09:39, schrieb Daan Hoogland:
Martin, is the shutting down happening with the systemvms or guest vms or both?
Do you see this also when you boot a vm of the same template in xen directly?
regards,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Martin Emrich martin.emr...@empolis.com wrote:
Hi!
Am 04.08.2014
Hi!
Am 05.08.2014 13:21, schrieb Erik Weber:
Could you post the complete log output from the point where you press
launch? ie. start a tail the second right before you do, that would help us
figure out why hosts are put in avoid set.
Yes, I uploaded it here:
http://apaste.info/dOL
Starts
deeper purpose?
Thanks,
Martin Emrich
rows in set (0.00 sec)
In the GUI, I can only see one Primary Storage (the current real one,
obviously ID 3).
How can I fix my Cloudstack? As there are no instances yet, I could reinstall,
but I'd like to understand what's going on...
Thanks
Martin Emrich
Hi!
Sorry, it is Cloudstack 4.4.0.
Here's a piece of the log file:
2014-08-29 09:06:15,853 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-d40f3eb8) Found 0 routers to update status.
2014-08-29 09:06:15,855 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
Yes, it's an internal server Thanks for the hint!
Ciao
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kirk Kosinski [mailto:kirkkosin...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. August 2014 22:28
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Downloading new templates blocked?
Hi, Martin. Is
Did you choose CentOS 6.5 (64bit)? This does not work here either, but if I
choose CentOS 6.4 (64bit), it works.
Cheers,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matthew Midgett [mailto:clouds...@trick-solutions.com.INVALID]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. September 2014 22:32
An:
Ok.. Thanks for the clarification. I'll just wait for the official release for
now...
Ciao
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014 17:35
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: 4.4.1 RPMs there and
Hi!
I am trying to configure CS 4.4.1 (with XenServer) with two guest networks: One
with GRE for isolated networks, and another with VLANs for shared networks.
During configuration of Advanced Mode, I configured them, went well. Afterwards
I got an error message, after some research I found
Hi!
Hi!
I'm having more strange issues with my GRE-based isolated networks:
While investigating my other issues, I noticed this output from ovs-vsctl
show on the xenservers:
Bridge xapi29
fail_mode: standalone
Port t1546-4-3
Interface t1546-4-3
Martin,
Are you trying to configure PF on SourceNAT IP address? If yes can you check
whether the conserver mode is set to Yes in your network offering?
-Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 6:26 PM
To: users
Hi!
Am 30.10.2014 17:04, schrieb Martin Emrich:
I wonder why this IP address for the GRE tunnel was chosen? The IP belongs to
one of my iSCSI storage networks, and should never be used for guest or public
traffic.
While thinking about it, I noticed that I never assigned IP addresses
Hi!
Am 04.11.2014 10:49, schrieb Erdősi Péter:
You can set it on the first pages of an advanced setup (down, where you
see domain also), if i remember well.
BTW, I think, you can use this subnet for guests, cause guest GRE
tunnels will never connect to storage network...
I do not mean the
Hi!
Am 04.11.2014 12:46, schrieb Erdősi Péter:
Hmm.. you mean isolated guest network right?
If yes, the IP subnet can be changed, if the user define guest network
(not auto, when first vm started)
There is an option to: Guest Gateway, and Guest Netmask, and if it
filled, the sysvm will use
Hi!
Am 05.11.2014 05:20, schrieb Sanjeev Neelarapu:
Hi,
Are you using the proper traffic labels for all the traffic types in the
physical network?
Since you have multiple PIFs on XenServer you must specify traffic labels on
zone's physical network for different
for that.
FWIW: sdn.ovs.controller.default.label really has to be set to the
traffic label (name-label in Xen speak), not the dom0 bridge name)..
Ciao
Martin
Am 05.11.2014 08:26, schrieb Martin Emrich:
Hi!
Am 05.11.2014 05:20, schrieb Sanjeev Neelarapu:
Hi,
Are you using the proper traffic labels
Hi!
Same problem here with CS 4.4.1 and 5 XenServers in one Cluster: Two
hosts are in maintenance mode, and canceling maintenance mode results in
Internal Server Error. Here's my backtrace:
2014-11-25 13:08:45,448 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher]
(API-Job-Executor-54:ctx-a076520e
Hi!
