...@ciseonweb.it
Form id is corret, but remember that form and feedback panel are not added
directly to modal window. They are inside ConnexionContentPanel which in
turn is added to modalwindow.
In your test you should be able to access form calling getContent() before
get(loginForm), i.e
Sorry, I didn't noticed that getContent() is protected. The solution you
found is perfect :-)
I didn't find getContent() method to modalWindow component, but it works
well in two steps :
ConnexionContentPanel loginPanel = (ConnexionContentPanel)
modalWindow.get(modalWindow.getContentId());
Form?
Am 16.04.2011 22:11, schrieb shetc:
What is advantage of Wicket Page Test over WicketTester?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/test-pages-with-selenuim-tp3452652p3454541.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
I use WicketTester on its own now. Will it help me to also use Selenium to
test Wicket as well?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/test-pages-with-selenuim-tp3452652p3455847.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Am 17.04.2011 19:54, schrieb shetc:
I use WicketTester on its own now. Will it help me to also use Selenium to
test Wicket as well?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/test-pages-with-selenuim-tp3452652p3455847.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list
Am 15.04.2011 20:04, schrieb fachhoch:
I am trying to test my wicket application using selenuim , I had no
success , did anybody try ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/test-pages-with-selenuim-tp3452652p3452652.html
Sent from the Users forum
What is advantage of Wicket Page Test over WicketTester?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/test-pages-with-selenuim-tp3452652p3454541.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
I am trying to test my wicket application using selenuim , I had no
success , did anybody try ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/test-pages-with-selenuim-tp3452652p3452652.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Apr 15, 2011, at 11:04 AM, fachhoch wrote:
I am trying to test my wicket application using selenuim , I had no
success , did anybody try ?
Yeah. I use Selenium with a ruby solution, just because that's how I was
introduced to it.
http://tersesystems.com/2010/10/05/simplest
Do you know that wicket provides a page tester ?
If not take a look at
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/util/tester/WicketTester.html
WicketTester
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/test-pages-with-selenuim-tp3452652p3452716
Hi!
I've received this message when I tried to answer a question:
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
users@wicket.apache.org
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend
HTML email raises the score pretty much.
Martijn
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Zoltán Nagy zberke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I've received this message when I tried to answer a question:
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
users@wicket.apache.org
Technical details
Thanks! I turn off formating.
2011/3/1 Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
HTML email raises the score pretty much.
Martijn
--
Zoltán Nagy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
I have been having the same problem for the last 2 weeks. Every time i send
a mail or a reply, i get a mail delivery failure. Today it however seemed
to be working. I have been able to send a reply. If this gets through, i
will conclude that the issue has been resolved or resolved its self.
In my case it turned out that (A) I was pasting in a snippet of XML;
(B) my mail client (Thunderbird ) decided therefore to send the
whole message as HTML; (C) apache's SpamAssassin has rules about
HTML and decided it was spam.
The fix (in TBird) was to edit the Contact record for
Everything I send to this list is being bounced by a spam-filter
at the list-serv end. Just testing a very simple text-only message.
Very sorry if this actually goes through, nothing else would
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Oh, it worked! :)
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Jim Goodwin jwg...@gmail.com wrote:
Everything I send to this list is being bounced by a spam-filter
at the list-serv end. Just testing a very simple text-only message.
Very sorry if this actually goes through, nothing else would
:
visibility can be triggered from a lot of places, isvisible() only
checks the visibility flag. the best way to test it is to see if the
image tag appears in the rendered markup.
-igor
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody
Could you provide me a simple exmaplte how can I do that?
Thank you!
On 3 February 2011 18:33, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
visibility can be triggered from a lot of places, isvisible() only
checks the visibility flag. the best way to test it is to see if the
image tag
Hello everybody!
Is the WicketTester method isVisible() the right solution to test if the
Image is shown on the webpage?
Thank you!
visibility can be triggered from a lot of places, isvisible() only
checks the visibility flag. the best way to test it is to see if the
image tag appears in the rendered markup.
-igor
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody
Thanks,
after i got it that i have to set the second parameter to the parent of
my lazyload the tester worked.
Cheers
Per
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi *,
i try to get it for hours now, but i can't.
I have a page with an AjaxLazyLoadPanel on it. The lazyLoadComponent on
it is a simple panel.
Everything works as expected.
