I ment branches :) ok :) sorry...
Evren
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Adam Hooper wrote:
> Two CVS sources is a nightmare -- as a user, I'd much rather two
> branches on the same source, so I could just do, for example, 'cvs up -r
> UNSTABLE'
>
> --
> Adam Hooper
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Evren Yurtes
Two CVS sources is a nightmare -- as a user, I'd much rather two
branches on the same source, so I could just do, for example, 'cvs up -r
UNSTABLE'
--
Adam Hooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Evren Yurtesen wrote:
I dont see why you fight over this. There should be two cvs sources anyhow
one for current de
100% right.
it will be really a pain to have two separate sources.
and if they don't agree between, i think that ken should keep the name
"vpopmail" for this product. the manner and style for the comments does
not apply there. futuremore, the public can not what happened between
tom and ken, m
??
/Raboo
- Original Message -
From: "Prodigy Abuse Department" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Raboo Treed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:18 AM
Subject: [ ABU1063185538696 ] Re: [vchkpw] lets stop the fight!
>
> Thank you for w
: "Evren Yurtesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vpopmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:11 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] lets stop the fight!
I dont see why you fight over this. There should be two cvs sources anyhow
one for current development branch and one for stable releases branch.
The new features shouldnt be added to stable branch until they are
relatively bug free.
Since Tom seems to handle cutting edge stuff in the code, we ne