I want to configure a port forwarding rule to a reserved IP (Which is assigned
as a virtual IP across several VMs). Using the Cloudstack load balancer is not
what I want, as it appears as the source of every request in the application
log files.
I have excluded a range of reserved IPs
for it in CloudStack.
Best regards,
Kirk
On 12/05/2014 08:11 AM, Martin Emrich wrote:
Hi!
I want to configure a port forwarding rule to a reserved IP (Which is
assigned as a virtual IP across several VMs). Using the Cloudstack load
balancer is not what I want, as it appears as the source of every request
to 30 nothing changed, but after increasing
the storage limit from 200 to 300GB, he was again able to create a new VM.
We use ACS 4.4.2 with XenServer 6.2.
How are these numbers calculated?
Thanks
Martin Emrich
Senior IT Administrator
Empolis Information Management GmbH | Europaallee 10 | 67657
Hello!
I just discovered that I periodically (every few minutes) a lot of these
messages in the server log:
2015-02-17 11:50:03,649 INFO [c.c.h.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-3:ctx-ee9d5d55 work-793) Processing
HAWork[793-Migration-2-Stopped-Migrating]
Hi!
Any news on this issue? I just fell in to this pit again :(
Regards,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. November 2014 13:39
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ALL Hosts Stuck in Maintenance
Hi
.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 5:44 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: Encountered unhandled exception during HA process
Hmm, without doing anything, the messages stopped
destroys foreign Snapshots
Martin, This sounds like a bug to me. Can you please create a ticket in jura
with the relevant info?
thanks,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Martin Emrich martin.emr...@empolis.com
wrote:
Hi!
I am running ACS 4.4.2 with XenServer 6.2.
I destroyed two instances
Hi!
I am running ACS 4.4.2 with XenServer 6.2.
I destroyed two instances which I no longer needed. Next I wanted to revert two
other instances to a snapshot, but I just saw them in state Expunging, then
they were gone.
Thus deleting completely unrelated VMs destroyed snapshots I wanted to
as a defect and you should file a bug report for the
same.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 7:48 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Encountered unhandled exception during HA process
Hello
solution must be possible but i
don't have time to look into that right now.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Martin Emrich martin.emr...@empolis.com
wrote:
Hi!
Any news on this issue? I just fell in to this pit again :(
Regards,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin
changes to the database necessary?
Or the other way around: How can I build NONOSS packages for Ubuntu?
Thanks,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2015 01:00
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: AW: SSVM
Hi!
I just tried memory overprovisioning with ACS 4.4.3 and KVM on Ubuntu 14.04.
With a ratio of 2.0, a VM configured for 1024MB RAM only sees 512MB RAM (the VM
is also running Ubuntu 14.04 with CONFIG_VIRT_BALLOON=y) even if the host is
not yet overloaded. This is obviously useless, as I
with oss?
Erik
Den tirsdag 19. mai 2015 skrev Martin Emrich martin.emr...@empolis.com
følgende:
Hi!
After using ACS with XenServer for some time now, I am now trying ACS
(4.4.3) with KVM in my lab environment.
But the SSVM does not start the agent. After stumbling upon
https
is typical when you try to run non-oss mgmt server with oss
system vm template (or was it the other way around - i never remember).
Which system vm template did you use (for kvm)?
--
Erik
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Martin Emrich martin.emr...@empolis.com
wrote:
Could you elaborate? I use
I found the solution (MS running on Java 8), I created an issue in Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8519
Ciao
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Mai 2015 11:17
An: users
), but it won't connect.
What can I do?
Thanks
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2015 15:29
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: SSVM agent not starting
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Martin Emrich martin.emr
, Cape Town
7130
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: 20 May 2015 03:57 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: KVM memory overprovisioning behaviour
Hi!
I just tried memory overprovisioning with ACS 4.4.3 and KVM on Ubuntu 14.04.
With a ratio
Hi!
After using ACS with XenServer for some time now, I am now trying ACS (4.4.3)
with KVM in my lab environment.
But the SSVM does not start the agent. After stumbling upon
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting,
I saw
Hi!