But if i start my unit test (wickettester.startPage) the content panel
is not exchanged. All i get is the lazy load
Hi Per, you can use the AjaxLazyLoadPanelTester
there is an example at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/releases/wicket-1.4.14/wicket-extensions/src/test/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/markup/html/AjaxLazyLoadPanelTesterTest.java
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Per Newgro per.new
Hello list,
I'm trying to set checkboxes with junit but without significant success.
My trouble is to find checkboxes. I've not found any way to access it if
I use CheckBoxMultipleChoice. With CheckGroup I get access with Visitor
tester.getLastRenderedPage().visitChildren(Check.class, new
Use getters:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/type-safe-testing-in-wicket.html
2010/12/15 Anton Bessonov exe...@googlemail.com:
Hello list,
I'm trying to set checkboxes with junit but without significant success. My
trouble is to find checkboxes. I've not found any way to access it if I use
Thanks, I will try!
Use getters:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/type-safe-testing-in-wicket.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi All,
I have an issue trying to test an ajax event.
I have two different wicket classes which need to talk each other.
Both classes have a TextField plus a ListMultipleChoice. When the user
types a word into the class A textField the items of the class A list
get filtered and, based on
the new
Hi Guys
I am having some trouble testing the inmethod grid, specifically when I
remove a row from the data list. On pagerender the grid tries to render the
deleted row, which of course does not exist anymore. This problem does not
occur running the application for real.
I try to click the column
Dear all,
Wicket page test 2.0.0 is now available. It is the first version
that works with Wicket 1.5-M1 and onwards. It is a library allowing
you to unit test your Wicket pages easily, supporting AJAX and
Javascript without changes to your pages.
Get it from maven as described in http
Dear all,
Wicket page test 1.6.1 is now available. It is a library allowing
you to unit test your Wicket pages easily, supporting AJAX and
Javascript without changes to your pages.
This minor release contains the follow changes:
* Fixed issue 3043110[1].
* Fixed issue 3037392[2
Dear all,
Wicket page test 1.6 is now available. It is a library allowing
you to unit test your Wicket pages easily, supporting AJAX and
Javascript without changes to your pages.
This release contains the follow changes:
* Support manual testing: allow some things to be mocked, without
Hello!
Just wanted to honk my horn: three examples of using the built in
wicket test facilities to test AJAX enabled controls, the check box,
radio group and the drop down.
http://blog.crisp.se/perlundholm/2010/06/20/127701780.html
/Per
is the deepest level with a wicket id:
...
panel:storyGrid:form:bodyContainer:body:row:2:item
com.inmethod.grid.common.AbstractGridRow
If you use http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net, then you can test
it easily like:
Selenium s = ...;
assert
s.getText(wicket=//storyGrid//body//row[2
Hi,
Does anybody know how to check the values of individual cells of an
InMethod DataGrid/Treedrid. in a unit test?
Looking at the output of WicketTester.debugComponentTrees() I can see
that the grid row is the deepest level with a wicket id:
NFO - BaseWicketTester - path
what about grabbing the model behind and checking that instead?
2010/6/3 Ronan O'Connell ronanoconnell1...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Does anybody know how to check the values of individual cells of an InMethod
DataGrid/Treedrid. in a unit test?
Looking at the output of WicketTester.debugComponentTrees
, then you can test
it easily like:
Selenium s = ...;
assert
s.getText(wicket=//storyGrid//body//row[2]//item[3]).equals(foo;
In this example you're checking the the 3rd cell in the 2nd row (both
are 0-based).
--
Kent Tong
Useful news for CIO's at http://www2.cpttm.org.mo/cyberlab/cio-news
Hi Kent,
Thanks for the answer, but that looks like it requires Spring, I'm not using
Spring. I was hoping to use the test framework that is included in Wicket,
not go outside it.
Well, it doesn't require you to use Spring in your code. However, it is
indeed assumed that you're using a IoC
Hi Kent,
Thanks for the answer, but that looks like it requires Spring, I'm not using
Spring. I was hoping to use the test framework that is included in Wicket,
not go outside it.
I come across this doing a demo of Wicket and it kind of broke the whole
spiel about Look, you can do unittests
, cat-in-a-hat peter_is...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Kent,
Thanks for the answer, but that looks like it requires Spring, I'm not using
Spring. I was hoping to use the test framework that is included in Wicket,
not go outside it.
I come across this doing a demo of Wicket and it kind of broke
Hi Peter,
If I use wicket:link around a link, how can I click on it with
WicketTester.clickLink()? It don't have a wicket:id so what would the path
be?
Please try http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net which supports testing
the links. You can do it like:
selenium.click(link=My Page);
...
