On 2005-10-28, at 0803, Ingo Claro wrote:
what do you mean by delete.net domain ? you have a bogus
virtualdomain to
catch spammers?
i own the domain delete.net, and i run it as a honeypot.
the http://www.delete.net/ web page explains this.
On 2005-10-26, at 1805, ISP Lists wrote:
Related to my earlier post, how expensive is it - resource-wise - to
reload a tcp.smtp file of 100-1000 lines?
if it's anything like mine, with currently 56,270 lines and more
added every time some spammer sends a message to an email address in
the
, 28 de Octubre de 2005 3:09
Para: vchkpw@inter7.com
Asunto: Re: [vchkpw] How expensive is reloading the tcp.smtp.cdb?
On 2005-10-26, at 1805, ISP Lists wrote:
Related to my earlier post, how expensive is it - resource-wise - to
reload a tcp.smtp file of 100-1000 lines?
if it's anything like
Related to my earlier post, how expensive is it - resource-wise - to
reload a tcp.smtp file of 100-1000 lines?
If I have processing that is updating tcp.smtp every 5-10 minutes and I
choose to reload the cdb from that tcp.smtp, is that a bad idea?
The qmailctl cdb command runs very fast for me
: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:05 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] How expensive is reloading the tcp.smtp.cdb?
Related to my earlier post, how expensive is it -
resource-wise - to reload a tcp.smtp file of 100-1000 lines?
If I have processing that is updating tcp.smtp every 5-10
ISP Lists wrote:
Related to my earlier post, how expensive is it - resource-wise - to
reload a tcp.smtp file of 100-1000 lines?
If it becomes expensive, you can use the SQL patch and do it with SQL.
There's no hit at all to adding or removing items in that case (may be
some with SQL, but I
: Steve Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] How expensive is reloading the tcp.smtp.cdb?
ISP Lists wrote:
Related to my earlier post, how expensive is it - resource-wise - to
reload a tcp.smtp file of 100-1000 lines
Wouter van der Schagt wrote:
I think his question was more on if reloading has any effect on running
processes from qmail, rather than the reloading itself.
Our mailserver is pretty busy and we reload it regularly without any
problems. However we have less lines in the tcp.smtp file.
well,
ISP Lists wrote:
Related to my earlier post, how expensive is it - resource-wise - to
reload a tcp.smtp file of 100-1000 lines?
If I have processing that is updating tcp.smtp every 5-10 minutes and I
choose to reload the cdb from that tcp.smtp, is that a bad idea?
The qmailctl cdb command runs
