[vchkpw] What's wrong with my vdelivermail
Hello, Sorry to bother you, but I'm near-scratching my lastest hairs ... Actually, I have a Qmail + Vpopmail server which *seems* to go very well, except when a user is inexistant. For exemple, when trying to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], if foobar isn't a user for domain foo, the mail must be bounced or delete (depends on the choice in .qmail-default), right ? Ok, here, vdelivermail is holding (indefinitely) and not bouncing nor anything (if at least it could die !). So, the number of qmail-local processes increase ... I have a very easy .qmail-default file : | /var/lib/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' delete I tried it with and without trailing cr. I must add I've moved this machine from 2.4 to 2.6 (probably a clue). Declared mailboxes are delivered. Any clue on what's happening ? Julien (and his few last hairs) !DSPAM:4819e2cf120501966374183!
Re: [vchkpw] What's wrong with my vdelivermail
Shane Chrisp a écrit : On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 17:33 +0200, Julien Escario wrote: Hello, Sorry to bother you, but I'm near-scratching my lastest hairs ... Actually, I have a Qmail + Vpopmail server which *seems* to go very well, except when a user is inexistant. For exemple, when trying to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], if foobar isn't a user for domain foo, the mail must be bounced or delete (depends on the choice in .qmail-default), right ? Ok, here, vdelivermail is holding (indefinitely) and not bouncing nor anything (if at least it could die !). So, the number of qmail-local processes increase ... I have a very easy .qmail-default file : | /var/lib/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' delete I tried it with and without trailing cr. I must add I've moved this machine from 2.4 to 2.6 (probably a clue). Declared mailboxes are delivered. Any clue on what's happening ? Julien (and his few last hairs) What is showing in your logs? Thanks for your answer. I think it's my bigger problem : I have very few logs and I don't know to get more verbosity without recompiling the whole vpopmail. Actually, I have something like this : @4000481a14ac35d2f41c starting delivery 812: msg 180014 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] @4000481a14ac35d31744 status: local 9/10 remote 14/20 And no did after, nothing concerning delivery 812. I was thinking to problem running qmail-queue : myserver:/var/log/qmail-send# ls -lha /usr/sbin/qmail-queue -rwsr-xr-x 1 qmailq qmail 8.5K Aug 18 2004 /usr/sbin/qmail-queue setuid, is it right ? AFAIK, after vdelivermail is called, nothing has to be done just redirect the mail to /dev/null. No really, I don't have any more idea. Thanks for your help, Julien !DSPAM:481a1694120503574260461!
Re: [vchkpw] what's wrong?
El mar, 03-02-2004 a las 07:46, -0700, Tom Collins escribió: On Feb 3, 2004, at 5:59 AM, Alejandro Ortega Páez wrote: I've just updated my vpopmail to new 5.4.0. I always install every new version you release. But from 25.4.0-preX I have noticed authentication with cram-md5 passwords fails. I hoped that installing the fresh stable 5.4.0 all this issue would leave apart, but it still continue. 5.4.0 ChangeLog: Tom Collins IF USING SMTP AUTH PATCH TO QMAIL-SMTPD * This release of vpopmail includes fixes for vchkpw that may break certain SMTP AUTH implementations. If SMTP AUTH fails after installing vpopmail 5.4.x, you may need to use the qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2 patch included in the contrib directory. * If you do switch to the 0.4.2 SMTP AUTH patch, you may need to update your qmail-smtpd run file (the first parameter to qmail-smtpd should now be the path to vchkpw and not the hostname). Oh, oh... thank you... indeed. I always update my vpopmail with so a complete safety, than I never read README, CHANGELOG or more files like these. Very sorry for this. Well, but... I have applied again auth patch and now it's impossible to get that qmail remakes right. Errors and more errors are the only thing I get. I used before this patch (and many others that it's used to be usual to install), and I don't know whether qmail code is a mere mess of patches now. So I'm not a programmer or a code hacker, I will have to resign myself to use vpopmail 5.4.0pre2 version... Moreover there is a thing you said that disappoints me: [...] the first parameter to qmail-smtpd should now be the path to vchkpw and not the hostname. What's does it mean? Must I write the run command this way: /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw myhost.com /bin/true 21? I pledge your pardon for my every time more forgotten English. And of course, I repeat my thanks, Tom. Alejandro Ortega
Re: [vchkpw] what's wrong?