Hi,
If I use wicket:link around a link, how can I click on it with
WicketTester.clickLink()? It don't have a wicket:id so what would the path
be?
Thanks/Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-test-a-link-in-wicket-links-tp2233376p2233376.html
Dear all,
Wicket page test 1.5 is now available. It is a library allowing you
to unit test your Wicket pages easily, supporting AJAX and
Javascript without changes to your pages.
New features implemented in this version:
* Start the Selenium server automatically.
* Support JUnit4
Hi *,
today i updated wicket from 1.4.7 to 1.4.8. I found a hardcoded
dependency to wicket-spring 1.4.1 in my pom.
I updated it to 1.4.8 to. Now i get in my page test the following
exception in setup. But what does it mean? Where
can i change something to make this work. Until now i didn't
Is your unit test setting up the application before it starts (i.e. in the
setUp method if you're using junit?). If you can't figure it out, create a
quickstart that demonstrates it, and attach that to a JIRA.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:42 AM
Did you upgrade to spring 3?
I ran into an issue with the testng spring test not creating the application
context before wicket tester tried to use it (iirc @BeforeTest executed
before the super classes @BeforeClass) Ended up switching anything
annotated with @BeforeTest to @BeforeMethod.
I
Dear all,
Wicket page test 1.4 is now available. It is a library allowing you
to unit test your Wicket pages easily, supporting AJAX and
Javascript without changes to your pages.
New features implemented in this version:
* Provide a super easy way to locate a DOM element with the Wicket ID
Hi,
What would be the best way to test clickLink on a bookmarkabel page link
added into ListView? How should I construct URL for assertPageLink,
clickLink and assertLabel methods?
Test code:
tester.assertComponent(userLinks, ListView.class);
tester.assertListView(userLinks, new
If you want to compose test pages on the fly, you should try also
mashupwebpage:
public void testSomeFieldComponent() {
Page page = new MashupWebPage();
Form form;
page.add(form = new MashUpForm(GID));
FormComponent customField;
form.add(customField = new CustomFieldToBeTested(GID
Dear all,
Wicket page test 1.3 is now available. It is a library allowing you
to unit test your Wicket pages easily, supporting AJAX and
Javascript without changes to your pages.
New features implemented in this version:
* Provide a generic starter page to launch another page whose
Dear all,
Wicket page test allows you to unit test Wicket pages easily including
its AJAX functionality.
Major enhancements in 1.2 is that now you can wait for the completion
of Ajax easily, without writing any Javascript. For example, in a test
case, do something like:
WicketSelenium
I want to test the following:
1. Whether I have any private members stored on my pages that are not
a primitive java type, or IModel
2. If they are IModels, that I do call onDetach() on them.
Reflection helps me to answer the 1st question but the second one baffles
me. Any tips on how to verify
Force your servlet container to serialize sessions after each request
and add non-serializable field to objects that you don't want to be
serialized.
2010/1/27 pieter claassen pie...@claassen.co.uk:
I want to test the following:
1. Whether I have any private members stored on my pages
()
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:51 PM, pieter claassen pie...@claassen.co.uk wrote:
I want to test the following:
1. Whether I have any private members stored on my pages that are not
a primitive java type, or IModel
2. If they are IModels, that I do call onDetach() on them.
Reflection helps me
If I start tomcat in the pre-integration-test the build hangs.
Why is this?
D/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Dear all,
wicket page test allows you to unit test Wicket pages including its
AJAX functionality.
Major enhancements in 1.1.0:
* It now supports Google Guice along with the existing support for
Spring (Thanks to our new member developer, Andy Chu).
* It is now organized in modules so that you
/examples.html which supports AJAX
without any special work
by you.
-
--
Kent Tong
Better way to unit test Wicket pages (http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net)
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/unit-test-of-AjaxLazyLoadPanel-and-ModalWindow-tp16851306p26809771.html
Sent from
commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/unit-test-of-AjaxLazyLoadPanel-and-ModalWindow-tp16851306p26793515.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi,
I'm executing the standard Wicket maven archetype's test target and it is
having trouble finding my JNDI datasource.
*mvn jetty:run* works just fine but when I execute the *mvn test* target
from within m2eclipse, I get a huge stracktrace with the following excerpt:
Caused
I discovered as I implemented the SessionListener to clean up user
record locks that the WicketTester object does not behave as expected in
regards to the HttpSession objects. I expected to have my
MockHttpSession already configured with the application session object
bound in the specified
Please ignore
I'm executing the standard Wicket maven archetype's test target and it is
having trouble finding my JNDI datasource.