Did you add the network of your webserver to the global setting
secstorage.allowed.internal.sites?
Otherwise, ACS will seems to refuse downloading templates from internal
subnets (10/8, 192.168/16, ...)
Ciao
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Luciano Castro
be possible, not
on vmware. Why do you say ,'If I had SSH access to the VRs,...'? Are you
running vmware?
2015-07-27 16:35 GMT+02:00 Martin Emrich martin.emr...@empolis.com:
Hi!
We are affected by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6885
(running ACS 4.4.3).
Our VR disks
-{routername}.:\n;
if ($ARGV[0] eq info)
{
status_router($target);
}
else
{
fix_router($target);
}
}
}
Ciao
Martin
Am 28.07.2015 um 09:00 schrieb Martin Emrich:
Thanks, that's how I can access the VRs. So
in that network are
marked as being used (though incorrectly).
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:21 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty
the table vlan.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 8:50 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left)
Thanks... I checked the table
Hi!
One of my shared networks seems to think it is full:
- In the GUI, it no longer appeared as a choice for creating a new
instance
- Attempting to create one via cloudmonkey resulted in the error
Insufficient address capacity.
After deleting some VMs in this network, it
.
cheers,
Stephan
Am Freitag, den 10.07.2015, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Martin Emrich:
Hi!
Am 10.07.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Timothy Lothering:
Hi Martin,
From the logs it seems that ACS has found that the host has sufficient
memory capacity, but when it deploys it, it seems there is not enough
a script... Or can I edit the template
somehow? Editing dozens of machines via the Console Proxy window would be
tedious and error-prone...
Thanks,
Martin Emrich
Senior IT Administrator
Empolis Information Management GmbH | Europaallee 10 | 67657 Kaiserslautern |
Germany
Phone +49 631 68037-71
ame domain and
have both access to the shared network. So why this new network?
Thanks,
Martin Emrich
Senior IT Administrator
Empolis Information Management GmbH | Europaallee 10 | 67657 Kaiserslautern |
Germany
Phone +49 631 68037-71 | Fax +49 631 68037-77
martin.emr...@empolis.com<mail
, virus, interception or interference.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: 08 July 2015 12:17 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: Deployment failed on XenServer due to capacity miscalculation
Hi!
I tried that (force reconnect
Hi!
I tried that (force reconnect). But no improvement:
Via cloudmonkey, memorytotal-memoryallocated == 4302535168, that's 4103MB. Via
XenServer, the host has only 1667 MB free memory.
Restarting the management server does not solve it, either. I see this:
2015-07-08 12:03:40,612 DEBUG
Hi!
Am 08.07.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Timothy Lothering:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the information.
From the details below, I understand that your Cluster will not allow
additional VMs to be created if 85% of the memory is consumed. This value is
important as you also need to factor in what
: Deployment failed on XenServer due to capacity miscalculation
Thanks Martin,
Could you please dump your full logs somewhere so we can look into this further?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: 09 July 2015 03:49 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
ACS
could have deployed the VM there...
Thanks
Martin Emrich
Senior IT Administrator
Empolis Information Management GmbH | Europaallee 10 | 67657 Kaiserslautern |
Germany
Phone +49 631 68037-71 | Fax +49 631 68037-77
martin.emr...@empolis.commailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com%0d
Hi!
Am 10.07.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Timothy Lothering:
Hi Martin,
From the logs it seems that ACS has found that the host has sufficient memory
capacity, but when it deploys it, it seems there is not enough. It could be a
bug whereby technically the system has enough capacity, but during the
://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/3b3d2fc9d4dc068d42c6f63132518d9702cfb5d9
For now, you can ignore these alerts.
Regards,
Remi
From: Martin Emrich
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org
Date: Thursday 27 August 2015 10:05
To: users
Hi!
Manually migrating VMs to the free host works (as long as I migrate at most two
at once, I guess that the data moving between the local storages produces too
much load otherwise).
I also can deploy a VM on a specific host via CloudMonkey, but I'd love to see
cloudstack choose a fitting
due to incorrect calculation of XS memory overhead calculation
by cloudstack. However, it is expected that the VMs launch is retried on other
available host in cluster.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 9
but a normal instance... Any ideas?
