Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket

2011-11-25 Thread Brian Mulholland
I hadn't.  I'm a wicket neophyte, so I am often not aware of what is
available.  I've been poking around on the internet...is there
somewhere where this inmethod grid is demoed?  I see the inmethod
website is not a mobile video streaming site, and I saw a couple
static photos of it, but I haven't seen a good demo like one finds
with wicketstuff.  Is there such a thing?

Brian Mulholland

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Warren Bell warrenbe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you
 are looking for something different? I am just curious.

 Thanks,

 Warren

 On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote:
 As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the
 jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar.  Am I overlooking it?

 Brian Mulholland


 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak
 pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
 I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious
 again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations
 and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
 just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
 and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
 being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
 that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
 Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
 (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a
 ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done
 it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible.

 On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket.

 1) Which is better and why?
 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other?
 3) Is one more full featured?

 What differentiates the two?

 Brian Mulholland

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket

2011-11-25 Thread Brian Mulholland
Nevermind, found it at wicketstuff:
(http://wicketstuff.org/grid-examples  for future seekers).

But the demo doesn't have source nearby like other wicketstuff demos.
Does inmethod grid support remote sorting, or is that sorting I see
local?  In a paged grid, sorting really has to be remote.

Also, what about things like client side validation?  Has anyone done
a Wicket extension that does client validation?

Brian Mulholland
A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring
one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their
own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the
mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good
government.
--Thomas Jefferson (1801)




On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Brian Mulholland
blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 I hadn't.  I'm a wicket neophyte, so I am often not aware of what is
 available.  I've been poking around on the internet...is there
 somewhere where this inmethod grid is demoed?  I see the inmethod
 website is not a mobile video streaming site, and I saw a couple
 static photos of it, but I haven't seen a good demo like one finds
 with wicketstuff.  Is there such a thing?

 Brian Mulholland

 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Warren Bell warrenbe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you
 are looking for something different? I am just curious.

 Thanks,

 Warren

 On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote:
 As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the
 jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar.  Am I overlooking it?

 Brian Mulholland


 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak
 pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
 I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious
 again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations
 and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
 just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
 and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
 being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
 that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
 Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
 (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a
 ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done
 it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible.

 On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket.

 1) Which is better and why?
 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other?
 3) Is one more full featured?

 What differentiates the two?

 Brian Mulholland

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket

2011-11-25 Thread Brian Mulholland
Another question.  It looks to me like this grid doesn't set any ARIA
stuff.  I don't suppose that it is WCAG2 AA comformant, is it?

Brian Mulholland





On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Brian Mulholland
blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 Nevermind, found it at wicketstuff:
 (http://wicketstuff.org/grid-examples  for future seekers).

 But the demo doesn't have source nearby like other wicketstuff demos.
 Does inmethod grid support remote sorting, or is that sorting I see
 local?  In a paged grid, sorting really has to be remote.

 Also, what about things like client side validation?  Has anyone done
 a Wicket extension that does client validation?

 Brian Mulholland
 A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring
 one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their
 own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the
 mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good
 government.
 --Thomas Jefferson (1801)




 On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 I hadn't.  I'm a wicket neophyte, so I am often not aware of what is
 available.  I've been poking around on the internet...is there
 somewhere where this inmethod grid is demoed?  I see the inmethod
 website is not a mobile video streaming site, and I saw a couple
 static photos of it, but I haven't seen a good demo like one finds
 with wicketstuff.  Is there such a thing?

 Brian Mulholland

 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Warren Bell warrenbe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you
 are looking for something different? I am just curious.

 Thanks,

 Warren

 On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote:
 As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the
 jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar.  Am I overlooking it?

 Brian Mulholland


 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak
 pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
 I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious
 again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations
 and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
 just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
 and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
 being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
 that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
 Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
 (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a
 ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done
 it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible.

 On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket.

 1) Which is better and why?
 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other?
 3) Is one more full featured?

 What differentiates the two?

