On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:57, Tom Walsh wrote:
I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ?
Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for
scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?
I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of our
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:57, Tom Walsh wrote:
I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ?
Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for
scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?
I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning
performance of
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 08:07 am, Tom Walsh wrote:
[snip]
You can run:
cat /path/to/known/spam/message | spamassassin -D
you should be using spamc and not spamassassin.
spamd/spamc is a much better combination, especially on
heavily loaded servers.
Jeremy,
While you are
If anybody is interested in some of the performance tweaks
we have made
to SA, please let me know.
Due to the response I got from this post... I have created a down and
dirty SA config page...
Please keep in mind these are only configuration tweaks... Not actually
changes to the SA
On Monday 26 January 2004 3:22 pm, knom wrote:
Hi people !
I want to install Spamassassin and Clam Antivirus with vpopmail !
Do you suggest any high speed scanning tool ?
I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? Meanwhile.. My
Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for
I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ?
Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for
scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?
I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of our
SpamAssassin installation.
You can run:
cat
Tom Walsh wrote:
I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ?
Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for
scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?
I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of our
SpamAssassin installation.
You can
Hello,
qmail-scanner-queue.pl runs spamassassin, razor2, pyzor, clamav, and its
own internal scanner, as well as doing rbl lookups, in under 1 second
per message, usually about .8 seconds for me.
The 10 second delay as someone pointed out is the default timeout for
rbl lookups.
I had this
