, Artur W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> >
> > Yes. Your filter should check if the resource is already compressed.
> > Wicket compress javascripts and css
Sorry, that will not work anyway. The files stored on disk are not
self-contained. The index required to interpret the files is stored in
memory and is specific for each node. The DiskPageStore at this point
doesn't support session replication (thus no back button for
replicated session). However,
Yes. Your filter should check if the resource is already compressed.
Wicket compress javascripts and css files already. Your filter
probably compresses it again.
-Matej
On Nov 30, 2007 3:51 PM, Artur W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I added Gzip Filter because my pages are really huge ;)
failure handler(s)...
> Antoine Angénieux a écrit :
>
> > Just updated and rebuilt from the trunk, and now Ajax the pager
> > component in AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable do not work any more... (IE6
> > and IE7)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
Could be caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-745
(read the last comment)
-Matej
On Nov 30, 2007 9:37 AM, Johan Maasing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 6:41 AM, Иванов Дмитрий <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Everybody hello.
> >
> > As far as i know:
> > - if ypu a
something new every day.
>
> Do you also serve the HTML gzipped?
>
>
> Regards,
> Sebastiaan
>
> Matej Knopp wrote:
> > We do also serve javascript gzipped, so there is no reason for using
> > mod_gzip either.
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On No
tra complexity, with no real gain. Wicket markup can already be
> "minimified" (see Matej's other mail), and I really think using
> something like mod_gzip is a much better option: separation of concerns
> and you get compression on other stuff as well.
>
> Regards,
>
But that would mean maintaining two files for every script. Which
means at least a compilation time dependency. And I still don't see
good reason for this.
-Matej
On Nov 29, 2007 1:26 PM, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sebastiaan, Matej, I think you get me wrong.
> I do not suggest
You can do this by directly using IHeaderResponse.renderString().
e.g. make a custom behavior that implements IHeaderContributor and
call this from it's renderHead.
I don't think we need this in HeaderContributor itself. But others
might have different opinion.
-Matej
On Nov 29, 2007 11:08 AM, Al
Wicket already strips whitespace and comments in deployment mode.
Using another tool to pack the javascript doesn't gives much advantage
and introduces another dependency.
-Matej
On Nov 29, 2007 11:17 AM, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It would be nice to have 2 versions of each js:
Looks like a bug in 1.2.6. Can you upgrade to 1.3?
-Matej
On Nov 28, 2007 9:29 PM, narend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks
> I use AjaxSubmitLink & AutoCompleteTextField on my wicket page. The
> AjaxSubmitLink works fine when I first access the page, but when I navigate
> away from the pag
Hi,
should be fixed in latest trunk.
-Matej
On Nov 26, 2007 5:24 PM, picknick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's the jira issue. Currently i can't say anything about IE7.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1186
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
On Nov 27, 2007 3:23 PM, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is up to you how to style the markup. A little of CSS can do all you need.
little CSS? for a floating column that says on screen while other
scroll? Heh, I doubt it :)
At least if you want to work it across different browsers.
t
the changes and updates itself properly.
-Matej
>
> Again, thank you very much I think I got it now :-)
>
>
> Greetings
>
> Thomas
>
> 2007/11/27, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > problem is that you rebuild the entire tree in onBefore
It might be a bug, can you please make a quickstart that shows the
behavior? Thanks.
-Matej
On Nov 14, 2007 12:31 AM, yadubi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have an application which is modeled on ajax SimpleTreePage example.
> Navigation is handled by overriding
> the onNodeLinkClicked of the L
tuff and that's why it is failing.
>
> Greetings
>
> Thomas
>
> 2007/11/27, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > It's hard to tell without any code. Basically, if you have proper
> > listeners fired in your model the tree should update itse
It's hard to tell without any code. Basically, if you have proper
listeners fired in your model the tree should update itself.
Alternatively, you can try calling invalidateAll() in your page
onBeforeRender() (before calling super.onBeforeRender).
