No, you were mistaken when you thought I meant the chkusr patch did
SMTP authentication. I said it works *with* SMTP authentication.
The mistake I made, earlier, is that I replied with a chkusr patch
link instead of SMTP authentication :)
My bad!
Ah! heheheheh. :-) No problem.
bruno.
io Nati) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com <mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:37 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] Using chkuser as 'smtp-authentication'
> mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AU
, 2005 12:37
PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Using chkuser as
'smtp-authentication' mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH
patch
At 15.53 14/09/2005, you wrote:
Hi Dave,I just discovered
that the chkuser-2.0.8b-release ships with a
netqmail-1.05_auth-0.4.2_chkuser-2
At 15.53 14/09/2005, you wrote:
Hi Dave,
I just discovered that the chkuser-2.0.8b-release ships with a
netqmail-1.05_auth-0.4.2_chkuser-2.0.8.patch. Maybe this is the patch
Matt is referring to.
vpopmail ships with an auth patch in the contrib directory. That chkuser
version was adapted to that
Hi Dave,
I just discovered that the chkuser-2.0.8b-release ships with a
netqmail-1.05_auth-0.4.2_chkuser-2.0.8.patch. Maybe this is the patch Matt
is referring to.
And I'm not sure, but I guess that this patch is Dr Erwin's auth patch(the
one shipped in vpopmail's contrib directory) but with
Bruno Negrao wrote:
Hi Guys,
Matt Brookings told me at EMPF mailing list that the chkuser patch can
be used to implement smtp authentication, but I never read in any place
that chkuser could be used for that.
If it really can, could someone point me for a documentation on this
subject?
At
