Having done Gsoc for 2008 (Unrelated OSS project) I'd suggest
extremely well defined projects, extremely clear project management and
quite a few introductions for tasks expected, not to mention multiple
mentors (For picking up slack) defined targets and monitoring as if
this was a VC set of
Here is some info: http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2009/faqs.html
I'll be happy to contribute my time also. The only catch is that I wouldn't
be considered a Wicket expert. I've only read Wicket in Action and I'm three
months into a professional application based on Wicket. However, I am a
I'll be happy to mentor, what does it require?. I do have a life besides
Wicket/Wicketstuff as Martijn has :)
regards Nino
2009/2/26 Martijn Dashorst
> While I am perfectly capable of working on Wicket in my spare time
> without being rewarded, I find it way out of line to characterize the
>
While I am perfectly capable of working on Wicket in my spare time
without being rewarded, I find it way out of line to characterize the
way I spend my own time as lame when such that doesn't fit the
criteria of anyone. Being characterized as lame because we are engaged
in other things, such as fam
The words of C. Bergstrom may have been poorly chosen, but he seems to have
the same goal of wanting Wicket to succeed and grow in popularity. Providing
harsh responses to users that, despite poor communication, are otherwise
excited about your project does not help to grow your community or get
ot
I did some reading and found that a "mentoring organization" for the GSoC is
considered "A group running an active free/open source software project".
That seems to imply a core committer would need to be involved. See:
http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2009/faqs.html#0_1_org_is_47611255748869
>
> Once again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various
> other things when this could both give the project good pr and possibly add
> more people who contribute to the framework.
I've found that the best way to convince people does not involve insulting
the person you're tryi
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Martijn
Thanks Martijn.. You've shown me what a good catalyst and community
leader you finally are.. It's not about my bidding.. I push for gsoc..
my points are valid.. others have brought up other good points.. and yet
when I push in general you make it personal. :
It seems like a lame proposition to coerce us to do your bidding "just
because you think it is a good idea". You're not the one to tell us
how to spend our personal time, or whether the choices we make on how
to spend our own time is lame or not.
There's a Wicket Stuff project where anyone can com
btw.. are any of the core devs interested or willing to mentor? Once
again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various other
things when this could both give the project good pr and possibly add
more people who contribute to the framework.
./C
-
- tool to migrate JSF apps to Wicket (heh heh)
+1 for that. this would be the killer argument to finally start
transitioning to wicket.
it does not need to be a 100% converter of all jsf+backing beans - a
two-way method for sharing panels/components would enable better
transition to wicket.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Antony Stubbs wrote:
> 286 Portlet support has already been finished.
>
> Cheers,
> Tony.
>
Great! I had no idea, can you provide a link to read up about it, even a
JIRA would be fine.
>
>
> On 25/02/2009, at 2:20 PM, C. Bergström wrote:
>
> Peter Thomas wrote
e useful projects for Wicket.
>
> Thanks
>
> ./Christopher
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
You've got 86 unresolved enhancements and 32 feature requests on
issues.apache.org. The leaders might want to umbrella a couple of
related ones and have them coded on GSoC. Also, there might be a
couple of orphaned projects on wicketstuff and elsewhere that could
get into the main distribution. wic
286 Portlet support has already been finished.
Cheers,
Tony.
On 25/02/2009, at 2:20 PM, C. Bergström wrote:
Peter Thomas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, "C. Bergström" >wrote:
Hi Everyone!
A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate
in the 08
GSoC.. This yea
Peter Thomas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
Hi Everyone!
A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the 08
GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see what
others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the 08
> GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see what
> others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
A few ideas:
- prop
Hi Everyone!
A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the
08 GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see
what others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
Thanks
./Christopher
18 matches
Mail list logo