Can you post a quickstart?
-Matej
On Nov 26, 2007
Hi,
there is currently no way to alter the position. It's always centered
first time it shows.
-Matej
On Nov 26, 2007 9:12 PM, Clay Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
>
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to specify ModalWindow's initial
> positioning. I have left the cookie
Does it happen for IE6 only or also for IE7? Can you create a jira
issue and attach a quickstart?
-Matej
On Nov 26, 2007 12:19 PM, picknick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm using a DataView-Table with an AjaxPagingNavigator listing 100 items per
> page. Each item has an AjaxLink to a detail vi
What you want to do is probably not possible, unless you create an
applet with will run with proper security manager settings (thus
requiring proper certificate, etc.). Generally, anything that runs in
browser can not really touch user's computer, as it would be a high
security risk.
-Matej
On No
Please create a jira entry, it's a bug probably.
-Matej
On Nov 22, 2007 11:17 AM, Francis De Brabandere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are deploying our wicket application to Glassfish (V2). After undeploying
> and deploying a few times the PageSavingThread's of each deploy keeps
> r
Hi,
there is no easy workaround I'm affraid. It's a bug that needs to be
fixed. I've reopened the issue.
-Matej
On Nov 22, 2007 2:10 AM, Matt Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I posted an update to a ticket tonight
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-745), which poi
You have to close the modal window and call setResponsePage from
within the WindowClosedCallback.
-Matej
On Nov 19, 2007 11:22 PM, Tim Lantry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to forward to a page outside of a modal window from within
> a modal window? The typical behavior when using
Are there still compression problems with current trunk? I've been
testing that with YUI and DOJO and had no problem.
-Matej
On Nov 19, 2007 2:34 PM, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Bille wrote:
> > The easy solution is to disable javascript cleanup:
> >
> > INIT:
> > getResourceSetting
On Nov 15, 2007 9:06 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for me, pros would be:
>
> trully object oriented: allows great encapsulation/extension/reuse
> code centric: easier refactoring, maintenance
> trivial component creation: awesome reuse of high level functionality
> inter/intra pro
When user presses the back button, wicket need to reconstruct the
previous page instance. And the previous page instance is stored in
second level cache. Wichet is a statefull framework, it maintains page
instances. Most of the time the url only contains page id and page
version. This is used to pu
No, there is no such thing as having ajax request target during page
load. What would it do, anyway?
What we could do is making ModalWindow.getWindowOpenJavascript public,
so that you could use the resuling javascript in
IHeaderResponse.renderOnDomReadyJavascript().
-Matej
On Nov 16, 2007 7:50 P
Yeah, don't you by any chance refresh the dataview usign ajax? Browser
seem to be caching old DOM tree. Try adding cache-control: no-store
header in Page.configureResponse.
-Matej
On Nov 14, 2007 8:54 PM, Evan Chooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using rc1 when I click on a link in a DataView, cli
Err. These exception shouldn't happen anymore with latest wicket.
Anyone who can reproduce this with latest wicket please file a jira
issue, preferred with quickstart. It's a bug.
Thanks.
-Matej
On Nov 14, 2007 4:22 PM, jweekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you try using something like set
You have something transient in your model. Or something implementing
Externalizable without properly serializing the properties.
-Matej
On Nov 13, 2007 3:59 PM, Evan Chooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having some strange behavior with a DataTable and the back button.
> When I back up to th
Thanks for the issue. Looks like a bug in AbstractTree.
-Matej
On Nov 12, 2007 5:47 AM, Doug Leeper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> JIRA issue created ( http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1148
> WICKET-1148 )
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/TreeModel-error-tf
No. The old pages (serialized to disk) are only saved on one node,
unless you have some kind of distributed page store. In the (possibly
near) future we might support automatic replication of page store.
