e-letter wrote:
Solution #1:
Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
spreadsheets in that format.
Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If the
suggestion is declined, buy m$o. When minor incompatibility is
discovered between m$ hardware and
-Original Message-
From: At0mic [mailto:atomicbutterfl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 8 September 2011 3:57 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Can Libre Office be installed on an
external drive. ?
I notice some people are talking about Thunderbird and
Looks like we have an M$ fanboy. Perhaps U should try some of those opensource
recommendations first and see if they don't perform before taking a side
I migrated from Outlook to thunderbird (it now comes with Lightning on Fedora).
I have my calender, tasks and mails working fine and I'm sure
Le 08/09/11 04:13, Steven Shelton a écrit :
Hi Steve,
Sorry, but this works for me on Mac OSX with 3.4.3, so I can not
reproduce the crash. I suspect you may have a corrupt user configuration
or else the problem is Windows specific.
Alex
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Le 07/09/11 18:34, John Mullen a écrit :
Hi John,
SELECT 1.00, CONTRACTS.Rental FROM CONTRACTS
this returns 1.00150
Any idea why?
IMHO, this could be either a bug in the LibO SQL parser, or maybe the
TYPE converter (jni_uno2java.cxx type converter that handles conversion
of
Le 07/09/11 18:34, John Mullen a écrit :
Hi John,
SELECT 1.00, CONTRACTS.Rental FROM CONTRACTS
this returns 1.00150
Any idea why?
OK, I tested further and this is IMHO a bug.
With SQL preprocessing on, i.e. the default LibO behaviour, if your
decimal has figures after the
Le 06/09/11 22:27, Antonio Sousa a écrit :
Hi Antonio,
Hello
I had a problem trying to install portuguese language pack for libreoffice
3.4 on MacOsX Lion.
When i try to run the installer it stops abruptelly.
The solution was to install the Brazilian language pack that run correctly.
Does
Am 08.09.2011 00:07, e-letter wrote:
Would be interested to hear your explanation why other m$ formats are
_not_ against the interests of LO (i.e. increased _visible_ usage of
odt. Using LO to write m$ formats should be considered invisible
usage, of what benefit exactly?).
If not for
On 07/09/2011, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
...
Now that ODF 1.2 does have an agreed specification for formulas and requires
that to be used in fully-conforming ODF 1.2 Spreadsheet documents, we will
see how implementations line up as there are releases from everyone that
Hi :)
This thread has gone waaay off-topic. Continuing with that = this wikipedia
guide might be interesting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Organization_for_Standardization#Criticism
I think the question that started this thread has been solved but i'm not
completely certain.
Hi :)
Running from the command-line often generates some output that can be
copypasted in emails quite easily and might help understand what is going
wrong. Sometimes it's possible to ask the command to be --verbose which
gives
more output.
Regards from
Tom :)
Unfortunately due to the information in the file I cannot post a link to it.
It is in xls format. I've also received another example of a completely
different spreadsheet doing the same thing. It is also an xls file, however
this time the formula doesn't make it halfway through before it stops
Hello:
I've been unable to install spell checkers with LibreOffice under
Windows 7.
Tools - Options - Language Settings - Writing Aids shows NO
available language modules. Tools - Extension Manager produced a
list of 43 available extensions. I select one and click Add. This
What the heck was that???
(top-posted because there is no way to make sense of the quoted text)
On 2011-09-07 9:53 PM, Keith Bates ke...@new-life.org.au wrote:
On 08/09/11 11:29, Don Myers wrote:Reply
below:On 09/07/2011 08:02 PM, NoOp wrote:For those that continue to
insist on top
On 2011-09-07 9:29 PM, Don Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com wrote:
I will respect your wishes about posting at the bottom.
It isn't about 'posting at the bottom' - it is about trimming your post
to only quote the relevant portion of the text you are responding to,
and placing each response (if you
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Spencer Graves wrote:
Hello:
I've been unable to install spell checkers with LibreOffice under
Windows 7.
