Re: cloudstack-agent 4.5 problem with cloudbr bridges

It worked for me! Oh my God, I spent lot of time trying to solve it.. Thank a lot! El vie., 29 ene. 2016 a las 9:44, Sebastian Gomez (<tioc...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Thank you Lucian, I will try it and let you know if worked for me. > > > > El vie., 29 ene. 2016

Re: cloudstack-agent 4.5 problem with cloudbr bridges

rg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - > > From: "Sebastian Gomez" <tioc...@gmail.com> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Sent: Thursday, 28 January, 2016 12:51:08 > > Subject: cloudstack-agent 4.5 problem with clo

cloudstack-agent 4.5 problem with cloudbr bridges

Hi all, I have been working with cloudstack and vmware for more than 3 years, and now I would like to test it with KVM, but I have problems with the bridges names. Summarizing, when I add the KVM host on cloudstack, the cloudstack agent creates a new bridge a part of the cloudbr0 and cloudbr1

Re: High importance Suggest backup tool

We use EMC VBA wich make an incremental for-ever backup at storage level. It has an appliance that allows to restore the full VM or file level. We have VMware as hypervisor, I don't know if there is support for xenserver. El 18/4/2016 16:03, "kotipalli venkatesh"

Re: S3 secondary storage performance considerations

Not just about any of your questions, but one advice: If you are talking about using AWS S3 as backend storage, is highly recommendable that you consider the storage network traffic cost. I have faced some cases, where the prize of the network traffic of out-coming data (from AWS to Internet) is

Re: Support for vSphere 9

com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Sebastian Gomez [mailto:tioc...@gmail.com] > Sent: 17 January 2017 06:48 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Supp

Re: Support for vSphere 9

t; www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Sebastian Gomez [mailto:tioc...@gmail.com] > Sent: 17 January 2017 07:56 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re:

Support for vSphere 9

Hi all! I have been looking for any reference into the ACS documentation, news, etc. about the support for vSphere 9, but I have not found anything. I am sure that this question has been made here before, so excuse me in advance for ask again: Is there any official plan for Cloudstack to

Re: Support for vSphere 9

d you please clarify what you're trying to accomplish? > > Thanks! > > Andrew > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Sebastian Gomez <tioc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > I have been looking for any reference into the ACS documentation, news, &g

Re: Support for vSphere 9

... Again, my mistake, I suppose. Any way, thank you for your support and your time. Atentamente, Sebastián Gómez On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Sebastian Gomez <tioc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great news! > Thanks again Paul, great job! > > > > Atentamente, > Seba

Re: CloudStack-UI 1.0.6 released on July, 25, 2017

Absolutely, me too! It's a good and nice work. I like it. @eveyone: have a nice holidays! Regards. Atentamente, Sebastián Gómez On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:47 PM, ilya wrote: > this is awesome - will give this a try! > > On 7/25/17 1:59 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev

Re: Alternative Cloudstack UI for KVM and Basic Zones (with SG)

Hello Iva, good work! Atentamente, Sebastián Gómez On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Rashmi Dixit wrote: > Congratulations! This looks really good. Plus it's on the latest (& > greatest) stack. > > Good stuff! > > Rashmi > > -Original Message- > From: Ivan

Re: Retiring OLD Primary Storage - Dealing with System VMs and (assumed) Snapshot related artifacts

Hi David, Perhaps could help you: He have 4.5.2, and recently have migrated the storage hardware, and so we had to migrate the primary storages to the new ones. I had to move manually some volumes and VMs with snapshots, and I had to update manually the cloudstack database to inform the new

Cloudstack 4.9.2, Error on routes on systemvm

Hi all, We are trying to upgrade our PRE environment from 4.5.2 to 4.9.2.0 to check the behaviour and apply on our production environment. I have noticed two problems on the new installation, one of them is that I can't access the VMs console via the console proxy VM (the other will arrive on

Re: Cloud Utilization

First of all, what means "instance utilization is 0%", just kernel processes and maintenance tasks can increase CPU usage during this period. No utilization means no logins? I don't know any service/soft that do it, but you can do it yourself: For example: You can easily develop a script to be

