Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread John Krasnay
Your approach sounds perfectly reasonable to me. What don't you like about it? jk On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:36:39AM +0300, Cristi Manole wrote: Hello, I have a wicket application where a user starts an action on another system (different machine, outside network). I would like for this

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread James Carman
Can the other application just write to the database? On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:28 AM, John Krasnay j...@krasnay.ca wrote: Your approach sounds perfectly reasonable to me. What don't you like about it? jk On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:36:39AM +0300, Cristi Manole wrote: Hello, I have a

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread David Brown
Hello Cristi, this is typically referred to as diparate sytems communications issue. In the past I have had some success between such sytems using a WSDL and messaging. I did not have a lot of time so I opted for the Apache Axis2 framework (http://ws.apache.org/axis2/). You will have to do some

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread John Krasnay
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 07:48:10AM -0500, David Brown wrote: Hello Cristi, this is typically referred to as diparate sytems communications issue. In the past I have had some success between such sytems using a WSDL and messaging. I did not have a lot of time so I opted for the Apache Axis2

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread James Carman
Or, just write to the database, since the wicket application polls the db for changes anyway. On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:59 AM, John Krasnay j...@krasnay.ca wrote: On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 07:48:10AM -0500, David Brown wrote: Hello Cristi, this is typically referred to as diparate sytems

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread Jonas
Hi, there are probably easier way to provide a 'callback' channel to a remote system than a wicket page. Of course, using the web server makes sense, but I'd recommend to use a simple servlet to receive the callback and to update the specific database table instead of a wicket page, since the

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread Cristi Manole
Thanks for your feedback, guys. I don't like the idea of both writing to the database directly, because I want the layers separated. I don't think either application should know anything about the other's database. I used Axis2 before, but at the moment i don't see how it can solve my problem -

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread David Brown
Hello Cristi, it sounds like you mean polling. When I glued the two disparate systems together the Axis2 .aar file was just connected to an Oracle socket. The socket was in permissive mode so whenever the data appeared at the socket it was immediately available to the Axis2 listener and all the

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread John Krasnay
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:14:43PM +0300, Cristi Manole wrote: I used Axis2 before, but at the moment i don't see how it can solve my problem - meaning how to update some panel *without* doing some action repeatedly until something worth displaying to the user happens. I don't think anyone

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread James Carman
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Cristi Manole cristiman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your feedback, guys. I don't like the idea of both writing to the database directly, because I want the layers separated. I don't think either application should know anything about the other's database.

How to manipulate an AjaxRequest

2009-04-09 Thread Frank Klein Koerkamp
Hi all, i have an Ajax call and when an exception occurs, i want to display the exception in an ModalWindow. But i also want to be able to delete everything(component, javascript) that is added or will be added to the AjaxRequestTarget. So only modalwindow popup but state on page stays the

Re: How to manipulate an AjaxRequest

2009-04-09 Thread Martin Makundi
You could collect your components into a list or collection before adding them into the Target..? Or does the error occur at render-time? ** Martin 2009/4/9 Frank Klein Koerkamp fkleinkoerk...@educator.eu: Hi all, i have an Ajax call and when an exception occurs, i want to display the

RE: How to manipulate an AjaxRequest

2009-04-09 Thread Frank Klein Koerkamp
The exception may occur when I try to delete a record in a table. So I click on the delete link this triggers an event that will delete record from db. After deletion I've to refresh an component on page, but if db gives error i don't want to do refresh anything. Regards, Frank -Original

Re: Wicket Noob: Long cannot be cast to java.lang.String

2009-04-09 Thread francisco treacy
Well, it was available 4 years ago :) 2009/4/9 David Brown dbr...@sexingtechnologies.com: Hello Johan, thanks! the static NumberValidator.RangeValidator(long minimum, long maximum) worked! Wicket is great. I just wished Wicket was available 10 years ago! Regards, David. There are 10 kinds

Package all CSS and JS

2009-04-09 Thread Eduardo Nunes
Hi, Is there a way to tell wicket to package all referenced javascripts together, the same for the css? If there isn't this solution yet, can anyone tell me where should I look for to implement it? Thanks, Eduardo S. Nunes -

Re: How to manipulate an AjaxRequest

2009-04-09 Thread Martin Makundi
From what I can see you could have: ListComponent refreshThese = new LinkedListComponent(); you add your components to refreshThese.add(component); and if your db update fails, just call refreshThese.clear()? Otherwise iterate through all refreshThese components and

