Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

Dave Richardson wrote: Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion offline? +1 I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may grow given the several threads of recent a

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion offline? I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may grow given the several threads of recent activity. Your energy and wisdo

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a closed architecture, not a modular one, adding a no-sense license. Hmm...qmail is STILL

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

At 14.14 15/01/2007, you wrote: People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is horrible. ??? QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Be

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is horrible. ??? QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a c

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

At 18.16 11/01/2007, you wrote: Look at QMAIL-SPP ( http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/ ). It provides a plugin for vpopmail and gets away from this patching situation. The idea is great, the implementation is good. A mix of this and the existing patches you ma

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

Look at QMAIL-SPP ( http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/ ). It provides a plugin for vpopmail and gets away from this patching situation. The idea is great, the implementation is good. A mix of this and the existing patches you may have is probably the best way to go. In the end, you make a perl s

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

Alle 12:31, giovedì 11 gennaio 2007, tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: > I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for > checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are > external and use me as proxy SMTP). > > But I'm really tired to fight with qmail. Bernste