*mvn jetty:run* works just fine but when I execute the *mvn test* target
from within m2eclipse, I get a huge stracktrace with the following excerpt:
Caused
should test it !
zedros wrote:
on a broader picture, my main question was about the way you proceed,
Do you test every page, including every validator or.. ? If doing so,
for pages that quite often are then not touched much, i would fear the
time needed for proper testing quite hard
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 08:32 +0200, Martin Makundi wrote:
Hi!
When I test a page like this
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/choice
with wicket tester and submit the form, the response page is the
HomePage instead of the expected page (ChoicePage).
Do you use
Thanx for your feedback! Did you have a look at http://is.gd/58mq3 which
shows the test?
Ofcourse I didn't look ;)
Now, having looked at it your bug is that FORMTESTER CAN BE SUBMITTED ONLY ONCE!
If you want to use it another time, you need to call newFormTester again.
**
Martin
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 11:44 +0200, Martin Makundi wrote:
Thanx for your feedback! Did you have a look at http://is.gd/58mq3 which
shows the test?
Ofcourse I didn't look ;)
Now, having looked at it your bug is that FORMTESTER CAN BE SUBMITTED ONLY
ONCE!
If you want to use it another
Line 63 you are re-using the same formTester. Cannot work.
**
Martin
2009/12/1 Martin Grotzke martin.grot...@javakaffee.de:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 11:44 +0200, Martin Makundi wrote:
Thanx for your feedback! Did you have a look at http://is.gd/58mq3 which
shows the test?
Ofcourse I didn't
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:46 +0200, Martin Makundi wrote:
Line 63 you are re-using the same formTester. Cannot work.
Wow, really fast! :)
However, I already had tested this and it doesn't make any difference -
the test still fails with the same error.
FWIW, I updated and pushed the test so
However, I already had tested this and it doesn't make any difference -
the test still fails with the same error.
I am not sure what you are doing. Do like this
{
// Operation 1
FormTester f1 = tester.newFormTester (...);
f1.setValue
tester.execute ...
}
{
// Operation 2
this and it doesn't make any difference -
the test still fails with the same error.
I am not sure what you are doing. Do like this
{
// Operation 1
FormTester f1 = tester.newFormTester (...);
f1.setValue
tester.execute ...
}
{
// Operation 2
FormTester f1
Hi,
When I test a page like this
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/choice
with wicket tester and submit the form, the response page is the
HomePage instead of the expected page (ChoicePage).
This issue was already reported some time ago without a final result:
http
Hi!
When I test a page like this
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/choice
with wicket tester and submit the form, the response page is the
HomePage instead of the expected page (ChoicePage).
Do you use a formtester? The wicket tester executeajax does not
properly submit
is not in a loop, just specify the HTML ID in the template.
If it is in a loop, use xpath.
zedros wrote:
on a broader picture, my main question was about the way you proceed,
Do you test every page, including every validator or.. ? If doing so,
for pages that quite often are then not touched much, i
I use it, and what I'm looking for is a mean to ensure my test coverage.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Kent Tong k...@cpttm.org.mo wrote:
Pierre Goupil wrote:
So I'm looking for a way to list all Page instances in a Wicket app,
which
could then allow me to be sure
Hi Kent
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Kent Tong k...@cpttm.org.mo wrote:
What you need is TDD. Once you adopt TDD, you will have every page tested.
I was under the assumption that unit testing isn't valuable for GUI,
esp. web gui, since the effort is too important... I think I even read
Use Cobertura or similar. It will work for both your use cases and provide
you with coverage metrics.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Pierre Goupil goupilpie...@gmail.comwrote:
I use it, and what I'm looking for is a mean to ensure my test
Hi,
What you can do is scan all Page classes (or Panel classes, etc) on the
class-path and check if there are tests for them.
Put this code in a unit test.
Fail the test if you find a class without accompanying test.
You can use this example to get started with the class path scanning:
http
Goupil goupilpie...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
One thing that I like regarding Wicket tester is that it easily allows one
to check a Page under design for any exception that it could throw at
creation-time. Actually, doing such a basic test is for me essential, so as
it takes only two lines of code
that it may be pointless
to test the position or the color of a button in automated tests. On the
other hand, functionality of GUI can definitely be tested. For example,
I am writing a Wicket application with TDD (sort of) with the library shown
in my signature. It is working very well.
