not replicate it in quickstart. The button works
fine there. For now I solved the problem by replacing AjaxButtons with
AjaxLinks.
Vitek
Matej Knopp wrote:
Plase create a jira issue and attach a quickstart to it. Thanks.
-Matej
On 9/13/07, Vit Rozkovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
No, currently there is not.
-Matej
On 9/14/07, Anthony J Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to center a ModalWindow so that when a user scrolls the site
with the navigator scrollbar, the ModalWindow stays centered while the site
behind scrolls?
Thanks
Anthony
Then it's a bug probably. Can you please create a JIRA issue so that I
don't forget to look at it?
Thanks.
-Matej
On 9/14/07, buealb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working with the trunk.
What wicket version are you using?
-Matej
On 9/13/07, buealb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm
for alternatives to ModalWindow and most of them
only have this working in FF (the small ones which don't involve a huge
library that is). Pity I'm not a JS expert...
- Original Message -
From: Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007
Well, modal window is a bit overkill in this case. I guess I'd replace
it by a custom mask and probably a centered message with a button.
It's hard to be any detailed, as this requires some CSS work and
custom javascript.
-Matej
On 9/13/07, Anthony J Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
.jar (Too many open files)
does suggest that the app is checking for last modified dates, while
for bundled resources the last modified time should use the jar's. I
thought we had a solution for that?
Martijn
On 9/14/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't look like
The panel is not rendered when you call setVisible(false). So the
subsequent ajax update has no dom element to replace. You can call
panel.setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true) to work around it.
-Matej
On 9/14/07, Kirk Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked over a lot of the usual examples but
Plase create a jira issue and attach a quickstart to it. Thanks.
-Matej
On 9/13/07, Vit Rozkovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day,
I am using last snapshot of wicket and there is a problem with modal
window - I create instance of the window and add it to the page. As a
content I use a panel
What wicket version are you using?
-Matej
On 9/13/07, buealb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Tree component. I have problems with the rendering of the children
of an TreeItem. If I look the code of Component.renderComponent, after of
calling to beforeRender(), you check if component
It should be fixed in svn already.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-942
-Matej
On 9/12/07, Justin Morgan (Logic Sector) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matej,
i think matej did fix that today or is fixing it
Any word on whether this bug is fixed? (see stack trace below)
Or
If you can submit a snapshot that demonstrates ajax failure in beta 3,
please do.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Nathan Hamblen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rüdiger Schulz wrote:
How can I find out more, or what more information would be needed to root
this down? Maybe this is related to WICKET-938?
Because currently there is no way during ajax processing to determine
that the event was a focus related one. I think that it's good to
restore focus on last focused element by default. But I'm also aware
that it causes problems with focus related event, so i think maybe we
should just call
Yeah, I must admit, that modal window is not the most customizable
piece of code out there. It is possible, but require a rather deep css
and modal window knowledge.
It's on my todo list to rewrite and modularize it, unfortunately I'm
rather busy lately.
-Matej
On 9/11/07, Anthony J Webster
that the next ajax
request would require again to call the (very costly) service and this is
not acceptable.
Alex.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
There seems to be something terribly weird going on. Your application
looks like a corner case. On page like that, I wouldn't be surprised
/file/p12588790/HttpSessionStore.jpg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p12588790/SecondSessionLevelStore.jpg
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
You can revert to httpsessionstore by changing
Application.newSessionStore method. But that's not
recommended.
What
There is no configuration option, you'll have to override css.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Ed _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking through the java docs - i see two settings for the modal window mask -
Transparent and Sem-transparent with an opacity of 10% - is there a way to
increase the opacity to
:
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
What Wicket version are you using? Because for reliable versioning you
will need 1.3. Also you problem can be browser caching the initial DOM
tree (not the modified one). So you should force browser to fire http
request on back button too - adding CacheControl
/span
/p
.
Could this be the cause?
Thanks
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: AjaxSubmitLink does nothing in IE
Could be related to markup
Even the regular DiskPageStore is optimized for use in clustered
environment, as it reuses serialized page instances when the session
is being replicated.
-Matej
On 9/9/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/8/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Also thanks to Matej
Can you be more specific? What kind of concurrency issues?
-Matej
On 9/7/07, Sam Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops, I posted on old forum...
http://www.nabble.com/threading-question-tf841003.html
[all request serialised on Session object]
Is this true even for Ajax requests? Is whole
and threading?
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Can you be more specific? What kind of concurrency issues?
