Hi,
Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 13:35 +0100 schrieb RW:
> > > It's not a spamassassin problem, right. Question is, can I install a
> > > SHA1 package without harming perl at other places?
> >
> > It should do any harm.
>
> That should have been:
>
> It shouldn't do any harm.
Thanks. Build a b
Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 13:35 +0100 schrieb RW:
> > It's not a spamassassin problem, right. Question is, can I install a
> > SHA1 package without harming perl at other places?
>
> It should do any harm.
That should have been:
It shouldn't do any harm.
On 21.09.16 10:18, Marcus Schopen wrot
Am 21.09.2016 um 10:18 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 13:35 +0100 schrieb RW:
It's not a spamassassin problem, right. Question is, can I install a
SHA1 package without harming perl at other places?
It should do any harm.
That should have been:
It shouldn't do any harm.
Am 20.09.2016 um 13:12 schrieb Paul Stead:
.
Hi Thomas,
The RelayCountry plugin would answer your needs:
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RelayCountryPlugin
Hello Paul,
I ve activated that Plugin and installed the geoip modul (aptitude
install libgeo-ip-perl), seems to work. I ve te
Am 21.09.2016 um 15:48 schrieb Thomas Barth:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.004 tagged_above=2 required=6.31
tests=[MESSAGEID_LOCAL=3, RELAYCOUNTRY_BAD=3.1,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.096, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
URIBL_BLOCKED shows you are using
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.096
override this idiotic rule with "score RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.001" and
hopefully that will soon get fixed until the end of all days as it was
for a long time in the past
fix the other issues below and you don't need bad rules like
"MESSAGEID_LOCAL=3" with such a dangerous
On 2016-09-21 15:48, Thomas Barth wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.004 tagged_above=2 required=6.31
tests=[MESSAGEID_LOCAL=3, RELAYCOUNTRY_BAD=3.1,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.096, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
@all
You all say that bayes
On 9/21/2016 9:48 AM, Thomas Barth wrote:
Am 20.09.2016 um 13:12 schrieb Paul Stead:
.
Hi Thomas,
The RelayCountry plugin would answer your needs:
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RelayCountryPlugin
Hello Paul,
I ve activated that Plugin and installed the geoip modul (aptitude
inst
Am 21.09.2016 um 16:13 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
#bayes
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
so your setup either don't use that config (amavais or something like
that part of the game then you don't have just spamassassin)
or you have not trained enough spam *and* ham - or you tr
Am 21.09.2016 um 17:23 schrieb Thomas Barth:
Am 21.09.2016 um 16:13 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
#bayes
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
so your setup either don't use that config (amavais or something like
that part of the game then you don't have just spamassassin)
or you ha
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:23:46PM +0200, Thomas Barth wrote:
> I cant do that because I dont have spam mails. I dont make store&forward. I
> didnt thought that I need the spam uncompressed in a folder for
> autolearning, I thought it works when sa is analyzing the mail. My
> mailsystem checks mail
Am 21.09.2016 um 17:53 schrieb Sean Greenslade:
As for your spam rejection paradigm, I can't possibly imagine that
working well unless you have a very close relationship with every single
person who emails you. If I send my resume to a job recruiter and they
get a bounce when they email me back
Am 21.09.2016 um 18:00 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
the problem of the OP is that he starts things the other side round and
first reject without good evidence and don't have anything to make the
system bullet profe because it's rejected
I remembered that I read a book about Postfix with the to
Am 21.09.2016 um 18:28 schrieb Thomas Barth:
Am 21.09.2016 um 18:00 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
the problem of the OP is that he starts things the other side round and
first reject without good evidence and don't have anything to make the
system bullet profe because it's rejected
I remembered
On 9/21/2016 12:28 PM, Thomas Barth wrote:
Am 21.09.2016 um 18:00 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
the problem of the OP is that he starts things the other side round and
first reject without good evidence and don't have anything to make the
system bullet profe because it's rejected
I remembered
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:54:32 +0200
li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 21.09.2016 um 10:18 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
> > Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 13:35 +0100 schrieb RW:
> It's not a spamassassin problem, right. Question is, can I
> install a SHA1 package without harming perl at other places?
Am 21.09.2016 um 23:36 schrieb RW:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:54:32 +0200
li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
surely - while DCC ist not a spam sign by it's descriptions
razor/pyzor *are* and they have nothing in common with DNSBL/URIBL
they are *content digest*
Actually razor is pretty close to a URIBL, n
17 matches
Mail list logo
