On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Leo David wrote:
Maybe its a perfect time to add ( again ) Ceph into discution.
Ceph already works pretty well in 4.4 in general. It would be nice if the
hosted engine supported ceph directly, but you can currently use an iSCSI
or NFS export from ceph to host it.
> you have 16 developer self support subscriptions from RH, those are more than
> enough to
> use with ovirt as a cluster/s.
I'd consider that an off-topic post.
And whilst we are off-topic, one of the main attractions of using TrueCentOS
(the downstream Community ENterprise Operating System)
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:42:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:31:52PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > This is expected on oVirt, our multipath configuration is intentionally
> > grabbing
> > any device that multipath can work with, even if the device only has one
Hello, understand this is an old post but were you able to make this work on
native kubernetes.
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
Hello, do you mean if there is a bug which is already discussed, is it possible
to get that particular page.
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:31:52PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> This is expected on oVirt, our multipath configuration is intentionally
> grabbing
> any device that multipath can work with, even if the device only has one path.
> The motivation is to be able to configure a system when only one path
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:55 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Would you like to file a doc bug about this?
>
> oVirt on RHEL is not such a common combination..
Well IBM seems bent on changing that (see the developer license post below)
>
> In CI we only test on Centos Stream (8, hopefully
Hello,
I work along with Moiz and here's what we tried.
We created a blank VM, loaded Windows 2016 ISO and booted it up. When we select
the OS as Windows 2016 x64 the ISO is loaded but the screen is stuck with the
windows logo. The CPU spikes up to 99%.
However if we select the OS as 'Other
Maybe its a perfect time to add ( again ) Ceph into discution.
Leo
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022, 18:21 Thomas Hoberg wrote:
> With Gluster gone, you could still use SAN and NFS storage, just like
> before they tried to compete with Nutanix and vSphere.
>
> Can you imagine IBM sponsoring oVirt, which
I just read this message: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016359
I am shocked but not surprised. And very, very sad.
But I believe this decision needs to be communicated more prominently, as
people should not get aboard a project already axed.
Hmm.
So if Gluster is being deprecated, what is it being replaced with?
Also, Nir did ask if this also applies to ovirt -- would be interesting to
see the response to that question.
-derek
On Fri, February 4, 2022 10:05 am, Thomas Hoberg wrote:
> I just read this message:
>
With Gluster gone, you could still use SAN and NFS storage, just like before
they tried to compete with Nutanix and vSphere.
Can you imagine IBM sponsoring oVirt, which doesn't make any money without RHV,
which evidently isn't profitable enough?
Most likely oVirt will lead RHV, in this case to
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:42:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:31:52PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > > This is expected on oVirt, our multipath configuration is intentionally
> > > grabbing
> > > any
Actually the inability to mix CPU vendors is increasingly becoming an issue,
and probably not just for me.
Of course this isn't an oVirt topic, not even a KVM-only topic, but reaches
deep into the OS and even applications.
I guess Intel rather likes adding extensions and proprietary
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:09:02PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:42:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:31:52PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > > > This is expected on oVirt,
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:18 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:09:02PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:42:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:18 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:09:02PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:42:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:47:11PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> Can be fixed with:
>
> $ sudo chcon -R -t nfs_t mnt
Yes that did work, thanks.
Is this still a bug?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:49 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:47:11PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > Can be fixed with:
> >
> > $ sudo chcon -R -t nfs_t mnt
>
> Yes that did work, thanks.
>
> Is this still a bug?
For NFS this works out of the box - I don't think you need
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:02:56PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:49 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:47:11PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > > Can be fixed with:
> > >
> > > $ sudo chcon -R -t nfs_t mnt
> >
> > Yes that did work, thanks.
>
>
It was this near endless range of possibilities via permutation of the parts
that originally attracted me to oVirt.
Being clearly a member of the original Lego generation I imagined how you could
simply add blocks of this and that to rebuild to something new fantastic...,
limitless gluster
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:49 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:47:11PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > Can be fixed with:
> >
> > $ sudo chcon -R -t nfs_t mnt
>
> Yes that did work, thanks.
Warning: that this configuration is a trap - if you add another host
to this system,
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:18 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:09:02PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:42:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022
This is the first time I hear that hyperconverged won't be supported in the
short future.
Since Ceph is supported by oVirt, wouldn't it be possible to use this for
hyperconverged deployments?
We are in the planning phase to buy servers for a typical 3 Gluster/Hosts
nodes deployment. Should we
Check the examples in 'man iscsiadm' and login to your target. Most probably it
won't be reachable.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
Hi,
We have a 4 node ovirt cluster running at 4.4.1.5. We are running it on iSCSI
shared Storage. The hosted engine is running on its separate iSCSI shared
So,we deprecate GlusterFS ? I understand it for RHV , but for oVirt, where
support was never an option, it doesn't make sense ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:43, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il giorno ven 4 feb 2022 alle ore 08:19 Strahil Nikolov
ha scritto:
Hi
RHV & RHGS might be abandoned, but this doesn't mean that oVirt & Gluster
should stop existing just because a corporation doesn't see HugePiles of $ in
them. Removing Gluster support from oVirt, just because RHGS support is close
to end, is irrelevant. After all, oVirt never had support in the
Hi all,
or maybe https://linbit.com/linstor/ ?
We too are in dilemma what to do with our RHV/oVirt production
environment. I have small 6 node HCI installation in my lab with linstor
and so far I'm impressed. If oVirt had support for linstor we would
certainly continue to use oVirt (even
Hello Everyone,
I requires your input as the VM that is currently Hosted on Ovirt 4.4.4.5 is
showing a locked Icon in the status column. I am unable to perform any actions
on this particular VM as it shows that the "Snapshot is currently being created
for VM
There was a failed snapshot
I don't want to be anybody's advocate here. And I also found DRBD alone
too cumbersome to use in this role in the past, but linstor actually
makes it very easy to use. In search for HCI storage solution I was
convinced by following press release (
30 matches
Mail list logo