-Matej
On 9/7/07, Sam Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops, I posted on old forum...
http://www.nabble.com/threading-question-tf841003.html
[all request serialised on Session object
check the Ajax debug window and the server *is* contacted and everything
however after recieving the response I get an ERROR: Error while parsing
response: Unknown runtime error in IE.
Any Ideas?
Many Thanks
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users
, not within one.
Martijn
On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
say 5 ms on a decent machine.
-Matej
On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL
We can't help you with this if you don't post any code. The session
object should of course be available for bookmarkable and
non-bookmarkable objects.
-Matej
On 9/7/07, Chris Lintz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This seems like a bug to me but I am hoping some one can lead me the right
Can't you just call webmarkupcontainer.setRenderBodyOnly(true) ?
-Matej
On 9/7/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get what you're saying, but the images in question are scattered
across the page rather than in one place that could simply be
enclosed. Thank you none the less, I do
();
}
}
};
WebPageTemplate.java snippet:
public void setUserInSession(User u)
{
MediumSession session = (MediumSession) getSession();
session.setUser(u);
}
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
We can't help you with this if you don't post any code
You can revert to httpsessionstore by changing
Application.newSessionStore method. But that's not recommended. What
are your performance problems? I doubt it is caused by the session
store.
-Matej
On 9/7/07, jamieballing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are trying to do some performance
You should try this with latest trunk. This should be fixed already,
but after beta 3.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When using wicket-1.3.0-beta3, still have the same problem.
Here is again the stacktrace:
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: component
I thought we were trimming textfield strings, but now i see it's no
longer the case. Is it a regression or a feature?
Also the missing message doesn't make much sense, can you please
report a JIRA issue and attach a quick start project?
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
beta-4 is out?
Alex.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Yes, I know what's causing it. And as I said, this should be already
taken care of. I've added a special precondition evaluated right
before each scheduled ajax request to check if the originating DOM
element is still in the document
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/
On 9/6/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno, there's still work to do, but there are snapshot somewhere
available, you can grab those if you don't want to build wicket.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please do, so that we don't forget.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you again, Matej! :)
Will it be fixed, or should I create a task in JIRA?
Alex
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Some time ago onBeforeRender was called always, even if the component
)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven
task
with the stacktrace and short description, than I'll do it.
Alex
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
that's weird. could be a bug in precodition check. Can you please
create a jira entry and add a quickstart project? This might be a
corner case, I'd like to fix this asap.
-Matej
On 9/6
Also, can you post code of the serverside event handler?
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately just a jira issue will not od that. Can't you try to
isolate the problem?
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's quite hard to create
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
When clicking _any_ row? Now that really is interesting. I hope you'll
able to provide the quickstart soon.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will do that as soon as I can (hope tomorrow. Anyway, the quickstart
is
easy
Hi,
this question has been asked here numerous times. The thing is, there
is in fact no real alternative of wicket-ajax for us.
Wicket is not built about Ajax widgets.Wicket is about server-side
components that can be partially updated using Ajax. That's a
fundamental difference.
As for the
Yeah, it does. Just check your logs, because this happens after page
is rendered, so if an exception is thrown, you won't see it in
browser.
-Matej
On 9/5/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is checked automatically when a statefull page is stored at the end
of the request in
Removed? They added it in 1.4.
-Matej
On 9/5/07, David Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The 'trace' log level is removed from the last version of slf4j.
In my project, I replaced trace(...) and is isTraceEnabled() by debug(...)
and isDebugEnabled().
I also use logback :
* successor
Problems with EC2 I had was that they don't support multicast. Which
is quite a bummer as most clustering/replication solution use
multicast heart-beats.
-Matej
On 9/5/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No experience (yet), but I'm
Looks like a bug in property resolver that it doesn't handle maps
properly. Johaaan?
-Matej
On 9/5/07, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks.
I managed to find the class of the source of the problem, and it seems
to be internal to Wicket.
is
required fair enough.
I was using the term Ajax in a very business sense ie: full stack
functionality; slides, fades etc.
So for those specific issues are we to say:
http://martijndashorst.com/blog/2007/04/16/javascript-animation-libraries-compared/
Is the future??
Matej
It's easier to just call getString(key) instead of using
ResourceModel in this case.
-Matej
On 9/5/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
String js += var myMsg = ' + JavascriptUtils.escapeQuotes(new
ResourceModel(MY_MSG, null) + ) + ';;
that looks a bit wrong, try something like this
I believe it will only fire the last added behavior.
