Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-12 Thread Andrea Del Bene
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Matthias Tonhäuser wrote: > Hi, > > I just started using Wicket recently and I quite like what I've seen so > far. To me, it is superior to JSF because it let's you spend more time > writing nice Java code instead of scratching your head whether the correct > hmtl

RE: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-11 Thread Chris Colman
; From: Matthias Tonhäuser [mailto:scaronthe...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, 12 October 2017 5:42 AM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: Wicket 8 GA for production > > Hi, > > I just started using Wicket recently and I quite like what I've seen so > far. To me, it

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-11 Thread Matthias Tonhäuser
Hi, I just started using Wicket recently and I quite like what I've seen so far. To me, it is superior to JSF because it let's you spend more time writing nice Java code instead of scratching your head whether the correct hmtl attribute is "render" or "reRender". I do think Wicket has a marketing

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-11 Thread Lon Varscsak
I agree with this wholeheartedly…I was just having this discussion with my boss yesterday. I do not understand (mostly) this drive to push stateless frameworks (client or server). Obviously your framework needs to support stateless as to not waste resources, but almost every application I write i

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-11 Thread Andrea Del Bene
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Илья Нарыжный wrote: > Andrea, > > We would be happy to help with: > 1) Translation of any articles/slides to russian and posting that on famous > russian IT resources. If you have any articles even right now which worst > to be translated: please send them to me.

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-10 Thread Илья Нарыжный
Andrea, We would be happy to help with: 1) Translation of any articles/slides to russian and posting that on famous russian IT resources. If you have any articles even right now which worst to be translated: please send them to me. 2) A long with articles about Orienteer we can after switch to Wic

RE: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-10 Thread Chris Colman
uld be that hard to explain to intelligent developers the benefits of Wicket over other frameworks. > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Del Bene [mailto:an.delb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 10 October 2017 8:57 PM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: Wicket 8 GA for p

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-10 Thread Andrea Del Bene
> And guys, you are doing incredible web-framework! Thank you for that. I'm > quite surprised that Wicket is not widely used:) Do you have some > marketing difficulties? > I personally expect that Wicket 8 release will be followed by some > marketing events, articles and etc. Will be glad to parti

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-10 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Илья Нарыжный wrote: > Martin, Andrea, Maxim, > > Thank you all for your answers! > > GA version will be a gift for us for sure:) Yes - we can use Java 8 source > level with Wicket 7, but we have some internal dependency for resolving of > which we need to inv

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-10 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Thanks a lot for reporting this! I have no idea why ".." was used will investigate and fix ASAP :( (this code was recently rewritten to bypass RedirectToUrl limitations ...) On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Peter Henderson wrote: > FYI > > I've just clicked on the demo link. (https://om.alteameta

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-10 Thread Peter Henderson
FYI I've just clicked on the demo link. (https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/ ) Using the Google button to sign on produced an error. *400.* That’s an error. *Error: invalid_request* Invalid parameter value for redirect_uri: Directory backtracking is not allowed: https://om.alteametasoft.co

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-09 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Hello Ilia, I believe wicket 7 and 8 are fully feature compatible, my migration from 7 to 8 was flawless :) WICKET-6105 introducing API break (wicket-datetime module is dropped), wicket-datetime in its current state is available at wicketstuff Our project is opensource :) openmeetings.apache.org

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-09 Thread Илья Нарыжный
Martin, Andrea, Maxim, Thank you all for your answers! GA version will be a gift for us for sure:) Yes - we can use Java 8 source level with Wicket 7, but we have some internal dependency for resolving of which we need to invest some good amount of time. Andrea, regarding my second question. It w

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-09 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Илья Нарыжный wrote: > Dear Wicket developers, > > Could you please help with understanding of Wicket 8 status? > 1) When do you expect GA version be released? (I mean first official > release which is not a candidate and etc.) > 2) How accurately Wicket 8 bra

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-09 Thread Andrea Del Bene
Hello Ilia, You can find some more information on the current Wicket 8 status here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46340987/how-stable-is-wicket-8-what-is-supposed-timeline We have been focused on solving a quite big task about removing Joda time from Wicket 8. The issue is in its review s

Re: Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-09 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Hello Ilia, we are using 8.0M* releases in production, everything seems to work as expected :)) 8.0.0 seems to be stable. I don't mind to update code base according to API changes. In case this is blocker for you you have to wait until 8.0.0 will be released and API will be finalized. Hopefully M

Wicket 8 GA for production

2017-10-08 Thread Илья Нарыжный
Dear Wicket developers, Could you please help with understanding of Wicket 8 status? 1) When do you expect GA version be released? (I mean first official release which is not a candidate and etc.) 2) How accurately Wicket 8 branch currently mimics features from version 7? 3) What the level maturit