Tools - Options - Language Settings - Writing Aids shows NO
available language modules. Tools - Extension Manager produced a list of
43
Hi :)
Top posting is fine. Almost everyone top-posts except some people in a few
OpenSource mailing lists. If you need to communicate with anyone that works in
an office then you probably have to top-post otherwise they will probably just
ignore your email and delete it without reading it.
On 09/08/2011 07:47 AM, Manfred J. Krause wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Spencer Graves wrote:
Hello:
I've been unable to install spell checkers with LibreOffice under
Windows 7.
Tools - Options - Language Settings - Writing Aids shows NO
available language
On 09/08/2011 01:22 AM, At0mic wrote:
e-letter wrote:
Solution #1:
Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
spreadsheets in that format.
Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If the
suggestion is declined, buy m$o. When minor incompatibility is
Hi gary,
NoOp wrote (08-09-11 02:02)
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
I think it is useful to have some clear examples (pictures from mails/
threads) that simply show how good mailing practices can be
On 09/08/2011 02:38 AM, Bruce Carlson wrote:
e-letter wrote:
Solution #1:
Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
spreadsheets in that format.
Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If the
suggestion is declined, buy m$o. When minor incompatibility
For long threads, scrolling down to the bottom to read the new stuff is
a pain.
But if you want to top post, or bottom post, to each his own.
On 09/08/2011 08:13 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Top posting is fine. Almost everyone top-posts except some people in a few
OpenSource mailing lists.
Hi :)
Renaming is better than deleting. With deleting you lose everything and can't
copy back some chunks from your old folder so you have to re-do any
configurations and re-download all extensions, fonts and anything else you have
in galleries and so on.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 09/08/2011 04:29 AM, Don Myers wrote:
I live in the US. I do a lot of work e-mails in my job, and receive a
lot of work e-mails. I never receive any e-mails where people reply to
me at the bottom.
Because people you talk with read bottum-up.
And it's not a country custom, just a matter of
On 09/08/2011 06:37 AM, toki wrote:
Intermixed posting was the US standard. That changed when:
* AOL allowed its members on the Internet;
* Microsoft released its email client that made intermixed posting
virtually impossible for non-techies.
Agreed.
--
RMA.
--
For unsubscribe instructions
On 09/08/2011 02:44 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
laziness vs spending a
few extra seconds intelligently crafting your responses.
That's the point: people are lazy and dont wan to mess with trimming and
formatting their answer. But they want the recipient to read carefully
what they wrote.
Crazy.
On 09/08/2011 03:13 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Top posting is fine.
Bottom posting is fine.
Almost everyone top-posts except some people in a few
OpenSource mailing lists. If you need to communicate with anyone that works in
an office then you probably have to top-post otherwise they will
On 09/08/2011 03:45 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
For long threads, scrolling down to the bottom to read the new stuff is
a pain.
Because your correspondants did not trim the message, as I just did for
yours: I just select the line I want to answer and click on reply.
It
Hi :)
It's all good :) Err, are the virtual-desktops like the work-spaces in
GnuLinux? Trying to work without them is really frustrating.
Usb-sticks do tend to be slower than hard-drives so there will be a performance
hit. I think increased speed is why some sticks are so ridiculously
I'm with you Don, - see below -
On 08/09/2011 02:29, Don Myers wrote:
Reply below:
On 09/07/2011 08:02 PM, NoOp wrote:
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
I realiz(s)e that the existing:
On 8 Sep 2011 at 8:45, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
For long threads, scrolling down to the bottom to read the new stuff is
a pain. But if you want to top post, or bottom post, to each his own.
This list seems to suffer from long sections of quoted text with
sometimes just
Hi :)
Do you know which version of java you use?
Tools - Options - LibreOffice - Java
Versions _24 and onwards are increasingly bad for LibreOffice. The _20 and _22
are quite good but the _21 seems the fastest and best. Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
currently ships with _20. On GnuLinux it quite easy to
e-letter wrote:
Solution #1:
Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
spreadsheets in that format.
Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If the
suggestion is declined, buy m$o. When minor incompatibility is
discovered between m$ hardware and software,
On 09/08/2011 07:44 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Nothing to do with countries - only to do with laziness vs spending a
few extra seconds intelligently crafting your responses.
