RE: [vchkpw] roamer's patches
Sorry so this patch just stops removal of vlog records? Because you don't actually make that very clear. -Original Message- From: Rick Widmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 24 November 2006 3:14 p.m. To: A list for the discussion of ongoing vpopmail development.; vpopmail list Subject: [vchkpw] roamer's patches In looking at the qmail control file sort limit problem, and roamer's solution in particular I've found that he has provided a number of patches that should be applied. Two of them are related, and change the behavior of vpopmail. [1573275] An option to remove deleted users/domains from vlog. In vpopmail 5.4.17, a new feature was introduced - when a virtual user or domain is deleted, also delete the relevant entries from the SQL log file. However, there are cases when this might not be such a good thing, and IMHO it should not really be the default behavior. Various reasons to preserve history come to mind - security audits, forensic analysis, plain old reports... So here's a patch against the 5.4.17 source that adds a new configure option, --enable-sql-remove-deleted, and a couple of ifdef's around the places in the code where the actual entries are deleted from the vlog table. Note that this will change the out-of-the-box behavior of vpopmail - removing the log entries is now disabled by default - thus reverting to the pre-5.4.17 behavior of keeping history intact. [ 1573285 ] Fix removing log entries for deleted users in vpgsql.c Here's a patch, from the FreeBSD port of 5.4.17, to actually make vpgsql.c compile - the changes to make it remove log entries for deleted users and domains had a misspelled name of a variable and of a PostgreSQL routine. This patch is actually meant to be applied after the --enable-sql-remove-deleted patch (SourceForge #1573275), but it should be trivial to fish out the misspellings even if y'all decide not to make this removal configurable. Since its a fix to the pgsql module, the second one should definitely go in. I'm not so sure about the first since it changes program behavior. Should I merge them both? Rick
RE: [vchkpw] vpopmaild patch
Let me be the first to say WTF? Is it just me or is this English so bad it makes no sense to you either? -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dmitriy MiksIr Sent: Saturday, 10 June 2006 4:08 a.m. To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmaild patch Hi! VpopmailD - is very useful for many function. May be in future mail will be delivered via this daemon too =)) I write check_user patch for vpopmaild (as source of ideas was used chkuser of Antonio Nati). Also i rewrite a little access levels systems, for centralized access control... and help command for show only available for current access level commands. This batch seems work, but not tested very careful - any suggestions will be welcome. After weekends i will try to add command for check quotas.
[vchkpw] shared calenders
does anyone know of anyway to implement shared calenders in vpopmail or something simlair like kolab does?
Re: [vchkpw] shared calenders
well mcal from what i can see does not have any outlook plugins as of yet - Original Message - From: Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 9:42 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] shared calenders On Wednesday 16 November 2005 12:30 pm, VeNoMouS wrote: does anyone know of anyway to implement shared calenders in vpopmail or something simlair like kolab does? that's not really vpopmail's job. Your imap server might support special folders where you can place contacts, but that isn't really vpopmail implementing anything. Kolab also does not use imap for its calendar stuff, that's all done via its own protocol and requires MUA plugins or integration. of course, the real question is why aren't you using MCAL :) -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob.
Re: [vchkpw] Interesting Problem
maybe take out 127.0.0.1 and put in your external ip in the vmysql.h. perhaps you dont have the localhost in hosts for root in your mysql user table - Original Message - From: Ryan Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:07 AM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Interesting Problem Thanks. I did/do search the archives, but couldn't find any/that info. That helped, I thought I had the newest version of vpopmail, but looks like I didn't. That will teach me to check inter7's website for the source...yeesh. OK, I am in the process of upgrading and recompiling everything, but I get this error in the maillog and no one can receive e-mail. I have it before whenI tried to re-install vpopmail. Oct 27 15:03:17 blasted qmail: 1067284997.969826 delivery 102: deferral: could_not_connect_to_mysql_update_server_Access_denied_for_user:_'[EMAIL PROTECTED] ocalhost'_(Using_password:_YES)_with_database/could_not_connect_to_mysql _update_server_Access_denied_for_user:_'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'_(Using_password: _YES)/ Nothing has changed with mysql, it works fine. I get this just after I upgrade vpopmail. Any ideas? Thanks. Ryan. -Original Message- From: J. Kendzorra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Interesting Problem Ryan Burton: at all.etc.I have three domains setup and it seems that if there is an email address with 6 characters or less in the e-mail address before the @, it will cause issues or wont work at all. If there are 7 characters or more, everything seems to work fine. That sounds very similar to http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=vchkpwm=106721117107731w=2 If in fact it is, you could maybe try searching the archives next time. It helps.