Hi, At 19:37 04.02.04 +0100, you wrote: El mar, 03-02-2004 a las 07:46, -0700, Tom Collins escribió: On Feb 3, 2004, at 5:59 AM, Alejandro Ortega Páez wrote: I've just updated my vpopmail to new 5.4.0. I always install every new version you release. But from 25.4.0-preX I have noticed authentication with cram-md5 passwords fails. I hoped that installing the fresh stable 5.4.0 all this issue would leave apart, but it still continue. 5.4.0 ChangeLog: Tom Collins IF USING SMTP AUTH PATCH TO QMAIL-SMTPD * This release of vpopmail includes fixes for vchkpw that may break certain SMTP AUTH implementations. If SMTP AUTH fails after installing vpopmail 5.4.x, you may need to use the qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2 patch included in the contrib directory. * If you do switch to the 0.4.2 SMTP AUTH patch, you may need to update your qmail-smtpd run file (the first parameter to qmail-smtpd should now be the path to vchkpw and not the hostname). Oh, oh... thank you... indeed. I always update my vpopmail with so a complete safety, than I never read README, CHANGELOG or more files like these. Very sorry for this. Well, but... I have applied again auth patch and now it's impossible to get that qmail remakes right. Errors and more errors are the only thing I get. I used before this patch (and many others that it's used to be usual to install), and I don't know whether qmail code is a mere mess of patches now. So I'm not a programmer or a code hacker, I will have to resign myself to use vpopmail 5.4.0pre2 version... Moreover there is a thing you said that disappoints me: [...] the first parameter to qmail-smtpd should now be the path to vchkpw and not the hostname. What's does it mean? Must I write the run command this way: /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw myhost.com /bin/true 21? I pledge your pardon for my every time more forgotten English. And of course, I repeat my thanks, Tom. Alejandro, pls read: http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html regards. --eh. Alejandro Ortega Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de/ Wiener Weg 8, 50858 Cologne | T: +49 221 484 4923 | F: ...24
Re: [vchkpw] what's wrong?
El mié, 04-02-2004 a las 21:01, +, Erwin Hoffmann escribió: Hi, Hi, Well, but... I have applied again auth patch and now it's impossible to get that qmail remakes right. Errors and more errors are the only thing I get. I used before this patch (and many others that it's used to be usual to install), and I don't know whether qmail code is a mere mess of patches now. So I'm not a programmer or a code hacker, I will have to resign myself to use vpopmail 5.4.0pre2 version... Moreover there is a thing you said that disappoints me: [...] the first parameter to qmail-smtpd should now be the path to vchkpw and not the hostname. What's does it mean? Must I write the run command this way: /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw myhost.com /bin/true 21? I pledge your pardon for my every time more forgotten English. And of course, I repeat my thanks, Tom. Alejandro, pls read: http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html regards. --eh. Good. So what? Alejandro Ortega.
Re: [vchkpw] what's wrong?
On Feb 4, 2004, at 11:37 AM, Alejandro Ortega Páez wrote: So I'm not a programmer or a code hacker, I will have to resign myself to use vpopmail 5.4.0pre2 version... Moreover there is a thing you said that disappoints me: [...] the first parameter to qmail-smtpd should now be the path to vchkpw and not the hostname. What's does it mean? Must I write the run command this way: /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw myhost.com /bin/true 21? No, just take 'myhost.com' out completely. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ Info on the Sniffter handheld Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/
[vchkpw] what's wrong?
I've just updated my vpopmail to new 5.4.0. I always install every new version you release. But from 25.4.0-preX I have noticed authentication with cram-md5 passwords fails. I hoped that installing the fresh stable 5.4.0 all this issue would leave apart, but it still continue. I have had to reinstall 5.4.0pre2 because it's only the more recent version that works fine. What is wrong in this versions? Is there any important change I have missed? All updates from four years have always worked right, and it's a bit strange, isn't it? Thank you, and I hope this question wouldn't be a mere repetition on this matter . I haven't had found anything related this one. If so, let me know. Sorry. Alejandro Ortega attachment: smiley-6.png
Re: [vchkpw] what's wrong?
On Feb 3, 2004, at 5:59 AM, Alejandro Ortega Páez wrote: I've just updated my vpopmail to new 5.4.0. I always install every new version you release. But from 25.4.0-preX I have noticed authentication with cram-md5 passwords fails. I hoped that installing the fresh stable 5.4.0 all this issue would leave apart, but it still continue. 5.4.0 ChangeLog: Tom Collins - Update configure with correct location of vlimits.default. - Fix typo (ammount) in vmoddomlimits. [882884] - Don't include $(DESTDIR) when building vpopmailbindir. [884247] - Mention compatability issues with older SMTP AUTH patches. [882351] relevant portion of UPGRADE regarding SMTP AUTH (including CRAM-MD5): IF USING SMTP AUTH PATCH TO QMAIL-SMTPD * This release of vpopmail includes fixes for vchkpw that may break certain SMTP AUTH implementations. If SMTP AUTH fails after installing vpopmail 5.4.x, you may need to use the qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2 patch included in the contrib directory. * If you do switch to the 0.4.2 SMTP AUTH patch, you may need to update your qmail-smtpd run file (the first parameter to qmail-smtpd should now be the path to vchkpw and not the hostname). -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ Info on the Sniffter handheld Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/
[vchkpw] What's wrong with this?
Hi, everybody at Inter 7 and all list users, I have recently had a problem when adding a new domain in a friend of mine's server. I also have to tell you that it is solved, but I would want to know the cause and the meaning of message error. Here you are: Oct 2 20:49:08 an vpopmail[2497]: vchkpw-pop3: autocreate dir errno 13 /home/vpopmail/domains/e-nevado.ws/postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:192.168.0.2 Then the entry into /var/qmail/users/assign file was: +e-nevado.ws-:e-nevado.ws:89:89:/home/vpopmail/domains/e-nevado.ws:-:: while the other domains or users have uid:gid 512:104. Directories created was also with 89:89 uid:gid, and log error was access denied. Please, I would like to know why this has occurred. System passwd file in /etc never has been changed and this uid:gid (89:89) doesn't exist at all. I don't understand anything... Thank you, as usual, -- Alejandro Ortega Paez [EMAIL PROTECTED] ROOTSISTEMAS signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje esta firmada digitalmente
