Am 31.05.2012 04:57, chimak111 wrote:
Apropos the announcement and referring to [i]with up to 100% performance
gains when opening large files (depending on operating system, hardware
configuration and file contents)[/i] in particular, it would be nice if
LibreOffice had a set of large files that
Hi :)
Please can we try to keep this mailing-list family friendly? It is a good
point that marketing and PR often needs to say things that are not always
objective or quantifiable. A salesman's claim that something is 100% is not
the same as a programmers idea of 100% and neither may bear any
Le 31/05/12 14:59, Tom Davies a écrit :
Hi Tom,
Why can't they just say things like A LOT faster?? Why drag in numbers
that are likely to be proven wrong in certain/all cases?
Well, probably because the cynic in me knows that someone in the AOO
camp released a statement about AOO 3.4
Alexander Thurgood wrote
... I ...
prefer factual analysis, but how often is software tested and
statistically significant results given ? errmm
On my Linux box, with less than one Gig of ram and an old 5400 rpm
harddisk, everything is slow ;-)
On my Macbook, it depends.
So
On 5/31/2012 12:57 PM, chimak111 wrote:
Alexander Thurgood wrote
... I ...
prefer factual analysis, but how often is software tested and
statistically significant results given ? errmm
On my Linux box, with less than one Gig of ram and an old 5400 rpm
harddisk, everything is slow ;-)
Am 31.05.2012 19:08, Chad Neeper wrote:
So in my own real-(in my)-world test files, v3.5.x is thousands of
percent slower! But I do see your point.
This project has too many consumers and fan boys but no power users.
Apart from that, the time of spreadsheets is over. In the 2020ies hardly
Hi Chad,
Le 2012-05-31 13:08, Chad Neeper a écrit :
But, really, so what? In my particular case, I regularly use a large and
complex spreadsheet with numerous custom macros. In my case, moving from
LO 3.4.x to 3.5.x apparently broke something vital. A process that has
taken less than 60
:)
--- On Thu, 31/5/12, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote:
From: Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 3.5.4: 100% faster
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 31 May, 2012, 18:18
Am 31.05.2012 19:08, Chad Neeper wrote:
So in my own real-(in my
On 5/31/2012 1:18 PM, Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 31.05.2012 19:08, Chad Neeper wrote:
So in my own real-(in my)-world test files, v3.5.x is thousands of
percent slower! But I do see your point.
This project has too many consumers and fan boys but no power users.
Apart from that, the time of
On 5/31/2012 1:29 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Chad,
Le 2012-05-31 13:08, Chad Neeper a écrit :
LO 3.4.x to 3.5.x apparently broke something vital. A process that has
taken less than 60 seconds to complete in versions 3.x through 3.4.x now
can take 30 minutes or more. Total deal-breaker and major
Hi Chad,
Le 2012-05-31 13:48, Chad Neeper a écrit :
On 5/31/2012 1:29 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Chad,
Le 2012-05-31 13:08, Chad Neeper a écrit :
LO 3.4.x to 3.5.x apparently broke something vital. A process that has
taken less than 60 seconds to complete in versions 3.x through 3.4.x now
can
On 5/31/2012 1:56 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
+1
Growth is good :) A fresh start in a new format can be great but_finding time
to do it is not always easy_!
...especially when one has to try to interpret mind-bending comments
about skill levels...LOL!
I'm driving quickly enough to the nut
Hi :)
[bows] I just re-read it and i think i need to lay off the coffee!
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 31/5/12, Chad Neeper cnee...@level9networks.com wrote:
From: Chad Neeper cnee...@level9networks.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 3.5.4: 100% faster
To: users
13 matches
Mail list logo
