Hi,
I've got a problem in production whereby our application home page
throws a :Unable to find component with id 'mainPanel' in
[MarkupContainer [Component id = _extend48]]
This only happens once or twice a week. We don't have any components
named '_extend48' or similar anywhere in the code.
/wicket:panel
124 /body
125 /html
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Would you show the html of this mainpanel and also its super panel?
**
Martin
2010/10/19 Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I've got
at 7:47 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
That is the id for the wicket extend tag in your markup
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
-- sent from my smart phone, so please excuse spelling, formatting, or
compiler errors
On Oct 19, 2010 12:46 PM, Wayne W
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Jeremy,
That is the id for the wicket extend tag in your markup
This might be a stupid question - but can I tell where in the page
We're on 1.4.7 currently and when I tried 1.4.11 we had a few issues
with ajax - unfortunality we've not had time to really try and
understand the issue.
I'll be interested if anyone else is having a problem.
I know there was some work done in the ajax area, but I'm not sure
where to start
Hi,
we see this error time to time in production, and one of use here got
the problem ourselves.
We have a Form set to multipart true and a FileUploadField and
SubmitLink amongst some other fields, however there is no ajax submit.
This works 99% of the time it seems.
Now this happened using
Hi,
has anyone had this issue? We're getting emails from our users that
sometime when clicking on an ajax link the raw wicket ajax response is
being rendered on the browser - ie the just see all the html source
code on the page. Its not any particular page.
Anyone seen this or has any ideas?
type issue, but it is still weird because the
response is received by the xml http request object, not the browser
directly. strange indeed.
-igor
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
has anyone had this issue? We're getting emails from our users
Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
see AjaxRequestTarget class, this is where the response is generated
on the serverside
wicket-ajax.js is where it is processed on the client side.
-igor
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Igor,
Whats odd
or something weird.
-igor
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks Igor,
I've just spent a few hours stepping though the code and I cannot see
anyway the content type could be set wrong - I see the content type is
set in the final respond(requestCycle) method
Hi,
we recently introduced a extensions.markup.html.tree.Tree component in
our product.
However we're seeing some errors in production where the nodeLink in
the component cannot be found in the page.
In our onNodeLinkClicked we just perform a setResponsePage with a
bookmarkable page.
I've done
We use the excellent wurfl open source project to help us out with devices.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:49 PM, jcgarciam jcgarc...@gmail.com wrote:
In server side, just check the User-Agent header from your HttpRequest.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Madlip89 [via Apache Wicket]
Hi,
I just want to check that there isn't an alternative out there already
that someone has done that supports webkit browsers?
We're finding nearly 20% of our users now are on these browsers so we
must support them better, hence why we're looking at alternatives.
If not we'll have to write
...@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just want to check that there isn't an alternative out there already
that someone has done that supports webkit browsers
the call to
transport send.
Our only conclusion is that is must be a javascript engine bug, we
just surprised this has never reported before as its not a wicket bug
.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
we've upgraded the apache to 2.2.15
Hi,
I love using wicket (1.4) its by far the best web framework for java I
have used. However the one thing that really is hard work is the url
handling for me.
Our users all the time want to copy and paste the url of a given page
in to an email or use in a comment to link to something in the
of the onSubmit, or onClick we don't call
setResponsePage. Should be call setResponsePage to get the
bookmarkable url?
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
2- is there a better
Hi,
We have a form that you can make comments in against something. This
is submitted normally via a AjaxSubmitLink, however if you attach a
file to the form then then form is submitted in a normal non-ajax
request.
The problem I'm seeing is if a form is marked as multipart/form-data
then is
Hi Jeremy,
did you find a solution as we've had the problem for a long time now
and more and more people are reporting it as they move over to FF and
Chrome?
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Perhaps this thread will help:
just to say we still have this issue and its getting more and more
worse as people are moving to FF and Chrome.