Thank you!!
--
*~~*
Don C. Myers
e-PRO Certified by the
Hi :)
Often you already know roughly what is going on and only need to read the
latest
post. Sometimes people might need quick easy access to previous comments and a
quick scroll downwards can help them gain context if they can't quite remember
some detail.
This list should allow people
Il 08/09/2011 14:35, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions ha scritto:
On 09/08/2011 01:22 AM, At0mic wrote:
e-letter wrote:
Solution #1:
Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
spreadsheets in that format.
Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO.
On 2011-09-08 9:11 AM, Chris Morgan ch...@lynxinfo.co.uk wrote:
I can see some of the advantages of bottom-posting, but it does mean
a lot more scrolling to get to the meat of the message.
I get so tired of this totally lame and purposefully ignorant excuse.
You only have to scroll if the
Hi :)
Really? Personal insults? Here??
Over the past few months there has been a steadily increasing amount of
top-posting. It is not just one or 2 people. Outside of LibreOffice and
OpenSource everyone else uses top-post almost exclusively. Smart phones make
it difficult to post any
You only have to scroll if the person who is replying *blindly* quotes
the *entire* *message*, rather than - as *all* top/inline posting
advocates suggest - trimming the quoted text to only what is relevant
to provide context to your reply.
You and Tom Davies simply ignore that - so what
On 9/8/11 6:45 AM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
For long threads, scrolling down to the bottom to read the new stuff is
a pain.
But if you want to top post, or bottom post, to each his own.
It seems to me, an inherent problem with this kind of free for all in
posting styles
On 2011-09-08, Tanstaafl wrote:
What the heck was that???
(top-posted because there is no way to make sense of the quoted text)
I... guess it was some serious Thunderbird misconfiguration? Or maybe
it's written in Quenya...
(replied exactly below the question it's supposed to address, just
On 09/08/2011 04:24 PM, Dave Sergeant wrote:
For long threads, scrolling down to the bottom to read the new stuff is
a pain. But if you want to top post, or bottom post, to each his own.
This list seems to suffer from long sections of quoted text with
sometimes just a single line of new
On 09/08/2011 04:11 PM, Chris Morgan wrote:
Professional emails are almost always top posted,
which is easier to read in the preview window of email readers.
What???
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/120
Linux kernel Mailing list would be a non professional?
Given all the big companies
On 09/08/2011 04:11 PM, Chris Morgan wrote:
I can see some of the advantages of bottom-posting, but it does mean a
lot more scrolling
to get to the meat of the message.
Again, what the problem with trimming the message, just as I did?
Please tell.
--
RMA.
--
For unsubscribe instructions
On 2011-09-08, Dave Sergeant wrote:
On 8 Sep 2011 at 8:45, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
[...] I am told by the way that top posting is
far preferable to disabled people using reading aids, as they hardly
want all the old stuff spoken by their machine before they get to
On 09/08/2011 04:33 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
This list should allow people to use what they are familiar with rather than try
to alienate new users surely?
I dont agree with you.
--
RMA.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
Hi, Tom,
On 9/8/11 6:13 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Top posting is fine. Almost everyone top-posts except some people in a few
OpenSource mailing lists. If you need to communicate with anyone that works in
an office then you probably have to top-post otherwise they will probably just
ignore your
On 2011-09-08, Tom Davies wrote:
On 09/08/2011 04:29 AM, Don Myers wrote:
I live in the US. I do a lot of work e-mails in my job, and receive a
lot of work e-mails. I never receive any e-mails where people reply to
me at the bottom.
Because people you talk with read bottum-up.
And it's not
On 2011-09-08, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-09-07 9:29 PM, Don Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com wrote:
I live in the US. I do a lot of work e-mails in my job, and receive a
lot of work e-mails. I never receive any e-mails where people reply
to me at the bottom. The reply is always at the top.
That
On 9/8/11 7:33 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Often you already know roughly what is going on and only need to read the latest
post.
