Re: JQWicket - Modal/Dialog to an External URL, Or Something Like It?

2014-09-25 Thread MissOvenMitts
Thanks so much! That worked like a charm. I hadn't thought of it at all before! HTML: Open the dialog JAVA: final DialogWebMarkupContainer insideDialogBox = new DialogWebMarkupContainer( "insideDialogBox", new DialogOptions().modal(true) .resiz

Re: JQWicket - Modal/Dialog to an External URL, Or Something Like It?

2014-09-25 Thread mscoon
Hi, You could simply put an iframe inside your dialog div: In case the url is dynamic you can attach the iframe to a wicket component and use an attribute modifier to set the src attribute. On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:04 AM, MissOvenMitts < chantal.lucette.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > Go

RE: jqwicket questions

2013-01-23 Thread Michal Wegrzyn
Point 2 is connected with this issue http://code.google.com/p/jqwicket/issues/detail?id=38 I've downloaded sources and applied patch (it seems that project is no more developed) and it helped, but framework did not work correctly due to conflicts with my custom jQuery. Switching back to non-conf

Re: Jqwicket

2012-11-28 Thread Nick Pratt
The current version on wiquery uses an older jquery version than does Wicket 6.3.0 which was causing issues for us. N On Nov 28, 2012 1:23 PM, "vishal" wrote: > Hi Folks - has there been any progress on JQWicket for Wicket 6.0? I am > unable to upgrade to Wicket 6.3 because I am using several JQ

Re: Jqwicket

2012-11-28 Thread vishal
Hi Folks - has there been any progress on JQWicket for Wicket 6.0? I am unable to upgrade to Wicket 6.3 because I am using several JQWicket components. I would like to avoid switching over to Wi-Query since our system is in production and it will have widespread impact at this time. -- View this

Re: Jqwicket

2012-09-05 Thread Pierre Goupil
Excellent! Thank you, everybody! On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, mk wrote: > I've started Wicket 6 migration, check the SCM. Plan to release next > JQWicket > version after Wicket 6 final is available. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Jqw

Re: Jqwicket

2012-09-04 Thread mk
I've started Wicket 6 migration, check the SCM. Plan to release next JQWicket version after Wicket 6 final is available. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Jqwicket-tp4651665p4651754.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: Jqwicket

2012-09-03 Thread Sebastien
Hi, Yes, wicket-jquery-ui has been designed to allow the (easy?) implementation of plugins. I am little bit late on finishing writing the how-tos to implement the plugins (the advanced part) but to begin, you already have the 2 first parts: http://code.google.com/p/wicket-jquery-ui/wiki/HowToCrea

Re: Jqwicket

2012-09-03 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Hi, For wiquery there is project http://code.google.com/p/wiquery-plugins/ which contains integrations with several plugins. A fraction of them can be seen in action at http://antiliasoft.com/wiquery-plugins/ Plugins are Wicket 1.4.x based but migrating them to 1.5.X and 6.0. should be in most

Re: Jqwicket

2012-09-03 Thread Decebal Suiu
Hi In my opinion the main advantage of the jqwicket over wiquery/wicket-jquery-ui is the impressive list of jquery plugins (ui components). See http://code.google.com/p/jqwicket/w/list for more details. Of course, it's not difficult to accommodate these jquery components with wiquery/wicket-jquery

Re: Jqwicket

2012-09-01 Thread Pierre Goupil
Cheers, men! On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > https://github.com/WiQuery/wiquery and > https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/ are migrated to Wicket 6 > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Decebal Suiu wrote: >> Hi >> >> On the jqwicket forum on Jul 14 I posted a sim

Re: Jqwicket

2012-09-01 Thread Martin Grigorov
https://github.com/WiQuery/wiquery and https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/ are migrated to Wicket 6 On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Decebal Suiu wrote: > Hi > > On the jqwicket forum on Jul 14 I posted a simple question about "jqwicket > and wicket 6.0". No response. The last commit on sv

Re: Jqwicket

2012-09-01 Thread Decebal Suiu
Hi On the jqwicket forum on Jul 14 I posted a simple question about "jqwicket and wicket 6.0". No response. The last commit on svn was on 30 Dec 2011. Good luck :) Best regards, Decebal -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Jqwicket-tp4651665p4651690.html

Re: Jqwicket

2012-08-31 Thread Alex
Wicket 6.0 has jQuery support by its own. 2012/8/30 Pierre Goupil > Good evening, > > I have two simple questions regarding jqwicket: > > - are there any plans for Wicket 6.0? Or even a work in progress? > > - does it have a Git repository? Or is it just using SVN? > > Regards, > > Pierre >

Re: jqWicket or wiQuery

2011-10-13 Thread mk
Martin Grigorov-4 wrote: > > > Both Wiquery and jqWicket provide integration with JQuery UI, not plain > JQuery. > Wicket core may provide some abstractions to make integrations with > JQuery UI at some later point. > > JQWicket provides much more than only JQuery UI integration. It delivers

Re: jqWicket or wiQuery

2011-10-12 Thread Martin Grigorov
1 6:11 PM >>To: users@wicket.apache.org >>Subject: Re: jqWicket or wiQuery >> >>Hey .. >> >>I've had a hope someone else allready did it .. so that's why I asked. >> >>Regards >> >>Armando >> >>-- >>View this message i

RE: jqWicket or wiQuery

2011-10-12 Thread Chris Colman
of jQuery and not intending to expose the entire jQuery API? >-Original Message- >From: armandoxxx [mailto:armando@dropchop.com] >Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2011 6:11 PM >To: users@wicket.apache.org >Subject: Re: jqWicket or wiQuery > >Hey .. > >I've

Re: jqWicket or wiQuery

2011-10-12 Thread armandoxxx
Hey .. I've had a hope someone else allready did it .. so that's why I asked. Regards Armando -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/jqWicket-or-wiQuery-tp3895432p3897026.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: jqWicket or wiQuery

2011-10-11 Thread Bruno Borges
Why don't you implement your use case with both projects and decide which one was easier/better? *Bruno Borges* (21) 7672-7099 *www.brunoborges.com* On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:04 PM, armandoxxx wrote: > hey guys need your opinion which you preffer ... I've checked both and > can't > decide ...