We have no idea how to solve as we cannot reproduce it consistently.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I thought you might
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from 1.4.8 to 1.4.18 and I'm finding that
AjaxSubmitLink is not working (at least with one form).
The form doesn't get submitted - the problem in wicket-ajax.js is (~line 1120):
// Submits a form using ajax.
// This method serializes a form and sends it as
can proceed.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from 1.4.8 to 1.4.18 and I'm finding that
AjaxSubmitLink is not working (at least with one form).
The form doesn't get submitted - the problem in wicket-ajax.js is (~line
you have form onsubmit=something(); without
returning anything. Since 'if (undefined)' is 'false' the call stops
there.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
and in what case does it not return anything?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Martin Grigorov
Hi,
I'm starting a new project so made the jump to wicket 1.5. However
when using ajax, I cannot see the responses being returned from the
server - this is a form thats submitted via ajax. However if I use an
ajx link then I get the response.
I'm sure this was not the case with 1.4.x
Am I
Hello,
I cannot get my component model to update correctly when being set. I
have list of products and when I click on the name via ajax I update a
Product panel to display the info. In that panel I have my component
that displays the image of the product. sudo code:
ProductPanel(id,
Am 11.01.2012 08:01, schrieb Wayne W:
Hello,
I cannot get my component model to update correctly when being set. I
have list of products and when I click on the name via ajax I update a
Product panel to display the info. In that panel I have my component
that displays the image of the product
Hi,
this is something I have found - I'm getting a consistent ajax error
in this scenario:
I have a page that has an AjaxLink (Add Product), that displays a
panel that contains a form. If I use AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to perform
the submit on the form the sequence of events is:
- Communication
Hi All,
I'm wanting to upgrade to the latest version of wicket but am worried about
the possible impact. Also I'm wanting to know the best migration plan. Do
you think it would be best to jump straight to 6 or first upgrade to 5?
Any tips or ideas would be much appreciated.
thanks
with the same effort as updating.
cheers and good luck ;)
Am 30.12.2013 17:45, schrieb Wayne W:
Hi All,
I'm wanting to upgrade to the latest version of wicket but am worried
about
the possible impact. Also I'm wanting to know the best migration plan. Do
you think it would be best to jump
Hi All,
please ignore this. We found the issue - it was due to AbstractBehavior
that was being added to the textfields that outputs the raw value in a div
before escaping it.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
Its been brought to my attention
Hi
Its been brought to my attention that wicket seems to be XSS vulnerable. We
have a public internet facing form, and by simply putting
img src=x onerror=prompt(1);
In the fields you can get a js prompt appearing. As add the fields have
validators on them, all code is passing through the
Hi,
we've just migrated from 1.4 to the 6.13 and I have to say its been very
painful! So many API breaks. We're also experiencing many UI issues mainly
brought about by how resources are now included. Anyhow we're though most
of them, however I cannot get the UploadProgressBar to work at all.
Hi all,
we've recently moved to Wicket 6.17 from 1.4 and I'm having trouble with
NOT showing the default wicket error page when a runtime exception is
thrown from an AjaxLink.
I've set the following in the application:
getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(ErrorPage.class);
Hi,
I have basically the following:
Form f = new Form('form) {
}
Hi,
I have basically the following
FormString typeInForm = new FormString(typeInForm) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit()
{
doSubmit(this);
}
};
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior ajax = new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(onkeyup) {
@Override
protected void
We have a page that has a rather big DataView list. We need to be able to
make insertions and removals of this list without sending back the whole
list via AJAX as its a bit slow over the wire.
Is it possible to add a new element and return and insert that into the
list? Obviously we could insert
Hi,
we have a simple search form:
FormString form = new FormString(searchForm) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
PageParameters params = new PageParameters();
params.add(0, search);
setResponsePage(SearchResultsPage.class, params);
}
};
This displays a list of results with each
I'd recommend to use event delegation, i.e. one change
listener on the dataview that handles 'change' for all items.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
We have
results page after your form's submit.
