Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Hi,
Finally I got solved the problem and I wanna share with you. My
checkgroup in the wizard panel werent setting up the setReuseItem in the
ListView It was hard to realize but I get it.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
wrote:
Please file a JIRA at the URL below [1]. The most effective issues
are ones that are submitted with a patch. To make it even more
effective, please run all tests against the patched codebase (run mvn
clean test) and notate that you did so when you submit your patch.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I moved to wicket 1.3.6, the lastest before 1.4, without any luck.
What
I did next, it was to cut the code that was bother me and It is working
now.
Of course, I am afraid that this could have colateral effects. This is
the
code,
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
If I liked to write a Jira with an example, What would I do? I've never
done
this before.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.
Martijn
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
from the top of my head :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor,
I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a
known
bug?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg
igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
of course patches are applied even quicker :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!,
I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and
several
check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked
boxes
are
lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
I verified several times if there was a problem between
models
and
It
is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw,
according to
check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know
how to
manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some
people
asking
about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
(check.class)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
Thanks in advance.
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
of course patches are applied even quicker :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!,
I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes are
lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
I verified several times if there was a problem between models and It
is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people asking
about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
(check.class)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
Thanks in advance.
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Igor,
I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
bug?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
of course patches are applied even quicker :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!,
I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes
are
lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
I verified several times if there was a problem between models and
It
is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
asking
about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
(check.class)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
Thanks in advance.
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
from the top of my head :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor,
I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
bug?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
of course patches are applied even quicker :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!,
I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes
are
lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
I verified several times if there was a problem between models and
It
is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
asking
about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
(check.class)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
Thanks in advance.
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.
Martijn
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
from the top of my head :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor,
I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
bug?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg
igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
of course patches are applied even quicker :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!,
I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes
are
lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
I verified several times if there was a problem between models and
It
is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
asking
about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
(check.class)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
Thanks in advance.
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Hi all,
I moved to wicket 1.3.6, the lastest before 1.4, without any luck. What
I did next, it was to cut the code that was bother me and It is working now.
Of course, I am afraid that this could have colateral effects. This is the
code,
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
If I liked to write a Jira with an example, What would I do? I've never done
this before.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.
Martijn
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
from the top of my head :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor,
I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
bug?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
of course patches are applied even quicker :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!,
I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and
several
check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked
boxes
are
lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
I verified several times if there was a problem between models
and
It
is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw,
according to
check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know
how to
manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
asking
about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
(check.class)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
Thanks in advance.
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Please file a JIRA at the URL below [1]. The most effective issues
are ones that are submitted with a patch. To make it even more
effective, please run all tests against the patched codebase (run mvn
clean test) and notate that you did so when you submit your patch.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I moved to wicket 1.3.6, the lastest before 1.4, without any luck. What
I did next, it was to cut the code that was bother me and It is working now.
Of course, I am afraid that this could have colateral effects. This is the
code,
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
If I liked to write a Jira with an example, What would I do? I've never done
this before.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.
Martijn
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
from the top of my head :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor,
I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
bug?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
of course patches are applied even quicker :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!,
I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and
several
check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked
boxes
are
lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
I verified several times if there was a problem between models
and
It
is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw,
according to
check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know
how to
manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
asking
about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
(check.class)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
}
}
}
else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
}
Thanks in advance.
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