RE: How to manipulate an AjaxRequest

2009-04-09 Thread Frank Klein Koerkamp
It could work, but that's not what I want, because also after the exception is thrown components could be added to the target. In that case I've to check on every add to target if an exception has occurred. I prefer to do this on one place. But thanks for your suggestion. Regards, Frank

Re: Package all CSS and JS

2009-04-09 Thread Craig Tataryn
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Eduardo Nunes esnu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there a way to tell wicket to package all referenced javascripts together, the same for the css? If there isn't this solution yet, can anyone tell me where should I look for to implement it? You can put your

Re: How to manipulate an AjaxRequest

2009-04-09 Thread Martin Makundi
It could work, but that's not what I want, because also after the exception is thrown components could be added to the target. In that case I've to check on every add to target if an exception has occurred. I prefer to do this on one place. Maybe your exception handling could deal with

Re: Package all CSS and JS

2009-04-09 Thread Eduardo Nunes
I think that I didn't explain it right. What I want is that wicket concatenate all included javascripts into one file. Something like wicket:link link.. javascript1.js / link.. javascript2.js / link.. javascript3.js / /wicket:link Generate just one resource with javacript1.js, javacript2.js

Re: Package all CSS and JS

2009-04-09 Thread Eduardo Nunes
link href=... / for the css and script language=javascript src=... / for the javascripts On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Eduardo Nunes esnu...@gmail.com wrote: I think that I didn't explain it right. What I want is that wicket concatenate all included javascripts into one file. Something like

Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-09 Thread Matt Welch
I have no intention of actually deploying it in development mode. I'm talking about the development sandbox provided by the Google App Engine Java SDK. Matt Martijn Dashorst wrote: Never *EVER* deploy your application in development mode. Use deployment mode and turn those features you

Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-09 Thread Matt Welch
Thanks. Matt Ryan Crumley wrote: Matt, Add this to your WebApplication.init() method: getResourceSettings().setResourcePollFrequency(null); Ryan On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Matthew Welch matt...@welchkin.net wrote: I'm experimenting with Wicket inside Google's new Java

Re: Montable PDF creating page

2009-04-09 Thread Igor Vaynberg
why would you want a mounted page to create pdfs? servlets are so much better at that. that said you can do getrequestcycle().setrequesttarget(new sometargetthatstreamspdfs()); throw new restartresponseexception(); -igor On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de

Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-09 Thread Igor Vaynberg
it is much simpler and more efficient to set proper caching headers. concatenating resources often does not work because different components on different pages contribute different resources, so there are a lot of variations of these huge files you may end up with and would have to stream to the

Re: Can client cache pages effectively?

2009-04-09 Thread Jim Pinkham
A quick follow up in case anyone else was curious about how this is going: I ended up using ehcache page cache filter for a simple page that just displays 'current' items (calendar view of events) based on a db query. No forms (state) on this page so it works pretty well. In my DAO that does

Re: Communication between applications, one using wicket

2009-04-09 Thread Martin Grigorov
What about some kind of messaging (JMS, AMQP, ...) ? It'd be blazing combined with Comet ;-) El jue, 09-04-2009 a las 16:14 +0300, Cristi Manole escribió: Thanks for your feedback, guys. I don't like the idea of both writing to the database directly, because I want the layers separated. I

Re: Package all CSS and JS

2009-04-09 Thread Roman Zechner
Hi Eduardo! I remember there was once a discussion here on the mailing list, I think part of that was http://techblog.molindo.at/2008/08/wicket-interface-speed-up-merging-resources-for-fewer-http-requests.html Roman Eduardo Nunes wrote: link href=... / for the css and script

Re: Can client cache pages effectively?

2009-04-09 Thread Eduardo Nunes
Usually IFrame isn't a good idea, I think it's because of the accessibility and search engines. At least that is what the major part of the HTML coders talk about it. But I can't think in another way to do it. just my 5c On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Jim Pinkham pinkh...@gmail.com wrote: A

Re: Wicket Noob: Long cannot be cast to java.lang.String

2009-04-09 Thread david
I'm referring to the days of no JSP on AS400 boxes. The only option was to out.println() from a Servlet or some Serializable object a whole bunch of HTML and then do HTTP GET URL daisy-chain to another Servlet. ;-) francisco treacy wrote .. Well, it was available 4 years ago :) 2009/4/9

Re: Package all CSS and JS

2009-04-09 Thread Alex Objelean
Take a look to web resource optimizer (wro4j) project, hosted on google code. It's pretty easy to use: http://code.google.com/p/wro4j/ wro4j Alex Eduardo Nunes wrote: I think that I didn't explain it right. What I want is that wicket concatenate all included javascripts into one file.

flush after /head?

