It probably shouldn't remain in an apache package, since it's not
officially an apache project.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i dont think any of us have time and energy to take on another core module
that we would have to keep in sync with jsecurity.
Question -
I came across the terms Swarm and Wasp a while ago, but didn't see
them mentioned in Wicket In Action in the Security chapter. I've been
using the book as sort of my starting point for writing JSecurity's
integration. Are these other things no longer used?
I mentioned in my previous
i dont think any of us have time and energy to take on another core module
that we would have to keep in sync with jsecurity.
i suggest putting it in wicketstuff first and letting it mature there for a
while. we can always reevaluate later.
-igor
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Maarten
Hello Les,
Great news !
No idea where these files should go.
I guess wicket-core shouldn't depend on jsecurity and vice versa, right ?
So maybe you could add it to wicket-stuff ?
That's also where the Wicket-Acegi examples are located AFAIK.
But I have the feeling that the quality and level of
Hello Les,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Les Hazlewood [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Haha, funny you should ask this - I'm doing it now ;)
Well, it wasn't pure coincidence: I saw your name appearing on the wicket
mailing-list a few weeks ago and I was kinda hoping for this answer ;-)
I've
Hi Maarten,
So far things are going great - it took almost no time at all to
integrate the two projects, which I consider a reflection of the good
design of both architectures ;)
I have a few classes created that basically recreates the SignIn*
classes in chapter 11 of Wicket In Action to show
Hi,
I'm about to start a new project using Wicket and is currently examining
which security framework to apply for. I'm looking for best practices
implementing security to a Wicket application.
Wicket has WASP which Swarm is an implementation of and then there is
wicket-auth-roles. Is
You can bridge the gap between Spring Security's default URL-based
model and the component-based model in Wicket. That's what we do here
at work. If you want an example, let me know. I've got one out there
on my public example stuff somewhere. You could try poking around in
(I think it's
Hi,
Anyone tried integrating Wicket with JSecurity ?
http://www.jsecurity.org/
Maarten
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:54 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can bridge the gap between Spring Security's default URL-based
model and the component-based model in Wicket. That's what we do
I was planning on doing that when I saw their proposal come into the
ASF incubator. It looks like a nice project.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Maarten Bosteels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anyone tried integrating Wicket with JSecurity ?
http://www.jsecurity.org/
Maarten
On Thu,
Haha, funny you should ask this - I'm doing it now ;) I've recently started
using Wicket for my latest web application, and naturally I wanted to do
this. I'll have to do a little write-up when I'm finished with it. Any
questions that I could help with in particular in the meantime?
Naturally,
Les, small world! If you'd like some help, let me know. I might
switch our projects at work over to JSecurity.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Les Hazlewood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haha, funny you should ask this - I'm doing it now ;) I've recently started
using Wicket for my latest web
12 matches
Mail list logo