-Matej
On 9/5/07, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Community,
what happens if two or event behavior are added on the save event handler.
I mean something like that
Button b = new Button(the-button);l
b.add(new
configs, and at which level, to get this? Enabling all Wicket logging is of
course quite verbose...
Thanks,
Jan
On 05/09/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, it does. Just check your logs, because this happens after page
is rendered, so if an exception is thrown, you won't see
This needs to be sorted out. Can you please add JIRA entry? Actually, is
there any other place where this causes problems apart from
form.setDefaultButton?
-Matej
On 9/3/07, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been trying to update to 1.3 and encountered some problems with
SubmitLink.
tool
complained because js was not minified even though it was gzipped.
-igor
On 9/2/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For certain browsers (even IE6) the GZIP compression doesn't work.
And
if
you have a lot of javascripts (YUI, dojo, ...) it can
If you need to access your component's parent in a safe way, the first
method when you can do that is onBeforeRender().
-Matej
On 9/3/07, Sam Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would that not be too soon? The Button could not have been added to a form
yet?
My particular use case is that I have
Yeah, but this way you are treating only effect. I think the error shouldn't
happen in a first place.
-Matej
On 9/3/07, Sam Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could give it a dummy IModel of just new Model()...
Ian Godman wrote:
Hi
I have a little problem with an AJAX submit
Can you please provide more code and entire stacktrace?
-Matej
On 9/3/07, Ian Godman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wicket version is 1.3 beta 2
- Original Message
From: Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 3 September, 2007 3:31:18 PM
Subject: Re
Hi,
there are multiple problems with your code. First you have
script type=text/javascript
document.getElementById('a').
/script
In your page's header. That's a javascript error (trailing .).
Also you've attached validating behavior in onblur. That's the behavior that
clears
On 9/3/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I don't find it surprising. Lot of javascript code are comments,
and
if you strip them out, you have less content to compress, thus the
numbers
are smaller. You can set as high compression as you want, but the
comments
still make
project with the dojo (and maybe YUI) compressors!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-918
On 9/1/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see reason why not, you can create a RFE in jira.
-Matej
On 9/2/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Your approach will not work, because the applications are in two different
contexts. So each one has separate servlet context.
Quite some time ago I had to deal with problem like this, I remember using
simple hessian based spring remoting which did it's job perfectly and was
quite easy to set up.
It will not help you append the hash to submitlink, as wicket redirect
afterwards. So the hash would be discarded anyway. Unfortunately we can't
just preserve it during request, as the hash doesn't leave the browser, so
it's not possible to get the actual value before issuing a redirect.
One
Hi Doug,
thanks for the quickstart, issue should be fixed, see the issue comments.
-Matej
On 9/1/07, Doug Leeper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See entry WICKET-914
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-914
--
View this message in context:
Good luck with such solutions. If you want to build things like that, you've
got basically two approaches. Use GWT (or something alike) - code logic in
limited subset of java and have it magically translated to javascript. This
seems somewhat fragile and limiting to me, but I don't have enough
Well, I certainly didn't want to reinvent the wheel. But all existing
solutions I was able to find either relied on a third part library
(shrinksafe) or had license not compatible with ASL. So I just wrote a
simple stripper. I think it still helps a lot, I didn't want to build a
perfect stripper.
You don't interact with WicketSessionFilter directly. You just set it up,
providing name of your WicketFilter ad argument. You need to map the
WicketSessionFilter to same url as your non-wicket filter/servlet and make
sure that you use a non-wicket filter WicketSessionFilter gets invoked
first.
What does it mean reset root node. What exactly do you do with your
TreeModel. And what tree model are you using?
-Matej
On 8/31/07, Doug Leeper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a tree that I reset the root node when a user selects on another
component (Component A). However, the tree is not
On 8/31/07, Kirk Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is why flat, page/request granularity web UI frameworks have
succeeded. They are simple and procedural. The reason that languages
such as Smalltalk, Java C# are much better than
it's simple :)
application.mountBookmarkablePage(/home/page, HomePage.class);
and the url can look like
http://server.com/context/home/page/cat/4
-Matej
On 8/31/07, V. Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I'm completely confused. I'm pretty sure I've done it this way
before and it
On 8/30/07, Kirk Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor, sorry if I've irritated you. I know some of my frustration comes
from A. an ugly reluctance to embrace change and B. Wicket is doing
great things but it's somewhat early days, and the documentation
(tutorial books and recipe collections)
Hi,
but the default factory doesn't do much, just creates markup parse. You have
to create your own markup factory, it's trivial.