Sven
On 10/16/2014 07:16 PM, Wayne W wrote:
Hi,
we have a simple search form:
FormString form = new FormString(searchForm) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit() {
PageParameters params = new PageParameters();
params.add(0, search
PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Sven,
We don't set the RenderStrategy so we should (in wicket 6) be using this
default strategy.
Any other idea?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
Hi,
what RenderStrategy are you using
Hi,
we recently migrated to 6.17 from 4.x. Something we are now experiencing is
an odd session problem in production.
We have 2 tomcats load balance running the front end wicket code. We have a
certain flow that goes like this:
1. User goes to : my.example.com/login (LoginPage.java)
2.
. The
HttpSession is replicated by Tomcat itself. What is your Tomcat config
related to replication ?
Do you use sticky sessions ? It seems you don't but I have to ask.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Wayne W
mail misleads.
Would you please explain again the steps with more details which step on
which node happens.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Martin,
I don't
Hi Martin,
I think this might have solved it . Many thanks :-)
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Thanks ! It is more clear now !
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry Martin its not clear enough
Perhaps your tomcats are not getting the session id? make sure your apache
is passing the JSESSION to the tomcat instance
ie ProxyPass / balancer://cluster/ stickysession=JSESSIONID nofailover=Off
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Jason Novotny jason.novo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I figured
Hi,
We have an issue with hyperlinks Microsoft Word and Excel documents. Its
seems to vary from version and OS, but the long and short of it is that
Word when a user clicks on a link it uses an internal library to try and
access the page, and once it gets a HTTP 200 it will open the default
...@meiers.net wrote:
Hi,
make your page stateless, then no redirection will occur.
Sven
On 11/13/2014 11:55 AM, Wayne W wrote:
Hi,
We have an issue with hyperlinks Microsoft Word and Excel documents. Its
seems to vary from version and OS, but the long and short of it is that
Word when
.
Here's a real stateless page:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/stateless/foo
Regards
Sven
On 11/13/2014 03:27 PM, Wayne W wrote:
Hi Sven,
I tried setting setStatelessHint(true); but it always does a 302
redirect.
I see something like this in the Net
policy per page type.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
it looks like we cannot make the page stateless as we have many links
that
require the model etc
Hi,
We had the requirement that we needed to use RedirectPolicy.NEVER_REDIRECT for
a single page in our app .
We used this code:
setPageRendererProvider(new IPageRendererProvider() {
@Override
public PageRenderer get(final RenderPageRequestHandler context) {
return new
the problem in a quickstart?
Sven
On 11/17/2014 06:46 PM, Wayne W wrote:
Hi,
We had the requirement that we needed to use
RedirectPolicy.NEVER_REDIRECT for
a single page in our app .
We used this code:
setPageRendererProvider(new IPageRendererProvider() {
@Override
public
provided.
Why aren't you using a RedirectToUrlException?
Regards
Sven
On 11/18/2014 08:35 PM, Wayne W wrote:
Hi Sven,
Kind of - however its seems to happen only in 6.17. In 6.18 it seems to
work ok with the quick start, but with our code base it still happens even
with 6.18. I see this fix
Hi,
we're trying to clear up our production logs at the moment and are going
through errors. I cannot understand what is happen here. We're getting :
org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ListenerInvocationNotAllowedException:
Component rejected interface invocationComponent: [InlineFrame
We have lots of really odd exceptions in our logs in production where
essentially the session is empty but pages are still being created.