If you're following only one thread/subthread in the messages, and have
been able to keep up. :-D But I follow a lot of things, in a lot of
places, and I often have
On 9/8/11 8:03 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Over the past few months there has been a steadily increasing amount of
top-posting.
It is not just one or 2 people. Outside of LibreOffice and OpenSource everyone
else uses
top-post almost exclusively. Smart phones make it difficult to post any other
On 9/8/11 8:20 AM, Chris Morgan wrote:
In most cases top-posting is preferable. However, in this 'list'
environment, bottom-posting
and selective quoting works better for retaining context. However, we
cannot enforce this
without alienating the very people this list is aimed at (ie everyone),
so
It has never ceased to amaze me how a select few individuals in key
positions in corporations are permitted to form a self-sustaining
interlocked stance on the use of MS Office suite due to their inability
to accept they are able learn other ways of conducting business.
MS Office has been
I recently downloaded LibreOffice 3.4.3 and an having a problem with the
“Record Macro” command.
According
to the instructions both at the “Help” command and in the written
documentation available at LibreOffice.org, the “Record Macro” command
is available for both Writer and Calc at Tools -
On 2011-09-08, Tom Davies wrote:
Outside of
LibreOffice and OpenSource everyone else uses top-post almost
exclusively.
Last time I went to USENET, people were still actively bottom-posting
(interleaved). At least excluding Google Groups posts, which I
filter. (Google Groups is the cultural
On 09/08/2011 05:49 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
I think the core problems of this dilemma of where to post is lack of
education, and lack of enforcement of the rules.
Oh Ken, thay got education! but the kind of education saying:
Well, let's quickly reply: the correcpondant will always understand
On 09/08/2011 05:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Really? Personal insults? Here??
If polite explanations are not enough, why not...
--
RMA.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
On 09/08/2011 05:20 PM, Chris Morgan wrote:
People are lazy - get used to it.
I do.
But get used o me always reminding then.
In most cases top-posting is preferable
No.
--
RMA.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
Thanks very much to Manfred Krause, webmaster for Kracked
Press, and Tom Davies: Removing (or renaming) .../bundled worked.
Next question: How can I add Spanish, French and German as
optional languages? I used to be able to specify them for selections of
text; now I don't see
Hi :)
There is a chapter about Macros in the Getting Started Guide and a more
advanced chapter specific to Calc in the Calc Guide
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation
It's also worth looking in the External Links on that page for the book by
Andrew Pitonyak.
I don't know why the
Sorry, this is another top-post. I agree totally but you need to give people
benefit of doubt too (like in my case ... I'm mobile and the mail app on this
phone is hardcoded to push all quotes below the reply)
Otherwise, I do bottom posts when I'm my desktop/laptop
I use Pegasus Mail and view the posts threaded, which by and large
works excellently. No need to quote lots in mails as it is very easy to
locate the original mails.
But Pegasus Mail truncates subject lines, as displayed in folder views,
to 35 characters, something that will be changed in a
Hi :)
+1
I would really like [LO-Users] because it's more descriptive but the main thing
is getting it shorter. I tried asking in the steering-discuss list ages ago
but the feeling was that it was important to avoid shortening the name because
we really needed to get the full name out there as
Okay, I just saw this after responding in similar manner shortly. At least
someone understands.
I wish my phone doesn't always expect me to use the browser just to comply with
demands for bottom posts. Otherwise, ... This reply would have been at the
bottom with the irrelevant phrases snipped
Hi
I'm using Evolution and it has e-mail, contacts, shedule,
jobs and notes. I think it is a complete program for business and for
personal use. The only think that I would think improve is that notified
with sound and message to the screen when it's time to do something
(jobs for
On 9/8/11 9:31 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 09/08/2011 05:49 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
I think the core problems of this dilemma of where to post is lack of
education, and lack of enforcement of the rules.
Oh Ken, thay got education! but the kind of education saying:
Well, let's
On 2011-09-08, Dave Sergeant wrote:
I use Pegasus Mail and view the posts threaded, which by and large
works excellently. No need to quote lots in mails as it is very easy to
locate the original mails.
