Possible starting point for a client solution for back button detection/support:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/10/26/ajax-handling-bookmarks-and-back-button.html?page=1
-Original Message-
From: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 6:30 PM
To:
+1
-Original Message-
From: bmarvell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 8:19 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: JavaScript Frameworks
Sorry,
Again mine is coming from a very front end perspective ie writing JS in a
progressive enhancement style.
Our company is in the process of evaluating the feasibility in transitioning
our UI framework to Wicket. In doing so, I stumbled upon this article
http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/a-wicket-user-tries-jsf/ that does a
nice job of composing a simple side-by-side comparison of JSF and
/Seam (The Dead Debate)
I didnt know Seam was a UI framework...
-Igor
On 9/14/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our company is in the process of evaluating the feasibility in
transitioning our UI framework to Wicket. In doing so, I stumbled upon this
article
http
Eelco,
I appreciate your input- very objective answer!
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:32 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket vs. JSF/Seam (The Dead Debate)
On 9/14/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thank you for your input Scott. I have noticed the same trend in my encounters
with JSF.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Swank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:04 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket vs. JSF/Seam (The Dead Debate)
When we chose
Is anyone interested in using the mask script (below) to a component in a
Wicket extension? The script prevents invalid input in a text field as the user
types (similar to the Atlas version:
http://www.fci.com.br/maskedit/MaskEdit/MaskEdit.aspx). I didn't see a
component in Wicket that would
it into wicketstuff-minis project which is in wicket-stuff?
-igor
On 10/18/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone interested in using the mask script (below) to a component in a
Wicket extension? The script prevents invalid input in a text field as the
user types (similar to the Atlas
Would it make more sense to add it to extensions instead?
-Original Message-
From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:39 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to change format in DateTimeField?
On 10/18/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL
-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 2:57 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to change format in DateTimeField?
On 10/18/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are no licenses or dependencies.
This is in itself a problem :). You
not implying anything wrong, but it is easy to
mess things up, and messy to clean up after the fact.
Martijn
On 10/18/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see... Not sure how the licensing works, but whatever is the suggested
license is fine with me. I'm not much of a business guru
, 2007 3:57 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Input Text Mask?
create a sf.net account and i will give you commit access to wicketstuff repo.
-igor
On 10/18/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. How would I go about doing so?
-Original Message-
From: Igor
: Input Text Mask?
On 10/18/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a Jira Issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1085)
with attached source. I placed the issue under extensions as others suggested.
Thanks.
Would I still have to go through sf.net?
It would either
.
johan
On 10/18/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
would you be interested in making this a subclass of textfield and
throwing it into wicketstuff-minis project which is in wicket-stuff?
-igor
On 10/18/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone interested in using the mask
for you :)
-Original Message-
From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 6:18 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IE 3-7
On Nov 1, 2007 4:52 PM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone is interested in running IE versions 3-7
Has anyone successfully setup JBoss jBPM with Wicket?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 1:31 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket jBPM
On 11/2/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone successfully setup JBoss jBPM with Wicket?
Several people who I know. You can use jBPM like any regular Java API.
Eelco
-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 3:28 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket jBPM
On 11/2/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess what I'm really asking is if anyone actually composed the UI
integration piece that supports
Is it appropriate to have the following...
final WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup fieldset = new
WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup(
fieldset);
final AttributeModifier levelModifier = new
AttributeModifier(class,
(class, fieldset-class);
}
});
-Original Message-
From: William Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 6:26 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Rendering a fieldset class attribute
Is it appropriate to have
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rendering a fieldset class attribute
William Hoover wrote:
final AttributeModifier levelModifier = new
AttributeModifier(class,
new Model() {
@Override
a fieldset class attribute
William Hoover wrote:
Is it better to use AbstractBehavior and override onComponentTag?
I assume that the AttributeModifier is only for cases when the attribute
already exists in the markup, correct?
Well, given the javadoc I told you to read for the second
:)
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:51 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket Servlet Filters
wicket is a UI framework, handling servlet filters is a bit outside its scope :)
-igor
On 11/8/07, William Hoover [EMAIL
Is there a wicket way to handle servlet filters internally in the API or is the
recomended method just to use typical servlet filters?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
instantiation listener and a global before
render listener. but so far that is all iirc.
-igor
On 11/8/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I was thinking more in lines of a request listener (similar to a JSF
phase listener). As Wicket enters internal phases of execution
AM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So in theory it can be accomplished, but is not recommended to do so... What
is the common practice when dealing with wicket related data in a servlet
filter?
Try to forget how other frameworks do things and look for solutions on
a case by case basis
Is there a way to exclude properties from being resolved in the
BoundCompoundPropertyModel?