It's on my todo list :)
-Matej
On Nov 13, 2007 10:17 AM, mfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> S
If the page is stateless, why are you using hybrid url coding strategy
for it? You should just mount it.
Also, even more important thing, is the page really stateless?
Stateless pages don't have versions.
Link is not a stateless component so if you use it on a page, it will
make it statefull.
As f
Hi,
It's because it only worked in IE and Firefox. As far as I know there
is no way to get that event in Safari on Opera. And we can't have
thing in wicket core which doesn't consistently across supported
browsers.
-Matej
On Nov 10, 2007 6:01 PM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI,
>
I am affraid you can't modify a component from a behavior before
render. Unline onBeforeRender in component, the behavior's
beforeRender is called right before component rendering, i.e. during
the rendering process. In the next verion we will probably rename the
before/afterRender methods in behavi
Yeah, something like this could be done, but then we would probably
have to user separate folder for each pagestore / application, just to
make sure that one page store doesn't touch other pagestore files.
Still, the question is whether we should do this at all. If you kill
your container (don't b
> We could read the session timeout from web.xml and delete what is older.
But should we really do that? When session timeouts, the data is
deleted anyway. These "dangling" files seem to be a caused by
something else.
-Matej
>
> Not a high priority thing for me tbh, but I think it can be done.
>
On Nov 8, 2007 6:43 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guys I am on the same project so I can speak a bit more. The real issue is
> > that on Redhat the default max directories is something like 32K. We ran
> > out of file descriptors. Basically for every unique session there is
gt; >
> > But 50 is nothing (at least i think it is nothing) and linux should be
> > able
> > to handle that just fine
> > Can somebody peak how many handles we take on those session files? Maybe
> > we
> > leak somewhere
> > or do take more then we think.
There is a constructor parameter in DiskPageStore constructor (the
last int parameter) that says how many handles DiskPageStore will keep
opened.
But the default number of file handles is 50. If this is causing your
server file handle problems than you should consider changing the
configuration. A
; >
> > http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/modal-window.1";
> > width="100%" height="100%">
> >
> >
> >
> > And then open "Show modal dialog with panel" and try to close the dialog.
> >
> > Mahavishnu
>
Ever heard of constructor chaining?
-Matej
On 11/3/07, Brill Pappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moving to the list as suggested by Gwyn.
>
> From Jira issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1108
>
> Maybe I wasn't clear on what my problem with it was.
>
> 1) doing any extensive am
Sorry, that is just a typo. Will be fixed in a second.
-Matej
On 11/2/07, Per Newgro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it correct that the jira entry says it is fixed in beta4? Because we use
> beta4 and the title still needs a Model instead of an IModel.
>
> Cheers
> Per
>
> --
I think this should wait after 1.3. And I'm not the one who's usually
hesitating what it comes to breaking stuff :)
-Matej
On 11/2/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/1/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if we rename it then we should also rename Component.RENDER
; Please let me know as I might done something incorrectly like filling the
> correct values for the properties of the Issue. Example: it is not major, it
> is minor. things like that.
>
>
> f(t)
>
>
> On 11/1/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
Why do you use frames anyway? If you want to pass things between
frames javascript is the only way, but I don't see what's the point of
using frames when you have framework capable of Ajax partial page
updates.
-Matej
On 11/1/07, Devin Venable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I posted a question a fe
Yourkit really works pretty darn well.
Btw. What wicket version are you using? And are you sure it's Wicket /
Web that is leaking?
-Matej
On 11/1/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i use yourkit, it seems to work pretty darn well
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 11/1/07, Doug Leeper <[EMAIL PROTECT
that show the issue.
>
> Now what?
>
> Do I Zip the root project folder with all inside and attach it to a JIRA?
>
> thanks,
>
> f(t)
>
>
> On 10/31/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well, it's the last resort for you, but first
The modal window probably won't work well when paced in a page that is
loaded in iframe. Still, if you can provide a quickstart assigned to a
JIRA entry I will take a look if there is a quick fix for your
problem.