-
--
Kent Tong
In my other post I gave a link to a full-fledged example which scans for
Panel classes with the default constructor and instantiates them.
http://stuq.nl/weblog/2009-11-01/automatically-test-your-wicket-panel-html-markup
This has almost no value (in my opinion) for reporting unit testing
is that it easily allows
one
to check a Page under design for any exception that it could throw at
creation-time. Actually, doing such a basic test is for me essential, so
as
it takes only two lines of code, I systematically check all my pages this
way.
You know
Pierre Goupil wrote:
I use it, and what I'm looking for is a mean to ensure my test coverage.
If you're using TDD, you will have developed the page and the unit test for
that
page at the same time and by definition you won't have a page that is not
tested.
-
--
Kent Tong
Better way
:
Pierre Goupil wrote:
I use it, and what I'm looking for is a mean to ensure my test coverage.
If you're using TDD, you will have developed the page and the unit test for
that
page at the same time and by definition you won't have a page that is not
tested.
-
--
Kent Tong
Better way
Yeah, test coverage is a big word here. But as I said I was not looking for
a way to generate a report, just a mean to have my test suit fail if 1) a
page throws an exception at instantiation 2) a page has not been so tested.
That's exactly what you did and I'm not surprised not to be the first
Item 2 (fail if a page has not been tested) is not in my solution, but
I'm glad I could help :-)
Regards,
Daan van Etten
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre Goupil wrote:
Yeah, test coverage is a big word here. But as I said I was not looking for
a way to generate a report, just a mean
No, it isn't but:
-with your solution, no test has to be written especially for each Component
/ Page (if one just want to check for exception)
-so we are assured that no Page / Component is forgotten (in the check for
exception process)) :-)
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Daan van Etten d
Without reference to his article, I can only guess that it may be pointless
to test the position or the color of a button in automated tests.
I think it was this one :
http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/11/uncle-bob-tdd-applicability
but in fact uncle bob mainly says it's pointless to do TDD when
Guys,
One thing that I like regarding Wicket tester is that it easily allows one
to check a Page under design for any exception that it could throw at
creation-time. Actually, doing such a basic test is for me essential, so as
it takes only two lines of code, I systematically check all my pages
Pierre Goupil wrote:
So I'm looking for a way to list all Page instances in a Wicket app, which
could then allow me to be sure that they are all covered by a test. And
when
it's done maybe I could use the same system in order to ensure that
Selenium
(the automated functional testing
Dear all,
I've made a small library to unit test Wicket pages: It launches Jetty
to run your webapp in-process and launches the Selenium client. Then you
inject POJO mock objects into @SpringBean annotated fields and use the
Selenium client to drive your page.
Why I think it is useful
Hi, all:
I have a page which is protected by MySession.isLogin().
I want to unit test this page and write the following code:
---
WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(new
El jue, 22-10-2009 a las 17:07 +0800, Haulyn R. Jason escribió:
Hi, all:
I have a page which is protected by MySession.isLogin().
I want to unit test this page and write the following code
Thanks very much, it works!
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bg wrote:
El jue, 22-10-2009 a las 17:07 +0800, Haulyn R. Jason escribió:
Hi, all:
I have a page which is protected by MySession.isLogin().
I want to unit test this page and write the following
Test test?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:03 PM, wicketmon...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi *,
i would like to test behavior of my page. In constructor there is a redirect if
page parameter not set. But the redirect target is a url and not a wicket page
instance. What is the best attribute to add my assertion to?
MyPage(PageParams p) {
if (p.get(xyz) == null) {
redirectTo
Per,
You can also throw a RestartResponseException or a subclass thereof.
That is the recommended way within a constructor anyway. For you it
would be RedirectToUrlException (or something like that).
Regards,
Erik.
Per Newgro wrote:
Hi *,
i would like to test behavior of my page
Thanks Erik,
this is definitly worth a shot. There seem to be many new classes in
1.4. So i have to dig deeper into wicket again.
Thanks for showing me the light on this.
Per
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi, All!
I have user update form, and it have search users subform. This subform
use AjaxFallbackButton as submit button.
I want to test this functionality with WicketTester, but when I try do it:
FormTester ft=tester.newFormTester(updateForm:selectUserForm);
ft.setValue
Hi, Martin!
I try use
tester.assertVisible(messageTabs:panel:company:commentForm:commentCreateModal)
where
messageTabs:panel:company:commentForm:commentCreateModal is
my.app.class.NotificationModalWindow
where
NotificationModalWindow extends ModalWindow.
But it not work,
201 - 300 of 420 matches
Mail list logo
