Hi,
if any of you could help, we have a problem in one of our wicket
installations. We have a system that connects to another system. Sometimes
the system's reply lasts for more than a minute.
Wicket is having problem with regards to the page map being locked.
I click for example on a page to
I'd suggest running the transaction in the background (separate
thread) and using an AjaxStoppableSelfUpdatingTimer to periodically
check if the thread was finished and only do the redirect after
finishing. This way, the pagemap remains unlocked.
2010/1/21 Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.com:
hi,
i believe this is due to the fact that wicket has synchronized page maps for
access.
do you think it is safe to remove it?
what are the precautions when removing synchronized for wicket page maps?
Is there a setting that I could use to disable this?
Thanks A Lot
Carlo
On Thu, Jan 21,
I'd suggest adapting your application to use Wicket properly instead
of the other way around. I'm not a Wicket Dev but I'm pretty sure that
desynchronizing page map access will cause more problems than it
solves.
Your problem is that Page A displays data which can take a lot of time
to gather due
Why not follow the Jeroen's suggestion instead of trying to trick framework
internals?
Ernesto
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Carlo Camerino
carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote:
hi,
i believe this is due to the fact that wicket has synchronized page maps
for
access.
do you think it is safe
if i can't do this, is there anyway that i could at least increase the
timeout of the pagemap to greater than 1 minute?
1 minute would be too little i guess
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not follow the Jeroen's suggestion instead of
is there anyway that i could just kill the previous thread?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote:
if i can't do this, is there anyway that i could at least increase the
timeout of the pagemap to greater than 1 minute?
1 minute would be too little i
If you do it my way, then you don't have to
2010/1/21 Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.com:
is there anyway that i could just kill the previous thread?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Carlo Camerino
carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote:
if i can't do this, is there anyway that i could at
Read up on Future's in the java.concurrent packages. They might
provide you with a good way to work with answers that lie in the
future...
Martijn
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Carlo Camerino
carlo.camer...@gmail.com wrote:
is there anyway that i could just kill the previous thread?
On
Carlo,
If you need some code illustrating how to do this, I can mail you the
source code of a similar use case: creating a lengthy PDF and providing
users with progress feedback... It uses the same approach Jeroen mentioned.
Best,
Ernesto
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Jeroen Steenbeeke
hi,
please do.
thanks a lot!
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Carlo,
If you need some code illustrating how to do this, I can mail you the
source code of a similar use case: creating a lengthy PDF and providing
users with progress
where do i get this class?
AjaxStoppableSelfUpdatingTimer ?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote:
hi,
please do.
thanks a lot!
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Carlo,
If you need some code
My apologies, that is a class we use internally. Must have confused it
with some basic wicket class.
You can use AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior to similar effect. Just override
the onTimer method
2010/1/21 Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.com:
where do i get this class?
no prob.
i was thinking, if was going to do timerbehaior approach, might as well go
with comet
have any of you guys used comet for this kind of situation before?
thanks
carlo
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Jeroen Steenbeeke j.steenbeeke.ml@
gmail.com wrote:
My apologies, that is a class we
Afraid not, but I believe wicketstuff-push is integrated with comet.
2010/1/21 Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.com:
no prob.
i was thinking, if was going to do timerbehaior approach, might as well go
with comet
have any of you guys used comet for this kind of situation before?
thanks
I would use timer as comet introduces additional dependencies...
I have used comet-push for other things but not via wicket-stuff project.
Thus, I can't offer any help.
Ernesto
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote:
no prob.
i was thinking, if was
16 matches
Mail list logo