-Matej
On 11/1/07, Deepak Mahavishnu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm do
I'd say more like the enclosure should check is the component will
render rather than a simple isVisible check.
-Matej
On 11/1/07, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2007 9:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there seems to be a bit of a disconnect between "re
art the last resort.
>
> I'll get right on it. Jira + QuickStart.
>
> We must all contribute.
>
> :-)
>
> f(t)
>
>
> On 10/31/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So even better than html page would be a quickstart attched to jira
Override Page.configureResponse() and add the flags you want there.
-Matej
On 10/31/07, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I notice that Pragma no-cache is set for every WebPage and I cannot
> see how I can turn it off for my bookmarkable stateless pages could
> would benefit fro
So even better than html page would be a quickstart attched to jira
issue that you create about this problem :-)
Cheers,
-Matej
On 10/31/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got your point. But I need a complete html file to be able to
> reproduce it with a
basically call the *Wicket.replaceOuterHtml=function(){ blah,
> blah* to replace the one in the framework with the fixed one. And we call
> the replacement on a window.setTimeOut() on the specific page in which we
> have the panel with subpanels.
>
> thanks,
>
> f(t)
>
>
Pen wrote / napísal(a):
I have a few question regarding the wicket usage. we are trying to Implement
wicket as our next MVC framework, Can please someone answer the questions
below
Hi
- about session support - wicket stores the render state of most renderer's
in session for different users o
IREBUG toolbar or something of the sort.
If everything else fails I'll provide a QuickStart.
Thanks,
f(t)
On 10/23/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you provide a quickstart?
-Matej
On 10/23/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi. I&#x
No idea. The javascript has nothing to do with wicket.
-Matej
On 10/30/07, Cristi Manole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with ModalWindow.
>
> No matter what I do I cannot manage to close it. Although the method for
> closing it IS INDEED called (and then the focus set to
s.
John
On 29 Oct 2007, at 17:27, Matej Knopp wrote:
I doubt it would prevent the page from being serialized. Versioning
doesn't spot all changes to page (e.g. setting a property) so we can't
rely on it, therefore we serialize it on every request.
However, if you really want to ge
or autocomplete requests.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote / napísal(a):
On 10/29/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I doubt it would prevent the page from being serialized. Versioning
doesn't spot all changes to page (e.g. setting a property) so we can't
rely on it, the
I doubt it would prevent the page from being serialized. Versioning
doesn't spot all changes to page (e.g. setting a property) so we can't
rely on it, therefore we serialize it on every request.
However, if you really want to get around the serialization for certain
cases, you need to call Ses
Are you sure that the newly added image has different src attribute
(e.g. adding a timestamp) than the old one? No-cache and no-store
headers on the image itself don't prevent the browser from caching
images on one page.
-Matej
Kirk Israel wrote / napísal(a):
I'm still having the fundamenta
It is indeed a bug in FormComponentFeedbackBorder. Should be fixed
soon though :)
-Matej
On 10/29/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > in 1.3.0-beta4, Page.renderPage() doesn't call the updateFeedback() on its
> > children any more. Because of this change the FormComponentFeedbackBo
Looks like the FormComponentFeedbackBorder is not fixed yet. Will fix today.
-Matej
On 10/29/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 4) Pages are stateful now because of -
> > http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-page-creating-session-tf4604432.html#a13147396
>
> Ah, I missed this. I fixed
It is already fixed in 1.3.
-Matej
On 10/29/07, wheleph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> I use Wicket 1.2.6 and when I try to disable AjaxSubmitLink via
> link.setEnabled(false) call it really doesn't react on clicks but it still
> looks like a regular link in browser. I mean th
I think this shouldn't be difficult to accomplish with BaseTree and
AjaxCheckBox.
-Matej
On 10/27/07, Doug Leeper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just about to tackle this. If I get something together I will forward
> the code.