Does wicket do this? and if so how do we handle the situation knowing that
data in the session is needed to build the page
thanks
Any ideas on this one?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
we have a list which gets updated via ajax. This works fine. I'm trying to
get it so that the style attribute is updated as well. However even though
I put break points in the getObject
Hi,
we have a list which gets updated via ajax. This works fine. I'm trying to
get it so that the style attribute is updated as well. However even though
I put break points in the getObject() and I can see its got the new User
object the style attribute sent back via ajax is the old one even
Wicket seems to think its not enabled isEnabledInHierarchy() returns false
randomly
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
we're still stuck on this. I can reproduce it - it seems a bit random but
I suspect it to do when the browser makes the request
)
haven't changed.
kind regards
Tobias
Am 18.02.15 um 18:06 schrieb Wayne W:
Wicket seems to think its not enabled isEnabledInHierarchy() returns
false
randomly
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
we're still stuck on this. I can
$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
we're trying to clear up our production logs at the moment and are going
through errors. I cannot understand what is happen
a WYSIWYG editor ?
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a wiki like component(s) as we need to add some wiki type
functionality to a product. Anyone know
Hi,
I'm looking for a wiki like component(s) as we need to add some wiki type
functionality to a product. Anyone know of any projects or open source
projects? I'd rather not start from scratch if there is something already
out there. I see alots of full java based wiki apps but they are all based
ple or N-click links if things are not going
> fast enough).
>
> Martijn
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Martijn,
> >
> > are you basically saving that with wicket there is no way I can not avoid
> >
Hi,
I have a org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.Link within a page this is
visible only if a certain criteria is met.
If user A visits this page the changes the criteria the link is visible.
The user can then click on the link for some other functionality.
However I'm finding is User B (in a
> you probably should look into websockets if you don't want polling.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a page that has a AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior which adds a new
>
ould it be because wicket is checking boolean isVisible() when
> >making this decision? (as we override the links isVisible()
>
> indeed.
>
> You should override #onConfigure() and call #setVisible() instead of
> overriding #isVisible().
>
> Regards
> Sven
>
>
&g
Hi,
I have a page that has a AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior which adds a new panel
in the ajax request. This new panel can be a long running process to
generate some data. I'm find this is locking the page map so other requests
on that page get locked.
How could I get around this aside from
t; >>>>
> >>>> Actually org.apache.wicket.Component#canCallListenerInterface() is
> >>>> responsible for the ACTION phase.
> >>>> #onConfigure() is called in the RENDER phase, i.e. after onClick().
> >>>>
> >>>> Mart
help with a use case that doesn't work with this impl then
> > please create a demo application and I'll try to help!
> > If one day the implementation is generic enough it may land in Wicket!
> >
> > Have fun!
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Wicket Training and C
sed to using the navigation back button - we did some user testing
and a fair number of people still use it, from from a UX perspective its
not great dropping it. I did't see that request unfortunately
>
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
>
> On 07.07.2016 14:13, Wayne W wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems you use Wicket for several years now and you have no idea how to
> use it!
>
Yes perhaps Martin, I do try but there's a lot too it.
>
> I have done this for a client of mine 4 years
rver-side rendered framework Wicket surely isn't the new kid on the
> block, but I can't think of anything forcing your application to be 'old
> school'.
>
> Can you be more specific?
>
> Sven
>
>
>
> Am 7. Juli 2016, 13:23, um 13:23, Wayne W <waynemailingli..
Hi,
we're been using wicket for some time now and we have a very established
application used by many clients. It is however feeling some what dated,
due to the fact the we have to constantly reload pages to access different
functionality/areas if the app. We use ajax fairly heavily within each
itter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If I put the AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior back in, it always fails. If I
> > remove the AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior most of the time it works, but
> every
&
lt;mgrigo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Martin,
> >
> > I have a theory what this is, perhaps you could confirm?
> >
> > What I observe is the
g the page parameters when
> > > constructing a new page instance in 7.0.0.
> > > I have the feeling you are using 6.x. Am I correct ?
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
Wicket you use ?
> There was an improvement related to reusing the page parameters when
> constructing a new page instance in 7.0.0.
> I have the feeling you are using 6.x. Am I correct ?
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
>
s to the user the session is lost.