IMarkupSettings.setMarkupParserFactory(new IMarkupParserFactory() {
public MarkupParser newMarkupParser(final MarkupResourceStream resource)
{
MarkupParser
It is correct, and there is nothing special you should do, if your TreeModel
is correctly implemented (=it reflects the change).
If it doesn't, it means that the TreeModel which you set to the tree is
holding stale data, you need to correct that.
-Matej
On 8/30/07, Doug Leeper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IPostOrderVisitor idea seems to me better than having another method
-Matej
On 8/30/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perhaps you can add an rfe into jira so we dont forget.
-igor
On 8/29/07, RedFury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply Igor. For now I'm
You can override newFeedbackPanel method of wizard
protected FeedbackPanel newFeedbackPanel(String id) {
FeedbackPanel fp = super.newFeedbackPanel(id);
fp.setVisible(false);
return fp;
}
-Matej
On 8/30/07, ivana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to remove/turn off Wizard's own
mountBookmarkablePage could help you here.
Wicket can't help you with autentication, but for authorization, you can
implement IAuthorizationStrategy which allows you to protect various bits of
wicket.
-Matej
On 8/30/07, Craig Tataryn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, this is my first post so
Hi, could you please create a jira issue and attach a quickstart project
that can be used to reproduce this? Thanks. I'll look at it ASAP.
-Matej
On 8/29/07, Stojce Dimski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a simple app embedded in my jetty (no web.xml, I wire-up the
components) with:
-
Well, it is just HTML. But there is a templating involved. And that has to
hinder previewability in a certain way.
-Matej
On 8/29/07, Carlos Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the is just HTML claim of wicket only goes so far.
On Aug 29, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Yeah, we have alrady seen it. But I personally think that responding to
arguments such as I just don't see what Wicket - or possibly any web
framework - buys you. is just a waste of time.
-Matej
On 8/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over in the Slashdot article about GWT in
You should use panels for this. You can have panels for 1 link, 2 links a 3
links. Or even put a repeater into panel to generate as many links as you
want. And you then need only one placeholder on the page (for the panel).
-Matej
On 8/29/07, Kirk Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey there--
You should use ResourceModel for this, it does the localization/message
lookup for you.
-Matej
On 8/28/07, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When I instantiate a Panel that does getLocalizer().getString() in the
constructor, I obviously get the errormessage:
WARN [Localizer] Tried
You can extend RequestCycle and do that in onEndRequest. To use custom
request cycle class override Application.newRequestCycle(final Request
request, final Response response);
-Matej
On 8/28/07, Huergo Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have a user context stored in a Wicket session
The validators work a bit differently in 1.3
you need to use the error(IValidationError error) on IValidatable inside
your IValidator.validate(IValidatable validatable);
as IValidationError you can use the convenience class ValidationError.
e.g. ValidationError error = new ValidationError();
Not really. The thing is that i don't even know if the tutorial will happen
util short time before the apache con (depending on number of attendees).
-Matej
On 8/28/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/28/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I was supposed to have
What exception?
On 8/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got some problems in my app with a nested ajax request.
In my form i'm using a DataTable whick includes AjaxEditableLabel
components.
The Problem with these combination is that if a label is changed, the rest
of
I've commited a possible fix. Can you plase try if it helps your problem?
-Matej
On 8/27/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/27/07, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't fixing bugs the task of the Wicket developers? We don't have a
problem
ordering support, but I
On 8/27/07, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your best bet on getting quick support is to fix it yourself and send
in a patch.
Well, if that would be possible, I would have done that or worked around
it
myself (like done with some own components).
http://www.wicket-support.com/
Beverungen
Josef Tillmann
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates
Heinz-Dieter Wendorff
Handelsregister
Amtsgericht Paderborn HRB 3270
Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27.08.2007 10:45
Bitte antworten an
users@wicket.apache.org
An
users@wicket.apache.org
Kopie
Thema
Re: Re: nested ajax
On 8/27/07, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
are discussing here though is quite a different case. If it is no
problem that people access members directly, and you think getters and
setters are too much bloat, why don't you just make them
Hagen
Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27.08.2007 11:24
Bitte antworten an
users@wicket.apache.org
An
users@wicket.apache.org
Kopie
Thema
Re: Re: Re: nested ajax requests (AjaxEditableLabel and form)
I need a quickstart with as little code as possible but enough to
demonstrate
a little bit for a web*site*, but when I
think
on a web*application* like JIRA, I also can't imagine at least one usecase
(always from my user's point of view) which accepts a timeout or blocking
when downloading a larger file.