Re: some issues after upgrade cloudstack to 4.9.2

The problem over upload from local and the problem with the console proxy were not a problem with cloudstack, was a problem of our network configuration. As I told before, we have public IPs and private IPs routed into the backbone network, so used as "public" IPs also, both mixed. The systemvm

Re: some issues after upgrade cloudstack to 4.9.2

Hello all! (I work with Marc) Thanks Ilya: About the Template upload from local--> - I installed the lastest tomcat 6 stable release, but the problem was not solved. - I fixed the problem creating the /var/www/html/public dir at the SSVM and it worked. But this change will be lost when the

Re: some issues after upgrade cloudstack to 4.9.2

/cloudstack-common/vms/systemvm.iso Destroy the SSVM and wait for the new to be created. SSH it and check that /var/www/html/upload dir is created. Check also that you can upload from local. Regards. Atentamente, Sebastián Gómez On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Sebastian Gomez <t

Re: Choosing Between Alternate Primary Storages

If I have understood correctly: Tag each primary storage (p.e. SSD and NLSAS), then create a different service offering for each storage tag (when you create a Service offering - cpu, mem, etc.- you can set the related storage tag, use SSD for one and NLSAS for the other). When you create the MV,

Re: Static NAT disconnected ( Windows VM )

We have problems like that with cloudstack and vmware when the nic driver was e1000 instead vmxnet3. We changed the nic driver to vmxnet3 (on the template) and the problem was solved (for the new virtual machines). Regards. Atentamente, Sebastián Gómez On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:23 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.3.0 RC1

Looks well! Atentamente, Sebastián Gómez On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Boris Stoyanov < boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 > > I’ve did upgrade testing from 4.9.2 on the following hypervisors: > > VMware 55u3 with management on CentOS7 - successful > KVM on CentOS7 both hosts and

Re: Migrating VMs from AWS to CloudStack

Puppet/Chef/Ansible will not help you to optimize the current task of migrating your servers from AWS to CS, but will reduce you if you have to do it again in the future. If you have to re-deploy the servers perhaps you can think about it. Automatic setup also reduces operative tasks, reduces

Re: cloud-set-guest-password working with systemctl

got it to work > for password, password-reset, sshkey and sshkey-reset. It also support > user-data, and provide an easy way to manage a different user than root. > > I think our community documentation need an update on this topic... > > Cheers, > > Le 28 août 2017 5:29 P

Re: cloud-set-guest-password working with systemctl

all our Linux templates. We got it to > > work for password, password-reset, sshkey and sshkey-reset. It also > > support user-data, and provide an easy way to manage a different user > than root. > > > > I think our community documentation need an update on this topic... &g

Re: cloud-set-guest-password working with systemctl

I had the same problem like Marc and I could not resolve it on Ubuntu 16.04. I followed the cloudstack steps to set it up, but the script is not running well on our environment. If I execute the script from command line, it works fine. During the boot process, there is any problem on systemd and

Re: Intel meltdown/spectre kvm upgrade results

Good! Thanks for sharing it, nice iniciative! We have to upgrade the VMware clusters, but vmware is changing daily the patch policy... Once done I will try to remember to share too. Regards. Atentamente, Sebastián Gómez On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev

Re: Customer Backup with CS 4.7 and VMWare

Thank you Paul, its a good proposal. This is a really piece to get a global solution. I think that it should be treated like load balancer, where Cloudstack offers a simple, but useful solution, and Cloudstack allows to integrate dedicated solutions like F5. In fact, Cloudstack just offers a

Re: Upgrading to XenServer 7.x

Hi all. I had a similar problem, but usign XenServer 7.2. It was a fresh installation from scratch. The system vms where created, but them *could'nt get the local link IP*, so the cloudstack agent never went up. After that, I found the compatibility matrix, where its specified that the

RE: Upgrading to XenServer 7.x

> Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Sebastian Gomez [mailto:tioc...@gmail.com] > Sent: 28 December 2017