But Pegasus Mail truncates subject lines, as displayed in folder views,
to 35
On 2011-09-08, Tom Davies wrote:
On Thu, 8/9/11, Nuno J. Silva nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
On 2011-09-08, Jeff Hahn wrote:
I recently downloaded LibreOffice 3.4.3 and an having a problem with
the “Record Macro” command.
When
I boot the program up and click on Tools - Macros on the
Hi :)
It is great to hear that the portable apps uses a fairly normal folder. I had
assumed they hid them in some horribly compressed file on an almost
unreachable path. So, this means that a LibreOffice installed on a hard-drive
could be made to point at the same config folder on the
On 9/8/11 10:02 AM, Dave Sergeant wrote:
I use Pegasus Mail and view the posts threaded, which by and large
works excellently. No need to quote lots in mails as it is very easy to
locate the original mails.
But Pegasus Mail truncates subject lines, as displayed in folder views,
to 35
Hi :)
Again, not just 1 email client. It affects mine too and probably countless
others too. I think being incompatible or awkward with other systems is very
arrogant. We don't need to restrict people and tell them what they can and
can't use. That sort of behaviour is exactly why i moved
The suggestion of Nuno J. Silva to activate the Enable experimental features
appears to have do the trick for me. Thanks.
Jeff Hahn
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:03:01 +0100
From: tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice - Record Macro
To:
On 8/20/11 10:57 AM, JOE Conner wrote:
On 8/20/2011 3:17 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
After a lot of plain dumb luck, I was able to finally get the
extensions I wanted.
All 2of them! LOL
Other than LO and OOo, are there any other places on the web that
anyone knows of that have a collection of
On 8/20/11 8:50 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
On 08/20/2011 06:10 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 8/20/11 1:27 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 08/20/2011 09:57 AM, JOE Conner wrote:
On 8/20/2011 3:17 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
After a lot of plain dumb luck, I was able to finally get the
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:50:53 -0600
Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
Hello Ken,
Personally, I don't think it's LibreOffice's responsibility to address
the shortcomings and limitations of other software products.
They already do, by prep-ending the subject with [libreoffice-users].
--
Hi :)
Interspersing or bottom-posting ensures that every message needs to be scrolled
through unless people delete all the stuff that is irrelevant (in their
opinion, which 'might not' be the same as the opinion of the person reading).
Top posting means that most emails can be read without any
On 8 Sep 2011 at 17:42, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
Wait, how is pegasus doing threading? Threading should not need the
subject for anything, and just rely on the References and In-reply-to
headers.
Check if there's somehow a way to enable that kind of threading in your
client (although one
Hi :)
Have you managed to find a good answer to this yet? I think there was
another thread about soemthing very similar but there haven't been many
posts in this thread.
Apols and regards from
Tom :)
--
View this message in context:
I hate to ask this question b/c it seems like something I should be able to
figure out...but how do I set up the save button you referenced? I can
add a button control but don't know how to assign it save or to make it a
default. I'm guessing the execute action under Events for the control is
On 2011-09-08 12:02 PM, Dave Sergeant d...@davesergeant.com wrote:
Net result is that there are very few characters left out of
the 35 to accurately thread on, and I get all sorts of totally
different things threaded together.
Ummm...
Any email client that displays threads based on SUBJECT
Hi :)
I think the Save button is just the normal one on the tool-bar just under
the menu-bar?
Regards from
Tom :)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Base-form-table-grid-new-record-on-top-tp3314448p3320507.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at
On 2011-09-08 11:14 AM Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Interspersing or bottom-posting ensures that every message needs to be scrolled
through unless people delete all the stuff that is irrelevant (in their
opinion, which 'might not' be the same as the opinion of the person reading).
Top posting
On 2011-09-08 1:18 PM, Dave Sergeant d...@davesergeant.com wrote:
Yes, there are two ways of threading.
No, there isn't, there is only one (standardized) way.
Pegasus chooses to do it purely from the subject line, and is
unlikely to change.
