hateSpam wrote:
Dear All,
I have spamassassin 3.1.9 I want to upgraded it with new version 3.2.5
I will appreciate if any one can tell me how can I upgrade it? Where should
i put new version files and which command should I run?
I looked at upgrade documentation but I didn't understand what
hateSpam wrote:
I haven't installed it. it was already installed. Do you mean I should delete
the current spamassassin and reinstall new version?
To upgrade SpamAssassin, you normally just install the new version on
top of the old one. But if you install with different settings or a
Ned Slider wrote:
hateSpam wrote:
Thanks for reply.
Sorry, I should say that before. I am using CentOS Linux 5. For
mailing
delivery we are using Postfix version 2.3.3 and Procmail.
In that case you need to update your CentOS system as CentOS is using
the latest SpamAssassin.
'yum
hateSpam wrote:
Thanks for reply i used (yum list installed 'spamassassin*') command and I
got
Loading installonlyn plugin
Installed Packages
spamassassin.x86_64 3.1.9-1.el5installed
Does it mean it has installed via rpm?
Exactly.
It should update
Linda Walsh wrote:
I got a really poorly scored piece of spam -- one thing that stood out
as weird was report claimed the sender was in my AWL.
Any sender who has sent mail to you previously will be in your AWL.
This is probably the most misunderstood component of SA. Read the wiki.
Linda Walsh wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Linda Walsh wrote:
I got a really poorly scored piece of spam -- one thing that stood out
as weird was report claimed the sender was in my AWL.
Any sender who has sent mail to you previously will be in your AWL.
This is probably the most
Linda Walsh wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Linda Walsh wrote:
I got a really poorly scored piece of spam -- one thing that stood out
as weird was report claimed the sender was in my AWL.
Any sender who has sent mail to you previously will be in your AWL.
This is probably the most
hateSpam wrote:
I have spamassassin installed in my server but I have never had an email wht
[SPAM] in the subject. I get lots of spam. I think it is not checking
properly.
anybody know how to solve the problem please?
There are lots of different ways to use SA with your email. We can't
Rich Shepard wrote:
Here are all headers from the mail log summary:
From r...@salmo.appl-ecosys.com Mon Jun 1 11:25:44 2009
Return-Path: r...@salmo.appl-ecosys.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-ph20040310.0 (2008-06-10) on
salmo.appl-ecosys.com
X-Spam-Level:
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
this is an example of var / log / qmail / spamd
2009-06-03 12:00:16.531889500 [19168] info: prefork: child states:
BB
2009-06-03 12:00:16.531949500 [19168] info: prefork: server reached
--max-children setting, consider raising
Rich Shepard wrote:
The empty body problem is a more difficult problem. Have procmail
save a
copy of the raw message somewhere and take a look at it. Make sure
there
is a blank line between the headers and the body. Run 'spamassassin
-D'
on this saved message and look for anything unusual
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:41, snowweb wrote:
Then I tried again with sa-update and got the following:
[r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update
Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/per
I couldn't find any place on junkmailfilter website to report this, so
I'll put it here.
I received a 419 scam email with this whitelist hit:
* -3.0 RCVD_IN_JMF_W RBL: Sender listed in JMF-WHITE
* [213.4.129.18 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
--
Bowie
.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
I couldn't find any place on junkmailfilter website to report this,
so I'll put it here.
I received a 419 scam email with this whitelist hit:
* -3.0 RCVD_IN_JMF_W RBL: Sender listed in JMF-WHITE
* [213.4.129.18 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
for
automation I'm interested.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
That one also hit DNSWL_MED and actually ended up with a negative
score. I reported to dnswl via their website.
It would be useful to have a reporting mechanism on your website so
we don't have to send these to the list.
Bowie
Marc Perkel wrote
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Also, can someone explain or send me a link to a *full* explanation of
the 4 different scores (local, net, with bayes, with bayes+net)?
It's fairly simple. Here is the description from the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page:
If four valid scores are
, is that used for all four scenarios?
