Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket
Inmethod-grid's code is at https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/inmethod-grid-parent AFAIK it doesn't have ARIA support. You can add it and make a Pull Request ;-) On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Brian Mulholland wrote: > Another question. It looks to me like this grid doesn't set any ARIA > stuff. I don't suppose that it is WCAG2 AA comformant, is it? > > Brian Mulholland > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Brian Mulholland > wrote: >> Nevermind, found it at wicketstuff: >> (http://wicketstuff.org/grid-examples for future seekers). >> >> But the demo doesn't have source nearby like other wicketstuff demos. >> Does inmethod grid support remote sorting, or is that sorting I see >> local? In a paged grid, sorting really has to be remote. >> >> Also, what about things like client side validation? Has anyone done >> a Wicket extension that does client validation? >> >> Brian Mulholland >> "A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring >> one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their >> own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the >> mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good >> government." >> --Thomas Jefferson (1801) >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Brian Mulholland >> wrote: >>> I hadn't. I'm a wicket neophyte, so I am often not aware of what is >>> available. I've been poking around on the internet...is there >>> somewhere where this inmethod grid is demoed? I see the inmethod >>> website is not a mobile video streaming site, and I saw a couple >>> static photos of it, but I haven't seen a good demo like one finds >>> with wicketstuff. Is there such a thing? >>> >>> Brian Mulholland >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Warren Bell wrote: Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you are looking for something different? I am just curious. Thanks, Warren On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote: > As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the > jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar. Am I overlooking it? > > Brian Mulholland > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak > wrote: >> I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious >> again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations >> and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always >> just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs, >> and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That >> being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems >> that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an >> Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors >> (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a >> ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done >> it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible. >> >> On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brian Mulholland" >> wrote: >>> We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket. >>> >>> 1) Which is better and why? >>> 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other? >>> 3) Is one more full featured? >>> >>> What differentiates the two? >>> >>> Brian Mulholland >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket
Another question. It looks to me like this grid doesn't set any ARIA stuff. I don't suppose that it is WCAG2 AA comformant, is it? Brian Mulholland On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote: > Nevermind, found it at wicketstuff: > (http://wicketstuff.org/grid-examples for future seekers). > > But the demo doesn't have source nearby like other wicketstuff demos. > Does inmethod grid support remote sorting, or is that sorting I see > local? In a paged grid, sorting really has to be remote. > > Also, what about things like client side validation? Has anyone done > a Wicket extension that does client validation? > > Brian Mulholland > "A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring > one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their > own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the > mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good > government." > --Thomas Jefferson (1801) > > > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Brian Mulholland > wrote: >> I hadn't. I'm a wicket neophyte, so I am often not aware of what is >> available. I've been poking around on the internet...is there >> somewhere where this inmethod grid is demoed? I see the inmethod >> website is not a mobile video streaming site, and I saw a couple >> static photos of it, but I haven't seen a good demo like one finds >> with wicketstuff. Is there such a thing? >> >> Brian Mulholland >> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Warren Bell wrote: >>> Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you >>> are looking for something different? I am just curious. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Warren >>> >>> On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote: As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar. Am I overlooking it? Brian Mulholland On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak wrote: > I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious > again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations > and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always > just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs, > and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That > being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems > that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an > Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors > (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a > ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done > it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible. > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brian Mulholland" > wrote: >> We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket. >> >> 1) Which is better and why? >> 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other? >> 3) Is one more full featured? >> >> What differentiates the two? >> >> Brian Mulholland >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket
Nevermind, found it at wicketstuff: (http://wicketstuff.org/grid-examples for future seekers). But the demo doesn't have source nearby like other wicketstuff demos. Does inmethod grid support remote sorting, or is that sorting I see local? In a paged grid, sorting really has to be remote. Also, what about things like client side validation? Has anyone done a Wicket extension that does client validation? Brian Mulholland "A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government." --Thomas Jefferson (1801) On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote: > I hadn't. I'm a wicket neophyte, so I am often not aware of what is > available. I've been poking around on the internet...is there > somewhere where this inmethod grid is demoed? I see the inmethod > website is not a mobile video streaming site, and I saw a couple > static photos of it, but I haven't seen a good demo like one finds > with wicketstuff. Is there such a thing? > > Brian Mulholland > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Warren Bell wrote: >> Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you >> are looking for something different? I am just curious. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Warren >> >> On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote: >>> As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the >>> jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar. Am I overlooking it? >>> >>> Brian Mulholland >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak >>> wrote: I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs, and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible. On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brian Mulholland" wrote: > We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket. > > 1) Which is better and why? > 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other? > 3) Is one more full featured? > > What differentiates the two? > > Brian Mulholland > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket
I hadn't. I'm a wicket neophyte, so I am often not aware of what is available. I've been poking around on the internet...is there somewhere where this inmethod grid is demoed? I see the inmethod website is not a mobile video streaming site, and I saw a couple static photos of it, but I haven't seen a good demo like one finds with wicketstuff. Is there such a thing? Brian Mulholland On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Warren Bell wrote: > Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you > are looking for something different? I am just curious. > > Thanks, > > Warren > > On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote: >> As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the >> jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar. Am I overlooking it? >> >> Brian Mulholland >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak >> wrote: >>> I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious >>> again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations >>> and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always >>> just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs, >>> and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That >>> being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems >>> that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an >>> Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors >>> (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a >>> ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done >>> it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible. >>> >>> On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brian Mulholland" >>> wrote: We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket. 1) Which is better and why? 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other? 3) Is one more full featured? What differentiates the two? Brian Mulholland - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket
Did you look at [1]? Implementation is not complete (not all the features of grid are implemented) but it could give you some starting point. Regards, Ernesto References, 1-http://wiquery-plugins-demo.appspot.com/demo/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:com.wiquery.plugins.demo.GridPage On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Brian Mulholland wrote: > As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the > jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar. Am I overlooking it? > > Brian Mulholland > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak > wrote: >> I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious >> again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations >> and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always >> just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs, >> and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That >> being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems >> that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an >> Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors >> (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a >> ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done >> it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible. >> >> On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brian Mulholland" >> wrote: >>> We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket. >>> >>> 1) Which is better and why? >>> 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other? >>> 3) Is one more full featured? >>> >>> What differentiates the two? >>> >>> Brian Mulholland >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket
Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you are looking for something different? I am just curious. Thanks, Warren On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote: > As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the > jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar. Am I overlooking it? > > Brian Mulholland > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak > wrote: >> I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious >> again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations >> and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always >> just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs, >> and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That >> being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems >> that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an >> Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors >> (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a >> ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done >> it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible. >> >> On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brian Mulholland" >> wrote: >>> We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket. >>> >>> 1) Which is better and why? >>> 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other? >>> 3) Is one more full featured? >>> >>> What differentiates the two? >>> >>> Brian Mulholland >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket
As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar. Am I overlooking it? Brian Mulholland On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak wrote: > I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious > again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations > and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always > just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs, > and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That > being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems > that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an > Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors > (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a > ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done > it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible. > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brian Mulholland" > wrote: >> We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket. >> >> 1) Which is better and why? >> 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other? >> 3) Is one more full featured? >> >> What differentiates the two? >> >> Brian Mulholland >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket
I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs, and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible. On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brian Mulholland" wrote: > We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket. > > 1) Which is better and why? > 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other? > 3) Is one more full featured? > > What differentiates the two? > > Brian Mulholland > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