--
Cheers,
Tom
Matej Knopp wrote:
On 8/27/07, Thomas Singer
, including a quickstart
gerolf
On 8/27/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's probably a bug, can you please fill in a JIRA entry and assign it
to
me? What wicket version are you using?
-Matej
On 8/27/07, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
For the sake of clarity, I think this:
with public getXXX and private setXXX the property is read only
with public getXXX and no setXXX the property is read only
So do I. I think it needs to be fixed. If there is a private setter, we
should use it. Period. Johaaan?!
-Matej
Why couldn't it access the attribute field directly?
-Matej
On 8/25/07, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. If you make the PropertyModel access private getter and setter I
don't see any reason because it cannot access the attribute field directly
(when the getter and setter
I agree with Igor here. If you are really concerned about protecting private
fields, your only option is running with a security manager. Otherwise there
will always be a way around it. Being able to access private field is
convenient and reduces code clutter. Even though it's not the cleanest way
There is not much point in comparing Wicket to Spring MVC. Spring MVC
is a very simple action based framework with very little functionality
(and probably minimal overhead). So what you would really be comparing
is Wicket to JSP (assuming you use JSP as your view layer). Now again,
Wicket is a
Hi,
there's nothing wrong with yor approach, actually, it's more solid
than using (Compound)PropertyModel because you get full refactoring
support. The downside is of course code verbosity. Unless java get
property expression there's not much we can do about it though :-/
-Matej
On 8/24/07, Sam
resolver by default provides access to private members and methods.
If guaranteeing encapsulation of the target objects is a big concern, you
should consider using an alternative implementation. out of date? I'm glad
to say it doesn't seem to be true in 1.3.0-beta2
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Hi
.
Realised I've been avoiding implementing something because I can't think of
a good property name and I don't want to have to fix it in my bean,
component java and component html... Maybe I will go with the verbose
solution. May also stop me pushing lots of rubbish into the model.
Matej Knopp-2
when you run the tests. there is also a jmeter
page on wiki somewhere if you want more clues.
-igor
On 8/24/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is not much point in comparing Wicket to Spring MVC. Spring MVC
is a very simple action based framework with very little functionality
Why can't you just implement read/writeObject on your page/component?
-Matej
On 8/23/07, Jan Kriesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to add a listener to PageStore events (storePage/getPage)?
I'm still looking for a clean way to re-inject Pages/Components when they are
Hi,
2) I like the back button support. My thinking is that extending Wicket's
AJAX integration to also support the back button (somehow) is a must.
Virtually everyone who uses Wicket will use it's AJAX functionality. Almost
all of these will need solve this problem. Sure would be nice if
Your treemodel must fire the appropriate treeNodesChanged events on
the listeners. And then you need to call
tree.updateTree(ajaxRequestTarget);
-Matej
On 8/20/07, Doug Leeper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using the TreeTable in Wicket Extensions. When selecting on a node, a
page allowing
Just beware that while conditional comments will work on regular
request, they will not work during ajax header contribution.
Also I don't understand what you mean by
I'd like to serve MSIE with
CompressedResourceReferences
-Matej
On 8/21/07, Rüdiger Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Does this happen in all browsers?
-Matej
On 8/13/07, al que [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Sean,
thanks for your suggestion.
I have upgraded to 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT but i still have the
same problem :(.
Alina.
--- Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you say that you
displays a
blank page from the beginning.
Thanks,
Alina.
--- Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this happen in all browsers?
-Matej
Sé un Mejor Amante del Cine
¿Quieres saber cómo? ¡Deja
There is no such thing as tabbed panel CSS. Tabbed panel doesn't come
with any CSS. I put
div.tab-panel {
clear: left;
}
to styles.css in wicket examples, just in case someone takes the
styles from there.
-Matej
On 8/14/07, Tauren Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A quick fix to this is
of ResourceReference) and be able to lookup the
Resource instance on request.
-Matej
On 8/8/07, Kent Tong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej Knopp matej.knopp at gmail.com writes:
Yeah, ResourceReference is like global resource factory. That is for
resources that don't belong to any component/page
601 - 700 of 709 matches
Mail list logo
