Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Jeremy Kister
On Sunday, October 19, 2003 12:42 AM, Gregory Kuhn wrote: > message_is_looping_/home/vpopmail/domains/ctch.net/gkuhn/Maildir// ah ha! :) this would explain why: grep 'is looping' /var/log/qmail/current bore no fruit :) s/\s+/_/g; sigh. after resolving the PEBKAC error, I do see the entries in

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Tom Collins
On Saturday, October 18, 2003, at 09:31 PM, Michael Bowe wrote: I have opened a tracker [826231] on sourceforge for this bug Can someone try this out on a development machine before I post it to CVS. It seems to make sense to me and it compiles. vdelivermail could definitely use a rewrite in t

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Gregory Kuhn
At 02:31 PM 10/19/2003 +1000, Michael Bowe wrote: I found you can replicate this bug simply by sending yourself a message with a subject like this : test Delivered-To Where is a space char I wonder if this effects all versions of vpopmail, or only the later devel versions I am running vpopmail-5

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Michael Bowe
I found you can replicate this bug simply by sending yourself a message with a subject like this : test Delivered-To Where is a space char I wonder if this effects all versions of vpopmail, or only the later devel versions I am running vpopmail-5.3.28 I have opened a tracker [826231] on sourc

Re: Fw: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread X-Istence
Jeremy Kister wrote: Upon examining the original message that my MTA bounced, I know this is not a coincidence. I trimmed the original message because I thought it was non-relevant, but it clearly is. something in the original message confused some part of my MTA; This _is_ a bug; im just not sure

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Michael Bowe
I received a bounce like this as well I believe this is a bug vdelivermail looks in the message headers for any "Delivered-To" entries. If it sees the same address popping up more than once, then this indicates a loop. I believe that the bug occurred with this particular message because the subj

Fw: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Jeremy Kister
Upon examining the original message that my MTA bounced, I know this is not a coincidence. I trimmed the original message because I thought it was non-relevant, but it clearly is. something in the original message confused some part of my MTA; This _is_ a bug; im just not sure if it's qmail or vp

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread X-Istence
Jeremy Kister wrote: On Saturday, October 18, 2003 11:18 PM, X-Istence wrote: So basically, its on their side, unless something is looping on my side, of which i know nothing. It cannot be on their side; how would their MTA know my maildir is in /home/vpopmail/domains/j

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Gregory Kuhn
At 11:10 PM 10/18/2003 -0400, Jeremy Kister wrote: I received the below bounce from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list tonight, at about 10PM EST. I've kept a list of which messages from the vchkpw mailing list have bounced from your address. Here are the message numbers: 23631 Interestingly I

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Jeremy Kister
On Saturday, October 18, 2003 11:18 PM, X-Istence wrote: > So basically, its on their side, unless something is looping on my side, > of which i know nothing. It cannot be on their side; how would their MTA know my maildir is in /home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister.co/jeremy/ ? they also clearly

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread X-Istence
Jeremy Kister wrote: I received the below bounce from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list tonight, at about 10PM EST. please note i have obfuscated all email addresses slightly. also note that I have been receiving mail fine from vchkpw, and havnt modified my configuration recently. the bounce my s

[vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Jeremy Kister
I received the below bounce from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list tonight, at about 10PM EST. please note i have obfuscated all email addresses slightly. also note that I have been receiving mail fine from vchkpw, and havnt modified my configuration recently. the bounce my system sent was: "us

Re: [vchkpw] Multi domain bounce message handling

2003-10-18 Thread Sigmund Gudvangen
Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 10:05, Sigmund Gudvangen a écrit : > Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 02:50, Tom Collins a écrit : > > On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 05:27 PM, David Bristol wrote: > > > > For debugging purposes, it's best to have the server use it's real > > name. You can adjust that by edi

Re: [vchkpw] Multi domain bounce message handling

2003-10-18 Thread Sigmund Gudvangen
Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 02:50, Tom Collins a écrit : > On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 05:27 PM, David Bristol wrote: > > This may not be the way to go about this, but have you verified that > > both domains are in the qmail/control/locals file? > > Don't put vpopmail domains in control/locals.

Re: [vchkpw] Multi domain bounce message handling

2003-10-18 Thread Jochen Schug
Tom Collins wrote: On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 05:27 PM, David Bristol wrote: This may not be the way to go about this, but have you verified that both domains are in the qmail/control/locals file? Don't put vpopmail domains in control/locals. You'll mess things up. There isn't a known s