On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 14:06, Adam Hooper wrote:
> I can't speak for squirrelmail, but as far as I know, sqwebmail is just
> a Maildir client. It does not open any IMAP or POP connections, just
> reads and writes files. (Note: This saves processor cycles!)
I have always considered that _the_ key
I can't speak for squirrelmail, but as far as I know, sqwebmail is just
a Maildir client. It does not open any IMAP or POP connections, just
reads and writes files. (Note: This saves processor cycles!)
Besides which, the "advantage" of POP that you desire (free space on the
server) is completel
It seems that the qmail, vpopmail, qmailadmin people tend to recommend
squirrelmail and sqwebmail. However, these are both imap clients. Our
initial reaction is to prefer (in order to save bandwidth, cpu cycles and
disk space) pop3 and have users keep their mail folders on their local
PC's. Why
On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 10:54 AM, Jeff Koch wrote:
It seems that the qmail, vpopmail, qmailadmin people tend to recommend
squirrelmail and sqwebmail. However, these are both imap clients. Our
initial reaction is to prefer (in order to save bandwidth, cpu cycles
and disk space) pop3 an
sqwebmail supports POP3 just fine. It's like a normal POP3 client that
"Leaves messages on server"
Darcy
It seems that the qmail, vpopmail, qmailadmin people tend to recommend
squirrelmail and sqwebmail. However, these are both imap clients. Our
initial reaction is to prefer (in order to save