Re: [vchkpw] qmail/vpopmail: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.)
did you run tcprules?? - Original Message - From: Sigmund Gudvangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:41 AM Subject: [vchkpw] qmail/vpopmail: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.) Hi, I have just done a fresh install of qmail and vpopmail, on Mandrake 9.1, following Dave Sill, http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html for the qmail installation. qmail is running fine; i.e. all four daemons are running and inst_check reports that all is well. I also managed to install vpopmail and add domains and users. Booth messages injected locally (using qmail-inject) and incomming messages via smtp (from KMail on another machine) duely arrive in the appropriate Maildir/new. However, when I attempt to send to an extern email-address (from KMail) qmail responds with the error message: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.). OK, the messaage is from qmail, but I think it is related to vpopmail, as I also have qmail (without vpopmail) running on another PC, and on with that machine I have no problems sending to external addresses. I installed vpopmail as follows: ./configure --enable-file-sync=y --enable-roaming-users=y make make install-strip and put 10.0.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT 192.168.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT into /etc/tcp.smtp and added 40 * * * * /home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp 21 /dev/null to crontab. The last response to [vchkpw] smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1) i.e http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14771.html suggest putting 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT into /etc/tcp.smtp I have also tried that, but it didn't make any difference. Booth the above response and the vpopmail install instructions mention /etc/tcp.smtp, but I can find anything about /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp What's the latter for? Any ideas what's wrong? Regards Sigmund. In case it helps, here is the output from /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl: qmail home directory: /var/qmail. user-ext delimiter: -. paternalism (in decimal): 2. silent concurrency limit: 120. subdirectory split: 23. user ids: 502, 504, 505, 0, 506, 507, 508, 509. group ids: 502, 503. badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed. bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON. bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is mydomain.net. concurrencylocal: (Default.) Local concurrency is 10. concurrencyremote: Remote concurrency is 20. databytes: (Default.) SMTP DATA limit is 0 bytes. defaultdomain: Default domain name is mydomain.net. defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is mydomain.net. doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: mydomain.net. doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster. envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is mydomain.net. helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is mydomain.net. idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is mydomain.net. localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes mydomain.net. locals: me: My name is mydomain.net. percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed. plusdomain: Plus domain name is mydomain.net. qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers. queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is 604800 seconds. rcpthosts: SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at mydomain.net. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at amotherdomain.net. morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect. morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect. smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220 mydomain.net. smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes. timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout is 60 seconds. timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds. timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200 seconds. virtualdomains: Virtual domain: mydomain.net:mydomain.net Virtual domain: anotherdomain.net:anotherdomain.net concurrencyincoming: I have no idea what this file does. rcpthosts.lock: I have no idea what this file does. defaultdelivery: I have no idea what this file does. virtualdomains.lock: I have no idea what this file does.
Re: [vchkpw] Re: smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1)
qmail replys with 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1) not relay. - Original Message - From: Michael Bowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:15 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1) I searched the sources of qmail and vpopmail, and that error does not appear anywhere. Are you sure that is the exact error that you are receiving? If so, then what other patches are you running on your qmail/vpopmail installation? Michael. - Original Message - From: songrit [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:00 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1) this account can send before. that no problem. when i have many domain this have problem again. - Original Message - From: Peter Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: songrit in vpop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:18 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Re: smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1) Hello Songrit, On Wednesday, October 8, 2003 at 9:25:04 PM you wrote (at least in part): i use hotmail send email to my qmail server my server return message smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1) when i delete domain and add this domain again. my server can recieve normal. what happend ? You misconfigured something. -- Best regards Peter Palmreuther All taglines are currently busy, one will be with you shortly.
