Re: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread David kerber
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote: Hi, So, I'm running an app which the development house say *has* to run on 4.1.31. I'm not especially happy about this, and will try running it under 4.1.37, but the developers say they *might* be able to get it to run under 5.5. I seem to recall a conversation in

Re: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread Stephen Nelson-Smith
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in the mid-to-long term. That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a wasteland? I'll need to understand the rationale behind the

RE: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Support and development of versions Is 5.5 a wasteland? It's not a wasteland, whereas 5.0 is. However, the most attention goes to the current level, while 4.1 and 5.5 activity is pretty much limited to only serious bug fixes

Re: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread David kerber
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in the mid-to-long term. That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a wasteland? I'll need

Re: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread Mark Thomas
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in the mid-to-long term. That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a wasteland? I'll need to

Re: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread Stephen Nelson-Smith
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in the mid-to-long term. That was my gut

RE: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current status is available from: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions What does RTC, for the process field stand for? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -

RE: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Support and development of versions Could someone help me understand the differences between the servlet and JSP versions? The servlet and JSP specs are the place to look. Each document includes a section on what's changed

RE: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 16:12 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Support and development of versions From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Support and development

Re: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread Mark Thomas
Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current status is available from: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions What does RTC, for the process field stand for? Review Then Commit. It means every patch must get at least 3 more

RE: Support and development of versions

2008-02-28 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Support and development of versions It might not be, but it should not be. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/compatibility.html and http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/compatibility.html Other than enum becoming a reserved word