Send your emails in a batch at a later time, or if you are using Spring
you could use the new @Async annotation.
From: lucast lucastol...@hotmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 04/25/2011 08:32 AM
Subject:Continue navigating while on submit button process stuff
on the
or if you are not using Spring...use Java Futures...
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/Future.html
From: lucast lucastol...@hotmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 04/25/2011 08:32 AM
Subject:Continue navigating while on submit button
The only thing that comes to mind is storing a flag in session. Or
perhaps if you are updating you datastore when the link is clicked you
could check there. Not the best solution in my mind, if you find
something else let me know...
From: hrbaer herber.m...@gmail.com
To:
How about using setResponsePage in ModalWindow.WindowClosedCallback() or
ModalWindow.CloseButtonCallback()?
Does modalwindow.close(target); fire CloseButtonCallback?
From: hrbaer herber.m...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 04/11/2011 06:03 AM
Subject:Re:
Sorry but I do not have the time/resources to create a quickstart (I don't
use Maven) but I wanted to alert the group to an issue I had in case
anyone wanted to test/fix it.
Using the following;
Wicket 1.4.16
UploadWebRequest in App object
Form with setMaxSize() (I'm using 1MB)
FileUploadField
The form does not process anything besides the file upload, and everything
works fine until the UploadProgressBar is introduced (and yes I set
mutlipart to true). I will open a jira if/when time permits, if you have
the appropriate credentials please create a jira on my behalf, I am not
I second Daniel's comments.
+1 for option 1
From: Daniel Neugebauer mailingli...@energiequant.de
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 04/01/2011 02:56 PM
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Behavior of CheckBox With Respect to
setRequired(true)
I would stick with 1 (required to be checked).
Not sure what your objects look like but I will try to answer question
2...
Not sure if this will work for you...sometimes I find myself using
PropertyModels mixed with CPMs...
new ListView(myId, new PropertyModel(foo, widgets))
And it may not be entirely obvious you can use dot notation to
I think you could do it by using a base role that all users receive,
then add additional roles to tighten it down. You would then need to fake
authentication of the base users by calling session.authenticate(user,
pass) and assigning the BASE role, even though the user won't
explicitly log
Hi,
I made a new test (serving a png and a js) with current trunk and the gap
is
much smaller now: tomcat is 25% faster on average.
Attila
Attila can you elaborate on your tests? Are you comparing the difference
between using a resource reference (js) and image component (png) in
wicket vs
For that many photos I would suggest storing them in a database. Storing
that many images on the file system is cumbersome and inefficient in my
opinion. You might run into many headaches especially around backups,
deploys, upgrades, performance, file names, storage space, etc...
From:
No offense Bas but that seems like a major hassle, especially considering
with an ORM its a simple update/delete/find. When it comes time to build
out new servers now you have to shuffle around 300k photos instead of
simply replicating a database. Also sounds like it would make debugging
I've run into this using tab-panels, you have to get the target right by
calling getParent() or something similar. If you look at the rendered
html the wicket id's can help yo track down the component you need to
target.
From: Coleman, Chris chris.cole...@thalesgroup.com.au
To:
Note, I'm referring to ajax-tab-panels which are ajax ready by default...
From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 03/11/2011 03:11 PM
Subject:RE: Wicket thinks setOutputMarkupId property is not set to
true
I've run into this using tab-panels, you have
Not completely sure what you're getting at, would RefreshingView help you?
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/repeater/RefreshingView.html
From: Alexandru Artimon aarti...@dgfoundation.org
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 03/04/2011 08:31 AM
Subject:
I'm not totally understanding so I will let someone else try to answer but
RefreshingView may apply to this question...
what if the user decides to leave the page without saving the form. At the
next load the empty-items will be there which is not the desired
functionality
From:
Okay but why not use an AjaxEditableLabel, then you don't have to manage
multiple components and state is managed for you?
From: robert.mcguinness robert.mcguinness@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 03/04/2011 08:59 AM
Subject:Re: Disable form prettyfier
Here's a start, please anyone correct me if I've made any mistakes...
public class ListLDM extends LoadableDetachableModelList {
private String id;
public ListLDM(List l, String id) {
//constructor with primed model
super(l);
). It will cache the list until after the request cycle is
complete. Upon subsequent request cycles, the load() method will be
called to re-load the list.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Juansoft andresnet2...@yahoo.es wrote:
Thank for the replies!
MZemeck wrote:
Here's a start, please
Great stuff, could you let us know when you have completed a 'final'
version so I can check back?