Re: [vchkpw] Can I integrate vpopmail with windows domain?
ldap? - Original Message - From: Adalberto da Silva Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:24 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Can I integrate vpopmail with windows domain? Hi Folks, Any of you knows if I can autenticate my vpopmail users in a windows 2000 domain? I need implement single logon in my network. If any of you help I'll thanks. []'s Adalberto. --
Re: [vchkpw] UPGRADE to MD5 encryption
it should, as the md5 holds a salt and it also defines as being MD5 with $1 in the front then $2 for the salt then $ for the rest of the md5 hash, if there isnt any detection in the src it should be added, im to hashed from last nite partying to go over the code, some 1 else do it... k thnx bye - Original Message - From: Mike Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:14 AM Subject: [vchkpw] UPGRADE to MD5 encryption Wondering if someone can answer this for me. I've got maybe 100 domains thus yet using crypt() encryption for passwords, as well as storing clear text [for CRAM-MD5 encryption requiring the password]. If I just install VPOPMAIL with MD5 support, will it detect which domains are crypt and which are MD5? Some of my domains don't have clear text passwords because they haven't changed them since before I started saving them. Will a simple upgrade make all new passwords MD5 and existing passwords crypt for a slow migration? as passwords get updated? I want to be able to use both at the same time. Thoughts? -Mike _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail
what is the actal problem again, as we fixed so many for you. - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail resending this. i think this got drowned in the flood of other mails. can some one help me on this pl. i appreciate it. -B --- Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: domain: ojoobala.com uid:89 gid:89 dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/ojoobala.com users: 3 --- Shane Chrisp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you type vdominfo ojoobala.com what output does it show for dir? -Original Message- From: Balaji NJL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2003 11:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail yes it does hv Maildir under /home/vpopmail/domains/ojoobala.com/balaji the permissions are vpopmail/vchkpw. Maildir has the following dir cur, new and tmp. it also contains sqweb configuration details. All the directories hv 700. i feel vpop is looking for Maildir under /home/balaji/Maildir but not under /home/vpopmail/domains/balaji/maildir. How to check where its looking for the maildir. Sqwebmail is working fine. it authenticates me correctly and i am able to send and receive mail. -B --- Shane Chrisp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user should have a maildir under ~/vpopmail/domains/ojoobala.com/myname/ and it should be owned vpopmail.vchkpw with permissions 700. Check that this is the case. Shane -Original Message- From: Balaji NJL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 8 September 2003 12:53 PM To: Tom Collins; vpopmail list Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail i did that. now i am getting [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] both delivered to my ojoobala.com account. i am able to check the mails using sqwebmail. but i am still unable to check it via outlook express by POP. this is the error i am getting There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected. Account: '192.168.0.3', Server: '192.168.0.3', Protocol: POP3, Server Response: '-ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir', Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92 i also tried this on my mailserver directly telnet localhost 110 user [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass x -ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir this is true because this is a virtual user and this user doesnt hv Maildir. Any ideas whats happening...thanks, -B --- Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you mean... ./vdeldomain mail.ojoobala.com and ./vadddomain ojoobala.com and ./vaddaliasdomain mail.ojoobala.com ojoobala.com Would this also solve my POP access problem. thanks, -B --- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 08:08 AM, Balaji NJL wrote: i think the reason why it happens is that vopomail doesnt know anything about ojoobala.com. i compiled ./vadddomain as mail.ojoobala.com. the only domain i see under home/vpopmail/domain is mail.ojoobala.com but no ojoobala.com. vaddaliasdomain ojoobala.com mail.ojoobala.com You might want to actually delete mail.ojoobala.com, add ojoobala.com as the domain, and re-create mail.ojoobala.com as the alias. Make sure mail.ojoobala.com and ojoobala.com don't appear in control/locals, but do appear in control/rcpthosts, control/virtualdomains and users/assign. -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? === message truncated === __ Do
Re: [vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin)
