Le 18 janv. 08 à 00:05, Your XEN ICT Team - Ricardo Rodriguez a écrit :
1 - I already have a good load of content, can I switch to UTF-8
without wrecking the wiki ?
As far as I understand, all involved actors must run the same
encoding.
It is just a guess, but if your database and your
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Le 18 janv. 08 à 00:05, Your XEN ICT Team - Ricardo Rodriguez a écrit :
1 - I already have a good load of content, can I switch to UTF-8
without wrecking the wiki ?
As far as I understand, all involved actors must run the same encoding.
It is just a guess, but if your
FAUX, Emmanuel wrote:
I have the same issue, and when of my users uploads a filename with a special
character, I end up removing an entry in XWIKIATTACHEMENT,
XWIKIATTACHEMENT_ARCHIVE, XWIKIATTACHEMENT_CONTENT.
Hi, Emmanuel,
I'm trying to remove some in troubles documents. None of them
FAUX, Emmanuel wrote:
As Vincent does ask, have you configured your XWiki installation for
UTF-8 ?
Nope. Current encoding is ISO-8859-1
But if it avoids me to remove db entries, I'm gonna configure it as soon as I
can.
I've read
Hi all,
I know it is good to avoid special characters in document names, but to
the best of my knowledge is not possible up to now to prevent users to
use them.
For instance, we have a number of entries including / in the document
name. These documents are created, but are not longer
FAUX, Emmanuel wrote:
I have the same issue, and when of my users uploads a filename with a special
character, I end up removing an entry in XWIKIATTACHEMENT,
XWIKIATTACHEMENT_ARCHIVE, XWIKIATTACHEMENT_CONTENT.
Thanks, Emmanuel. I'll do that.
Anyway, don't you think this issue is worth
include those characters.
--
Emmanuel FAUX
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
part de Your XEN ICT Team - Ricardo Rodriguez
Envoyé : mercredi 16 janvier 2008 16:46
À : XWiki Users
Objet : Re: [xwiki-users] document name including /
FAUX
FAUX, Emmanuel wrote:
Anyway, don't you think this issue is worth a JIRA issue?
My first issue... XE-182
Sorry! I'd failed to find it!
I supposed a discussion here is not needed to create such an issue, but I
would like to know if there is some reason to allow all this