From: Per p...@hamburg.de
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 03/01/2011 02:22 PM
Subject:Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come
true! (Anyone here who has tuned
If I understand where you are going I completely agree the example is a
little misleading. Some ways to think about it differently...
id is synonymous with a small sub-set of the entire result-set which
can be used to rehydrate the detached model
The model is the data you want to provide to
This is the best solution I have found...
http://www.richardnichols.net/2010/03/apache-wicket-force-page-reload-to-fix-ajax-back/
Note that when refreshing the page it will return to its default state
(first tab selected). I have been meaning to test with
HybridUrlCodingStrategy to see if the
How are you storing/retrieving your photos? I recently did some session
size testing and I found the sessions were surprisingly small. Once I
removed the detachable model wrapped around an object holding a photo
(byte array) retrieved from the database my session size shot up
considerably.
Interesting how the HeaderResponseFilteredResponseContainer in this
example is after the /body tag even though best practices as well as the
Javadoc suggest it should be just before the /body. Perhaps the example
should be changed so as not to set a bad...er...example...
A header response
Can you link the mailing list to it when its posted? I'm very interested
in seeing it, especially after the positive remarks on this list...
From: Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 02/08/2011 09:15 AM
Subject:Re: FOSDEM 2011
This may be related to...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3321
From: Muro Copenhagen copenha...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 02/02/2011 08:19 AM
Subject:Regarding AjaxIndicatorAppender and IE
Hi,
Has anyone experienced problems with IE (v. 8)
The Wicket version and deployment mode are also output during startup...
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 01/31/2011 11:33 AM
Subject:Re: Static member wicket version... post 1.4.13
Sent by:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Just a suggestion, pass the UserDto to the service layer and let the
service layer do the conversion. Then you can look at a href=
http://code.google.com/p/simple-object-assembler/;Simple Object
Assembler/a to encapsulate the conversion. Hint: use
automapWhenNoConverterFound property and you
Right right right, good catch, but I suppose you could write a conversion
service which throws the business exception. Not really a solution to
your question, but it would clean up your code a bit and take conversion
logic out of the frontend.
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Ok but if the conversion has to be done multiple times why not encapsulate
it and clean up your code, rather than coding a conversion for each dto
every time its needed. With my suggestion the frontend calls a service to
do the conversion, then supplies the primed object to the service to
This problem still exists in Wicket 1.14.15. IndicatingAjaxButton does
not show the busy indicator in IE, it does work in Firefox.
IndicatingAjaxLink does show the indicator in IE.
- Forwarded by Matthew Zemeck/ADM/NYSOSC on 01/07/2011 03:32 PM -
From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us
To:
Or...
Object[] vars = ...add dynamic file name object
StringResourceModel rModel = new
StringResourceModel(message.fileAlreadyUploaded, null, vars);
error(rModel.getObject());
From: James james.eliye...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 01/04/2011 09:22 PM
Subject:
Just a hunchtry WicketServlet instead of WicketFilter (in web.xml)...
From: LucHub luca.abb...@luchub.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 01/04/2011 03:26 PM
Subject:Re: Wicket web site down with a few hits
Hi, thank you for the fast reply,
Nothing strange from tomcat
I think you are correct, calling setOutputMarkupId(true) is not necessary
when calling setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true). If I remember correctly
from looking at the code for setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(), this will
call setOutputMarkupId(true) for you.
From: Duro
Where are you storing the image, on the file system, classpath,
database...?
From: Matthew Goodson matt...@spidertracks.co.nz
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 11/29/2010 10:12 PM
Subject:Dynamically loading image
Hi all,
I'm needing to generate the url to an image
+1
Yes I have seen this as well...
From: Corbin, James jcor...@iqnavigator.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 11/30/2010 04:07 PM
Subject:IndicatingAjaxButton (Doesn't display indicator in
Internet Explorer)
I recently noticed that the
AjaxIndicatorAppender?
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/AjaxIndicatorAppender.html
From: Ann Baert ann.ba...@tvh.be
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 10/13/2010 10:09 AM
Subject:DownloadLink with AjaxIndicator
I would like to
Can you share the final solution?
From: Per Newgro per.new...@gmx.ch
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 10/12/2010 01:37 PM
Subject:Re: Can i execute an inline-javascript added to head for
replaced panel on ajax-response?
Jeeehhaa. Thanks alot Igor. That did it. Both tips
I've had similar issues, have you tried HybridUrlCodingStrategy?
Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
under
Sounds like a nice feature, however be careful, if the content is too
large the close button may be off-screen and make it impossible to close.
So maybe it should auto adjust within the bounds of the screen...
From: andrea del bene andrea.on@libero.it
To: users@wicket.apache.org
I should make it clear, the intention is to use SSL and JS one-way hash,
not just JS...
Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
08/03/2010 03:49 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010
On a related note...
The Wicket Strings class provides the method stripJSessionId...
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/util/string/Strings.html#stripJSessionId(java.lang.CharSequence)
And the Wicket SEO wiki provides a way to remove the JSessionId...
Yes I realize you've solved the jetty issue, but I was posing some
additional questions relating to jsessionid...