Thanks,
Martin Emrich
Senior IT Administrator
Empolis Information Management GmbH | Europaallee 10 | 67657 Kaiserslautern |
Germany
Phone +49 631 68037-71 | Fax +49 631 68037-77
martin.emr...@empolis.commailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com%0d
www.empolis.comhttp
Hi!
I am still/again having issues with the capacity calculation on Cloudstack:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2344
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7857
As these Issues are still in 4.7.1, I thought about implementing a fix myself,
I thought of a
ff: Re: Still having capacity calculation problems with XenServer.
Check if the fix for CLOUDSTACK-8181 helps.
> On 10-Feb-2016, at 7:33 PM, Martin Emrich <martin.emr...@empolis.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I am still/again having issues with the capacity calculatio
allocator? In the log file, I still see
"FirstFitAllocator".
Thanks
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 09:20
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: AW: Still having capacity calculatio
Got the answer in another thread: setting
system.vm.default.hypervisor=XenServer did the trick.
Regards,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2016 22:56
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: How to set
Hi!
To follow up:
- I upgraded to 4.7.0 (there are no 4.7.1 el6 RPMs yet, neither from CloudStack
nor from Shapeblue)
- The problem still persists
- It seems that VRs can be created on XenServer, but not on KVM. I tried
forcing new VRs to XenServers only via host tags, but the decision to use
120 seconds. I expect the packages
will be ready in a day or two.
If XenServer works, try setting system.vm.default.hypervisor to XenServer and
it will not use another hypervisor.
Regards,
Remi
On 28/01/16 13:38, "Martin Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>T
Hi!
After upgrading from 4.5.2 to 4.6.2, I also face this issue. We use both KVM
and XenServer. Any stable workaround for this?
Thanx
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 02:55
An: users
Hi!
We have both KVM and XenServer hosts in the same CloudStack Zone/Pod. How can I
specify the hypervisor to use for the SystemVMs?
According to the log files, the hypervisor is decided before host tags are
evaluated, so using host tags is not enough...
Thanks
Martin
: AW: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout
The 4.7.1 packages will be there soon. I’d advise anyone currently on 4.6 to
upgrade to it as it has several speed improvements.
What version was this Martin?
Regards,
Remi
On 28/01/16 15:46, "Martin Emrich" <martin.em
one else will be
> able to advise.
> What I would try to do first is to change the MAC addr on the backup VR to
> something else and see if that stops the problems.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
hapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 2:50 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: API deploy virtualmachine failed with custom offerin
HI!
I try to deploy a virtual machine with a custom offering via the API. But I get
"401 unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature".
First I thought my signing code is wonky (although it worked fine for over a
year now)... But if I use cloudmonkey I get the same:
(local) >
prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Martin Emrich <martin.emr...@empolis.com>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I also tried with [0], but it fails, too.
>
> The command line:
>
/network is not available to the selected zone, or something similar to
that effect.
Yiping
On 3/23/16, 9:28 AM, "Martin Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Sorry, same effect:
>
>(local) > deploy virtualmachine
>zoneid=9c667177-4f6e-4d51-
rtual Router just switched from Unknown
to Master".
I also noticed lots of these messages in the messages-logfile on the master
router: "Password server failed with error code 1. Restarting it..."
What could be wrong?
Thanks
Martin Emrich
Senior IT Administrator
Empolis Informa
interface up
and same mac addr?
Could be this issue https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com>
> To: users@clouds
Hi!
This is probably a Xenserver issue, but maybe someone here can help: I am
currently upgrading a XenServer cluster with 7 hosts from 6.2 to 6.5 (ACS is
4.7.1). I have done this on another cluster without problems.
After evacuating and upgrading the master and one slave (having the XS pool
/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.9/accounts.html#using-dynamic-roles
Regards.
From: Martin Emrich <martin.emr...@empolis.com>
Sent: 27 January 2017 14:57:50
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Login hangs/freezes after update to 4.9.2.0
Hi!