Then it will continue to be a seriously BROKEN
On 2011-09-08 11:32 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby miham...@rktmb.org wrote:
On 09/08/2011 05:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Really? Personal insults? Here??
If polite explanations are not enough, why not...
Rotflmao! Someone gets it...
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
On 9/8/11 10:55 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
We don't need to restrict people and tell them what they can and can't use.
We aren't telling people what they can and can't use. We are telling
people what the finished product needs to look like. How they get there
is up to them. :-)
It's like
On 9/8/11 11:37 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-09-08 11:14 AM Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Interspersing or bottom-posting ensures that every message needs to be
scrolled through unless people delete all the stuff that is irrelevant
(in their opinion, which 'might not' be the same as the opinion of
On 2011-09-08, Dave Sergeant wrote:
On 8 Sep 2011 at 17:42, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
Wait, how is pegasus doing threading? Threading should not need the
subject for anything, and just rely on the References and In-reply-to
headers.
Check if there's somehow a way to enable that kind of
The big button in the first form of
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/download/file.php?id=2879 is an
ordinary push button belonging to the additional Genres form with
action=save record and DefaultButton=Yes... no, in fact it is No but you
can set it to Yes so it saves the form when
Hi :)
No, he didn't. He just showed that he has not read any of the posts yet as
his arguments are already countered in previous posts.
Besides it doesn't matter how strong the argument against top-posting might
be. The fact is that it is widely used especially by office workers. Do we
Hi :)
I have cheekily uploaded the attachment you sent me. There didn't appear to
be any issue of confidentiality so i hope it's ok?
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3320651/Image4.jpg Image4.jpg
The issue does look VERY weird and unusual.
Hopefully someone might have a good answer
-sigh- let's see if I can get this attribution thing
fixed... gnus-outlook-deuglify-article couldn't process this message
On 2011-09-08, Tom Davies wrote:
On Thu, 8/9/11, Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
On 9/8/11 11:37 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-09-08 11:14 AM Tom Davies wrote:
On 2011-09-08 12:10 PM Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
No, he didn't. He just showed that he has not read any of the posts yet as
his arguments are already countered in previous posts.
Bullshit. You continually do not show the proper attribution in the posts you reply to. You
have not countered
On 09/08/2011 01:07 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 8/20/11 8:50 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
On 08/20/2011 06:10 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 8/20/11 1:27 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 08/20/2011 09:57 AM, JOE Conner wrote:
On 8/20/2011 3:17 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
After a lot of plain
Hi :)
I use a standard email client in a standard way set on it's defaults. There
are likely to be more people using such systems as LibreOffice becomes more
popular. Hold onto your hats!
Why are people in here so determined to make things unpleasant and difficult
for normal office workers?
On 2011-09-08 2:10 PM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
No, he didn't. He just showed that he has not read any of the posts
yet as his arguments are already countered in previous posts.
Coming from you - someone who pretends that top posting advocates
advocate blindly top-posting,
On 2011-09-08 2:58 PM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Why are people in here so determined to make things unpleasant and
difficult for normal office workers?
Why should 'normal office workers' be exempt from general rules of
common courtesy?
Sorry, Tom, you're a lazy ass, and a
On 2011-09-08, Tom Davies wrote:
On 2011-09-08, Tom Davies wrote:
Besides it doesn't matter how strong the argument against top-posting
might be. The fact is that it is widely used especially by office
workers.
I use a standard email client in a standard way set on it's defaults.
There
Hi to all,
Some of you have convinced me to use top posting, since it is better.
Some of you have convinced me to use bottom posting, since it is better.
Some of you have convinced me to do snipping, since it is better.
Obviously there isn't a black and white solution.
*My Big Concern* here
Hi :)
Look, the interspersed answers from Larry are practically unidentifiable from
the message. By posting at the top (or bottom) it would have been clearer
which were your answers.
Sometimes interspersing becomes possible if i notice the other persons response
is in a different colour but
Hi :)
+1
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 8/9/11, Don C. Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com wrote:
From: Don C. Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top Posting... Can we have an LO Mailing
List Guidelines Page?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 8
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