2009-04-09 Thread Ryan McKinley
Is there an easy way to flush after you send the /head tag? http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#flush I don't know if this is premature optimization or just hoping for magic speed up from simple fixes... but it is worth a shot! thanks ryan

debugging a Wicket application running under Jetty-6.1 in Eclipse

2009-04-09 Thread Chenini, Mohamed
Hi, This is about debugging a Wicket application running under Jetty-6.1 in Eclipse. I followed the steps shown at: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Debugging+with+the+Maven+Jetty+Pl ugin+inside+Eclipse But I am getting this exception: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:

Re: debugging a Wicket application running under Jetty-6.1 in Eclipse

2009-04-09 Thread jcgarciam
I'll suggest to do it in the Wicket Way, you will have much more benefits. If you made your project from the QuickStart, you will notice a 'Start' class under your 'test' source. that what it does is just start an embedded jetty pointing to your webapp directory and mounting your application

Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-09 Thread Sam Stainsby
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:41:20 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote: Never *EVER* deploy your application in development mode. Use deployment mode and turn those features you want on. Just curious - does something catastrophic happen? I'm running a testing demo for a client and haven't bothered

Re: Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-09 Thread nick
Thank you for your mail. I am presently on vacation and will return April 14th. If you need urgent assistance, please email supp...@bookingbooster.com. You can also reach our Support via Skype callto://premiersupport Thank you Best regards, Nick Wheeler Booking Booster.com t: +44 (0)1273

Re: Changing form validation depending on submit button.

2009-04-09 Thread Ian MacLarty
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:20 PM, John Krasnay j...@krasnay.ca wrote: Have a look here: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/conditional-validation.html Thanks. That's pretty much what I ended up doing. It seemed a bit kludgy to be doing validation in the onSubmit method. It means I can't put my

Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-09 Thread Martin Voigt
Na, nothing catastrophic will happen, or else you won't be able to development your app using development configuration...HOWEVER...the performance of your app is likely to double when running in deployment mode, some exceptions won't be visible to the user (i think component-in-use-check and

wicket:link behavior changed in 1.4r2

2009-04-09 Thread Mike Comb
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade several sites from 1.4m3 to 1.4r2 and have hit an issue with the AutoLinkResolver. We have lots of html with linked images that look like this: wicket:linka href=SomePage.htmlimg src=/some/full/path/ image.gif //a/wicket:link This used to work fine, but with the

Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-09 Thread Jonathan Locke
Oh, it's MUCH worse than even that. Every single component constructed by your application will get a complete Java stack trace attached to it at the point of construction. Not only does that seriously damage your performance, but this stack trace also takes up space! This is why we warn you

Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-09 Thread Jonathan Locke
Oh, it's MUCH worse than even that. Every single component constructed by your application will get a complete Java stack trace attached to it at the point of construction. Not only does that seriously damage your performance, but this stack trace also takes up space! This is why we warn you

Re: Changing form validation depending on submit button.

2009-04-09 Thread Igor Vaynberg
there is form#onvalidate() -igor On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ian MacLarty ian.macla...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:20 PM, John Krasnay j...@krasnay.ca wrote: Have a look here: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/conditional-validation.html Thanks.  That's pretty much what I

Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-09 Thread Igor Vaynberg
i dont think that is on by default anymore. it made the app too slow even for dev mode :) -igor On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jonathan Locke jonathan.lo...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, it's MUCH worse than even that. Every single component constructed by your application will get a complete Java

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

2009-04-09 Thread Brill Pappin
There is no real easy way, but to do it :) I find the hardest thing about Wicket, particularly when your first starting out, is discarding all the old ideas about how a webapp is built... Having worked in the field for a long time, servlets, JSPs, Struts, etc. it took me a while to get

Re: Package all CSS and JS

2009-04-09 Thread Brill Pappin
Funny, I was thinking that same thing... in one quick app i was writing, I had ~20 header links! I kept thinking that can't be good :) although I have not done so yet, I think there must be a way to modify or create a resource loader that would generate a buffered version of css (for

Re: Package all CSS and JS

2009-04-09 Thread Brill Pappin
Oh nice... exactly what I was thinking... glad I don't have to write it! - Brill Pappin On 9-Apr-09, at 1:26 PM, Roman Zechner wrote: Hi Eduardo! I remember there was once a discussion here on the mailing list, I think part of that was

how to control the required validations before the validation process is started

2009-04-09 Thread srinivas
Hi, I need to control the required validations set on the components dynamically depending on the value of the other element (ex: selecting a radio button should trigger required field validation for some elements). For this I extended the components, and I m dynamically adding or removing