1. What are the implications of stripping jsessionid for all users...like
so in app object...
CharSequence encodedUrl = super.encodeURL(url);
return
As a side effect you will disable session for cookieless connections.
Wouldn't this be desired, ie bots...
Depends what you want to strip/not-strip... skipping encoding also
strips but I am not sure if there is any other encoding happening...
Right, I guess that's my question, what are you
Ok, the value will be hashed, one-way...anyone have any ideas?
James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Sent by: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
08/02/2010 04:42 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
Then it's
An already existing system is being rewritten and the db currently stores
hashed values. I don't disagree there are better ways to reach the end
goal, but this is the spec I am working with.
James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Sent by: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
08/03/2010 01:45 PM
Correct
James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Sent by: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
08/03/2010 02:12 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
So, you never need to get the original values out of the
I have to laugh because I also agree its kind of crazy...
Yes the original value must be hashed by the client. The reasoning being
that SSL could be broken and expose the data. I don't necessarily agree
but thats how the original system was written.
James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript)
Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and
replace original value (###-##-)
This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will
be considerably longer than the
I totally agree, seems like double-duty that accomplishes very little, and
actually adds overhead. But this is another debate and the feature has
been requested and must be implemented as I described...
Craig McIlwee craig.mcil...@openroadsconsulting.com
08/02/2010 03:06 PM
Please respond
Thanks for the reply, that would work however per our business rules the
encryption must be one-way and will not be decrypted...
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
08/02/2010 03:23 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Encrypt Form
The only thing I've come up with to meet all the requirements is to set
the hashed value to a hidden field, and replace the original value
(123-45-6789) with all nines (999-99-). This would allow the
validator to pass but puts a requirement on the js to validate the
original value, ie it
Which version of hibernate? Try the latest 3.5 version?
Luther Baker lutherba...@gmail.com
07/26/2010 06:55 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Error integrating with Hibernate and Spring
I'm sure I'm doing something incorrectly. For
Let me know if you find a solution for this...
Sam Barrow s...@sambarrow.com
07/26/2010 11:43 AM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Passing raw value to html
Is there a way to pass a raw value to be displayed in a wicket markup
file? I'm
I saw the replies and the markmail link, thanks guys...
mzem...@osc.state.ny.us
07/26/2010 01:51 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Passing raw value to html
Let me know if you find a solution for this...
Sam Barrow
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/url-coding-strategies.html
Laurentiu Trica laurentiu.tr...@finalfolder.biz
07/21/2010 11:24 AM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Clean URLs without /?wicket:interface=:0 stuff - is it possible?
Hello,
Some things I've seen on this forum...Wal-Mart's mobile site, lasvegas.com
Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
One difference I am aware of (and community correct me if I am wrong),
Wicket GZIPs resources. So if you directly link to the css using an
href you will not have that feature.
sahar rostami sahar.rost...@gmail.com
04/07/2010 11:16 AM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
Wicket
Igor,
We are using WicketFilter with SpringWebApplicationFactory. This works
fine, but I've noticed SpringWebApplication has been deprecated, and since
SpringWebApplicationFactory returns a SpringWebApplication we tried the
ContextParamWebApplicationFactory which also works.
Which is
Yes we are using Spring. Our Spring configuration works with either the
SpringWebApplicationFactory or ContextParamWebApplicationFactory.
James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
03/29/2010 04:31 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re:
I am also interested in a sitemap project. Check out the Wiki about
dynamic sitemap below. Would be nice if someone encapsulated this into a
project for reuse.
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/seo-search-engine-optimization.html
Fernando Wermus fernando.wer...@gmail.com
03/25/2010 11:49 AM
I would gather they are eluding to the fact that search engines may not
index url's with duplicate titles, so its a best practice to provide a
title unique to the url.
Fernando Wermus fernando.wer...@gmail.com
03/25/2010 01:46 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
ContextParamWebApplicationFactory to work with a Spring Annotation
approach. SpringWebApplicationFactory also works with a Spring Annotation
approach, but
I downloaded the jar from wicketstuff repo...
Here is the DTD;
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:wicket=
http://wicket.apache.org/; xml:lang=en lang=en
Martijn
I've added htmlvalidator-1.3.1.jar to my classpath, and the appropriate
code in the application's init method (see link below). I get the
following error when running the app;
java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not find dtds folder null
Any updates on this issue? Will there be a fix?
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
02/10/2010 06:15 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: @SpringBean injection expensive - a bug?
create a jira issue and a quickstart. thanks.
-igor
On page 331 of Wicket In Action is the following excerpt, Note that you
should modify the default encryption key that is stored in
ISecuritySettings to prevent malicious hackers from using the default
publicly available key as an attack vector. Does this only pertain to
when Sun JCE is not
67 matches
Mail list logo