I'm using:
// in page form
SomeModel someModel = new SomeBean();
Form someForm = new Form(some-form-id, new
BoundCompoundPropertyModel(someModel));
someForm.add(someModel.bind(new
is that code?
I guess 1.2? then you should use onAttach()
because onBeforeRender you can't change anything anymore because the page is
already rendering.
johan
On Nov 9, 2007 4:00 PM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious if my approach is incorrect when implementing
and add onBefore/after render
method consistent with component's onBeforeRender/onAfterRender.
-Matej
On Nov 9, 2007 5:06 PM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its 1.3.0-beta4
Is it still an issue?
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
:30 PM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that to dynamically update a StringResourceModel?
-Original Message-
From: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 11:11 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: beforeRender() - Cannot
Found the problem... I forgot to add a model to the new
SomePanel(some-form-panel-id, new Model()).
I added this to the wiki
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+with+Wicket+models
-Original Message-
From: William Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
+1 GENERICS!!!
-Original Message-
From: mathias axelsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 5:35 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1 released!
Mmmm... Generics
Thanks alot for a great framework!
On Nov 12, 2007 7:33 PM, Johan
I think that the html code residing next to the java code is a lot more natural
than the traditional schema and would be a pro. We are always resistant to
change, but in some cases change is good thing. If they go hand-in-hand why
would you not want to keep them together?
I hope you have a
I added this to the wiki a while back
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:06 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Add Form components
This happens
Is there a definitive reference guide for all of the current url coding
strategies in Wicket 1.3?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While your on the subject... shouldn't there be a forJavaScript that is
external from the HeaderContributor that does a more intelligent insertion of
the script farther down the dom tree to increase performance
(http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#js_bottom)?
-Original
done... http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1203
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:32 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RFE] HeaderContributor.forFavicon(Reference)
On Nov 30, 2007 4:29 AM, William
8, 2007 1:19 PM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, AFAIK any dependencies that fall under Sun's Binary License cannot
be distributed by the central repository
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
IMHO, it would seem more natural if Wicket used
http://www.alphacsp.com/Events/JavaEdge-2007/Presentations/wicket-deliver-your-webapp-on-time.pdf
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to the WIKI?
Eelco
On Dec 21, 2007 4:20 AM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.alphacsp.com/Events/JavaEdge-2007/Presentations/wicket-deliver-your-webapp-on-time.pdf
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
doesn't this work?
new BookmarkablePageLink(yourLink, Editor.class).setParameter(note,
123456)
-Original Message-
From: Haritha Juturu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:37 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: BookmarkablePageLink giving a different URL
Does anyone have any clue why all the links are dead in Internet Exploder for
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to wait until
the examples are updated again.
Frank
On Jan 3, 2008 9:11 PM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any clue why all the links are dead in Internet Exploder
for http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13
you should take
a look at swarm itself a a reference, just ignore all the stuff about
permissions, principals, subjects and stuff.
Maurice
On Jan 4, 2008 2:15 PM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can wicket-security be used with LDAP? If so, are there any examples
available demonstrating
Can wicket-security be used with LDAP? If so, are there any examples available
demonstrating its use?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the info. We are not using Spring (opted for Plexus) so I'm not
sure how plausible it will be to implement the easiest solution in our case.
The application in question is still in the preliminary evaluation stage so
we may have to look
Never mind... I wasn't calling super.init() when I was overriding init() in
SwarmWebApplication impl
-Original Message-
From: William Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 1:14 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: [wicket-security] LDAP integration?
I'm
AbstractBasePage and SecureWebPage)
OtherPage2 extends ? (cannot extend both AbstractBasePage and SecureWebPage)
...
-Original Message-
From: William Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 1:24 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: [wicket-security] LDAP integration
for ISecurePage from SecureWebPage
BTW once you have the ldap part up and running and if it is setup in a
generic way i would be interested in including it with swarm or a
subproject if thats alright with you.
Maurice
On Jan 4, 2008 8:39 PM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have another
oops!!!
*definitely*
-Original Message-
From: William Hoover
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 9:23 AM
To: 'users@wicket.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [wicket-security] LDAP integration?
The only issue I have with proposed solution 1 is that there is duplication of
code, but I cannot see
if the
page class in question is the login page, so give it a try.
The reason the documentation says you should not have your login page
extend SecurePage is because it just doesn't feel right to do so.
Maurice
On Jan 7, 2008 3:24 PM, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops!!!
*definitely
One other question... Is it necessary to increase visibility of all the WebPage
constructors (protected - public) for SecureWebPage impls?
-Original Message-
From: William Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 2:24 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE
Is there a wicket equivalent to pageContext.getErrorData()?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
53 matches
Mail list logo
