, yet a bit flakey.
Any help is greatly appreciated,
Eelco
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Issue-with-SSL-server--network-configuration-tp22618057p22618057.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
...@tomcat.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Issue-with-SSL-server--network-configuration-tp22618057p22618310.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
From: i_am_superman [mailto:ee...@objectivation.nl]
is there a simple way to map one
domain name to two different SSL connectors?
I don't think there is, unless you want part of your application to be
accessible from a different port. So the part that doesn't need certs might be
at
:-)
(it's tempting though)
And firefox tends to be very annoying with self-signed certificates
lately
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Issue-with-SSL-server--network-configuration-tp22618057p22618647.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
i_am_superman wrote:
It's gonna be a public government website, so a self-signed certificate will
not be an option :-)
Considering the amount of taxpayer money that governments are currently
pumping into failed financial institutions and car makers, I'm sure they
could afford a 400 €
From: i_am_superman [mailto:ee...@objectivation.nl]
I don't think my client will allow me to run a public SSL
website any port but 443 (firewalls).
Then you'll also need a second IP address on the server, as I'm sure you've
already realised.
- Peter
.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Issue-with-SSL-server--network-configuration-tp22618057p22618849.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User
Why not opt for a wildcard certificate for the domain, if that's applicable
(e.g. *.yourcompany.com)
-Original Message-
From: i_am_superman [mailto:ee...@objectivation.nl]
Sent: 20 March 2009 11:52
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Issue with SSL server/ network configuration
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, i_am_superman ee...@objectivation.nl wrote:
If anyone else has another idea, please respond.
How about a self-seigned cert?
A nasty browser-window will pop up once, however, the users could
import the server-cert into their browser, and then they#re done
Rgds
addresses? Or is the IP address tied to the (wildcard) certificate?
Best regards,
Eelco
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Issue-with-SSL-server--network-configuration-tp22618057p22619652.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
From: i_am_superman [mailto:ee...@objectivation.nl]
we have 3 environment (test, accept, prod) so we
need 3 extra certificates. No big deal indeed, but I need
to be sure that I really need them.
Get a wildcard certificate? They're about 3 times the price of a regular cert,
and can
From: i_am_superman [mailto:ee...@objectivation.nl]
What are the restrictions on wildcard certificates?
Some very old browsers don't understand them. Probably not a problem in your
environment, but check your client's browser support requirements.
If I
have two subdomains with one wildcard
, this is a Tomcat mailing list :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Issue-with-SSL-server--network-configuration-tp22618057p22619885.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:36 PM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
Considering the amount of taxpayer money that governments are currently
pumping into failed financial institutions and car makers, I'm sure they
could afford a 400 € certificate, no ?
Or is it that bad ?
+1
Cheers
Peter,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:05 PM, i_am_superman ee...@objectivation.nl wrote:
I just don't
understand it; how do hosting companies host 2 sites on one box with a
certificate each? That'll be a lot of IP address juggling..
Well, we f.e. do have a box 8ok, actually two boxes behind a
15 matches
Mail list logo
