I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for
checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are
external and use me as proxy SMTP).
But I'm really tired to fight with qmail. Bernstein programming is
accademic and heavy to use, license is criminal.
Hi list:
Have anyone of you achieve to patch qmail source with john
simpson combined patch (version stable 6) and then apply the qmail-tap
patch without getting any errors??
or any one know how to do it, combine both patches and have a
successfull qmail compiling??
Thanks in advance
--
Alle 12:31, giovedì 11 gennaio 2007, tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto:
I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for
checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are
external and use me as proxy SMTP).
But I'm really tired to fight with qmail. Bernstein
Joshua Megeman wrote:
It sets the connection type based on a list of known
ports (25/465/587 for SMTP, 110/995 for POP and 143/993 for IMAP), and
defaults to POP on an unknown conenction.
Sorry, this isn't an actual thread reply, but I just came across an
issue with the vchkpw program
Look at QMAIL-SPP ( http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/ ).
It provides a plugin for vpopmail and gets away from this patching situation.
The idea is great, the implementation is good.
A mix of this and the existing patches you may have is probably the best way to
go.
In the end, you make a perl
At 18.16 11/01/2007, you wrote:
Look at QMAIL-SPP (
http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/ ).
It provides a plugin for vpopmail and gets away from this patching
situation. The idea is great, the implementation is good.
A mix of this and the existing patches you may
Joshua Megeman wrote:
It sets the connection type based on a list of known
ports (25/465/587 for SMTP, 110/995 for POP and 143/993 for IMAP), and
defaults to POP on an unknown conenction.
Sorry, this isn't an actual thread reply, but I just came across an
issue with the vchkpw program
you can try merge both patch on one... 'cause each one have much similar
things, and when the second try to patch the code, aren't the same code
where the patch was created... it's a little work, but must be done...
--
[]'s
Rafael 'fumasa' Giorgetti
On 1/11/07, Facundo Barrera - GMail [EMAIL
Joshua Megerman wrote:
For example, vchkpw-imap would set the type to imap. vchkpw-smtp would
set it to smtp, etc. This seems like a trivial change, and would only
require a softlink back to vchkpw to enable. Am I thinking straight, or
am I way offbase?
It's not an unreasonable way of