Dan Schaefer
Application Developer
Performance Administration Corp.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Also, can someone explain or send me a link to a *full* explanation
of the 4 different scores (local, net, with bayes, with bayes+net)?
It's fairly
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, July 7, 2009 19:53, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Reply button replies only to the sending individual.
should be okay
thunderbird can have a plugin to fix this problem ?
The plugin is called Reply to mailing list. It adds a Reply list
button that works
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
I just installed that and it works nicely. However, we're getting off
track a little... My second question was answered with RTFMP, but my
first question about a script that will show me the ending score after
all config files have been read, has not been answered. If
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
chauhananshul wrote:
I'm new to linux world can some one please help in understanding .cf
.pm
files.
Neither of those files are specific to linux.
The .pm files are perl modules. To understand how those works in
detail you need to learn perl. You don't need to know
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, July 10, 2009 18:17, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Anyway, as I've told you before with some hastily scribbled logic, you
seriously should read up on De Morgan's law. The above meta equals
! ( __URIBL_BLACK __URIBL_GREY )
are you sure this logic holds in
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I tried with this:
-(local.cf)---
internal_networks 10.0.0.0/8
trusted_networks 10.0.0.0/8 127.0.0.1
trusted_networks 212.16.98.0/24 212.16.100.0/24 62.142.0.0/16 195.197.172.98
trusted_networks 195.74.0.0/16 213.192.189.2/24 217.30.188.0/24 65.54.0.0/16
Patrick Saweikis wrote:
Has anyone had any experience trying to make spamassassin use a mysql
database for it’s ruleset instead of text files? We are planning on
making our anti-spam solution redundant, and it would be nice to have
this in a database instead of copying files around when we
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net [2009-07-21 14:11]:
The gist is:
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `/var/lib/spamassassin/keys'
And ls -l returns:
[r...@coyote linux-2.6.30.2]# ls -l
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Bowie Bailey wrote:
If permissions are 0700 and sa-update cannot read the directory, then
sa-update is not running as the user saupdate. Double-check which
user sa-update runs as and chown the directory to that user.
Here is the line
Dan Schaefer wrote:
Clip of /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
__
required_score 7
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 10.0
endif
__
Some messages with a SA score of
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Bowie Bailey wrote:
First off, sa-learn and sa-update have absolutely nothing to do with
each other. sa-update downloads new rules and sa-learn trains the Bayes
subsystem. Just wanted to clarify this since your last message seemed
to imply
Matt Kettler wrote:
Gary Smith wrote:
We have a process in place using the perl CPAN module for invoking SA. This is
outside of the scope of the normal mail system. Basically we use this to see
what scores emails would generate for some statistical stuff. The spam engine
this calls is
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, July 22, 2009 12:41, snowweb wrote:
- PackageKit as the Gnome (GUI) package manager. Its in the Gnome menu
as System|Administration|Add/Remove software
Thanks Martin. I'll remember to use Yum from now on. Cheers mate.
Joao Neves wrote:
At 22-07-2009 14:56, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
http://www.google.dk/search?q=cpan2distie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=com.ubuntu:da-DK:unofficialclient=firefox-a
if some rpm is missing, then use the url to make native rpm from cpan
before install them
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi all,
Some time ago someone had mentioned to never use whitelist_from but
instead use whitelist_from_rcvd. Where is whitelist_from_rcvd
documented? It doesn't appear in the SA docs in the same place that
whitelist_from is listed.
So, forever I have been using
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi,
Are spamd and amavisd-new mutually exclusive?
Yes. amavisd-new uses the Perl API directly, so it does not talk to spamd.
I'm also trying to use sa-stats.pl, and it is reporting zeros because
I've just learned it relies on spamd, which I'm apparently not using.
Dan Schaefer wrote:
It means that if you were using BL at MTA level your SA might never
have seen the message at all.
No your rule would not be overlooked 'because the site is in a
blacklist' *unless* you were using the BL in your MTA and rejected
the transaction from a blacklisted IP
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:36:28 +0200, Mark Martinec
mark.martinec...@ijs.si
wrote:
Does perl complain?
$ perl effectiveTLDs.pm
no errors
so
'bar' = {},
foo' = {},
'bar' = {},
is valid for perl ?
example in line around 2106
but perl accept it, imho this
Toni Mueller wrote:
I'm open to ideas about what else to do.
For me, the Sought rules catch more than anything other than the Zen
blacklist.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SoughtRules
--
Bowie
Erik Bloodaxe wrote:
I have a default install of Redhat 5.2. I have mail scanner using it
and it appears to be creating a large number of false positives. The
version of SpamAssassin is version 3.2.4 which is running on Perl
version 5.8.8. I am using the latest version of mail scanner. I
Dan Schaefer wrote:
Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? I
have 4 in my inbox this morning with scores no more than 5.
http://pastebin.com/m561b461b
Scored pretty high here. DCC and JMF-BLACK account for quite a bit, but
it would have scored 5.0 and been
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty catching spam with subjects that include Home
Depot $100 Gift Card type of mail, and wondered if anyone had any
ideas:
http://pastebin.com/m57dc753b
What rules exist that I might be missing? They don't seem to do well
with bayes, and
poifgh wrote:
I am trying to understand inner workings of spam assassin and would be great
if someone can answer my questions. I have read online documentation but
there are still some questions left unanswered or I am not sure about.
I'm not an expert, just a long-time user, but I can
Luis campo wrote:
hi,
I set to work with RBL Spamassasin by skip_rbl_checks option 0.
But in my statistics were not reporting any RBL test
Run spamassassin-D-lint
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-ussource=wlmailtagline
One of the side-effects of
Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
Dear Sirs.
Thank you for your answers
Qmail-Smtpd have the following RBL configured:
* bl.spamcop.net
cbl.abuseat.org
combined.njabl.org
*
You might want to try zen.spamhaus.org. That is the only one I trust
enough to block mail on my MTA.
These are the
poifgh wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
For auto-learning, the high and low scoring messages are fed to Bayes.
However, for an optimal setup, you should manually train Bayes on as
much of your (verified) ham and spam as possible. The more of your mail
stream Bayes sees, the better the results
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/30/2009 12:18 AM, R-Elists wrote:
warren,
marc already decided once, please dont give more choices...
you should have thought that out before putting the list in a minor
tiz on
it.
- rh
I'll note that he's the one that said he prefers HOSTKARMA names,
poifgh wrote:
RW-15 wrote:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
poifgh abhinav.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a question about - understanding how are rulesets generated for
...
a. Is it done manually with people writing regex to see how
efficiently they capture spams?
b. Is
I have several virtual users and I want them to all use the same Bayes
DB (and user_prefs, etc). The are all using the same UID/GID. Is it
safe to make all of the $HOME/spamassassin directories symlinks to a
common directory? I can't think of a problem with this, but I wanted to
check before I
After testing the khop rules for a few days, I noticed one oddity.
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM
%OFHAM
8
Luis campo wrote:
*
skip_rbl_checks 1
*
RBL checks are quite useful. Why are you skipping them?
*#Con esto evalua cada mensaje, se requiere un 5.0 para marcarlo como
spam
required_hits 3
*
Spamassassin is designed to score spam at 5 points. If you lower this
score, you are risking
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 03:43 +0800, Care4U wrote:
I would like to host some virtual domains. I had decided to install qmail,
vpopmail, simscan, clamav, spamassassin and maildrop. I will be providing 2
types of mail packages. The first package comes with filtering,
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 20-Oct-2009, at 17:03, Evan Platt wrote:
At 03:58 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
Domains cost about $10 a year. Static IP addresses depend on your ISP.
Some are cheap, some are not, and some won't do it at all. However,
you do not have to have a static
LuKreme wrote:
On 21-Oct-2009, at 14:31, Bowie Bailey wrote:
If you can do the spam and virus scanning during the original smtp
transaction, you can reject viruses and high-scoring spam with a 5xx
error at that point, but once your server accepts the mail, your choices
are to deliver
Alex wrote:
Anyone can add a Habeas header. At best, it means they've got an outdated
configuration; at worst, it means they're spammers trying to get past
filters.
https://senderscore.org/lookup.php?lookup=208.85.50.30 reveals that the
208.85.50.30 is not currently accredited under the
polloxx wrote:
Hi,
Is the spamassassin development dead?
On the website there's: 2008-06-12: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 has been released.
Not quite. If you look at svn, you'll see this:
spamassassin_20091103151200.tar.gz03-Nov-2009 15:122.1M
Doesn't look dead to me! :)
--
Bowie
Kent Borg wrote:
I admit I have been ignoring Spamassassin because it seems to work. I
have been pleased that Spamassassin has been regularly flagging over 94%
of my spam. And this list seems active (if mostly ignored by me).
But this e-mail caught my eye. Indeed, the version on
Luigi Gasbarro wrote:
I checked my mailserver vs http://cqcounter.com/rbl_check/ and the
only negative response comes from blacklist.spambag.org
I try same other IP (randomly) and have found the same RBL marking all
the address as negative
The spambag.org domain is expired. It gives the
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Bowie Bailey wrote:
The SA core rules are not updated very often. For the most part, they
just work. If you are not already doing so, you may want to consider
Justin's Sought ruleset. It is dynamically generated and updated every
4 hours or so
john ffitch wrote:
Have I missed something? I used to pull the sought rules daily, but
nothing seems to have changed since 2 Nov. Is that expected behaviour?
==John ffitch
No, that's not expected behavior...
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Justin Mason wrote:
Right now, SOUGHT appears to be
Justin Mason wrote:
Yep -- sorry -- I got to reboot the server, but it appears to have not
fixed the problem.
Right now I'm not likely to be able to perform more investigation for a week
or two. :(
Sorry about this -- the perils of volunteer infrastructure!
No problem. I've set scores for
Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
Dear Sir,
Some additional data.
I am running debugging and got these messages:
@40004afb1ab22375c434 [12572] info: prefork: child states: III
@40004afb1ab22375d7bc [12572] dbg: prefork: child 13018: entering
state 3
@40004afb1ab22375e75c [12572]
Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:30:58 -0500
From: bowie_bai...@buc.com
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamd SIGCHLD
This is just the normal child cleanup. You have set a maximum of 2 idle
children, so when there were 3, it killed one. This
Michael Schmid wrote:
Hi!I checked if SpamAssassin works with GTUBE. GTUBE was recognised... So
far, so good.Then I added to one cf-File a Test like this:**header
L_TO_ME ToCc =~ /gord...@csse\.uwa\.edu\.au/describe L_TO_ME Email
addressed to mescore L_TO_ME
I have been seeing this output from sa-update recently:
http: request failed: 404 Not Found: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN htmlhead title404 Not Found/title /headbody h1Not
Found/h1 pThe requested URL
/home/katz/sa/khop-sc-neighbors/2009120306.tar.gz was not found on this
LuKreme wrote:
On 4-Dec-2009, at 01:18, jdow wrote:
With all the animosity on this issue I decided to give the HABEAS
rules a score, a negligible score to be sure, just to see what the
state of HABEAS is for me today.
In the last four days - nothing either spam or ham.
I tend to
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
That to one side, the default for a spam filter should not be to give
any weight to a white list unless the user modifies the config
themselves specifically. It can be seen to be suspicious and offering a
pecuniary advantage to those involved and using it.
I
Jason Bertoch wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
In this case, there are a few people complaining about the Habeas
rules, but just as many people who do not see any problems.
Silence does not necessarily mean assent. I disabled the Habeas rules
long ago and therefore have no useful data to add
bernics.gabor wrote:
I use spamassassin 3.2.5 on the Debian 5.0, it#8217;s great, because I have a
problem:
My SP dont view the users specific configuration
(/home/$user/.spamassassin/user_prefs) only the main configuration
(/etc/spamassassin/*).
SP?
Are you saying it is not configured
Rich Shepard wrote:
I've read the FAQ and Wiki without seeing an answer to my question. The
answer may very well be in a document I've not examined; if it is, please
point me to it. Here's the situation:
SpamAssassin-3.2.5 is installed here and works well for me with our
postfix MTA. We
Rich Shepard wrote:
We use POP3 here (qpopper, in fact).
If I correctly understand your suggestion, I add a subdirectory to
her ~/
called, like mine 'spam-uncaught'. She saves spam messages there, then
cron
will scp that file to the server where I can run sa-learn on them (or
have
Christian Brel wrote:
The point comes back to this and it has *not* been answered sensibly;
WHY DOES SPAMASSASSIN DEFAULT INSTALL WITH A NEGATIVE SCORING RULE THAT
FAVOURS A COMMERCIAL BULK MAILER. Namely the negative score for Habeas?
This point has been answered. SA ships with that rule
R-Elists wrote:
as far as museum pieces go, i submit that my first was an Apple 2E if i
remember correctly..
BRUN BEERRUN
was an interesting game, or something to that effect... ;-)
...and (snore) i also programmed a helicopter to fly across the top and drop
a bomb on a space invader
JPP100 wrote:
1. English URL
2. Double words separated with a '-'
3. Rarely a 'www' at the front - usually 4 or more random letters
4. Always (for now) 4 numbers at the end
Example:
http://llhti.tour-traveled.com/4651/
So my rule:
# hotmail drug spam
uri MY_HOTMAIL_SPAM
Christian Brel wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:10:28 -0500
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas of what else might help?
#ADD TO THE END OF local.cf at your own risk
score RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED 0 4.3 0 4.3
score RCVD_IN_SSC_TRUSTED_COI 0 3.7 0 3.7
score
Larry Starr wrote:
From my install there is a /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin which I'm not
using,
that provides none of that information.
I believe I will have to implement a wrapper script to, at least, notify me
when updates have been applied.
I patched sa-update to add a verbose
Mark Martinec wrote:
On Tuesday January 5 2010 22:47:42 Bowie Bailey wrote:
I patched sa-update to add a verbose option which outputs all the
channel names that had changes. Very simple patch if anyone is
interested. It installs cleanly on 3.2.5, I haven't tried 3.3.
This looks
tonjg wrote:
On 01/13/2010 07:22 PM, tonjg wrote:
thanks for your response Ned.
your last line describes exactly what I want to do - reject mail, do it at
the smtp stage in sendmail - but I don't know how to achieve this.
Take a look at the Sendmail section of this page:
tonjg wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
ls -l /root/.spamassassin
this command gives:
total 0
So there are no files in that directory. Are you going to be running SA
as root on a general basis? If so, you need to make sure you have
permission to write in that directory.
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
Hello spam assassins,
The question, which bothers me is about Bayes data size. How much is a
typical
size of those data and what mechanisms are there to limit growing of it? Can
mysql be used for storage and would you recommend it (well, maybe it can then
be easier
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
MM == Michael Mansour m...@npgx.com.au writes:
MM Why couldn't the mailing list filters simply whitelist your email address
or
MM whitelist people automatically subscribed to the mailing list?
Yes, but that's beside the point. That is not solving the bad thing
ram wrote:
* 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
This rule started causing problems at the beginning of the year and was
fixed. Have you run sa-update to get the latest rules?
--
Bowie
ram wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com
mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
ram wrote:
* 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
This rule started causing problems at the beginning of the year
Alex wrote:
Hi,
http://www.returnpath.net/blog/2010/01/spamassasin-rarely-misses.php
Yeah, it's partly self-serving, but that's what corporate blogs are for.
The people who read this
blog are mostly marketers with very little exposure to the open source
community, so this
should
Noel Butler wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 12:53 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Alex wrote:
Hi,
http://www.returnpath.net/blog/2010/01/spamassasin-rarely-misses.php
Yeah, it's partly self-serving, but that's what corporate blogs are for.
The people who read this
blog are mostly
McDonald, Dan wrote:
Please excuse the top-post. This truly brain-damaged mua does not
allow me to edit the body.