 Brian Mulholland

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket

2011-11-25 Thread Martin Grigorov
Inmethod-grid's code is at
https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/inmethod-grid-parent

AFAIK it doesn't have ARIA support.
You can add it and make a Pull Request ;-)

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Brian Mulholland
blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 Another question.  It looks to me like this grid doesn't set any ARIA
 stuff.  I don't suppose that it is WCAG2 AA comformant, is it?

 Brian Mulholland





 On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 Nevermind, found it at wicketstuff:
 (http://wicketstuff.org/grid-examples  for future seekers).

 But the demo doesn't have source nearby like other wicketstuff demos.
 Does inmethod grid support remote sorting, or is that sorting I see
 local?  In a paged grid, sorting really has to be remote.

 Also, what about things like client side validation?  Has anyone done
 a Wicket extension that does client validation?

 Brian Mulholland
 A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring
 one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their
 own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the
 mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good
 government.
 --Thomas Jefferson (1801)




 On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 I hadn't.  I'm a wicket neophyte, so I am often not aware of what is
 available.  I've been poking around on the internet...is there
 somewhere where this inmethod grid is demoed?  I see the inmethod
 website is not a mobile video streaming site, and I saw a couple
 static photos of it, but I haven't seen a good demo like one finds
 with wicketstuff.  Is there such a thing?

 Brian Mulholland

 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Warren Bell warrenbe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you
 are looking for something different? I am just curious.

 Thanks,

 Warren

 On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote:
 As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the
 jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar.  Am I overlooking it?

 Brian Mulholland


 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak
 pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
 I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious
 again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations
 and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
 just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
 and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
 being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
 that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
 Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
 (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a
 ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done
 it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible.

 On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket.

 1) Which is better and why?
 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other?
 3) Is one more full featured?

 What differentiates the two?

 Brian Mulholland

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket

2011-11-24 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Did you look at [1]? Implementation is not complete (not all the
features of grid are implemented) but it could give you some starting
point.

Regards,

Ernesto

References,

1-http://wiquery-plugins-demo.appspot.com/demo/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:com.wiquery.plugins.demo.GridPage

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Brian Mulholland
blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the
 jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar.  Am I overlooking it?

 Brian Mulholland


 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak
 pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
 I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious
 again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations
 and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
 just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
 and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
 being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
 that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
 Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
 (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a
 ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done
 it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible.

 On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket.

 1) Which is better and why?
 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other?
 3) Is one more full featured?

 What differentiates the two?

 Brian Mulholland

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket

2011-11-23 Thread Pointbreak
I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious
again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations
and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
(i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a
ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done
it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible.

On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, Brian Mulholland
blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket.
 
 1) Which is better and why?
 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other?
 3) Is one more full featured?
 
 What differentiates the two?
 
 Brian Mulholland
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket

2011-11-23 Thread Brian Mulholland
As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the
jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar.  Am I overlooking it?

Brian Mulholland


On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak
pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
 I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious
 again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations
 and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
 just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
 and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
 being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
 that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
 Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
 (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a
 ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done
 it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible.

 On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket.

 1) Which is better and why?
 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other?
 3) Is one more full featured?

 What differentiates the two?

 Brian Mulholland

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: WiQuery vs JQWicket

2011-11-23 Thread Warren Bell
Have you tried the InMethod grid, and if you have is there a reason you
are looking for something different? I am just curious.

Thanks,

Warren

On 11/23/11 8:26 AM, Brian Mulholland wrote:
 As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the
 jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar.  Am I overlooking it?
 
 Brian Mulholland
 
 
 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak
 pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
 I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious
 again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations
 and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
 just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
 and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
 being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
 that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
 Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
 (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a
 ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done
 it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible.

 On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, Brian Mulholland
 blmulholl...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket.

 1) Which is better and why?
 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other?
 3) Is one more full featured?

 What differentiates the two?

 Brian Mulholland

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org