>
> - Doug
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.n
Wicket doesn't track dirty components (because there are lot of
different ways you can consider a component "dirty"). But you can mark
your dirty dirty yourself (e.g. setting some flags) and then use a
visitor (MarkupContainer.visitChildren()) to find dirty components and
add them to AjaxReques
you can try to add cache-control: no-store header to your page. If
that doesn't help, fill a jira issue with attached quickstart.
-Matej
On 10/25/07, Evan Chooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having issues using the ALLP and the back button. I'm getting the
> following error:
>
> java.lang.Il
It's about how you implement the TreeModel. You need to roll your own
TreeNode implementation that loads the children lazily when then
children() method is called. That way you don't have to populate the
whole tree upfront.
-Matej
On 10/25/07, lubosp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use extension
Where do you have your LoadableDetachableModel declared? And what kind
of IDataProvider are you talking about? If it is wicket's
IDataProvider than it has to be serializable, because DataView/Table
keep it's reference.
LoadableDetachableModel is usually declared as anonymous class inside
component
I see, well, in that case you can use IHeaderResponse.renderText() to
render the entire script tag on your own (you can look at the
implementation of renderJavascriptReference to do something similiar
just put the encoding attribute in there)
-Matej
On 10/25/07, kent lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
I believe this is already fixed in trunk, so it will also be part of beta 5.
-Matej
On 10/24/07, marcus dickerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, but does apply to all ajax features?
> I am not using an Ajax Link explicitly.I add an AjaxEventBehavior to a radio
> component.
>
>
Why do you want to append the charset attribute? Why do you need it?
AFAIK if the charset is ommited the browser should use document
charset for the javascript as well. I don't understand the usecase
here.
-Matej
On 10/24/07, kent lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, or maybe even subclassing do
No, there shouldn't be as far as I know. This might be a regression
though, could you file a jira issue and attach a quickstart that
demonstrates the problem? Thanks.
-Matej
On 10/24/07, Thies Edeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For validation purposes I've added a class exending Abs
Hi, unfortunately the Tree class is not able to grow horizontally,
neither it is possible for it to have a horizontal scrollbar. If you
need this features, you have to use the new LinkTree (or it's
superclass BaseTree) from wicket 1.3.
-Matej
On 10/24/07, David Struck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
You can call setRedirect(false) during the request in the onSubmit
handler, that should prevent wicket from redirecting in that
particular case.
-Matej
On 10/24/07, Chris Lintz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok. Its a good thing.. I didnt know it was the default setting. I guess i
> should than
Modal window doesn't keep the reference to the page. What prevents you
from keeping the reference inside the page creator instance if you
need to?
-Matej
On 10/23/07, Kirk Israel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at the JavaDoc and inspected the class, but couldn't find a
> clear way of getti
What you want to accomplish needs a little bit more of javascript,
it's not a simple timeout. Problem is that you need to make sure that
after the timeout the mouse is still over the element. Anyway, you can
use AjaxEventBehavior.getAjaxCallDecorator() to return your own
decorater which decorates t
Can you provide a quickstart?
-Matej
On 10/23/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. I'm going to try to explain the best that I can and without posting code
> at first the issue that is happening.
>
> I have the following panels A and C. A has two instances of B neste
Problem is that AjaxRequestTarget only applies to one page. If you
want to update the outer page (assuming that you have another page
inside modal window, not a panel), the only way to do it is from
within WindowClosedCallback registered to modal window. So you have to
mark somehow dirty components
I think what you could try (though it would be a nasty hack :) ) is to
set rawInput property on FormComponent. However, you'll need some
introspection to do that, as it is private and we don't plan to
provide an accessor for it :)
-Matej
On 10/23/07, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ha
1.3 doesnt have this problem.
>
> On 10/20/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Johan?
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On 10/20/07, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > my question was probably unclear
501 - 600 of 859 matches
Mail list logo
