Felix Defrance skrev den 2017-08-10 17:09:
Ok but in many other cases, spamassassin not failed at this point and
validate the signing.. why it fail sometimes, and not all time ?
verify when it fails what size the failed mail have, if that its
truncated with amavisd, then extend mailtruncateing
Le 10/08/2017 à 16:33, RW a écrit :
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:12:11 +0200
> Felix Defrance wrote:
>
>
>> In the first lines on log, you could see opendkim results are success.
>>
>> Aug 9 10:25:42 vmail opendkim[21923]: 0D81A778B1D: DKIM verification
>> successful
>> Aug 9 10:25:43 vmail opendmarc
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:12:11 +0100, Felix Defrance
wrote:
In the first lines on log, you could see opendkim results are success.
Aug 9 10:25:42 vmail opendkim[21923]: 0D81A778B1D: DKIM verification
successful
Aug 9 10:25:43 vmail opendmarc[7879]: 0D81A778B1D: groupeastek.fr none
That why
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:12:11 +0200
Felix Defrance wrote:
> In the first lines on log, you could see opendkim results are success.
>
> Aug 9 10:25:42 vmail opendkim[21923]: 0D81A778B1D: DKIM verification
> successful
> Aug 9 10:25:43 vmail opendmarc[7879]: 0D81A778B1D: groupeastek.fr
> none
>
Le 09/08/2017 à 18:53, David Jones a écrit :
> On 08/09/2017 10:19 AM, Felix Defrance wrote:
>> Do you have any idea why the body has been altered sometimes ? I
>> don't have any log about amavis alterate body message.
>>
>
> This happens when any server in the path modify some of the headers or
Le 10/08/2017 à 14:46, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> RW skrev den 2017-08-10 02:06:
>
>> If amavis only passes part of the email to SA, it isn't going to pass
>> DKIM.
>
> i think there is more underlaying problems there, amavisd have its own
> dkim verify and signer, even if spamassassin does not s
RW skrev den 2017-08-10 02:06:
If amavis only passes part of the email to SA, it isn't going to pass
DKIM.
i think there is more underlaying problems there, amavisd have its own
dkim verify and signer, even if spamassassin does not see the fullmail,
amavisd can verify and sign it still, so
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:33:57 +0200
Felix Defrance wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I don't understand why Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM fail on
> signature verification instead of opendkim success..
>
> I see thats issues on domain which use onmicrosoft.com or
> gappssmtp.com
...
> Aug 9 10:25:43 vmail a
On 08/09/2017 10:19 AM, Felix Defrance wrote:
Do you have any idea why the body has been altered sometimes ? I don't
have any log about amavis alterate body message.
This happens when any server in the path modify some of the headers or
the body of the email after it was signed by the origin
Do you have any idea why the body has been altered sometimes ? I don't
have any log about amavis alterate body message.
You don't think the problem came from this line ?
SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM, i=@groupeastek365.onmicrosoft.com,
d=groupeastek365.onmicrosoft.com, s=selector1-groupeastek-fr,
a=r
On 08/09/2017 09:33 AM, Felix Defrance wrote:
Hi all,
I don't understand why Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM fail on
signature verification instead of opendkim success..
I see thats issues on domain which use onmicrosoft.com or gappssmtp.com
Here is the mail trace on my MTA, if anybody coul
11 matches
Mail list logo