This is at least what I am observing. I can provide a Quick start to
demonstrate if needed.
many thanks for you time thus far.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:09 PM
, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> no - I still get the ComponentNotFoundException in the new instance. :-/
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Th
appreciated.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> So it seems the homepage is not the only page. However removing the
> AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior makes no difference I still get the same
> issues. Just don;t know where to start with this one. Is th
the cluster, if it the replication is actually working!
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have 2 instances of Tomcat running with Apache sitting in front
> > balancing between the Tomcat
Hi Martin,
no - I still get the ComponentNotFoundException in the new instance. :-/
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > H
Hi,
we are currently using Wicket 6.17 and use a version of Atmosphere jar
libraries (not the wicket version). Its never been great and have had lots
of production issues with it. I'm looking to replace it with straight web
sockets as the fall back long polling etc we never could get to work.
Many thanks Martin
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > we are currently using Wicket 6.17 and
Hi,
We have 2 instances of Tomcat running with Apache sitting in front
balancing between the Tomcat instances. I have session replication setup
which seems to work for basic bookmarkable links on the pages. I can stop
one of the instances and I'm not logged in as it failover to the other
thanks
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Please ignore my last email I have done a lot more debugging and I
> *think*
&
Hi,
I've got a strange issue I cannot get to the bottom of. Basically we have
our app deployed on jetty 9.2.1 with apache 2.4 in front. If I make calls
to stateless pages its all good. However as soon as I try to make a call to
a stateful page it does a 302 to the login page for our app, but then
says that getRedirectUrl() returns null.
> > So something calls RedirectRequestHandler's constructor with null url.
> > Wicket doesn't instantiate this class for its needs, so it should be your
> > application.
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Wicket Training
Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got a strange issue I cannot get to the bottom of. Basically we have
> > our app deployed on jetty 9.2.1 w
Hi,
does anyone else have an ideas whats I could do here. Is there anyone out
there who's successfully got the CSRF protection up and running in
production?
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Martin,
>
&g
Hi Maxim, what are you using? CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It works for us, but we are not using *CryptMapper's ...
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.co
questHandle
> r#getComponent()
> instanceOf Form
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Martin,
> >
> &g
Hi,
I've been trying to use CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener in production.
However we are seeing in the logs that about 30 times a day we get the
request aborted because the clients browsers are not sending the referrer
header sometimes. Doing some research it seems we cannot rely on the
ion with
> them!
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying to use CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener in
> production.
> > However we are seeing in the logs that about 30 times a
Hi,
we've started to experience very slow shutdown of our tomcat instances in
production. Doing a thread dump I see:
"localhost-startStop-2" #14871 daemon prio=5 os_prio=64
tid=0x06700800 nid=0x3a37 runnable [0xfcffcc5fd000]
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
at
replication is configured as all sessions are replicate
when it starts up?
thanks
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Wayne W <waynemailingli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
Hi,
we have a lot of these in our production logs:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already been called
for this response
at
org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.getWriter(Response.java:578)
at
dardSession.bindingEvent"), t);
}
}
The valueUnbound is call to notify the object its no longer in the session.
However looking at the change you did for
PageStoreManager.valueUnbound its actually
removing the session by calling clear()
Doesn't seem correct?? or am I missing something?
On Fri, May
Hi,
I've take a memory dump of one of our production instances and I'm seeing
about 500MB of memory consumed just by the DiskDataStore which doesn't seem
correct to me. Here is a screen shot:
https://customerservices.glasscubes.com/share/s/qmvnvrdtm36amme6sdrqg4dp2g
I've highlighted the item -
Hi,
Is there timeframe for this release?
Thanks!
Wayne
Ok thanks. So soon then hopefully!!
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:37 PM Andrea Del Bene
wrote:
> yes. 8.5.0 and 7.14.0 go hand in hand together :-)
>
> see
>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-8-5-0-ready-td4682248.html
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 4:27 PM Wayne
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo