Thanks!
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:54 Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> Sure :)
>
> I would add some overridable method like `protected boolean
> shouldAddJsCss`, returning `true` in base class
> and controlling which header items will be rendered
>
> Or you can create separate method to render those js
Sure :)
I would add some overridable method like `protected boolean
shouldAddJsCss`, returning `true` in base class
and controlling which header items will be rendered
Or you can create separate method to render those js/css resources and
override it with empty method ...
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at
Dear Wicketers
I have a basepage with headerpanel and footerpanel, every webpage were
extends it. Now, I have a question, may I have a page extends basepage, and
without output extended js and css files?
Perfect! Thank you so much for getting me situated!
-Lon
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a known problem with TransparentWebMarkupContainers, see
> WICKET-5479
>
> You should use a WebMarkupContainer and #queue() instead.
>
> Regards
> Sven
>
>
>
> On 04.08.
Hi,
this is a known problem with TransparentWebMarkupContainers, see WICKET-5479
You should use a WebMarkupContainer and #queue() instead.
Regards
Sven
On 04.08.2016 01:49, Lon Varscsak wrote:
Hey guys,
I’ve got a component (ComponentB) that subclasses from another component
(ComponentA).
Hey guys,
I’ve got a component (ComponentB) that subclasses from another component
(ComponentA). In ComponentB I call a method on ComponentA that updates a
div (ajax) that wraps some content on ComponentA in addition to the
(which is ComponentB’s content). While this updates
correctly, if I hav
le.com/Overriding-markup-loading-results-in-errors-with-inheritance-tp4658319p4658400.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional co
cases the same content.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Overriding-markup-loading-results-in-errors-with-inheritance-tp4658319p4658369.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
&
() delivers in both cases the same content.
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Overriding-markup-loading-results-in-errors-with-inheritance-tp4658319p4658369.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
inherited
> markup
> }
> }
> }
>
> Even if is.getInputStream() gives exactly the same text as
> standard.getInputStream(), this leads for any markup containing inheritance
> from another markup to the following stacktrace:
&
contain inherited
markup
}
}
}
Even if is.getInputStream() gives exactly the same text as
standard.getInputStream(), this leads for any markup containing inheritance
from another markup to the following stacktrace:
ERROR - MarkupFactory - Markup not found: Base
lt;
> dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I have another problem during Wicket 6 migration. This time it is a
> problem
> > with markup inheritance.
> >
> > I have an old wicket panel and appropriate markup fil
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Marios Skounakis wrote:
> Understood. I am still unclear why wicket would behave differently in
> deployment and development configuration with respect to missing components
> in the markup. Is there any actual use case for this? If not, I believe it
> would be bet
xhtml-tags.html#Wicket%2527sXHTMLtags-Elementwicket%253Aextend
> https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/markup-inheritance.html
>
> But if this was working for you in 5.x then I presume you do have the
> markup inheritence setup right.
>
> ~ Thank you,
>Paul Bors
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 3:52
kis wrote:
> I've seen this happen too. It's not related to inheritance. If you add a
> component in code and omit it in the html file, you get different behavior
> in the following cases:
>
> - if your web.xml specifies configuration=deployment, you don't get an
> error
I've seen this happen too. It's not related to inheritance. If you add a
component in code and omit it in the html file, you get different behavior
in the following cases:
- if your web.xml specifies configuration=deployment, you don't get an error
- if you web.xml specifie
ere...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have another problem during Wicket 6 migration. This time it is a problem
> with markup inheritance.
>
> I have an old wicket panel and appropriate markup file:
> MyOldGoodWicketPanel & MyOldGoodWicketPanel.html
>
> Markup fi
Hi Folks,
I have another problem during Wicket 6 migration. This time it is a problem
with markup inheritance.
I have an old wicket panel and appropriate markup file:
MyOldGoodWicketPanel & MyOldGoodWicketPanel.html
Markup file looks like this:
... stuff ...
Some months ago I needed
uot; instead of
"bodyComponent.add(someOtherComponent)".
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:52 PM, brad steiner
wrote:
> Can you please elaborate on the use of TransparentWebMarkupContainer in 1.5
> for use with Panel inheritance? I have a page with tabbed panels, each of
> which has its own
Can you please elaborate on the use of TransparentWebMarkupContainer in 1.5 for
use with Panel inheritance? I have a page with tabbed panels, each of which has
its own left nav. Each panel subclass thus inherits from the base class /
markup where the corresponding left nav is defined. When I
:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd";>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Where-to-add-javascript-in-html-pages-which-follow-inheritance-relationship-tp4650855p46509
: if you extend Page3)
Also, you should add a to the HTML file(s) that are your base
classes (the ones you declared in).
See this example on Creating layouts using markup inheritance from Wicket's
website:
http://wicket.apache.org/learn/examples/markupinheritance.html
Hope that
2012 12:38 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Where to add javascript in html pages which follow inheritance
relationship.
Please help me out here...for a child page..how would I add javascript in
its head. I have tried out wicket:head with head tag in base page but it is
not wor
;>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:38 AM, kshitiz wrote:
> Please help me out here...for a child page..how would I add javascript in its
> head. I have tried out wicket:head with head tag in base page but it is not
> working out...
>
>
>
> --
> View this me
-follow-inheritance-relationship-tp4650855p4650903.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h
Nothat appeared as a replacement of "" in the forum...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Where-to-add-javascript-in-html-pages-which-follow-inheritance-relationship-tp4650855p4650873.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at
I assume the " entities aren't really there in the code?
From: kshitiz
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 07/30/2012 09:16 AM
Subject:Re: Where to add javascript in html pages which follow
inheritance relationship.
hi,
Sorry to disturb you again but I am tryin
data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd";>
*JS code is not being called...:(. I have tried out all combinations like
removing head tags from Page2 or enclosing wicket:head tags with head tags
in Page1*
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.18429
OkkI was thinking this as a possibility..thanks for clarifying my
doubt...:)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Where-to-add-javascript-in-html-pages-which-follow-inheritance-relationship-tp4650855p4650869.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list
-add-javascript-in-html-pages-which-follow-inheritance-relationship-tp4650855p4650866.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apa
So, if put JS in page3, why it is not working? After all, it is the root
one...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Where-to-add-javascript-in-html-pages-which-follow-inheritance-relationship-tp4650855p4650866.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list
pache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd";>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Page 1 extends from page2 and page2 extends from page3. Now the problem is I
> have a JS code which is being called from page1. When I put that code in
> page1 or page3, it does no
gt;
> .. component here..
>
>
>
>
> the problem is that I want the inner div to inherit the height:100%
> attribute, but that only looks at the parent div.. which was inserted by
> wicket and breaks the chain of inheritance...
>
> i'm sure th
et and breaks the chain of inheritance...
i'm sure there is some glaringly obvious solution to this...
any thoughts?
TIA
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/nested-divs-ajax-css-inheritance-tp4635925.html
Sent from the Users forum maili
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4361
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Hi,
Looks like a problem in Wicket.
Please create a ticket.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Bodis, Jerome wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a web page 'ChildPage' that inherits (java/markup) from a 'SuperPage'
> ('ChildPage' --> 'SuperPage'). 'ChildPage' now needs to override
> getVariation() based on
ssage in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Borders-and-inheritance-in-wicket-1-5-tp3965704p3982218.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-uns
e border in other components where I want the same
> appearance but dont want to extend from panel A.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Borders-and-inheritance-in-wicket-1-5-tp3965704p3981920.html
> Sent from the Users forum maili
-inheritance-in-wicket-1-5-tp3965704p3981920.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
if you are using inheritance why are you using a border? same effect
can be achieved with markup inheritance...
-igor
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:55 AM, bjolletz wrote:
>
> Igor Vaynberg-2 wrote:
>>
>> extending panel A means that your components go into panel A not into
>
ll
> dont really see how this one could be solved without
> setTransparentResolver.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Borders-and-inheritance-in-wicket-1-5-tp3965704p3965704.html
> Sent from the Users forum mail
it?
>
> I have read the section about borders in the migration guide, but I still
> dont really see how this one could be solved without setTransparentResolver.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Borders-
longer possible,
or is there another way to do it?
I have read the section about borders in the migration guide, but I still
dont really see how this one could be solved without setTransparentResolver.
Any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Border
IValueMap attributes) {
this.attributes = attributes;
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Attribute-Inheritance-or-Copying-tp3332828p3940229.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
See Panel class.
I.e. use composition instead of inheritance.
This way one panel can contain the static html and another the
dynamically generated one.
You can place them wherever you want in any page.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Sarah kho wrote:
> I am reading http://wicket.apache.org/le
I am reading http://wicket.apache.org/learn/examples/markupinheritance.html and
I want to find a way to make the content section sliced into two parts. I am
wondering how I can do that. I want the left section to show a fixed html
page and the right section to show load a content page which is a wi
OK, I found the problem : I used style.css instead of styles.css.
Now, .css and images folder are in the right place (next to BasePage.html in
the package) and they are in the class path.
Thanks to that configuration, when I tried, I had this warning message :
INFO - haredResourceRequestTarget - s
1. the images in .css should use relative urls to the .css file.
For beginning put .css and the images in the same folder and reference them
with url('someImage.png')
2. Did you move style(s).css in fr/statlife/protoE4N/ folder ?
If you use Wicket's resources then you should put the .css (and the
OK, I tried "/style.css" but it didn't work : style is apply but error page
is called (maybe for images used in style.css?)
So, I try to implement the other solution.
I found example on the wiki (
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/including-css-resources.html). I try with
on basePage.ht
u are right again : when I remove the css file of ma BasePage,
> > errorPage
> > > constructor is not called.
> > >
> > > So, what is the good practice to declare style css file when you use
> > Markup
> > > Inheritance?
> > > I thougth that put th
> it should either be in WEB-INF/ folder or you should use
> > .../>
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Mathilde Pellerin <
> > mathilde.pelle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > You are right again : when I remove the css file of ma BasePage,
&
ed.
> >
> > So, what is the good practice to declare style css file when you use
> Markup
> > Inheritance?
> > I thougth that put the link :
> >
> >
> > in the head of basePage was enougth, but visibly not...
> >
> >
> > 2011/5/20 Ma
uctor is not called.
>
> So, what is the good practice to declare style css file when you use Markup
> Inheritance?
> I thougth that put the link :
>
>
> in the head of basePage was enougth, but visibly not...
>
>
> 2011/5/20 Martin Grigorov
>
> > You have a re
You are right again : when I remove the css file of ma BasePage, errorPage
constructor is not called.
So, what is the good practice to declare style css file when you use Markup
Inheritance?
I thougth that put the link :
in the head of basePage was enougth, but visibly not...
2011/5/20 Martin
ge's constructor and see the thread stack.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Mathilde Pellerin <
> > mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am new in wicket and I encountering a problem with my
ge's constructor and see the thread stack.
>
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Mathilde Pellerin <
> mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am new in wicket and I encountering a problem with my Markup
> inheritance.
>
It shouldn't be called as you described it.
Put a breakpoint in BasePage's constructor and see the thread stack.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Mathilde Pellerin <
mathilde.pelle...@statlife.fr> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am new in wicket and I encountering a problem w
Hi all,
I am new in wicket and I encountering a problem with my Markup inheritance.
In my BasePage (that extends WebPage), I have a menu with some
BookmarkablePageLink :
Accueil
Infos E4N
FAQ
Contact
and for each link I have a code like this in my BasePage constructor
All,
We have developed an application which spans both authenticated and
unauthenticated users.
We have secured the authenticated part of the application using wicket auth
roles.
This would be good enough, however, we need to get SSO working between two
different application
servers & their respe
842946.n4.nabble.com/Attribute-Inheritance-or-Copying-tp3332828p3399490.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional comma
markupContainer, you can get
> and preserve the desired attributes and then remove them.
>
> In onComponentTag of the TextArea you add the previously preserved
> attributes.
>
>
> -
> --
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> http://cantaa.de
>
> --
> View th
the TextArea you add the previously preserved
attributes.
-
--
Regards,
Hans
http://cantaa.de
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Attribute-Inheritance-or-Copying-tp3332828p014.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing li
(which
itself is a wicket-component also)?
I've to access the ComponentTag of my Panel but dont know how, except
iam in "onComponentTag".
Thanks in Advance for any Hint,
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Attribute-Inheritance-or-
arman
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:37 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Panel Inheritance
and will only let you add stuff in
wherever you put the element in your parent's markup.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:32 PM, GOODWIN, MATTHEW (ATTCORP)
wrote:
> That is my situatio
gt; sufficient. I will review the examples.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On
> Behalf Of James Carman
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:26 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> S
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:26 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Panel Inheritance
However, sometimes that just doesn't work, because you want to inject
stuff at different places in the subpanel. You can override the
entire markup file if you want in that case, right?
On Thu
However, sometimes that just doesn't work, because you want to inject
stuff at different places in the subpanel. You can override the
entire markup file if you want in that case, right?
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> The Wicket way is to use in MyPanel.html and
> ...
The Wicket way is to use in MyPanel.html and
in MyExtPanel.html
See the examples.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:05 PM, GOODWIN, MATTHEW (ATTCORP)
wrote:
> I would like to extend a custom panel that we have and add some
> additional components.
>
>
>
> Ex pseudocode:
>
>
>
> public class MyPanel
I would like to extend a custom panel that we have and add some
additional components.
Ex pseudocode:
public class MyPanel extends Panel {
// adding 2 components
add(component a);
add(component b);
}
public class MyExtPanel extends MyPanel {
// add additional 2 components
a
remove wicket:child tag.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:13 AM, DCarr wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is it possible to have class inheritance without markup inheritance?
>>>
>>> I would like a wicket-aware base
tag.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:13 AM, DCarr wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it possible to have class inheritance without markup inheritance?
>>
>> I would like a wicket-aware base class (with an associated markup
>> file)
>&
> Is it possible to have class inheritance without markup inheritance?
>
> I would like a wicket-aware base class (with an associated markup file)
> with derived classes supplying data (e.g.. BaseClass with an 'abstract
> protected String getName()') and no markup files
Hi,
Is it possible to have class inheritance without markup inheritance?
I would like a wicket-aware base class (with an associated markup
file) with derived classes supplying data (e.g.. BaseClass with an
'abstract protected String getName()') and no markup files (or XML
k and want to make a
big use of markup inheritance. What i can't do is to make a page3, which
markup inherits from page2 and at the same time page2 markup inherits
from page1. Am i doing something wrong, or there is no support for this
No problem, it should work fine. Page inheritance is just like standard
class inheritance
Hello,
i am starting to explorer this beautifull framework and want to make a
big use of markup inheritance. What i can't do is to make a page3, which
markup inherits from page2 and at the same time
Page/markup inheritance is supported. Do you have code that isn't working?
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Juraj Petko wrote:
> Hello,
> i am starting to explorer this beautifull framework and want to make a
> big use of markup inheritance. What i can't do is to make a pa
LayoutPage
LayoutPage.html :
..layout stuff..
This will be replaced by Page1
.. more layout stuff ..
Page1.html :
.. Page1 stuff ..
Matt
On 2010-11-23 14:31, Juraj Petko wrote:
Hello,
i am starting to explorer this beautifull framework and want to make a
big use of markup inheritan
Hello,
i am starting to explorer this beautifull framework and want to make a
big use of markup inheritance. What i can't do is to make a page3, which
markup inherits from page2 and at the same time page2 markup inherits
from page1. Am i doing something wrong, or there is no support for
s in extended pages from my
> parent page.
>
> cheer gab
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Inheritance-and-wicket-child-inside-a-component-tag-Wicket-1-5-tp2965286p2966068.html
Sent from the Users f
Have you tried to use the TransparentWebMarkupContainer? based on the
migration guide this could be a potential solution.
also have a look at this open bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3045
then after using the TransparentWebMarkupContainer... wicket was no
longer able to find
havior in case
> of Wicket 1.5.
>
> Wicket gurus, I need your advice :)
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Inheritance-and-wicket-child-inside-a-component-tag-Wicket-1-5-tp2965286p2965286.html
>
.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Inheritance-and-wicket-child-inside-a-component-tag-Wicket-1-5-tp2965286p2965286.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
Am 25.06.2010 20:09, schrieb Jeremy Thomerson:
> If you want to do this, you are basically using the single-page paradigm
> where your content is always a panel. Basically you just create a single
> page, and then all of your content goes into panels instead of pages with
> markup
If you want to do this, you are basically using the single-page paradigm
where your content is always a panel. Basically you just create a single
page, and then all of your content goes into panels instead of pages with
markup inheritance. Then swap the panel in your link and add it to the ajax
What you are trying to accomplish doesn't require markup inheritance.
You can use a panel and replace it with an Ajax link.
That panel could be nested within wicket children participating in
markup inheritance, but that's another matter. The panel should be
the component ad
Hello all,
I would like to extend the Markup Inheritance example
(http://wicket.apache.org/examplemarkupinheritance.html) by replacing
the content part of the page (i.e. the wicket:child) using Ajax.
I tried to replace the BookmarkablePageLink on the BasePage with an
AjaxLink but this does not
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:34 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Cc: Berlin Brown
Subject: Re: Question about markup inheritance and page layouts
>
> >
> Where did you place the wicket:panel
>
> >
> Where did you place the wicket:panel tags in your markup?
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
> They are in the SomePage:
>
> > SomePage.html:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
No, the wicket:panel tags that must appear in the panel html files - where
are they?
-
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:26 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Cc: Berlin Brown
Subject: Re: Question about markup inheritance and page layouts
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] <
berlin.br...@primerica.com> wrote:
> I was a little confused about page layouts and markup inheritance. I
> was thinking that a I could take a piece of HTML markup and reuse that
> component when I need to, and use it
I was a little confused about page layouts and markup inheritance. I
was thinking that a I could take a piece of HTML markup and reuse that
component when I need to, and use it multiple times within page without
ever having to create the content.
I was not able to do this. What I have now
Yes, but both are missing in HTML A.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sven Meier [mailto:s...@meiers.net]
Gesendet: Di 11.05.2010 08:52
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: doctype and markup inheritance
#setStripXmlDeclarationFromOutput() has nothing to do with doctype - it
#setStripXmlDeclarationFromOutput() has nothing to do with doctype - it
controls the xml prolog.
Sven
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Html-root-tag-and-contents-repeating-in-response-after-302-redirect-tp2173315p2173399.html
Sent from the Wicket - Use
Hi Stefan,
as far as I understood markup inheritance correctly, the xml and doctype
of B is ignored and only the part that is specified inside the
... tags is taken over in A instead of
the ... part.
Everything that is specified additionally in B is only for previewing B
in a browser of your
Dear Wicket wizzards,
given is a page A with a HTML file that has no doctype, just starting with
...
The Page's class is extended by B and the markup of B has a proper HTML file
with XML and doctype lines.
What is the intended behavior of wicket?
1. Ignore the exdending B's xml and doctype an
Reported WICKET-2569: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2569 . I
worked around this issue by using a label to render the xml header.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Neil Curzon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems that Wicket 1.4.3 is stripping the XML header when using page
>
Hi all,
It seems that Wicket 1.4.3 is stripping the XML header when using page
inheritance for layout. My super page defines the layout and has a ?xml
header at the top. If a sub page has content, when wicket renders it, the
?xml header will be excluded. Strangely, for subclasses with no content
ow.de
> xing | http://www.xing.com/profile/Jens_Zastrow
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
ht
The "SuperDiv" component is just a WebMarkupContainer
I just tried to find the getTransparentResolver() method, but without success...
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
--
dipl. inform jens zastrow
phone | +49.152.04840108
mail | m...@jens-zastrow.de
web | http://jens-zastrow.de
xing | http://www.xin
yeah, what you are doing is not inheritance, it is a mix of
composition and inhertiace - which is quiet hard to map. the
transparent resolver hack is there for such circumstances but...use at
your own risk :)
-gior
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:45 PM, jWeekend wrote:
>
> Jens,
>
> That
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