I just u
During Upgrades on other ACS installations, I nailed it down further:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9771
Regards,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2017 14:58
An: users
Hi!,
After getting the upgrade to 4.9.2.0 on my test cloud going, I decided to
upgrade the hosts from XenServer 6.5SP1 to XenServer 7. I followed the process
like I did many times with upgrades form 6.0 to 6.2 or to 6.5.
Normally, Cloudstack "reinstalled" the integration scripts under
-xenserver-versions
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 02/02/2017, 13:09, "Martin Emrich" <martin.emr...@empolis.com> wrote:
Hi!,
After getting the upgrade to 4.9.2.0 on my test cloud going, I decided to
upgrade the hosts from XenServer 6.5SP1 t
Hi!
I just updated my test system from 4.7.0 to 4.9.2.0... Now I cannot login
anymore: The web UI completely freezes after clicking the login button.
(It freezes so hard, I have to kill the management server process before I can
even close the tab in the browser).
Cloudmonkey also hangs after
Hi!
After shutting down a VM for resizing, it no longer starts. The GUI reports
insufficient Capacity (but there's plenty), and in the Log I see this:
2017-02-22 12:18:40,626 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.VolumeOrchestrator]
(Work-Job-Executor-11:ctx-c5cca7da job-70304/job-70306 ctx-a412f4b8) Checking
if
? Or should I start a new thread for that?
Thanks,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017 14:39
An: Martin Emrich <martin.emr...@empolis.com>; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: AW: XenSer
@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: AW: XenServer VM does no longer start
Hi Martin,
does the volume still exist on primary storage? You can also take a look at
SMlog on XenServer.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
Swen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr
Hi!
I upgraded my test cluster from 4.9 to 4.11. The default policy for
isolated networks is "Deny".
But now, adding rules to allow egress traffic are not applied to the
virtual router. adding a 0.0.0.0/0 rule looks fine from the UI, but does
not appear in the iptables output on the VR.
Hi!
Am 10.04.18 um 11:09 schrieb Stephan Seitz:
Hi!
I think your facing a bug already discussed here. After reloading (imho doesn't matter if
you check "clean up") the network, the egress rules are applied.
So just reload every net with egress rules :)
IIRC I tried that several times with no
g the cleanup option which will reconfigure
the VR and add the egress table.
I've a fix in this PR:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2508/files#diff-2d3ea57dfd9156e3983b1bb2d64abecd
- Rohit
<https://cloudstack.apache.org>
________
From: Martin Emrich
I investigated further, and opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/2561
Cheers,
Martin
Am 11.04.18 um 12:18 schrieb Martin Emrich:
Thanks... But I think something else is now broken, too...:
The SystemVMs are now no longer being provisioned: They come up
"
Hi!
Am 11.04.18 um 13:38 schrieb Stephan Seitz:
Hi martin,
I've just read your issue on github and was wondering how you;ve been able to
select Debian 9.
But maybe you did a fresh installation.
No, Upgrade from 4.9.2.0. I set the OS type to Debian 8 in ACS.
"Debian 9.3" is what XenCenter
Hi!
Am 24.04.18 um 12:12 schrieb Marc-Aurèle Brothier:
Hi Martin,
The response format does not come from the "accept" header but from the
request parameter "response", see the documentation:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/dev.html#response-formats-xml-and-json.
So your code works
Hi!
Am 23.04.18 um 15:34 schrieb Marc-Aurèle Brothier:
Hi everyone,
I thought it would be good to move from XML to JSON by default in the
response of the API if no response type is sent to the server along with
the request. I'm wondering that's the opinion of people on the mailing list.
Would
ql and mgmt. servers on separate
hosts to make life easier when moving stuff around (like now).
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich <martin.emr...@empolis.com>
Sent: 02
Hello!
My management server (running CentOS 6) is getting old... What is the
correct procedure to move the management server to a new host, with new
CentOS 7?
I expect that I have to change the IP address of the management server
in many places (Agents/Config on the XenServers, SystemVMs,
Hi!
Am 02.03.18 um 10:49 schrieb Paul Angus:
Hi Martin,
At a high level, what I would recommend doing, is building a new management
host on CentOS7, add it as an additional management server. Update the 'host'
entry in the global settings to point to the new host. And then mark the
89 matches
Mail list logo