Easiest way to disable whitelists is:
grep -E score\ RCVD.+-
/var/lib/spamassassin/updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf | cut -d\
-f1-3
ram wrote:
The rules in /usr/share/spamassassin are the original rules from the
install. If /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002.005 exists, those rules
will be
used instead. You can verify which rules are being used by
running this
command:
$ spamassassin
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, LuKreme wrote:
$ bzgrep dynamic.hinet.net /var/log/maillog.?.bz2 |\
grep -i reject |\
awk -F: {'print $9'} |\
awk -F';' {'print $1'} |\
sort -u
Client host rejected
Helo command rejected
Recipient address rejected
Relay access
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 09:18 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
McDonald, Dan wrote:
Please excuse the top-post. This truly brain-damaged mua does not
allow me to edit the body.
Easiest way to disable whitelists is:
grep -E score\ RCVD.+-
/var/lib/spamassassin
Eddy Beliveau wrote:
Hi!
Interesting subject... which make me checked my 3.3.0 installation
I did update spamassassin to version 3.3.0
Then I erased /var/lib/spamassassin/*
did a sa-update --verbose
/Update available for channel updates.spamassassin.org
Update was available, and was
This was listed in the Hostkarma whitelist:
[198.217.64.52 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
Can we get this IP removed?
(I was going to report this directly, but I lost the email address and
wasn't able to find anything on the junkemailfilter website.)
--
Bowie
ram wrote:
hi
what i am looking is
iam looking sitewide, not userwide
so if the user feel its spam mail, he will send that mail to another
email of local account,
from there i want to choose the bayes learn and decide what is spam
and what is not spam
hope i explained well i
Even if they are emailing me regarding the amazingly large sum of money
some unknown person apparently left me in his will? :)
Marc Perkel wrote:
That's the outgoing email gateway for a hospital. It stays whitelisted.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
This was listed in the Hostkarma whitelist
ram wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com
mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
ram wrote:
hi
what i am looking is
iam looking sitewide, not userwide
so if the user feel its spam mail, he will send that mail
tonjg wrote:
ever since I did a bayes learn on 200 spams and 200 hams a couple of days ago
I've had the following error appearing in my mail log:
'mimedefang-multiplexor[13951]: Slave 0 stderr: bayes: locker: safe_lock:
cannot create tmp lockfile
Since the sought rules have been updating for a while now, I took a look
at my stats to see how they were doing. They used to be one of my most
useful rules, but recently, they don't seem to be doing so good.
Here are the stats for the last month:
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
Adam Katz wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Since the sought rules have been updating for a while now, I took a
look at my stats to see how they were doing. They used to be one
of my most useful rules, but recently, they don't seem to be doing
so good.
Here are the stats for the last month
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Cardwell
spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
The error message, gpg required but not found, means that gpg was
required, but was not found. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest
that maybe gpg wasn't found, but
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
Sounds to me like you need to install the actual gpg package.
Installing the keys doesn't do much if the program that uses them
doesn't exist.
Yes this was 1/2 my problem
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
I'm not sure why root would have a problem writing to the file.
sa-update-keys IS a directory, right? Try removing the sa-update-keys
file/directory and then running the command again
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
sa-update-keys should default to the same location as your local.cf
file. On my system, that is /etc/mail/spamassassin. Create the
directory and try the import again.
I created
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat,
and wrong. - H. L. Mencken
I think your auto-quote program is trying to tell you something... :)
--
Bowie
jd wrote:
A lot of older people still believe that giving the PC the wrong
command will cause it to explode in a shower of sparks, thanks to
Hollywood. It seems that Hollywood is still doing that.
Electronics generating sparks when overloaded? Yes.
Generating smoke? Yes.
Flames? Yes.
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 02/11, Henrik K wrote:
What a complex scheme you invented for a simple problem. All you have to do
is to require legimate relays to have a FCrDNS entry with an actually
identifiable name, like starting with smtp. Much simpler to take advantage
of that and
1 - 100 of 1325 matches
Mail list logo