*WANK WANK* is this really nessicary for the public fourm?? shouldnt this be handled with personal email rather then pulling us all into it?? - Original Message - From: Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:27 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin) Robert Kropiewnicki writes: I've spoken definitively to no such thing. What Ken Jones will do now that he has been granted admin access (bravo Tom!) is not at the core of my argument. My argument is that he has done enough in the past for vpopmail development to warrant his inclusion as an admin. I disagree with you there. What Ken did in the past prior to the last six months is sufficient to get him many mentions and many praises. And if he had continued doing the same in the past six months then he would still be project leader. It is those past six months, and the responses from Inter 7 in the past few days, which are critical. I give you a preview of the next UK Olympics Selection Committee meeting... A: who are we going to select for the 1500 metres? B: I suggest Roger Bannister. He was the first person to run the mile in under 4 minutes. He has a proven track record. C: *groan* Bad pun! D: I want to know how he has performed recently. Surely that is important. B: It doesn't matter how he has performed recently. What matters is that he used to be the best! E: Do any of you bozos know that Roger Bannister is DEAD? B: That doesn't matter. What matters is that he once broke an important world record. Therefore we should select him. Many of the projects I spoke about in terms of personal experience had more to do with internal infrastructure projects. Actually, it was projects for external paying clients that would often be the reason they were put on hold. With any business, the needs of the paying clients come first. You said it. With Inter 7, as long as people keep paying them to install vpopmail BECAUSE they have their name on the project, their motivation in times of difficulty will be to divert resources to paying clients and let vpopmail development go unattended for six months. In fact they DID let vpopmail development go unattended for six months and only paid attention to it once more when it appeared that the Inter 7 name would no longer be listed as its developer. If it takes that to motivate them into paying attention to this list then they are NOT good candidates for an admin position. Because if they can delete the other admins then we return to a situation where vpopmail development is a lower priority than Inter 7's paying customers and can be neglected for half a year at a time. For the most part I can agree with this argument. If Ken were going to have complete and total administrative control again to the exclusion of Tom, I would completely agree with this argument. As I understand Tom's assessment of things, if Ken has equal powers to Tom then Ken can kick Tom out. As I understand the mail from the Cat, that is something I consider to have a significant probability of happening. However, as it stands right now, Ken and Tom are both listed as administrators Can one administrator delete the other administrators? Can one administrator copy the whole CVS tree then delete it? As I understand it, Tom's only defence against a sneak attack of that nature is to maintain his own local CVS tree (which is a pain). Would Inter 7 do anything like that to re-assert the brand ownership of vpopmail so that they continue to be the first port of call for people who have problems and are willing to pay for answers? I don't know. But after the Cat's catty mail and Ken's equivocating mail I cannot deny the possibility. That may be grossly unfair to Inter 7, but they are the ones who control what they did and what they wrote, not I. If what they did and wrote causes me, and many others, to distrust them then that is their fault. If I needed urgent support, so urgent that paying an outside consultant were warranted, then Tom would be top of my list and Inter 7 would be the very bottom, just below the option of selling my soul to the devil for an answer. The position of Inter 7 on my list is absolutely nothing to do with anything that Tom has done and everything to do with what Inter 7 have failed to do for six months and have done for the past few days. As a user of vpopmail, I am no longer happy with an Inter 7 involvement of any kind. -- Paul Allen Softflare Support
Re: [vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin)
dude get a fucking hint, WE DONT CARE ABOUT THIS BS IN THE PUBLIC FORUM! - Original Message - From: Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:47 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin) Hello Rick Rick Macdougall writes: I think Tom and Ken have resolved their issues off list So it appears. Ken has not resolved my issue with his involvement with vpopmail. and we We??? Do you claim to speak for everyone on the list? Surely not because at best you can speak for everyone on the list EXCEPT me. And I suspect there may be one or two others you do not speak for either. would appreciate it if you did the same. Gosh, wouldn't it have been a good idea if you wanted to avoid unnecessary traffic on the list if you had mailed me DIRECTLY instead of posting to the list? If you want to make your point ON the list then you have to allow me to respond there. Well, whether you allow me or not, that's what I'm gonna do. If you want to discuss this by mail then feel free to take it there. If you want to rebuke me on the list, however nicely, then expect me to respond there. As I explained to somebody else today, all you get to control is what you read and write and where you post it. You do not get to control what I read and write and where I post that. Any attempt to claim the moral high ground about unnecessary traffic to the list which is POSTED TO THE LIST will get the rebuke it deserves ON the list. If Tom or Ken has an issue, it may belong on the list, if you personally have an issue with Inter7 and/or Tom it does not. I disagree with your statement, for which you have provided no backing. If I disagree with Ken being an admin and can provide a compelling argument for my belief then that DOES belong on the list. I believe I have provided grounds why Ken is not a suitable choice for an admin. Perhaps you would care to provide some reasoning, however slender, why I should not take issue with Ken here. Thank you in advance for your understanding. You are ever the optimist... -- Paul Allen Softflare Support
[vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin)
in short, YES, because how is it related to what any one here reads, as far as ive seen this has been a post a q and answer forum, not hi im gonna state my fucking opinion on what ever the fuck i feel like, who died and made you ceo of inter7? as i said before, take it to personal emails and leave us the fuck out of your bitching. EOF. - Original Message - From: Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:24 PM Subject: Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin) VeNoMouS writes: [A load of crap] So you quote the WHOLE of my mail to lecture me about wasting bandwidth and brainwidth in the mailing list and post it to the mailing list. Please find a dictionary and look up the meaning of the folliwing words: hypocrite and moron. -- Paul Allen Softflare Support
Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail
then why are you trying to login as a virtual user - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:35 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail i am able to check the mails using sqwebmail. but i am still unable to check it via outlook express by POP. this is the error i am getting There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected. Account: '192.168.0.3', Server: '192.168.0.3', Protocol: POP3, Server Response: '-ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir', Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92 i also tried this on my mailserver directly telnet localhost 110 user [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass x -ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir this is true because this is a virtual user and this user doesnt hv Maildir. thanks --- VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what is the actal problem again, as we fixed so many for you. - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail resending this. i think this got drowned in the flood of other mails. can some one help me on this pl. i appreciate it. -B --- Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: domain: ojoobala.com uid:89 gid:89 dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/ojoobala.com users: 3 --- Shane Chrisp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you type vdominfo ojoobala.com what output does it show for dir? -Original Message- From: Balaji NJL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2003 11:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail yes it does hv Maildir under /home/vpopmail/domains/ojoobala.com/balaji the permissions are vpopmail/vchkpw. Maildir has the following dir cur, new and tmp. it also contains sqweb configuration details. All the directories hv 700. i feel vpop is looking for Maildir under /home/balaji/Maildir but not under /home/vpopmail/domains/balaji/maildir. How to check where its looking for the maildir. Sqwebmail is working fine. it authenticates me correctly and i am able to send and receive mail. -B --- Shane Chrisp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user should have a maildir under ~/vpopmail/domains/ojoobala.com/myname/ and it should be owned vpopmail.vchkpw with permissions 700. Check that this is the case. Shane -Original Message- From: Balaji NJL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 8 September 2003 12:53 PM To: Tom Collins; vpopmail list Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail i did that. now i am getting [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] both delivered to my ojoobala.com account. i am able to check the mails using sqwebmail. but i am still unable to check it via outlook express by POP. this is the error i am getting There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected. Account: '192.168.0.3', Server: '192.168.0.3', Protocol: POP3, Server Response: '-ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir', Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92 i also tried this on my mailserver directly telnet localhost 110 user [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass x -ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir this is true because this is a virtual user and this user doesnt hv Maildir. Any ideas whats happening...thanks, -B --- Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you mean... ./vdeldomain mail.ojoobala.com and ./vadddomain ojoobala.com and ./vaddaliasdomain mail.ojoobala.com ojoobala.com Would this also solve my POP access problem. thanks, -B --- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 08:08 AM, Balaji NJL wrote: i think the reason why it happens is that vopomail doesnt know anything about ojoobala.com. i compiled ./vadddomain as mail.ojoobala.com. the only domain i see under home/vpopmail/domain
Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail
man stop sending 3 times to the mailing list. can you even telnet 0 25 do u even have tcpserver running for your smtp? - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail When i remove ojoobala.com from locals and then send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i get the following error in my logs delivery 22: deferral: sorry, _I_ wasnt able to establish an SMTP connection #4.4.1 thanks, -B --- VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ive checked your mx its fine, what do your logs say when u send yourself an email?? - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail Actually ny setup is slightly different. i hv a single static IP address that points to my firewall and my webserver and mail server are behind a firewall. i am doing a port forward to my servers. The physical name of my mail server machine is mail.ojoobala.com. my mx and all other alias point to same external IP address. Would adding ojoobala.com as my virtual address in vpopmail would help. i would like to receive mails to both mail.ojoobala.com and ojoobala.com. thanks a lot, -B --- Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Balaji, As an aside .. check your DNS records for both oojoobala.com mail.oojoobala.com!!! Neither resolve properly .. Cheers! Chris. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail
oh yea u do, maybe your router is just shit and it dont understand the return external route if ure comming from yourself - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail When i remove ojoobala.com from locals and then send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i get the following error in my logs delivery 22: deferral: sorry, _I_ wasnt able to establish an SMTP connection #4.4.1 thanks, -B --- VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ive checked your mx its fine, what do your logs say when u send yourself an email?? - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail Actually ny setup is slightly different. i hv a single static IP address that points to my firewall and my webserver and mail server are behind a firewall. i am doing a port forward to my servers. The physical name of my mail server machine is mail.ojoobala.com. my mx and all other alias point to same external IP address. Would adding ojoobala.com as my virtual address in vpopmail would help. i would like to receive mails to both mail.ojoobala.com and ojoobala.com. thanks a lot, -B --- Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Balaji, As an aside .. check your DNS records for both oojoobala.com mail.oojoobala.com!!! Neither resolve properly .. Cheers! Chris. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail
wats in your /var/qmail/users/assign file - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:08 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail to avoid router issues, i am doing this on the mail server telnet localhost 110 user [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass ERR $Home/Mailbox doesnt exist for this user. Connection closed by remote host. It successfuly authenticates [EMAIL PROTECTED] but rejects the user because the user doesnt hv Mailbox. this is true because this is a virtual user. i am only able to access mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thru sqwebmail but not thru Outlook express - POP. then i tried telnet localhost 110 user [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass ERR authentication failed. Connection closed by remote host. i think the reason why it happens is that vopomail doesnt know anything about ojoobala.com. i compiled ./vadddomain as mail.ojoobala.com. the only domain i see under home/vpopmail/domain is mail.ojoobala.com but no ojoobala.com. thanks, -B --- VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes and as i said to you, your router prob dont understand how to return the to the internel ip once passing to the externel, telnet to mail.oobala.com on 110 , tell me if it connects , if it dont telnet to the internal ip of your mail server and if it connects, and if your got your pop3 to your external host, well then change it to your internal in outlook because your router dont understand how to do the return route from internal to external to internal again. anyway give it a try and let me know - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 6:23 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail i am not sending messages 3 times. i did check the mail thread i hv only one posting. i think the issue is not whether my SMTP is running. i am having issue with accessing my virtual domain - mail.ojoobala.com and local domain using POP (Outlook express) Chris did send me couple of messages to my new eamil address earlier and i got them all. -B --- VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: man stop sending 3 times to the mailing list. can you even telnet 0 25 do u even have tcpserver running for your smtp? - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail When i remove ojoobala.com from locals and then send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i get the following error in my logs delivery 22: deferral: sorry, _I_ wasnt able to establish an SMTP connection #4.4.1 thanks, -B --- VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ive checked your mx its fine, what do your logs say when u send yourself an email?? - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail Actually ny setup is slightly different. i hv a single static IP address that points to my firewall and my webserver and mail server are behind a firewall. i am doing a port forward to my servers. The physical name of my mail server machine is mail.ojoobala.com. my mx and all other alias point to same external IP address. Would adding ojoobala.com as my virtual address in vpopmail would help. i would like to receive mails to both mail.ojoobala.com and ojoobala.com. thanks a lot, -B --- Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Balaji, As an aside .. check your DNS records for both oojoobala.com mail.oojoobala.com!!! Neither resolve properly .. Cheers! Chris. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail
ive checked your mx its fine, what do your logs say when u send yourself an email?? - Original Message - From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail Actually ny setup is slightly different. i hv a single static IP address that points to my firewall and my webserver and mail server are behind a firewall. i am doing a port forward to my servers. The physical name of my mail server machine is mail.ojoobala.com. my mx and all other alias point to same external IP address. Would adding ojoobala.com as my virtual address in vpopmail would help. i would like to receive mails to both mail.ojoobala.com and ojoobala.com. thanks a lot, -B --- Chris Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Balaji, As an aside .. check your DNS records for both oojoobala.com mail.oojoobala.com!!! Neither resolve properly .. Cheers! Chris. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail
something else as well, you put ojoobala.com into locals, from my understanding with vpopmail this is a no no dont it bypass vpopmail and try to develier to local users on this???, when using vpopmail leave locals blank. - Original Message - From: Shane Chrisp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 5:23 AM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail Err, typo, get rid of the extra 0 110.. #!/bin/sh VPOPMAILUID=`id -u vpopmail` VPOPMAILGID=`id -g vpopmail` exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l 0 \ -u$VPOPMAILUID -g$VPOPMAILGID 0 110 \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \ mail.oojoobala.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 Shane -Original Message- From: Shane Chrisp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 3 September 2003 1:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail Hi Balaji, It doesn't look like you have your popd server running as the vpopmail user. Try: #!/bin/sh VPOPMAILUID=`id -u vpopmail` VPOPMAILGID=`id -g vpopmail` exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l 0 \ -u$VPOPMAILUID -g$VPOPMAILGID 0 110 0 110 \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \ mail.oojoobala.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 Check that the home dir's have been created with the correct permissions of vpopmail:vchkpw as well. Regarding your other issue, you can use valiasdomain to link the 2 domains together, however, it is more common to setup your domain name as only the domain part. As long as you MX records are correct, the email will send the mail to that system. eg: for Bind ojoobala.com. IN MX 10 mail.ojoobala.com. tells the internet to send any mail for ojoobala.com to the host mail.ojoobala.com. Hope this helps. Shane -Original Message- From: Balaji NJL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 3 September 2003 1:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with vpopmail Hi All, At last third time seemed to be lucky for me. i was able to install qmail. this time i followed the steps described in this page http://hibrida.interaksi.web.id/man/qmail/step-dnata.html#QMAIL and i literally did a cut and paste of all commands. My qmail-smtpd is working fine, vpopmail, qmailadmin, sqwebmail is also working fine. i am able to send and receive mails. i am facing few issues. this is my setup. My mail server name is mail.ojoobala.com and i want to receive mails for ojoobala.com too. So i added both of them in rcpthosts file and added ojoobala.com in locals file. rcpthosts mail.ojoobala.com ojoobala.com locals ojoobala.com i configured vpopmail as ./vadddomain mail.ojoobala.com So when i send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it goes into directory /home/vpopmail/mail.ojoobala.com/name/current. And when i send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it goes into /home/name/Mailbox. Due to this i am only able to access [EMAIL PROTECTED] via sqwebmail. sqwebmail doesnt even authenticate [EMAIL PROTECTED] it just authenticates [EMAIL PROTECTED] i want to access both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] via sqwebmail. How can do this. Secondly i am unable to access my mails using POP outlook express (Dont scream, pl). when i configure Outlook using [EMAIL PROTECTED] the error message that i am getting is '$home/Mailbox' doesnt exist. But when i try with [EMAIL PROTECTED] it fails in authentication. my pop3 run script is exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l 0 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \ mail.oojoobala.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 How can i acess my both accounts [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] using POP. thanks a lot, -Balaji __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Re: [vchkpw] postgres
erm 5.3.24?? the latest dev is 5.3.23, and when you --enable-postgres=y, vauth.c symlinks to voracle.c not vpgsql.c - Original Message - From: Tom Collins To: vpopmail list Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:52 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] postgres On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 02:00 PM, VeNoMouS wrote: has any one actally been able to get vpopmail to work with postgresql yet?Charles Boening contributed a few postgresql patches for the 5.3.24 release, and I'm assuming that at the very least he has been able to use it.--Tom Collins[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester
Re: [vchkpw] postgres
you are indeed correct just read the changelog. Charles Boening- Update configure.in to work for pgsql compiles.- Add --enable-pgsql-logging configure option.- Add vauth_crypt() to vpgsql.c. cheers - Original Message - From: Tom Collins To: vpopmail list Cc: Ken Jones Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] postgres On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 04:15 PM, VeNoMouS wrote: erm 5.3.24?? the latest dev is 5.3.23, and when you --enable-postgres=y, vauth.c symlinks to voracle.c not vpgsql.cThe latest is 5.3.24 and includes a patch to fix that.http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail/Hopefully Ken will update the Inter7 site soon to avoid future confusion related to new releases.--Tom Collins[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester
[vchkpw] postgres
has any one actally been able to get vpopmail to work with postgresql yet?
